From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35536CCC for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 13:30:37 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Apr 2018 04:30:36 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,335,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="46495571" Received: from bricha3-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.221.51]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2018 04:30:33 -0700 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:30:31 +0100 Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:30:31 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWC?= Kozik Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Marcin Wojtas , =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82?= Krawczyk , "Tzalik, Guy" , evgenys@amazon.com, "Matushevsky, Alexander" , "Chauskin, Igor" , Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <20180427113030.GA101968@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1523455637-31719-1-git-send-email-rk@semihalf.com> <20180411144251.GA33124@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Research and Development Ireland Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] support for write combining X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 11:30:38 -0000 On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:27:02AM +0200, RafaƂ Kozik wrote: > Hello Bruce, > > As from my last post passed ten days I would kindly ask if there are > any more comments? > > Best regards, > Rafal Kozik Hi Rafal, sorry for not responding before. The set makes a lot more sense to me now. However, just one more question? If igb_uio is passed the flag to make mappings wc, what happens if you have a mix of drivers that support or don't support wc at the driver, not the hardware level. For example, support there is one ena adapter and one i40e adapter. The hardware on both should be mappable as WC, but one driver can use that, the other can't. How is it handled? /Bruce