From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Pascal Mazon <pascal.mazon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
motih@mellanox.com, Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/tap: remove queue specific offload support
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 18:54:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180424175408.42099-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180423093846.81133-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
It is not clear if tap PMD supports queue specific offloads, removing
the related code.
Fixes: 95ae196ae10b ("net/tap: use new Rx offloads API")
Fixes: 818fe14a9891 ("net/tap: use new Tx offloads API")
Cc: motih@mellanox.com
Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
---
Cc: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
v2:
* rebased
v3:
* txq->csum restored,
- ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_IGNORE check removed since ethdev layer takes care of it
- tx_conf != NULL check removed, this is internal api who calls this is
ethdev and it doesn't pass null tx_conf
---
drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 102 +++++-------------------------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
index ef33aace9..61b4b5df3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
@@ -278,31 +278,6 @@ tap_rx_offload_get_port_capa(void)
DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
}
-static uint64_t
-tap_rx_offload_get_queue_capa(void)
-{
- return DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER |
- DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
- DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
- DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
- DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP;
-}
-
-static bool
-tap_rxq_are_offloads_valid(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint64_t offloads)
-{
- uint64_t port_offloads = dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads;
- uint64_t queue_supp_offloads = tap_rx_offload_get_queue_capa();
- uint64_t port_supp_offloads = tap_rx_offload_get_port_capa();
-
- if ((offloads & (queue_supp_offloads | port_supp_offloads)) !=
- offloads)
- return false;
- if ((port_offloads ^ offloads) & port_supp_offloads)
- return false;
- return true;
-}
-
/* Callback to handle the rx burst of packets to the correct interface and
* file descriptor(s) in a multi-queue setup.
*/
@@ -411,31 +386,6 @@ tap_tx_offload_get_port_capa(void)
DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM;
}
-static uint64_t
-tap_tx_offload_get_queue_capa(void)
-{
- return DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS |
- DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
- DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
- DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM;
-}
-
-static bool
-tap_txq_are_offloads_valid(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint64_t offloads)
-{
- uint64_t port_offloads = dev->data->dev_conf.txmode.offloads;
- uint64_t queue_supp_offloads = tap_tx_offload_get_queue_capa();
- uint64_t port_supp_offloads = tap_tx_offload_get_port_capa();
-
- if ((offloads & (queue_supp_offloads | port_supp_offloads)) !=
- offloads)
- return false;
- /* Verify we have no conflict with port offloads */
- if ((port_offloads ^ offloads) & port_supp_offloads)
- return false;
- return true;
-}
-
static void
tap_tx_offload(char *packet, uint64_t ol_flags, unsigned int l2_len,
unsigned int l3_len)
@@ -763,12 +713,10 @@ tap_dev_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info)
dev_info->max_tx_queues = RTE_PMD_TAP_MAX_QUEUES;
dev_info->min_rx_bufsize = 0;
dev_info->speed_capa = tap_dev_speed_capa();
- dev_info->rx_queue_offload_capa = tap_rx_offload_get_queue_capa();
- dev_info->rx_offload_capa = tap_rx_offload_get_port_capa() |
- dev_info->rx_queue_offload_capa;
- dev_info->tx_queue_offload_capa = tap_tx_offload_get_queue_capa();
- dev_info->tx_offload_capa = tap_tx_offload_get_port_capa() |
- dev_info->tx_queue_offload_capa;
+ dev_info->rx_offload_capa = tap_rx_offload_get_port_capa();
+ dev_info->tx_offload_capa = tap_tx_offload_get_port_capa();
+ dev_info->rx_queue_offload_capa = 0;
+ dev_info->tx_queue_offload_capa = 0;
}
static int
@@ -1094,19 +1042,6 @@ tap_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
return -1;
}
- /* Verify application offloads are valid for our port and queue. */
- if (!tap_rxq_are_offloads_valid(dev, rx_conf->offloads)) {
- rte_errno = ENOTSUP;
- RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD,
- "%p: Rx queue offloads 0x%" PRIx64
- " don't match port offloads 0x%" PRIx64
- " or supported offloads 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
- (void *)dev, rx_conf->offloads,
- dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads,
- (tap_rx_offload_get_port_capa() |
- tap_rx_offload_get_queue_capa()));
- return -rte_errno;
- }
rxq->mp = mp;
rxq->trigger_seen = 1; /* force initial burst */
rxq->in_port = dev->data->port_id;
@@ -1175,29 +1110,12 @@ tap_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
return -1;
dev->data->tx_queues[tx_queue_id] = &internals->txq[tx_queue_id];
txq = dev->data->tx_queues[tx_queue_id];
- /*
- * Don't verify port offloads for application which
- * use the old API.
- */
- if (tx_conf != NULL &&
- !!(tx_conf->txq_flags & ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_IGNORE)) {
- if (tap_txq_are_offloads_valid(dev, tx_conf->offloads)) {
- txq->csum = !!(tx_conf->offloads &
- (DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
- DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
- DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM));
- } else {
- rte_errno = ENOTSUP;
- RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD,
- "%p: Tx queue offloads 0x%" PRIx64
- " don't match port offloads 0x%" PRIx64
- " or supported offloads 0x%" PRIx64,
- (void *)dev, tx_conf->offloads,
- dev->data->dev_conf.txmode.offloads,
- tap_tx_offload_get_port_capa());
- return -rte_errno;
- }
- }
+
+ txq->csum = !!(tx_conf->offloads &
+ (DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM |
+ DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
+ DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM));
+
ret = tap_setup_queue(dev, internals, tx_queue_id, 0);
if (ret == -1)
return -1;
--
2.14.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-24 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-22 18:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-05 17:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-12 16:23 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-18 8:59 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-18 9:40 ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-18 10:55 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-22 16:04 ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-23 8:39 ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-23 9:17 ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-23 10:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-23 11:32 ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-24 17:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-23 9:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-24 17:54 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2018-04-25 9:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Ophir Munk
2018-04-25 9:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-25 12:00 ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-25 12:20 ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-25 16:17 ` Ophir Munk
2018-04-25 17:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180424175408.42099-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=motih@mellanox.com \
--cc=ophirmu@mellanox.com \
--cc=pascal.mazon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).