Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: allow setting shaper profile id to none

[Tomasz Duszynski <tdu@semihalf.com>]

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 08:37:08AM +0100, Tomasz Duszynski wrote:
> Private shaper profiles are attached to nodes defined
> in traffic manager hierarchy.
>
> Since not every node must have a configured shaper
> testpmd should allow setting shaper profile id to
> invalid (RTE_TM_SHAPER_PROFILE_ID_NONE) easily.
>
> This patch follows same approach as in case of setting
> parent id of the root node i.e passing a negative value
> sets node id to RTE_TM_NODE_ID_NULL.
>
> In case of private shaper profile negative value will set
> shaper profile id to RTE_TM_SHAPER_PROFILE_ID_NONE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Duszynski <tdu@semihalf.com>
> ---
>  app/test-pmd/cmdline_tm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_tm.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_tm.c
> index 35cad54..9859c3d 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_tm.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_tm.c
> @@ -1500,7 +1500,7 @@ struct cmd_add_port_tm_nonleaf_node_result {
>  	uint32_t priority;
>  	uint32_t weight;
>  	uint32_t level_id;
> -	uint32_t shaper_profile_id;
> +	int32_t shaper_profile_id;
>  	uint32_t n_sp_priorities;
>  	uint64_t stats_mask;
>  	cmdline_multi_string_t multi_shared_shaper_id;
> @@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@ cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_add_port_tm_nonleaf_node_level_id =
>  		 level_id, UINT32);
>  cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_add_port_tm_nonleaf_node_shaper_profile_id =
>  	TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_add_port_tm_nonleaf_node_result,
> -		 shaper_profile_id, UINT32);
> +		 shaper_profile_id, INT32);
>  cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_add_port_tm_nonleaf_node_n_sp_priorities =
>  	TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_add_port_tm_nonleaf_node_result,
>  		 n_sp_priorities, UINT32);
> @@ -1593,7 +1593,11 @@ static void cmd_add_port_tm_nonleaf_node_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>  		return;
>  	}
>
> -	np.shaper_profile_id = res->shaper_profile_id;
> +	if (res->shaper_profile_id < 0)
> +		np.shaper_profile_id = UINT32_MAX;
> +	else
> +		np.shaper_profile_id = res->shaper_profile_id;
> +
>  	np.n_shared_shapers = n_shared_shapers;
>  	if (np.n_shared_shapers)
>  		np.shared_shaper_id = &shared_shaper_id[0];
> @@ -1651,7 +1655,7 @@ struct cmd_add_port_tm_leaf_node_result {
>  	uint32_t priority;
>  	uint32_t weight;
>  	uint32_t level_id;
> -	uint32_t shaper_profile_id;
> +	int32_t shaper_profile_id;
>  	uint32_t cman_mode;
>  	uint32_t wred_profile_id;
>  	uint64_t stats_mask;
> @@ -1693,7 +1697,7 @@ cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_add_port_tm_leaf_node_level_id =
>  		 level_id, UINT32);
>  cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_add_port_tm_leaf_node_shaper_profile_id =
>  	TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_add_port_tm_leaf_node_result,
> -		 shaper_profile_id, UINT32);
> +		 shaper_profile_id, INT32);
>  cmdline_parse_token_num_t cmd_add_port_tm_leaf_node_cman_mode =
>  	TOKEN_NUM_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_add_port_tm_leaf_node_result,
>  		 cman_mode, UINT32);
> @@ -1747,7 +1751,11 @@ static void cmd_add_port_tm_leaf_node_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>  		return;
>  	}
>
> -	np.shaper_profile_id = res->shaper_profile_id;
> +	if (res->shaper_profile_id < 0)
> +		np.shaper_profile_id = UINT32_MAX;
> +	else
> +		np.shaper_profile_id = res->shaper_profile_id;
> +
>  	np.n_shared_shapers = n_shared_shapers;
>
>  	if (np.n_shared_shapers)
> --
> 2.7.4
>

This has been here for a while already. Any comments?

--
- Tomasz Duszyński