DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: add IGMP packet type
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:38:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180829093853.5f866760@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180829155904.GA7133@jerin>

On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 21:29:05 +0530
Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> > Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:31:10 -0700
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev]  [PATCH] mbuf: add IGMP packet type
> > 
> > External Email
> > 
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:08:35 +0530
> > Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Add support for IGMP packet type.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>  
> > 
> > Could you add logic to recoginize IGMP to the software packet type identification
> > rte_net_get_ptype used by drivers that don't have hardware support.  
> 
> If everyone agrees then I can do it as adding IGMP support will reduce
> the performance of rte_net_get_ptype() and most of the NIC may not need it.

Since IGMP is an IP protocol field and the code is already looking for
TCP and UDP, how could adding another else slow it down in any observable way.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-29 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-27 12:38 Jerin Jacob
2018-08-29  5:35 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2018-08-29  7:07 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-08-29 15:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-29 15:59   ` Jerin Jacob
2018-08-29 16:34     ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-29 16:40       ` Jerin Jacob
2018-08-29 16:38     ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2018-10-23  9:20 ` Olivier Matz
2018-10-25 13:57   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180829093853.5f866760@xeon-e3 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).