From: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
To: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: fix responsibility of flow API bits
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 13:20:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180517112045.GE6497@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C24E0CD818@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 09:26:15AM +0000, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
> Hi Adrien,
>
> <snip>
>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] maintainers: fix responsibility of flow API bits
> > > >
> > > > The following commits lack MAINTAINERS entries for this mess.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 4d73b6fb9907 ("doc: add generic flow API guide")
> > > > Fixes: 19c90af6285c ("app/testpmd: add flow command")
> > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
> > > > Cc: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > MAINTAINERS | 2 ++
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index bd08d4292..187817fff
> > > > 100644
> > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > > @@ -303,6 +303,8 @@ F: devtools/test-null.sh Flow API
> > > > M: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
> > > > T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net
> > > > +F: app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > > > +F: doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> > >
> > > doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/testpmd_funcs.rst
> > > Should be added to the list of flow related files.
> >
> > I did not add it because there is no way to split responsibility on a
> > documentation section basis AFAIK, and only a fraction of this file contains
> > information about rte_flow-related stuff.
> >
> > --
> > Adrien Mazarguil
> > 6WIND
>
> There are already several maintainers for testpmd, adding another maintainer for the flow parts of this file should be ok (I think).
True, however providing an exact file name instead of a directory or
wildcard makes me the main maintainer/contact for that specific file
(e.g. "app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c" vs. "app/test-pmd"), basically I do not
want to be responsible for the entirety of testpmd's documentation.
How about the following instead: another patch that extracts the flow
command documentation in its own file (testpmd_flow.rst?) using the include
directive (somewhat like cmdline_flow.c). This patch will update MAINTAINERS
accordingly.
--
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-10 9:29 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: add maintainer for testpmd Bernard Iremonger
2018-05-15 16:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: fix responsibility of flow API bits Adrien Mazarguil
2018-05-16 9:18 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-05-16 14:35 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-05-17 9:26 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-05-17 11:20 ` Adrien Mazarguil [this message]
2018-05-17 11:26 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-05-17 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-17 14:51 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-05-17 15:50 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-05-16 0:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: add maintainer for testpmd Lu, Wenzhuo
2018-05-22 20:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180517112045.GE6497@6wind.com \
--to=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).