DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
	Kevin Wilson <wkevils@gmail.com>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce control mbuf removal
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 11:05:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180212110501.GA13612@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180212102215.bzowbuxr7r6asliq@platinum>

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:22:15AM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Please, any other comments or acks for this one?
> 
> Thanks
> Olivier

I would tend to support leaving the flag in place. Other than that, I
think the functions for it can go.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:30:27AM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > Link: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-July/069813.html
> > Link: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/32041/
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> > ---

Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

> >  doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > index d59ad5988..e98ce6a0a 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > @@ -59,3 +59,16 @@ Deprecation Notices
> >    be added between the producer and consumer structures. The size of the
> >    structure and the offset of the fields will remain the same on
> >    platforms with 64B cache line, but will change on other platforms.
> > +
> > +* mbuf: The control mbuf API will be removed in v18.05. The impacted
> > +  functions and macros are:
> > +
> > +  - ``rte_ctrlmbuf_init()``
> > +  - ``rte_ctrlmbuf_alloc()``
> > +  - ``rte_ctrlmbuf_free()``
> > +  - ``rte_ctrlmbuf_data()``
> > +  - ``rte_ctrlmbuf_len()``
> > +  - ``rte_is_ctrlmbuf()``
> > +  - ``CTRL_MBUF_FLAG``
> > +
> > +  The packet mbuf API should be used as a replacement.
> > -- 
> > 2.11.0
> > 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-12 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-29  9:30 Olivier Matz
2018-01-29 10:04 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-02-12 10:22 ` Olivier Matz
2018-02-12 10:33   ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-02-12 11:05   ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2018-02-13  3:49   ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-02-14  0:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-02-14 15:41   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180212110501.GA13612@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=wkevils@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).