From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3FC1B7F5 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 15:43:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Apr 2018 06:43:15 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,427,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="41899434" Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([163.33.26.43]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2018 06:43:14 -0700 Received: from sivswdev01.ir.intel.com (sivswdev01.ir.intel.com [10.237.217.45]) by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id w39DhDWn012873; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 14:43:13 +0100 Received: from sivswdev01.ir.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sivswdev01.ir.intel.com with ESMTP id w39DhDAv025692; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 14:43:13 +0100 Received: (from lma25@localhost) by sivswdev01.ir.intel.com with LOCAL id w39DhDAY025688; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 14:43:13 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 14:43:12 +0100 From: "Liang, Ma" To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: "Rosen, Rami" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "thomas@monjalon.net" , Peter Mccarthy Message-ID: <20180409134312.GA23402@sivswdev01.ir.intel.com> References: <9B0331B6EBBD0E4684FBFAEDA55776F94C401373@HASMSX110.ger.corp.intel.com> <685f7b21-c36c-9896-36c7-c781e2390fb7@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <685f7b21-c36c-9896-36c7-c781e2390fb7@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] OPDL and 18.02 Release Notes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 13:43:18 -0000 On 05 Mar 17:58, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 2/9/2018 12:08 AM, Rosen, Rami wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following the recent announcement of DPDK 18.02-RC4, I went over > > 18.02 release notes and I have this minor query which I am not sure about: > > In the release notes: > > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_02.html > > we have the following: > > ... > > The OPDL (Ordered Packet Distribution Library) eventdev > > ... > > > > While in http://dpdk.org/dev/roadmap > > We have: > > .... > > eventdev optimized packet distribution library (OPDL) driver > > ... > > > > So I am not sure about this inconsistency -should it be "optimized" or "ordered" ? > > According driver documentation (doc/guides/eventdevs/opdl.rst) it is: > "Ordered Packet Distribution Library", release notes seems correct. > > cc'ed maintainers. Hi Ferruh, Team agree stay with "Ordered Packet Distribution Library" name so far. the roadmap information might need update. Many thanks Liang > > > > > Regards, > > Rami Rosen > > > > >