DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Pascal Mazon <pascal.mazon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, motih@mellanox.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/tap: remove queue specific offload support
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:38:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180423093846.81133-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180322182843.105732-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>

It is not clear if tap PMD supports queue specific offloads, removing
the related code.

Fixes: 95ae196ae10b ("net/tap: use new Rx offloads API")
Fixes: 818fe14a9891 ("net/tap: use new Tx offloads API")
Cc: motih@mellanox.com

Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
---
v2:
* rebased
---
 drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 99 +++----------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
index 66e026f6d..a0b8922e5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
@@ -278,31 +278,6 @@ tap_rx_offload_get_port_capa(void)
 	       DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
 }
 
-static uint64_t
-tap_rx_offload_get_queue_capa(void)
-{
-	return DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER |
-	       DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
-	       DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
-	       DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
-	       DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
-}
-
-static bool
-tap_rxq_are_offloads_valid(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint64_t offloads)
-{
-	uint64_t port_offloads = dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads;
-	uint64_t queue_supp_offloads = tap_rx_offload_get_queue_capa();
-	uint64_t port_supp_offloads = tap_rx_offload_get_port_capa();
-
-	if ((offloads & (queue_supp_offloads | port_supp_offloads)) !=
-	    offloads)
-		return false;
-	if ((port_offloads ^ offloads) & port_supp_offloads)
-		return false;
-	return true;
-}
-
 /* Callback to handle the rx burst of packets to the correct interface and
  * file descriptor(s) in a multi-queue setup.
  */
@@ -411,31 +386,6 @@ tap_tx_offload_get_port_capa(void)
 	       DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM;
 }
 
-static uint64_t
-tap_tx_offload_get_queue_capa(void)
-{
-	return DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS |
-	       DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
-	       DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
-	       DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM;
-}
-
-static bool
-tap_txq_are_offloads_valid(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint64_t offloads)
-{
-	uint64_t port_offloads = dev->data->dev_conf.txmode.offloads;
-	uint64_t queue_supp_offloads = tap_tx_offload_get_queue_capa();
-	uint64_t port_supp_offloads = tap_tx_offload_get_port_capa();
-
-	if ((offloads & (queue_supp_offloads | port_supp_offloads)) !=
-	    offloads)
-		return false;
-	/* Verify we have no conflict with port offloads */
-	if ((port_offloads ^ offloads) & port_supp_offloads)
-		return false;
-	return true;
-}
-
 static void
 tap_tx_offload(char *packet, uint64_t ol_flags, unsigned int l2_len,
 	       unsigned int l3_len)
@@ -761,12 +711,10 @@ tap_dev_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info)
 	dev_info->max_tx_queues = RTE_PMD_TAP_MAX_QUEUES;
 	dev_info->min_rx_bufsize = 0;
 	dev_info->speed_capa = tap_dev_speed_capa();
-	dev_info->rx_queue_offload_capa = tap_rx_offload_get_queue_capa();
-	dev_info->rx_offload_capa = tap_rx_offload_get_port_capa() |
-				    dev_info->rx_queue_offload_capa;
-	dev_info->tx_queue_offload_capa = tap_tx_offload_get_queue_capa();
-	dev_info->tx_offload_capa = tap_tx_offload_get_port_capa() |
-				    dev_info->tx_queue_offload_capa;
+	dev_info->rx_offload_capa = tap_rx_offload_get_port_capa();
+	dev_info->tx_offload_capa = tap_tx_offload_get_port_capa();
+	dev_info->rx_queue_offload_capa = 0;
+	dev_info->tx_queue_offload_capa = 0;
 }
 
 static int
@@ -1092,19 +1040,6 @@ tap_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	/* Verify application offloads are valid for our port and queue. */
-	if (!tap_rxq_are_offloads_valid(dev, rx_conf->offloads)) {
-		rte_errno = ENOTSUP;
-		RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD,
-			"%p: Rx queue offloads 0x%" PRIx64
-			" don't match port offloads 0x%" PRIx64
-			" or supported offloads 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
-			(void *)dev, rx_conf->offloads,
-			dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads,
-			(tap_rx_offload_get_port_capa() |
-			 tap_rx_offload_get_queue_capa()));
-		return -rte_errno;
-	}
 	rxq->mp = mp;
 	rxq->trigger_seen = 1; /* force initial burst */
 	rxq->in_port = dev->data->port_id;
@@ -1163,7 +1098,7 @@ tap_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 		   uint16_t tx_queue_id,
 		   uint16_t nb_tx_desc __rte_unused,
 		   unsigned int socket_id __rte_unused,
-		   const struct rte_eth_txconf *tx_conf)
+		   const struct rte_eth_txconf *tx_conf __rte_unused)
 {
 	struct pmd_internals *internals = dev->data->dev_private;
 	struct tx_queue *txq;
@@ -1173,29 +1108,7 @@ tap_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 		return -1;
 	dev->data->tx_queues[tx_queue_id] = &internals->txq[tx_queue_id];
 	txq = dev->data->tx_queues[tx_queue_id];
-	/*
-	 * Don't verify port offloads for application which
-	 * use the old API.
-	 */
-	if (tx_conf != NULL &&
-	    !!(tx_conf->txq_flags & ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_IGNORE)) {
-		if (tap_txq_are_offloads_valid(dev, tx_conf->offloads)) {
-			txq->csum = !!(tx_conf->offloads &
-					(DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
-					 DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
-					 DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM));
-		} else {
-			rte_errno = ENOTSUP;
-			RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD,
-				"%p: Tx queue offloads 0x%" PRIx64
-				" don't match port offloads 0x%" PRIx64
-				" or supported offloads 0x%" PRIx64,
-				(void *)dev, tx_conf->offloads,
-				dev->data->dev_conf.txmode.offloads,
-				tap_tx_offload_get_port_capa());
-			return -rte_errno;
-		}
-	}
+
 	ret = tap_setup_queue(dev, internals, tx_queue_id, 0);
 	if (ret == -1)
 		return -1;
-- 
2.14.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-23  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-22 18:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-05 17:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-12 16:23   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-18  8:59     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-18  9:40       ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-18 10:55         ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-22 16:04           ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-23  8:39             ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-23  9:17               ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-23 10:13                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-23 11:32                   ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-24 17:57                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-23  9:38 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2018-04-24 17:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-25  9:18     ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-25  9:48       ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-25 12:00         ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-25 12:20         ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-25 16:17         ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-25 17:18           ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180423093846.81133-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=motih@mellanox.com \
    --cc=pascal.mazon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).