* [dpdk-dev] Question on documentation / Mellanox ConnectX-3
@ 2018-04-03 17:59 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2018-04-05 9:26 ` Adrien Mazarguil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2018-04-03 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev; +Cc: Timothy Redaelli
Hi,
http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/dpdk/ says:
Some NICs (i.e. Mellanox ConnectX-3) have only one PCI address
associated with multiple ports. Using a PCI device like above won’t
work. Instead, below usage is suggested:
$ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p0 -- set Interface dpdk-p0 type=dpdk \
options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55:01"
$ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface dpdk-p1 type=dpdk \
options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55:02"
But these MACs are 7 bytes long. Seems the idea was to mention the two
incremental MAC addresses that the ports have, and thus the ':55'
should have been removed from there, right?
Reading the code, it doesn't seem prepared to handle the extra byte in
any (special) way.
Marcelo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] Question on documentation / Mellanox ConnectX-3
2018-04-03 17:59 [dpdk-dev] Question on documentation / Mellanox ConnectX-3 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
@ 2018-04-05 9:26 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-04-08 21:27 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Adrien Mazarguil @ 2018-04-05 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner; +Cc: dev, Timothy Redaelli
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 02:59:38PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/dpdk/ says:
>
> Some NICs (i.e. Mellanox ConnectX-3) have only one PCI address
> associated with multiple ports. Using a PCI device like above won’t
> work. Instead, below usage is suggested:
>
> $ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p0 -- set Interface dpdk-p0 type=dpdk \
> options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55:01"
> $ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface dpdk-p1 type=dpdk \
> options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55:02"
>
> But these MACs are 7 bytes long. Seems the idea was to mention the two
> incremental MAC addresses that the ports have, and thus the ':55'
> should have been removed from there, right?
>
> Reading the code, it doesn't seem prepared to handle the extra byte in
> any (special) way.
After a quick glance at the original patch [1], I confirm it looks like a
mistake in the OVS documentation. MAC addresses should be 6 bytes long, the
7th byte is not a workaround to identify a physical port like I initially
thought.
As you pointed out, since default MAC addresses on mlx4 ports are normally
incremental, documentation should read something like:
$ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p0 -- set Interface dpdk-p0 type=dpdk \
options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55"
$ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface dpdk-p1 type=dpdk \
options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:56"
[1] https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/5e7588186839
--
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] Question on documentation / Mellanox ConnectX-3
2018-04-05 9:26 ` Adrien Mazarguil
@ 2018-04-08 21:27 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2018-04-09 15:07 ` Adrien Mazarguil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2018-04-08 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrien Mazarguil; +Cc: dev, Timothy Redaelli
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:26:21AM +0200, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 02:59:38PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/dpdk/ says:
> >
> > Some NICs (i.e. Mellanox ConnectX-3) have only one PCI address
> > associated with multiple ports. Using a PCI device like above won’t
> > work. Instead, below usage is suggested:
> >
> > $ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p0 -- set Interface dpdk-p0 type=dpdk \
> > options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55:01"
> > $ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface dpdk-p1 type=dpdk \
> > options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55:02"
> >
> > But these MACs are 7 bytes long. Seems the idea was to mention the two
> > incremental MAC addresses that the ports have, and thus the ':55'
> > should have been removed from there, right?
> >
> > Reading the code, it doesn't seem prepared to handle the extra byte in
> > any (special) way.
>
> After a quick glance at the original patch [1], I confirm it looks like a
> mistake in the OVS documentation. MAC addresses should be 6 bytes long, the
> 7th byte is not a workaround to identify a physical port like I initially
> thought.
>
> As you pointed out, since default MAC addresses on mlx4 ports are normally
> incremental, documentation should read something like:
>
> $ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p0 -- set Interface dpdk-p0 type=dpdk \
> options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55"
> $ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface dpdk-p1 type=dpdk \
> options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:56"
>
> [1] https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/5e7588186839
Thanks Adrien. Question now is, who can fix the doc?
Marcelo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] Question on documentation / Mellanox ConnectX-3
2018-04-08 21:27 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
@ 2018-04-09 15:07 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-04-09 17:08 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Adrien Mazarguil @ 2018-04-09 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner; +Cc: dev, Timothy Redaelli
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 06:27:50PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:26:21AM +0200, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 02:59:38PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/dpdk/ says:
> > >
> > > Some NICs (i.e. Mellanox ConnectX-3) have only one PCI address
> > > associated with multiple ports. Using a PCI device like above won’t
> > > work. Instead, below usage is suggested:
> > >
> > > $ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p0 -- set Interface dpdk-p0 type=dpdk \
> > > options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55:01"
> > > $ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface dpdk-p1 type=dpdk \
> > > options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55:02"
> > >
> > > But these MACs are 7 bytes long. Seems the idea was to mention the two
> > > incremental MAC addresses that the ports have, and thus the ':55'
> > > should have been removed from there, right?
> > >
> > > Reading the code, it doesn't seem prepared to handle the extra byte in
> > > any (special) way.
> >
> > After a quick glance at the original patch [1], I confirm it looks like a
> > mistake in the OVS documentation. MAC addresses should be 6 bytes long, the
> > 7th byte is not a workaround to identify a physical port like I initially
> > thought.
> >
> > As you pointed out, since default MAC addresses on mlx4 ports are normally
> > incremental, documentation should read something like:
> >
> > $ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p0 -- set Interface dpdk-p0 type=dpdk \
> > options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55"
> > $ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface dpdk-p1 type=dpdk \
> > options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:56"
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/5e7588186839
>
> Thanks Adrien. Question now is, who can fix the doc?
Someone should submit a request or patch pointing to this thread to the
documentation maintainer of OVS. Since it's a different project there's not
much I can do from the DPDK side.
--
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] Question on documentation / Mellanox ConnectX-3
2018-04-09 15:07 ` Adrien Mazarguil
@ 2018-04-09 17:08 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2018-04-09 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrien Mazarguil; +Cc: dev, Timothy Redaelli
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 05:07:51PM +0200, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 06:27:50PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:26:21AM +0200, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 02:59:38PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/howto/dpdk/ says:
> > > >
> > > > Some NICs (i.e. Mellanox ConnectX-3) have only one PCI address
> > > > associated with multiple ports. Using a PCI device like above won’t
> > > > work. Instead, below usage is suggested:
> > > >
> > > > $ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p0 -- set Interface dpdk-p0 type=dpdk \
> > > > options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55:01"
> > > > $ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface dpdk-p1 type=dpdk \
> > > > options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55:02"
> > > >
> > > > But these MACs are 7 bytes long. Seems the idea was to mention the two
> > > > incremental MAC addresses that the ports have, and thus the ':55'
> > > > should have been removed from there, right?
> > > >
> > > > Reading the code, it doesn't seem prepared to handle the extra byte in
> > > > any (special) way.
> > >
> > > After a quick glance at the original patch [1], I confirm it looks like a
> > > mistake in the OVS documentation. MAC addresses should be 6 bytes long, the
> > > 7th byte is not a workaround to identify a physical port like I initially
> > > thought.
> > >
> > > As you pointed out, since default MAC addresses on mlx4 ports are normally
> > > incremental, documentation should read something like:
> > >
> > > $ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p0 -- set Interface dpdk-p0 type=dpdk \
> > > options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55"
> > > $ ovs-vsctl add-port br0 dpdk-p1 -- set Interface dpdk-p1 type=dpdk \
> > > options:dpdk-devargs="class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:56"
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/5e7588186839
> >
> > Thanks Adrien. Question now is, who can fix the doc?
>
> Someone should submit a request or patch pointing to this thread to the
> documentation maintainer of OVS. Since it's a different project there's not
> much I can do from the DPDK side.
Makes sense. Thanks.
Marcelo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-09 17:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-04-03 17:59 [dpdk-dev] Question on documentation / Mellanox ConnectX-3 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2018-04-05 9:26 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-04-08 21:27 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2018-04-09 15:07 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-04-09 17:08 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).