From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.droids-corp.org (zoll.droids-corp.org [94.23.50.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69A94C96 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:37:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rsa59-2-82-233-193-189.fbx.proxad.net ([82.233.193.189] helo=droids-corp.org) by mail.droids-corp.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fXTZ2-0001sN-Et; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:38:02 +0200 Received: by droids-corp.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:37:26 +0200 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:37:26 +0200 From: Olivier Matz To: Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: "Burakov, Anatoly" , "dev@dpdk.org" Message-ID: <20180625153726.ekmv72bjcouxnogv@platinum> References: <1527571694-121047-1-git-send-email-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> <3b43c395-2ebd-228a-23be-cbe149e4c812@intel.com> <86d0c839-8a45-9c6b-38e1-a196aafbd59f@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] rte_ring: clarify preemptible nature of ring algorithm X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 15:37:33 -0000 Hi Honnappa, On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 04:53:01AM +0000, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Burakov, Anatoly > > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 2:48 AM > > To: Honnappa Nagarahalli ; olivier.matz@6wind.com > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] rte_ring: clarify preemptible nature of ring algorithm > > > > On 29-May-18 5:36 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote: > > > I do not see the documentation regarding this in programmer's guide. > > > > Hi > > > > Apologies, it's not in rte_ring section, it's in programmer's guide for EAL: > > > > http://www.dpdk.org/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.html#known-issues > > > > Perhaps this could be referenced in the rte_ring (or indeed copied/moved there)? > > No problem, it is still in programmer's guide :). I will rework the patch. > Thank you, > Honnappa Thank you for your patch proposal. Do you still plan to submit a new version? I think the description from http://www.dpdk.org/doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.html#known-issues should be moved in rte_ring.h header. Thanks, Olivier