DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
Cc: Sachin Saxena <sachin.saxena@nxp.com>,
	"Yang, Zhiyong" <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: using initial-exec model for thread	local	variable
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 11:02:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180706100208.GA23248@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E630EF9EF@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 02:22:14AM +0000, Liu, Yong wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sachin Saxena
> > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2018 10:46 PM
> > To: Liu, Yong <yong.liu@intel.com>; Yang, Zhiyong <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>;
> > thomas@monjalon.net; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: using initial-exec model for thread
> > local variable
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > When building share library, thread-local storage model will be changed
> > to
> > > global-dynamic. It will add additional cost for reading thread local
> > variable.
> > > On the other hand, dynamically load share library with static TLS will
> > request
> > > additional DTV slot which is limited by loader. By now only
> > librte_pmd_eal.so
> > > contain thread local variable. So that can make TLS model back to
> > initial-exec
> > > like static library for better performance.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.vars.mk b/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.vars.mk
> > > index 7e4531bab..19d5e11ef 100644
> > > --- a/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.vars.mk
> > > +++ b/mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.vars.mk
> > > @@ -43,6 +43,13 @@ ifeq (,$(findstring -O0,$(EXTRA_CFLAGS)))  endif
> > endif
> > >
> > > +# Initial execution TLS model has better performane compared to dynamic
> > > +# global. But this model require for addtional slot on DTV when dlopen
> > > +# object with thread local variable.
> > > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB),y)
> > > +TOOLCHAIN_CFLAGS += -ftls-model=initial-exec endif
> > > +
> > 
> > [Sachin Saxena]   Using initial-exec model for shared object is not
> > recommended. If you link a shared object containing IE-model, the object
> > will have the DF_STATIC_TLS flag set. By the spec, this means that dlopen()
> > might refuse to load it if TLS usage is greater than static TLS space.
> > This is what happening, when I tried to validate this change on ARM64
> > based NXP platform with VPP-dpdk solution. VPP initialization fails with
> > following error:
> >   "load_one_plugin:145: /usr/lib/vpp_plugins/dpdk_plugin.so: cannot
> > allocate memory in static TLS block"
> > 
> > Note that dpdk dpaa2 driver and VPP both uses TLS variables quite
> > significantly. When forced to Initial-exec model in dpdk shared object,
> > VPP static TLS space is getting exhausted and dlopen() returns error while
> > trying to load the DPDK object.
> > For same reason, when we use "-fPIC" the default TLS model changed to
> > "global-dynamics" from "Initial-exec".
> > 
> > In my opinion, this change should not be merged as it is breaking basic
> > functionality.
> 
> Thanks for your opinion, Sachin. 
> IE model may cause problem when using dlopen open share object. On the other hand, it can benefit performance.
> It will be better to keep current workable setting and users may change it by themselves.
> 
What is the performance delta, and where is it most seen? I suggest for
future patches like this, that the commit message itself should give a
rough/approx indication of the perf impacts.

/Bruce

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-06 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-05 14:13 Marvin Liu
2018-07-05  9:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-07-05 14:46 ` Sachin Saxena
2018-07-06  2:22   ` Liu, Yong
2018-07-06 10:02     ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-28  9:54 Marvin Liu
2018-04-28  4:39 ` Yang, Zhiyong
2018-05-18  9:46   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180706100208.GA23248@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=sachin.saxena@nxp.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=zhiyong.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).