From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: add IGMP packet type
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:34:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180829093436.3f06421f@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180829155904.GA7133@jerin>
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 21:29:05 +0530
Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> > Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:31:10 -0700
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: add IGMP packet type
> >
> > External Email
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:08:35 +0530
> > Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Add support for IGMP packet type.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> >
> > Could you add logic to recoginize IGMP to the software packet type identification
> > rte_net_get_ptype used by drivers that don't have hardware support.
>
> If everyone agrees then I can do it as adding IGMP support will reduce
> the performance of rte_net_get_ptype() and most of the NIC may not need it.
>
> Opinions?
>
> >
> > Also shouldn't this bit be part of RTE_PTYPE_L4_MASK?
>
> The RTE_PTYPE_L4_MASK is 0x00000f00 so it is part it. Right?
Then you must add it to the software matcher since most drivers are advertising L4_MASK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-27 12:38 Jerin Jacob
2018-08-29 5:35 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-08-29 7:07 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-08-29 15:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-29 15:59 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-08-29 16:34 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2018-08-29 16:40 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-08-29 16:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-10-23 9:20 ` Olivier Matz
2018-10-25 13:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180829093436.3f06421f@xeon-e3 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).