From: Xiaoyu Min <jackmin@mellanox.com>
To: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
Cc: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: eswitch-IP address UDP/TCP port rewrite
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 15:21:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180930072104.f7o5c6yazgznivzd@MTBC-JACKMIN.mtl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180928230318.GA90324@minint-98vp2qg>
On 18-09-29 07:03:33, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 07:51:06PM +0800, Xiaoyu Min wrote:
> > Offload the following rte_flow actions by inserting accordingly
> > E-Switch rules via TC Flower driver
> >
> > - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC
> > - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST
> > - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC
> > - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST
> > - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC
> > - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST
>
> Can you put an example command of testpmd for the reference?
>
Sure, I'll add.
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaoyu Min <jackmin@mellanox.com>
> > ---
> > This patch bases on Rahul Lakkireddy's patchs[1][2] and
> > Yongseok Koh's patchset [3]
> >
> > [1] https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/45191/
> > [2] https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/45192/
> > [3] https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=1474
> >
> >
> > drivers/net/mlx5/Makefile | 5 +
> > drivers/net/mlx5/meson.build | 2 +
> > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.h | 6 +
> > drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c | 356 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 369 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/Makefile b/drivers/net/mlx5/Makefile
> > index ca1de9f21..49b95e78e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/Makefile
> > @@ -346,6 +346,11 @@ mlx5_autoconf.h.new: $(RTE_SDK)/buildtools/auto-config-h.sh
> > linux/tc_act/tc_vlan.h \
> > enum TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_PRIORITY \
> > $(AUTOCONF_OUTPUT)
> > + $Q sh -- '$<' '$@' \
> > + HAVE_TC_ACT_PEDIT \
> > + linux/tc_act/tc_pedit.h \
> > + enum TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_UDP \
> > + $(AUTOCONF_OUTPUT)
> > $Q sh -- '$<' '$@' \
> > HAVE_SUPPORTED_40000baseKR4_Full \
> > /usr/include/linux/ethtool.h \
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/meson.build b/drivers/net/mlx5/meson.build
> > index fd93ac162..ef6a85101 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/meson.build
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/meson.build
> > @@ -182,6 +182,8 @@ if build
> > 'TCA_FLOWER_KEY_VLAN_ETH_TYPE' ],
> > [ 'HAVE_TC_ACT_VLAN', 'linux/tc_act/tc_vlan.h',
> > 'TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_PRIORITY' ],
> > + [ 'HAVE_TC_ACT_PEDIT', 'linux/tc_act/tc_pedit.h',
> > + 'TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_UDP' ],
> > [ 'HAVE_RDMA_NL_NLDEV', 'rdma/rdma_netlink.h',
> > 'RDMA_NL_NLDEV' ],
> > [ 'HAVE_RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_GET', 'rdma/rdma_netlink.h',
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.h b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.h
> > index 10d700a7f..be182a643 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.h
> > @@ -87,6 +87,12 @@
> > #define MLX5_ACTION_OF_PUSH_VLAN (1u << 8)
> > #define MLX5_ACTION_OF_SET_VLAN_VID (1u << 9)
> > #define MLX5_ACTION_OF_SET_VLAN_PCP (1u << 10)
> > +#define MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV4_SRC (1u << 11)
> > +#define MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV4_DST (1u << 12)
> > +#define MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV6_SRC (1u << 13)
> > +#define MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV6_DST (1u << 14)
> > +#define MLX5_ACTION_SET_TP_SRC (1u << 15)
> > +#define MLX5_ACTION_SET_TP_DST (1u << 16)
> >
> > /* possible L3 layers protocols filtering. */
> > #define MLX5_IP_PROTOCOL_TCP 6
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c
> > index 14376188e..85c92f369 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c
> > @@ -53,6 +53,62 @@ struct tc_vlan {
> >
> > #endif /* HAVE_TC_ACT_VLAN */
> >
> > +#ifdef HAVE_TC_ACT_PEDIT
> > +
> > +#include <linux/tc_act/tc_pedit.h>
> > +
> > +#else /* HAVE_TC_ACT_VLAN */
> > +enum {
> > + TCA_PEDIT_UNSPEC,
> > + TCA_PEDIT_TM,
> > + TCA_PEDIT_PARMS,
> > + TCA_PEDIT_PAD,
> > + TCA_PEDIT_PARMS_EX,
> > + TCA_PEDIT_KEYS_EX,
> > + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX,
> > + __TCA_PEDIT_MAX
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum {
> > + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HTYPE = 1,
> > + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD = 2,
> > + __TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_MAX
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum pedit_header_type {
> > + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_NETWORK = 0,
> > + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_ETH = 1,
> > + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_IP4 = 2,
> > + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_IP6 = 3,
> > + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_TCP = 4,
> > + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_UDP = 5,
> > + __PEDIT_HDR_TYPE_MAX,
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum pedit_cmd {
> > + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_SET = 0,
> > + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_ADD = 1,
> > + __PEDIT_CMD_MAX,
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct tc_pedit_key {
> > + __u32 mask; /* AND */
> > + __u32 val; /*XOR */
> > + __u32 off; /*offset */
> > + __u32 at;
> > + __u32 offmask;
> > + __u32 shift;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct tc_pedit_sel {
> > + tc_gen;
> > + unsigned char nkeys;
> > + unsigned char flags;
> > + struct tc_pedit_key keys[0];
> > +};
> > +
> > +#endif /* HAVE_TC_ACT_VLAN */
> > +
> > /* Normally found in linux/netlink.h. */
> > #ifndef NETLINK_CAP_ACK
> > #define NETLINK_CAP_ACK 10
> > @@ -153,6 +209,14 @@ struct tc_vlan {
> > #define IPV6_ADDR_LEN 16
> > #endif
> >
> > +#ifndef IPV4_ADDR_LEN
> > +#define IPV4_ADDR_LEN 4
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#ifndef TP_PORT_LEN
> > +#define TP_PORT_LEN 2 /* Transport Port (UDP/TCP) Length */
> > +#endif
> > +
> > /** Empty masks for known item types. */
> > static const union {
> > struct rte_flow_item_port_id port_id;
> > @@ -227,6 +291,220 @@ struct flow_tcf_ptoi {
> >
> > #define MLX5_TCF_FATE_ACTIONS (MLX5_ACTION_DROP | MLX5_ACTION_PORT_ID)
> >
> > +#define IS_MODIFY_ACTION(act_) ({typeof(act_) act = (act_); \
> > + ((act) == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC || \
> > + (act) == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST || \
> > + (act) == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC || \
> > + (act) == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST || \
> > + (act) == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC || \
> > + (act) == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST) ? \
> > + 1 : 0; })
>
> The reason why you need this complex multi-conditional macro is that
> RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_* isn't a bitmask. But, as this actions will be converted
> to MLX5_ACTION_* which is a bitmask, you can use that instead. Then, this
> would be enough to be:
>
> #define MLX5_TCF_SET_ACTIONS \
> (MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV4_SRC | ...)
>
> And in the flow_tcf_validate() below,
> if (action_flags & MLX5_TCF_SET_ACTIONS) {
> ...
> }
>
Well, I did consider using bitmask but action_flags is an _accumulated_ variable,
records all the actions parsed so far.
But, here, I need to know what is the _current_ action and whether it belongs to modify
actions. If using bitmask, Looks like a new variable (i.e current_action) needed (?)
case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC:
current_action = MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV4_SRC;
.....
if (current_action & MLX5_TCF_SET_ACTIONS) ...
...
action_flags |= current_action;
I feel more code change needed or you think it's worth?
> And please note that I'm going to rename MLX5_ACTION_* to MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_*.
> Please refer to "net/mlx5: rename flow macros" in PR #885. You might need to
> rebase it again.
>
Sure, I'll rebase on it
> > +#define MAX_PEDIT_KEYS (128)
> > +#define SZ_PEDIT_KEY_VAL (4)
> > +
> > +struct pedit_key_ex {
> > + enum pedit_header_type htype;
> > + enum pedit_cmd cmd;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct pedit_parser {
> > + struct tc_pedit_sel sel;
> > + struct tc_pedit_key keys[MAX_PEDIT_KEYS];
> > + struct pedit_key_ex keys_ex[MAX_PEDIT_KEYS];
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int
> > +flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(const uint64_t size)
>
> Please add documentation by comment for every funcs you add.
> Refer to the other existing ones for formality.
>
Sure!
> > +{
> > + int keys = (size / SZ_PEDIT_KEY_VAL) +
> > + ((size % SZ_PEDIT_KEY_VAL) ? 1 : 0);
>
> Indentation.
>
Will fix it
> > + return keys;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +flow_tcf_pedit_key_set_tp_port(const struct rte_flow_action *actions,
> > + struct pedit_parser *p_parser,
> > + uint64_t item_flags)
> > +{
> > + int idx = p_parser->sel.nkeys;
> > +
> > + if (item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_UDP)
> > + p_parser->keys_ex[idx].htype = TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_UDP;
> > + if (item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_TCP)
> > + p_parser->keys_ex[idx].htype = TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_TCP;
> > + p_parser->keys_ex[idx].cmd = TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_SET;
> > + p_parser->keys[idx].off =
> > + actions->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST ? 2 : 0;
>
> assert(offsetof(struct tcp_hdr, src_port) ==
> offsetof(struct udp_hdr, src_port));
> assert(offsetof(struct tcp_hdr, dst_port) ==
> offsetof(struct udp_hdr, dst_port));
> p_parser->keys[idx].off =
> actions->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC ?
> offsetof(struct tcp_hdr, src_port) :
> offsetof(struct tcp_hdr, dst_port);
>
> assert() is just to be informative.
> And how about src first like others below?
>
Yes, I will update above.
> > + p_parser->keys[idx].mask = 0xFFFF0000;
> > + p_parser->keys[idx].val = ((const struct rte_flow_action_set_tp *)
> > + actions->conf)->port;
>
> Assigning 2B to 4B big-endian stroage? Doesn't look consistent with the mask
> above - 0xffff0000.
>
So it should be as following ?
p_parser->keys[idx].val = (__u32)((const struct rte_flow_action_set_tp *))
actions->conf)->port;
> > + p_parser->sel.nkeys = (++idx);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +flow_tcf_pedit_key_set_ipv6_addr(const struct rte_flow_action *actions,
> > + struct pedit_parser *p_parser)
> > +{
> > + int idx = p_parser->sel.nkeys;
> > + int keys = flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(IPV6_ADDR_LEN);
> > + int off_base =
> > + actions->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC ? 8 : 24;
>
> offsetof(struct ipv6_hdr, src_addr) :
> offsetof(struct ipv6_hdr, dst_addr);
>
Got it!
> > + const struct rte_flow_action_set_ipv6 *conf =
> > + (const struct rte_flow_action_set_ipv6 *)actions->conf;
> > +
> > + for (int i = 0; i < keys; i++, idx++) {
> > + p_parser->keys_ex[idx].htype = TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_IP6;
> > + p_parser->keys_ex[idx].cmd = TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_SET;
> > + p_parser->keys[idx].off = off_base + i * SZ_PEDIT_KEY_VAL;
> > + p_parser->keys[idx].mask = ~UINT32_MAX;
> > + memcpy(&p_parser->keys[idx].val,
> > + conf->ipv6_addr + i * SZ_PEDIT_KEY_VAL,
> > + SZ_PEDIT_KEY_VAL);
> > + }
> > + p_parser->sel.nkeys += keys;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +flow_tcf_pedit_key_set_ipv4_addr(const struct rte_flow_action *actions,
>
> How about getting rte_flow_action_set_ipv4 instead of rte_flow_action?
> Same comment for ipv6 and tp_port.
>
What's the benefit by using rte_flow_action_set_ipv4 and how I know it's
for src or dst address ?
> > + struct pedit_parser *p_parser)
> > +{
> > + int idx = p_parser->sel.nkeys;
> > +
> > + p_parser->keys_ex[idx].htype = TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_IP4;
> > + p_parser->keys_ex[idx].cmd = TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_SET;
> > + p_parser->keys[idx].off =
> > + (actions->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC ? 12 : 16);
>
> offsetof(struct ipv4_hdr, src_addr) :
> offsetof(struct ipv4_hdr, dst_addr);
>
Got it!
> > + p_parser->keys[idx].mask = ~UINT32_MAX;
> > + p_parser->keys[idx].val =
> > + ((const struct rte_flow_action_set_ipv4 *)
> > + actions->conf)->ipv4_addr;
> > + p_parser->sel.nkeys = (++idx);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +flow_tcf_create_pedit_mnl_msg(struct nlmsghdr *nl,
> > + const struct rte_flow_action **actions,
> > + uint64_t item_flags)
> > +{
> > + struct pedit_parser p_parser;
> > +
> > + memset(&p_parser, 0, sizeof(p_parser));
> > + mnl_attr_put_strz(nl, TCA_ACT_KIND, "pedit");
> > + struct nlattr *na_act_options = mnl_attr_nest_start(nl,
> > + TCA_ACT_OPTIONS);
> > + /* all modify header actions should be in one tc-pedit action */
> > + for (; (*actions)->type != RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; (*actions)++) {
>
> It seems that you want to aggregate all the pedit actions and form a single
> na attr. But what if rte_flow_action_set_* are not contiguous? E.g.
>
> flow create ... actions set1 / set2 / port_id / set3 / end
>
> Then, it would have two pedit na attrs. Is that okay?
> Or, need to think about another way?
>
> Same will happen in flow_tcf_get_pedit_actions_size().
>
It's OK if we have more than one pedit na attrs.
_BUT_ only last pedit take effect based on my experiment
> > + switch ((*actions)->type) {
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC:
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST:
> > + flow_tcf_pedit_key_set_ipv4_addr(*actions, &p_parser);
> > + break;
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC:
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST:
> > + flow_tcf_pedit_key_set_ipv6_addr(*actions, &p_parser);
> > + break;
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC:
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST:
> > + flow_tcf_pedit_key_set_tp_port(*actions,
> > + &p_parser, item_flags);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + goto pedit_mnl_msg_done;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +pedit_mnl_msg_done:
> > + p_parser.sel.action = TC_ACT_PIPE;
> > + mnl_attr_put(nl, TCA_PEDIT_PARMS_EX,
> > + sizeof(p_parser.sel) +
> > + p_parser.sel.nkeys * sizeof(struct tc_pedit_key),
> > + &p_parser);
> > + struct nlattr *na_pedit_keys = mnl_attr_nest_start(nl,
> > + TCA_PEDIT_KEYS_EX | NLA_F_NESTED);
> > + for (int i = 0; i < p_parser.sel.nkeys; i++) {
> > + struct nlattr *na_pedit_key = mnl_attr_nest_start(nl,
> > + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX | NLA_F_NESTED);
> > + mnl_attr_put_u16(nl, TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HTYPE,
> > + p_parser.keys_ex[i].htype);
> > + mnl_attr_put_u16(nl, TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD,
> > + p_parser.keys_ex[i].cmd);
> > + mnl_attr_nest_end(nl, na_pedit_key);
> > + }
> > + mnl_attr_nest_end(nl, na_pedit_keys);
> > + mnl_attr_nest_end(nl, na_act_options);
> > + (*actions)--;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * Calculate max memory size of one TC-pedit actions.
> > + * One TC-pedit action can contain set of keys each defining
> > + * a rewrite element (rte_flow action)
> > + *
> > + * @param[in] actions
> > + * actions specification.
> > + * @param[inout] action_flags
> > + * actions flags
> > + * @param[inout] size
> > + * accumulated size
> > + * @return
> > + * Max memory size of one TC-pedit action
> > + */
> > +static int
> > +flow_tcf_get_pedit_actions_size(const struct rte_flow_action **actions,
> > + uint64_t *action_flags)
> > +{
> > + int pedit_size = 0;
> > + int keys = 0;
> > + uint64_t flags = 0;
> > +
> > + pedit_size += SZ_NLATTR_NEST + /* na_act_index. */
> > + SZ_NLATTR_STRZ_OF("pedit") +
> > + SZ_NLATTR_NEST; /* TCA_ACT_OPTIONS. */
> > + for (; (*actions)->type != RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; (*actions)++) {
> > + switch ((*actions)->type) {
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC:
> > + keys += flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(IPV4_ADDR_LEN);
> > + flags |= MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV4_SRC;
> > + break;
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST:
> > + keys += flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(IPV4_ADDR_LEN);
> > + flags |= MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV4_DST;
> > + break;
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC:
> > + keys += flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(IPV6_ADDR_LEN);
> > + flags |= MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV6_SRC;
> > + break;
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST:
> > + keys += flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(IPV6_ADDR_LEN);
> > + flags |= MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV6_DST;
> > + break;
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC:
> > + /* TCP is as same as UDP */
> > + keys += flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(TP_PORT_LEN);
> > + flags |= MLX5_ACTION_SET_TP_SRC;
> > + break;
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST:
> > + /* TCP is as same as UDP */
> > + keys += flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(TP_PORT_LEN);
> > + flags |= MLX5_ACTION_SET_TP_DST;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + goto get_pedit_action_size_done;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +get_pedit_action_size_done:
> > + /* TCA_PEDIT_PARAMS_EX */
> > + pedit_size += SZ_NLATTR_DATA_OF(sizeof(struct tc_pedit_sel) +
> > + keys * sizeof(struct tc_pedit_key));
>
> > + pedit_size += SZ_NLATTR_NEST; /* TCA_PEDIT_KEYS */
> > + pedit_size += keys *
> > + /* TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX + HTYPE + CMD */
> > + (SZ_NLATTR_NEST + SZ_NLATTR_DATA_OF(2) + SZ_NLATTR_DATA_OF(2));
> > + (*action_flags) |= flags;
> > + (*actions)--;
> > + return pedit_size;
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * Retrieve mask for pattern item.
> > *
> > @@ -430,6 +708,8 @@ flow_tcf_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > of_set_vlan_vid;
> > const struct rte_flow_action_of_set_vlan_pcp *
> > of_set_vlan_pcp;
> > + const struct rte_flow_action_set_ipv4 *set_ipv4;
> > + const struct rte_flow_action_set_ipv6 *set_ipv6;
> > } conf;
> > uint32_t item_flags = 0;
> > uint32_t action_flags = 0;
> > @@ -690,12 +970,64 @@ flow_tcf_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_SET_VLAN_PCP:
> > action_flags |= MLX5_ACTION_OF_SET_VLAN_PCP;
> > break;
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC:
> > + action_flags |= MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV4_SRC;
> > + break;
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST:
> > + action_flags |= MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV4_DST;
> > + break;
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC:
> > + action_flags |= MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV6_SRC;
> > + break;
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST:
> > + action_flags |= MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV6_DST;
> > + break;
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC:
> > + action_flags |= MLX5_ACTION_SET_TP_SRC;
> > + break;
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST:
> > + action_flags |= MLX5_ACTION_SET_TP_DST;
> > + break;
> > default:
> > return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
> > RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> > actions,
> > "action not supported");
> > }
> > + if (IS_MODIFY_ACTION(actions->type)) {
> > + if (!actions->conf)
> > + return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
> > + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION_CONF,
> > + actions,
> > + "action configuration not set");
> > + }
> > + }
> > + if (action_flags &
> > + (MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV4_SRC | MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV4_DST)) {
> > + if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3_IPV4))
> > + return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
> > + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> > + actions,
> > + "no ipv4 item found in"
> > + " pattern");
> > + }
> > + if (action_flags &
> > + (MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV6_SRC | MLX5_ACTION_SET_IPV6_DST)) {
> > + if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3_IPV6))
> > + return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
> > + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> > + actions,
> > + "no ipv6 item found in pattern");
> > + }
> > + if (action_flags & (MLX5_ACTION_SET_TP_SRC | MLX5_ACTION_SET_TP_DST)) {
> > + if (!(item_flags &
> > + (MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_UDP |
> > + MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_TCP)))
> > + return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
> > + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> > + actions,
> > + "no TCP/UDP item found in"
> > + " pattern");
>
> Isn't this 'set' action compatible with drop action? No point of modifying
> packet which will be dropped, isn't it?
>
Yes, you are absolutely right :-)
> > }
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -840,6 +1172,15 @@ flow_tcf_get_actions_and_size(const struct rte_flow_action actions[],
> > SZ_NLATTR_TYPE_OF(uint16_t) + /* VLAN ID. */
> > SZ_NLATTR_TYPE_OF(uint8_t); /* VLAN prio. */
> > break;
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC:
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST:
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC:
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST:
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC:
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST:
> > + size += flow_tcf_get_pedit_actions_size(&actions,
> > + &flags);
> > + break;
> > default:
> > DRV_LOG(WARNING,
> > "unsupported action %p type %d,"
> > @@ -998,6 +1339,7 @@ flow_tcf_translate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct mlx5_flow *dev_flow,
> > struct nlattr *na_flower_act;
> > struct nlattr *na_vlan_id = NULL;
> > struct nlattr *na_vlan_priority = NULL;
> > + uint64_t item_flags = 0;
> >
> > claim_nonzero(flow_tcf_build_ptoi_table(dev, ptoi,
> > PTOI_TABLE_SZ_MAX(dev)));
> > @@ -1189,6 +1531,7 @@ flow_tcf_translate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct mlx5_flow *dev_flow,
> > }
> > break;
> > case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_UDP:
> > + item_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_UDP;
>
> Let's add the same to the rest of items like flow_tcf_validate().
>
OK!
>
> Thanks,
> Yongseok
>
> > mask.udp = flow_tcf_item_mask
> > (items, &rte_flow_item_udp_mask,
> > &flow_tcf_mask_supported.udp,
> > @@ -1218,6 +1561,7 @@ flow_tcf_translate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct mlx5_flow *dev_flow,
> > }
> > break;
> > case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_TCP:
> > + item_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_TCP;
> > mask.tcp = flow_tcf_item_mask
> > (items, &rte_flow_item_tcp_mask,
> > &flow_tcf_mask_supported.tcp,
> > @@ -1368,6 +1712,18 @@ flow_tcf_translate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct mlx5_flow *dev_flow,
> > conf.of_set_vlan_pcp->vlan_pcp;
> > }
> > break;
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC:
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST:
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC:
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST:
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC:
> > + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST:
> > + na_act_index =
> > + mnl_attr_nest_start(nlh, na_act_index_cur++);
> > + flow_tcf_create_pedit_mnl_msg(nlh,
> > + &actions, item_flags);
> > + mnl_attr_nest_end(nlh, na_act_index);
> > + break;
> > default:
> > return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
> > RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-30 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-25 11:51 Xiaoyu Min
2018-09-28 23:03 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-09-30 7:21 ` Xiaoyu Min [this message]
2018-10-01 20:19 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-10-08 11:22 ` Xiaoyu Min
2018-10-08 22:08 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-10-09 7:03 ` Jack Min
2018-10-09 8:55 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-10-10 12:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: rewrite IP address UDP/TCP port by E-Switch Jack Min
2018-10-11 4:45 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-10-11 9:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Jack Min
2018-10-11 13:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Jack Min
2018-10-11 13:39 ` Shahaf Shuler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180930072104.f7o5c6yazgznivzd@MTBC-JACKMIN.mtl.com \
--to=jackmin@mellanox.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).