DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhiyong Yang <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, bernard.iremonger@intel.com,
	Zhiyong Yang <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] flow_classify: remove void pointer cast
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:10:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180226081103.64154-2-zhiyong.yang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180226081103.64154-1-zhiyong.yang@intel.com>

Cc: bernard.iremonger@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Yang <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.c       |  4 +---
 lib/librte_flow_classify/rte_flow_classify_parse.c | 24 +++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.c b/lib/librte_flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.c
index 7edb2f15f..591d98e25 100644
--- a/lib/librte_flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.c
+++ b/lib/librte_flow_classify/rte_flow_classify.c
@@ -635,9 +635,7 @@ action_apply(struct rte_flow_classifier *cls,
 		}
 		if (count) {
 			ret = 0;
-			ntuple_stats =
-				(struct rte_flow_classify_ipv4_5tuple_stats *)
-				stats->stats;
+			ntuple_stats = stats->stats;
 			ntuple_stats->counter1 = count;
 			ntuple_stats->ipv4_5tuple = rule->rules.u.ipv4_5tuple;
 		}
diff --git a/lib/librte_flow_classify/rte_flow_classify_parse.c b/lib/librte_flow_classify/rte_flow_classify_parse.c
index 10eaf0435..f65ceaf7c 100644
--- a/lib/librte_flow_classify/rte_flow_classify_parse.c
+++ b/lib/librte_flow_classify/rte_flow_classify_parse.c
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ classify_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 
 	}
 
-	ipv4_mask = (const struct rte_flow_item_ipv4 *)item->mask;
+	ipv4_mask = item->mask;
 	/**
 	 * Only support src & dst addresses, protocol,
 	 * others should be masked.
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ classify_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 	filter->src_ip_mask = ipv4_mask->hdr.src_addr;
 	filter->proto_mask  = ipv4_mask->hdr.next_proto_id;
 
-	ipv4_spec = (const struct rte_flow_item_ipv4 *)item->spec;
+	ipv4_spec = item->spec;
 	filter->dst_ip = ipv4_spec->hdr.dst_addr;
 	filter->src_ip = ipv4_spec->hdr.src_addr;
 	filter->proto  = ipv4_spec->hdr.next_proto_id;
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ classify_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 	}
 
 	if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_TCP) {
-		tcp_mask = (const struct rte_flow_item_tcp *)item->mask;
+		tcp_mask = item->mask;
 
 		/**
 		 * Only support src & dst ports, tcp flags,
@@ -373,12 +373,12 @@ classify_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
-		tcp_spec = (const struct rte_flow_item_tcp *)item->spec;
+		tcp_spec = item->spec;
 		filter->dst_port  = tcp_spec->hdr.dst_port;
 		filter->src_port  = tcp_spec->hdr.src_port;
 		filter->tcp_flags = tcp_spec->hdr.tcp_flags;
 	} else if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_UDP) {
-		udp_mask = (const struct rte_flow_item_udp *)item->mask;
+		udp_mask = item->mask;
 
 		/**
 		 * Only support src & dst ports,
@@ -397,11 +397,11 @@ classify_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 		filter->dst_port_mask = udp_mask->hdr.dst_port;
 		filter->src_port_mask = udp_mask->hdr.src_port;
 
-		udp_spec = (const struct rte_flow_item_udp *)item->spec;
+		udp_spec = item->spec;
 		filter->dst_port = udp_spec->hdr.dst_port;
 		filter->src_port = udp_spec->hdr.src_port;
 	} else {
-		sctp_mask = (const struct rte_flow_item_sctp *)item->mask;
+		sctp_mask = item->mask;
 
 		/**
 		 * Only support src & dst ports,
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ classify_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 		filter->dst_port_mask = sctp_mask->hdr.dst_port;
 		filter->src_port_mask = sctp_mask->hdr.src_port;
 
-		sctp_spec = (const struct rte_flow_item_sctp *)item->spec;
+		sctp_spec = item->spec;
 		filter->dst_port = sctp_spec->hdr.dst_port;
 		filter->src_port = sctp_spec->hdr.src_port;
 	}
@@ -480,12 +480,12 @@ classify_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 	switch (act->type) {
 	case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_COUNT:
 		action.action_mask |= 1LLU << RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_COUNT;
-		count = (const struct rte_flow_action_count *)act->conf;
+		count = act->conf;
 		memcpy(&action.act.counter, count, sizeof(action.act.counter));
 		break;
 	case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MARK:
 		action.action_mask |= 1LLU << RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MARK;
-		mark_spec = (const struct rte_flow_action_mark *)act->conf;
+		mark_spec = act->conf;
 		memcpy(&action.act.mark, mark_spec, sizeof(action.act.mark));
 		break;
 	default:
@@ -502,12 +502,12 @@ classify_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 	switch (act->type) {
 	case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_COUNT:
 		action.action_mask |= 1LLU << RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_COUNT;
-		count = (const struct rte_flow_action_count *)act->conf;
+		count = act->conf;
 		memcpy(&action.act.counter, count, sizeof(action.act.counter));
 		break;
 	case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MARK:
 		action.action_mask |= 1LLU << RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MARK;
-		mark_spec = (const struct rte_flow_action_mark *)act->conf;
+		mark_spec = act->conf;
 		memcpy(&action.act.mark, mark_spec, sizeof(action.act.mark));
 		break;
 	case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END:
-- 
2.13.3

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-26  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-26  8:10 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] remove void pointer explicit cast Zhiyong Yang
2018-02-26  8:10 ` Zhiyong Yang [this message]
2018-03-14 11:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] flow_classify: remove void pointer cast Iremonger, Bernard
2018-02-26  8:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] net/ixgbe: " Zhiyong Yang
2018-02-26  8:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] net/e1000: " Zhiyong Yang
2018-02-26  8:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] net/bnxt: " Zhiyong Yang
2018-02-26  8:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] net/sfc: " Zhiyong Yang
2018-02-26 11:03   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-02-27 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] remove void pointer explicit cast Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-06 18:57 ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180226081103.64154-2-zhiyong.yang@intel.com \
    --to=zhiyong.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).