From: <wang.yong19@zte.com.cn>
To: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>, <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
<wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>, <john.griffin@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] 答复: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] net/dpaa: add null point check and fix mem leak
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:53:17 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201801221053179672021@zte.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3290561.5TofqmsUDE@xps>
Hi,
I've sent this patch again and it is accepted.
The other 3 pathes have no conflict with the latest master version and the titles have described the modification of the patches.
So I need not send the patches for v3, right?
------------------origin------------------
From : <thomas@monjalon.net>;
to :wang.yong19@zte.com.cn;
cc: <dev@dpdk.org>; <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; <beilei.xing@intel.com>; <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; <john.griffin@intel.com>;
date :2018-01-18 07:00
subject :Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] net/dpaa: add null point check and fix mem leak
Hi,
Please could you rebase on master and keep the acked already given?
Please use --in-reply-to to keep v3 in the same thread as v2.
Titles are the same for every patches.
Are they all fixing a NULL pointer check and a mem leak?
More details in the commit message may help.
If they are fixes, a tag Fixes: may help for backports.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-22 2:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-20 10:23 [dpdk-dev] " Yong Wang
2017-12-20 10:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] net/i40e: " Yong Wang
2017-12-27 6:41 ` Xing, Beilei
2017-12-20 10:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net/e1000: add null point check for rte_zmalloc Yong Wang
2017-12-20 10:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] crypto/qat: add null point check and fix mem leak Yong Wang
2017-12-20 12:22 ` Trahe, Fiona
2017-12-20 12:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] net/dpaa: " Shreyansh Jain
2018-01-17 23:00 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-22 2:53 ` wang.yong19 [this message]
2018-01-22 7:51 ` [dpdk-dev] 答复: " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201801221053179672021@zte.com.cn \
--to=wang.yong19@zte.com.cn \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=john.griffin@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).