From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: tom.barbette@uliege.be
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Linking with -ldpdk
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 10:14:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180219101440.GA9676@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <328301853.77122566.1519033179263.JavaMail.zimbra@uliege.be>
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:39:39AM +0100, tom.barbette@uliege.be wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I found out that to staticly compile against DPDK using the combined lib, I needed all these options :
>
> -I${RTE_SDK}/${RTE_TARGET}/include -L${RTE_SDK}/${RTE_TARGET}/lib -Wl,--whole-archive -ldpdk -Wl,--no-whole-archive -lnuma -ldl -lpthread -lm -lmlx4 -lmlx5 -libverbs
>
> The whole-archive makes sense, as we need to embed drivers that wouldn't be found at linking time (failing to include it prevents port discovery).
> However it leads to missing inclusion. That's why I added all the libs at the end of the line. The mlx4 libs particularly leads me to think that there must be a more programmatic way, portable accross versions of DPDK to find out which libraries referenced in DPDK I should include, right? Morveover if the DPDK user didn't include mlx4, it will fail to compile...
>
> What should I use? (the whole rte.extapp.mk DPDK build process is not an option as the build system is rather complex in this project)
>
> Or maybe some of these libraries should be included in the dpdk static lib?
>
> I use the last git version (but it's the same problem with previous ones).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom
Hi Tom,
this is something that I was hoping to achieve using pkg-config files
generated by the meson build system. This is still a work in progress,
but you can use "ninja install" to install a pkg-config file for DPDK at
the end of the build process, and the Makefiles for the DPDK examples
show how to build a static binary using that information.
Now the limitations: there is no support for building all of DPDK as a
single static library, but pkg-config does provide the list of all DPDK
libs and drivers individually, as well as a list of the extra lib names
that have to be added to the end. [Given what pkg-config provides, I
fail to see the need to produce the single .a file any more too] Sadly
for the use case you mention above, the mlx* drivers aren't available as
part of the build yet either.
In the meantime, while the gaps are being filled out, any feedback on
building using pkg-config output would be appreciated. I admit it is a
bit more geared towards shared library building, but static should work
also.
Regards,
/Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-19 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-19 9:39 tom.barbette
2018-02-19 10:14 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2018-02-19 14:04 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180219101440.GA9676@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=tom.barbette@uliege.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).