DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>
To: thomas@monjalon.net, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com,
	stephen@networkplumber.org
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] test: add tests for reciprocal based division
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:34:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180126050451.5953-3-pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180126050451.5953-1-pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>

This commit provides a set of tests for verifying the correctness and
performance of both unsigned 32 and 64bit reciprocal based division.

Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>
---
 test/test/Makefile                        |   2 +
 test/test/test_reciprocal_division.c      | 167 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 test/test/test_reciprocal_division_perf.c | 201 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 370 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 test/test/test_reciprocal_division.c
 create mode 100644 test/test/test_reciprocal_division_perf.c

diff --git a/test/test/Makefile b/test/test/Makefile
index 5ba5a9ac7..c943a927a 100644
--- a/test/test/Makefile
+++ b/test/test/Makefile
@@ -67,6 +67,8 @@ SRCS-y += test_spinlock.c
 SRCS-y += test_memory.c
 SRCS-y += test_memzone.c
 SRCS-y += test_bitmap.c
+SRCS-y += test_reciprocal_division.c
+SRCS-y += test_reciprocal_division_perf.c
 
 SRCS-y += test_ring.c
 SRCS-y += test_ring_perf.c
diff --git a/test/test/test_reciprocal_division.c b/test/test/test_reciprocal_division.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8ea9b1d24
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/test/test_reciprocal_division.c
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright(c) 2017 Cavium, Inc
+ */
+
+#include "test.h"
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <inttypes.h>
+
+#include <rte_common.h>
+#include <rte_cycles.h>
+#include <rte_random.h>
+#include <rte_reciprocal.h>
+
+#define MAX_ITERATIONS	(1ULL << 32)
+#define DIVIDE_ITER	(100)
+
+static int
+test_reciprocal(void)
+{
+	int result = 0;
+	uint32_t divisor_u32 = 0;
+	uint32_t dividend_u32;
+	uint32_t nresult_u32;
+	uint32_t rresult_u32;
+	uint64_t i, j;
+	uint64_t divisor_u64 = 0;
+	uint64_t dividend_u64;
+	uint64_t nresult_u64;
+	uint64_t rresult_u64;
+	struct rte_reciprocal reci_u32 = {0};
+	struct rte_reciprocal_u64 reci_u64 = {0};
+
+	rte_srand(rte_rdtsc());
+	printf("Validating unsigned 32bit division.\n");
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITERATIONS; i++) {
+		/* Change divisor every DIVIDE_ITER iterations. */
+		if (i % DIVIDE_ITER == 0) {
+			divisor_u32 = rte_rand();
+			reci_u32 = rte_reciprocal_value(divisor_u32);
+		}
+
+		dividend_u32 = rte_rand();
+		nresult_u32 = dividend_u32 / divisor_u32;
+		rresult_u32 = rte_reciprocal_divide(dividend_u32,
+				reci_u32);
+		if (nresult_u32 != rresult_u32) {
+			printf("Division failed, %"PRIu32"/%"PRIu32" = "
+					"expected %"PRIu32" result %"PRIu32"\n",
+					dividend_u32, divisor_u32,
+					nresult_u32, rresult_u32);
+			result = 1;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	printf("Validating unsigned 64bit division.\n");
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITERATIONS; i++) {
+		/* Change divisor every DIVIDE_ITER iterations. */
+		if (i % DIVIDE_ITER == 0) {
+			divisor_u64 = rte_rand();
+			reci_u64 = rte_reciprocal_value_u64(divisor_u64);
+		}
+
+		dividend_u64 = rte_rand();
+		nresult_u64 = dividend_u64 / divisor_u64;
+		rresult_u64 = rte_reciprocal_divide_u64(dividend_u64,
+				&reci_u64);
+		if (nresult_u64 != rresult_u64) {
+			printf("Division failed,  %"PRIu64"/%"PRIu64" = "
+					"expected %"PRIu64" result %"PRIu64"\n",
+					dividend_u64, divisor_u64,
+					nresult_u64, rresult_u64);
+			result = 1;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	printf("Validating unsigned 64bit division with 32bit divisor.\n");
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITERATIONS; i++) {
+		/* Change divisor every DIVIDE_ITER iterations. */
+		if (i % DIVIDE_ITER == 0) {
+			divisor_u64 = rte_rand() >> 32;
+			reci_u64 = rte_reciprocal_value_u64(divisor_u64);
+		}
+
+		dividend_u64 = rte_rand();
+
+		nresult_u64 = dividend_u64 / divisor_u64;
+		rresult_u64 = rte_reciprocal_divide_u64(dividend_u64,
+				&reci_u64);
+
+		if (nresult_u64 != rresult_u64) {
+			printf("Division failed, %"PRIu64"/%"PRIu64" = "
+					"expected %"PRIu64" result %"PRIu64"\n",
+					dividend_u64, divisor_u64,
+					nresult_u64, rresult_u64);
+			result = 1;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	printf("Validating division by power of 2.\n");
+	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
+		divisor_u64 = 1ull << i;
+		reci_u64 = rte_reciprocal_value_u64(divisor_u64);
+		reci_u32 = rte_reciprocal_value((uint32_t)divisor_u64);
+
+		for (j = 0; j < MAX_ITERATIONS >> 4; j++) {
+			dividend_u64 = rte_rand();
+
+			nresult_u64 = dividend_u64 / divisor_u64;
+			rresult_u64 = rte_reciprocal_divide_u64(dividend_u64,
+					&reci_u64);
+
+			if (nresult_u64 != rresult_u64) {
+				printf(
+				"Division 64 failed, %"PRIu64"/%"PRIu64" = "
+					"expected %"PRIu64" result %"PRIu64"\n",
+						dividend_u64, divisor_u64,
+						nresult_u64, rresult_u64);
+				result = 1;
+			}
+
+			nresult_u32 = (dividend_u64 >> 32) / divisor_u64;
+			rresult_u32 = rte_reciprocal_divide(
+					(dividend_u64 >> 32), reci_u32);
+
+			if (nresult_u32 != rresult_u32) {
+				printf(
+				"Division 32 failed, %"PRIu64"/%"PRIu64" = "
+					"expected %"PRIu64" result %"PRIu64"\n",
+						dividend_u64 >> 32, divisor_u64,
+						nresult_u64, rresult_u64);
+				result = 1;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	for (; i < 64; i++) {
+		divisor_u64 = 1ull << i;
+		reci_u64 = rte_reciprocal_value_u64(divisor_u64);
+
+		for (j = 0; j < MAX_ITERATIONS >> 4; j++) {
+			dividend_u64 = rte_rand();
+
+			nresult_u64 = dividend_u64 / divisor_u64;
+			rresult_u64 = rte_reciprocal_divide_u64(dividend_u64,
+					&reci_u64);
+
+			if (nresult_u64 != rresult_u64) {
+				printf("Division failed, %"PRIu64"/%"PRIu64" = "
+					"expected %"PRIu64" result %"PRIu64"\n",
+						dividend_u64, divisor_u64,
+						nresult_u64, rresult_u64);
+				result = 1;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	return result;
+}
+
+REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(reciprocal_division, test_reciprocal);
diff --git a/test/test/test_reciprocal_division_perf.c b/test/test/test_reciprocal_division_perf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a7be8aa71
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/test/test_reciprocal_division_perf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+ * Copyright(c) 2017 Cavium, Inc
+ */
+
+#include "test.h"
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <inttypes.h>
+
+#include <rte_common.h>
+#include <rte_cycles.h>
+#include <rte_random.h>
+#include <rte_reciprocal.h>
+
+#define MAX_ITERATIONS	(1ULL << 32)
+#define DIVIDE_ITER	(1ULL << 28)
+
+static int
+test_reciprocal_division_perf(void)
+{
+	int result = 0;
+	uint32_t divisor_u32 = 0;
+	uint32_t dividend_u32;
+	uint64_t divisor_u64 = 0;
+	uint64_t dividend_u64;
+	volatile uint32_t nresult_u32;
+	volatile uint32_t rresult_u32;
+	volatile uint64_t nresult_u64;
+	volatile uint64_t rresult_u64;
+	uint64_t start_cyc;
+	uint64_t split_cyc;
+	uint64_t end_cyc;
+	uint64_t tot_cyc_n = 0;
+	uint64_t tot_cyc_r = 0;
+	uint64_t i;
+	struct rte_reciprocal reci_u32 = {0};
+	struct rte_reciprocal_u64 reci_u64 = {0};
+
+	rte_srand(rte_rdtsc());
+
+	printf("Validating unsigned 32bit division.\n");
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITERATIONS; i++) {
+		/* Change divisor every DIVIDE_ITER iterations. */
+		if (i % DIVIDE_ITER == 0) {
+			divisor_u32 = rte_rand();
+			reci_u32 = rte_reciprocal_value(divisor_u32);
+		}
+
+		dividend_u32 = rte_rand();
+
+		start_cyc = rte_rdtsc();
+		nresult_u32 = dividend_u32 / divisor_u32;
+		split_cyc = rte_rdtsc();
+		rresult_u32 = rte_reciprocal_divide(dividend_u32,
+				reci_u32);
+		end_cyc = rte_rdtsc();
+
+		tot_cyc_n += split_cyc - start_cyc;
+		tot_cyc_r += end_cyc - split_cyc;
+		if (nresult_u32 != rresult_u32) {
+			printf("Division failed, expected %"PRIu32" "
+					"result %"PRIu32"",
+					nresult_u32, rresult_u32);
+			result = 1;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	printf("32bit Division results:\n");
+	printf("Total number of cycles normal division     : %"PRIu64"\n",
+			tot_cyc_n);
+	printf("Total number of cycles reciprocal division : %"PRIu64"\n",
+			tot_cyc_r);
+	printf("Cycles per division(normal) : %3.2f\n",
+			((double)tot_cyc_n)/i);
+	printf("Cycles per division(reciprocal) : %3.2f\n\n",
+			((double)tot_cyc_r)/i);
+
+	tot_cyc_n = 0;
+	tot_cyc_r = 0;
+
+	printf("Validating unsigned 64bit division.\n");
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITERATIONS; i++) {
+		/* Change divisor every DIVIDE_ITER iterations. */
+		if (i % DIVIDE_ITER == 0) {
+			divisor_u64 = rte_rand();
+			reci_u64 = rte_reciprocal_value_u64(divisor_u64);
+		}
+
+		dividend_u64 = rte_rand();
+
+		start_cyc = rte_rdtsc();
+		nresult_u64 = dividend_u64 / divisor_u64;
+		split_cyc = rte_rdtsc();
+		rresult_u64 = rte_reciprocal_divide_u64(dividend_u64,
+				&reci_u64);
+		end_cyc = rte_rdtsc();
+
+		tot_cyc_n += split_cyc - start_cyc;
+		tot_cyc_r += end_cyc - split_cyc;
+		if (nresult_u64 != rresult_u64) {
+			printf("Division failed, expected %"PRIu64" "
+					"result %"PRIu64"",
+					nresult_u64, rresult_u64);
+			result = 1;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	printf("64bit Division results:\n");
+	printf("Total number of cycles normal division     : %"PRIu64"\n",
+			tot_cyc_n);
+	printf("Total number of cycles reciprocal division : %"PRIu64"\n",
+			tot_cyc_r);
+	printf("Cycles per division(normal) : %3.2f\n",
+			((double)tot_cyc_n)/i);
+	printf("Cycles per division(reciprocal) : %3.2f\n\n",
+			((double)tot_cyc_r)/i);
+
+	tot_cyc_n = 0;
+	tot_cyc_r = 0;
+
+	printf("Validating unsigned 64bit division with 32bit divisor.\n");
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITERATIONS; i++) {
+		/* Change divisor every DIVIDE_ITER iterations. */
+		if (i % DIVIDE_ITER == 0) {
+			divisor_u64 = rte_rand() >> 32;
+			reci_u64 = rte_reciprocal_value_u64(divisor_u64);
+		}
+
+		dividend_u64 = rte_rand();
+
+		start_cyc = rte_rdtsc();
+		nresult_u64 = dividend_u64 / divisor_u64;
+		split_cyc = rte_rdtsc();
+		rresult_u64 = rte_reciprocal_divide_u64(dividend_u64,
+				&reci_u64);
+		end_cyc = rte_rdtsc();
+
+		tot_cyc_n += split_cyc - start_cyc;
+		tot_cyc_r += end_cyc - split_cyc;
+		if (nresult_u64 != rresult_u64) {
+			printf("Division failed, expected %"PRIu64" "
+					"result %"PRIu64"",
+					nresult_u64, rresult_u64);
+			result = 1;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	printf("64bit Division results:\n");
+	printf("Total number of cycles normal division     : %"PRIu64"\n",
+			tot_cyc_n);
+	printf("Total number of cycles reciprocal division : %"PRIu64"\n",
+			tot_cyc_r);
+	printf("Cycles per division(normal) : %3.2f\n",
+			((double)tot_cyc_n)/i);
+	printf("Cycles per division(reciprocal) : %3.2f\n\n",
+			((double)tot_cyc_r)/i);
+
+	tot_cyc_n = 0;
+	tot_cyc_r = 0;
+
+	printf("Validating division by power of 2.\n");
+	for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
+		divisor_u64 = 1ull << i;
+		reci_u64 = rte_reciprocal_value_u64(divisor_u64);
+
+		dividend_u64 = rte_rand();
+
+		start_cyc = rte_rdtsc();
+		nresult_u64 = dividend_u64 / divisor_u64;
+		split_cyc = rte_rdtsc();
+		rresult_u64 = rte_reciprocal_divide_u64(dividend_u64,
+				&reci_u64);
+		end_cyc = rte_rdtsc();
+
+		tot_cyc_n += split_cyc - start_cyc;
+		tot_cyc_r += end_cyc - split_cyc;
+		if (nresult_u64 != rresult_u64) {
+			printf("Division 64 failed, %"PRIu64"/%"PRIu64" = "
+					"expected %"PRIu64" result %"PRIu64"\n",
+					dividend_u64, divisor_u64,
+					nresult_u64, rresult_u64);
+			result = 1;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	printf("64bit Division results:\n");
+	printf("Total number of cycles normal division     : %"PRIu64"\n",
+			tot_cyc_n);
+	printf("Total number of cycles reciprocal division : %"PRIu64"\n",
+			tot_cyc_r);
+	printf("Cycles per division(normal) : %3.2f\n",
+			((double)tot_cyc_n)/i);
+	printf("Cycles per division(reciprocal) : %3.2f\n",
+			((double)tot_cyc_r)/i);
+
+	return result;
+}
+
+REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(reciprocal_division_perf, test_reciprocal_division_perf);
-- 
2.14.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-26  5:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-29 18:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal: introduce integer divide through reciprocal Pavan Nikhilesh
2017-08-29 18:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] eal: add u64 bit variant for reciprocal Pavan Nikhilesh
2017-08-29 19:35   ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-08-29 19:38   ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-08-30  4:05     ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2017-12-04 13:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/3] eal: introduce integer divide through reciprocal Pavan Nikhilesh
2017-12-04 13:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] eal: add u64 bit variant for reciprocal Pavan Nikhilesh
2017-12-04 13:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] test: add tests for reciprocal based division Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-01-18 23:49     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-25 22:35       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-11 16:01   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/3] eal: introduce integer divide through reciprocal Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-01-26  5:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 " Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-01-26  5:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] eal: add u64 bit variant for reciprocal Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-01-29  6:42     ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-29  7:54       ` Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-01-29  8:14         ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-10-28  0:06     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-26  5:04   ` Pavan Nikhilesh [this message]
2018-01-27 21:39   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] eal: introduce integer divide through reciprocal Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180126050451.5953-3-pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).