DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix rte_eth_dev_owner_unset
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 09:55:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180814095521.492e575a@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR0502MB4019D2C8D2486AEDF7B95734D2380@AM0PR0502MB4019.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>

On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 05:52:20 +0000
Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com> wrote:

> Hi Stephen
> 
> From: Stephen Hemminger
> > The rte_eth_dev_owner_unset function is unusable because it always
> > returns -EINVAL. This is because the magic (unowned) value is flagged as not
> > valid.
> >   
> 
> It's OK to raise an error when you do unset for unowned device.
> It means that unset owner should be called for owned device.
> 

Original code was broken. The following would always fail.

	rte_eth_dev_owner_new(&owner.id);
	sprintf(owner.name, "example");
	rte_eth_dev_owner_set(port_id, &owner);
	rte_eth_dev_owner_unset(port_id, owner.id);

That is because of:
	rte_eth_dev_owner_unset(port_id, owner_id)
		_rte_eth_dev_owner_set(port_id, owner_id, &new_owner)  << new_owner.id == RTE_ETH_DEV_NO_OWNER (0)


	if (!rte_eth_is_valid_owner_id(new_owner->id) &&  << new_owner->id == RTE_ETH_DEV_NO_OWNER (which is flagged as invalid)
	    !rte_eth_is_valid_owner_id(old_owner_id))
		return -EINVAL;

The failsafe driver never checks the return value, and therefore doesn't see that it never clears ownership.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-14 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-14  0:19 Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-14  5:52 ` Matan Azrad
2018-08-14 16:55   ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2018-08-14 19:46     ` Matan Azrad
2018-08-24 13:55       ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-08-24 14:42         ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-16 22:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] ethdev: minor ownership changes Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-16 22:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: silence error message on rte_eth_dev_owner_unset Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-21 10:04     ` Matan Azrad
2018-08-21 15:45     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-21 15:53       ` Matan Azrad
2018-08-27 13:01         ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-08-16 22:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: make rte_eth_is_valid_owner_id return bool Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-21 10:20     ` Matan Azrad
2018-08-21 15:06       ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-21 15:48         ` Matan Azrad
2018-08-21 18:31           ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-26  7:49             ` Matan Azrad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180814095521.492e575a@xeon-e3 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=matan@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).