DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
To: "Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <matias.elo@nokia.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] eventdev: rte_event_dev_start() all queues are linked requirement
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:35:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180730080507.GA15830@jerin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21037D32-C2B9-40FF-92E6-55F6FA725E24@nokia.com>

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 07:38:27 +0000
> From: "Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <matias.elo@nokia.com>
> To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
> CC: "jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com" <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>, "Van
>  Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
> Subject: eventdev: rte_event_dev_start() all queues are linked requirement
> x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
> 

+ mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com as his SW driver is scheduled for next
release.

> 
> Hi,
> 
> rte_event_dev_start() requires that all queues have to be linked, which makes
> writing applications which link/unlink queues at runtime cumbersome.
> E.g. the application has to dummy link all queues before rte_event_dev_start()
> and then unlink them after the function call. This alone wouldn't be a big issue
> but rte_event_dev_start() may also be called inside
> rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_create() implementation causing additional complexity.
> 
> To me this check seems more like eventdev implementation specific limitation,
> which should be solved by the particular implementation and not enforced by the
> API to all applications. From an application point of view enqueueing events to
> an unlinked queue and expecting something meaningful to happen is an error
> anyway. So, would it be conceivable to remove this particular requirement?

For HW drivers, It is OK remove the particular requirement. But, If
there is an issue(performance/functionality) for enabling such feature
in SW driver. I would like keep that constraint to keep eventdev as
abstraction for both SW and HW driver. Harry and/or Mattias.ronnblom can
comment from SW driver perspective.

> 
> -Matias

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-30  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-30  7:38 Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
2018-07-30  8:05 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2018-07-30  9:15   ` Van Haaren, Harry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180730080507.GA15830@jerin \
    --to=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=matias.elo@nokia.com \
    --cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).