From: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
To: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>,
Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] net/mlx5: fix errno values for flow engine
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 18:02:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181008180150.39273-8-yskoh@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181008180150.39273-1-yskoh@mellanox.com>
Fixes: 4f07e13d6af5 ("net/mlx5: split flow validation to dedicated function")
Fixes: f7adfffa3de1 ("net/mlx5: add Direct Verbs validation function")
Fixes: edcdef4e5fe4 ("net/mlx5: add Linux TC flower driver for E-Switch flow")
Cc: orika@mellanox.com
Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
---
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c | 8 ++---
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c | 4 +--
4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c
index 30aa95f14..ed60c40f9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.c
@@ -452,10 +452,10 @@ mlx5_flow_item_acceptable(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
}
ret = memcmp(spec, last, size);
if (ret != 0)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
item,
- "range is not supported");
+ "range is not valid");
}
return 0;
}
@@ -657,15 +657,15 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_action_flag(uint64_t action_flags,
{
if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
"can't drop and flag in same flow");
if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_MARK)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
"can't mark and flag in same flow");
if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_FLAG)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
"can't have 2 flag"
" actions in same flow");
@@ -704,17 +704,17 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_action_mark(const struct rte_flow_action *action,
"mark id must in 0 <= id < "
RTE_STR(MLX5_FLOW_MARK_MAX));
if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
"can't drop and mark in same flow");
if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_FLAG)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
"can't flag and mark in same flow");
if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_MARK)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
- "can't have 2 flag actions in same"
+ "can't have 2 mark actions in same"
" flow");
return 0;
}
@@ -735,15 +735,15 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_action_drop(uint64_t action_flags,
struct rte_flow_error *error)
{
if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_FLAG)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
"can't drop and flag in same flow");
if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_MARK)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
"can't drop and mark in same flow");
if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_FATE_ACTIONS)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
"can't have 2 fate actions in"
" same flow");
@@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_action_queue(const struct rte_flow_action *action,
const struct rte_flow_action_queue *queue = action->conf;
if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_FATE_ACTIONS)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
"can't have 2 fate actions in"
" same flow");
@@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_action_rss(const struct rte_flow_action *action,
unsigned int i;
if (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_FATE_ACTIONS)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, NULL,
"can't have 2 fate actions"
" in same flow");
@@ -931,7 +931,7 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_attributes(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ATTR_TRANSFER,
NULL, "transfer is not supported");
if (!attributes->ingress)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ATTR_INGRESS,
NULL,
"ingress attribute is mandatory");
@@ -1017,11 +1017,11 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_item_vlan(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_VLAN;
if (item_flags & vlanm)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"VLAN layer already configured");
else if ((item_flags & l34m) != 0)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"L2 layer cannot follow L3/L4 layer");
if (!mask)
@@ -1085,7 +1085,7 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_item_ipv4(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
"multiple L3 layers not supported");
else if (item_flags & (tunnel ? MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L4 :
MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4))
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"L3 cannot follow an L4 layer.");
if (!mask)
@@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_item_ipv6(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
"multiple L3 layers not supported");
else if (item_flags & (tunnel ? MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L4 :
MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4))
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"L3 cannot follow an L4 layer.");
/*
@@ -1192,18 +1192,18 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_item_udp(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
int ret;
if (target_protocol != 0xff && target_protocol != IPPROTO_UDP)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"protocol filtering not compatible"
" with UDP layer");
if (!(item_flags & (tunnel ? MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L3 :
MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3)))
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"L3 is mandatory to filter on L4");
if (item_flags & (tunnel ? MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L4 :
MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4))
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"L4 layer is already present");
if (!mask)
@@ -1243,18 +1243,18 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_item_tcp(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
int ret;
if (target_protocol != 0xff && target_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"protocol filtering not compatible"
" with TCP layer");
if (!(item_flags & (tunnel ? MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L3 :
MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3)))
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"L3 is mandatory to filter on L4");
if (item_flags & (tunnel ? MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_INNER_L4 :
MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4))
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"L4 layer is already present");
if (!mask)
@@ -1307,7 +1307,7 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_item_vxlan(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
* https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7348
*/
if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_UDP))
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"no outer UDP layer found");
if (!mask)
@@ -1335,11 +1335,11 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_item_vxlan(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
* currently refused.
*/
if (!vlan_id)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"VXLAN vni cannot be 0");
if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER))
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"VXLAN tunnel must be fully defined");
return 0;
@@ -1393,7 +1393,7 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_item_vxlan_gpe(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
* https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7348
*/
if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_UDP))
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"no outer UDP layer found");
if (!mask)
@@ -1407,7 +1407,7 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_item_vxlan_gpe(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
return ret;
if (spec) {
if (spec->protocol)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
item,
"VxLAN-GPE protocol"
@@ -1426,11 +1426,11 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_item_vxlan_gpe(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
* is currently refused.
*/
if (!vlan_id)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"VXLAN-GPE vni cannot be 0");
if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER))
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"VXLAN-GPE tunnel must be fully"
" defined");
@@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_item_gre(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
int ret;
if (target_protocol != 0xff && target_protocol != IPPROTO_GRE)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"protocol filtering not compatible"
" with this GRE layer");
@@ -1520,7 +1520,7 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_item_mpls(const struct rte_flow_item *item __rte_unused,
int ret;
if (target_protocol != 0xff && target_protocol != IPPROTO_MPLS)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, item,
"protocol filtering not compatible"
" with MPLS layer");
@@ -2336,7 +2336,7 @@ mlx5_flow_query_count(struct rte_flow *flow __rte_unused,
}
return 0;
}
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED,
NULL,
"flow does not have counter");
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
index 2fb1d9ee7..3bb462ceb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ flow_dv_validate_attributes(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
NULL,
"transfer is not supported");
if (!attributes->ingress)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ATTR_INGRESS,
NULL,
"ingress attribute is mandatory");
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c
index 0406e84f6..91f6ef678 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ flow_tcf_item_mask(const struct rte_flow_item *item, const void *mask_default,
if (item->last &&
(((const uint8_t *)item->spec)[i] & mask[i]) !=
(((const uint8_t *)item->last)[i] & mask[i])) {
- rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM_LAST,
item->last,
"range between \"spec\" and \"last\""
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ flow_tcf_validate_attributes(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
attr,
"lowest priority level is 0xfffe");
if (!attr->ingress)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ATTR_INGRESS,
attr, "only ingress is supported");
if (attr->egress)
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ flow_tcf_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PORT_ID:
if (action_flags & MLX5_TCF_FATE_ACTIONS)
return rte_flow_error_set
- (error, ENOTSUP,
+ (error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, actions,
"can't have multiple fate actions");
conf.port_id = actions->conf;
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ flow_tcf_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_DROP:
if (action_flags & MLX5_TCF_FATE_ACTIONS)
return rte_flow_error_set
- (error, ENOTSUP,
+ (error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, actions,
"can't have multiple fate actions");
action_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP;
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c
index 3df467214..696447674 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_verbs.c
@@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ flow_verbs_translate_action_count(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
flow->counter = flow_verbs_counter_new(dev, count->shared,
count->id);
if (!flow->counter)
- return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, rte_errno,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
action,
"cannot get counter"
@@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@ flow_verbs_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
if (next_protocol != 0xff &&
next_protocol != IPPROTO_MPLS)
return rte_flow_error_set
- (error, ENOTSUP,
+ (error, EINVAL,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, items,
"protocol filtering not compatible"
" with MPLS layer");
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-08 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-08 18:02 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] net/mlx5: fixes for the new " Yongseok Koh
2018-10-08 18:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] net/mlx5: fix wrong flow action macro usage Yongseok Koh
2018-10-09 7:45 ` Ori Kam
2018-10-08 18:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] net/mlx5: use standard IP protocol numbers Yongseok Koh
2018-10-09 7:37 ` Ori Kam
2018-10-09 8:02 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-10-09 15:39 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-08 18:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] net/mlx5: rename flow macros Yongseok Koh
2018-10-09 7:43 ` Ori Kam
2018-10-09 8:05 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-10-09 8:17 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-10-10 11:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-08 18:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] net/mlx5: fix validation of VLAN ID in flow spec Yongseok Koh
2018-10-09 7:47 ` Ori Kam
2018-10-09 15:44 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-08 18:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] net/mlx5: fix flow validation for no fate action Yongseok Koh
2018-10-09 7:49 ` Ori Kam
2018-10-10 12:24 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-08 18:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] net/mlx5: add missing VLAN action constraints Yongseok Koh
2018-10-08 19:48 ` Or Gerlitz
2018-10-08 18:02 ` Yongseok Koh [this message]
2018-10-09 7:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] net/mlx5: fix errno values for flow engine Ori Kam
2018-10-10 12:59 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-09 8:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] net/mlx5: fixes for the new " Shahaf Shuler
2018-10-09 15:49 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-10 5:57 ` Shahaf Shuler
2018-10-10 10:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-10 13:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181008180150.39273-8-yskoh@mellanox.com \
--to=yskoh@mellanox.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=orika@mellanox.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).