From: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
To: Jack Min <jackmin@mellanox.com>
Cc: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: rewrite IP address UDP/TCP port by E-Switch
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 04:45:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181011044521.GB27741@mtidpdk.mti.labs.mlnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181010125536.23035-1-jackmin@mellanox.com>
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 05:56:15AM -0700, Jack Min wrote:
> Offload the following rte_flow actions by inserting accordingly
> E-Switch rules via TC Flower driver
>
> - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC
> - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST
> - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC
> - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST
> - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC
> - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST
>
> The example testpmd command is:
>
> flow create 0 transfer ingress
> pattern eth / ipv4 / udp dst is 7000 / end
> actions set_ipv4_src ipv4_addr 172.168.0.1 /
> set_ipv4_dst ipv4_addr 172.168.10.1 /
> set_tp_dst port 9000 /
> set_tp_src port 700 /
> port_id id 1 / end
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyu Min <jackmin@mellanox.com>
> ---
A few minor comments below. If you agree, please make changes and submit v3 with
my acked-by tag.
Thanks
> v2:
> * rebased
> * validate pedit actions with drop action
> * validate successive pedit actions
> * a more generic way of validation
> * added testpmd commands in commit log
> * added comments of new added functions
> * fix some coding style issue
>
> drivers/net/mlx5/Makefile | 5 +
> drivers/net/mlx5/meson.build | 2 +
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.h | 6 +
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c | 468 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 475 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/Makefile b/drivers/net/mlx5/Makefile
> index ca1de9f21..49b95e78e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/Makefile
> @@ -346,6 +346,11 @@ mlx5_autoconf.h.new: $(RTE_SDK)/buildtools/auto-config-h.sh
> linux/tc_act/tc_vlan.h \
> enum TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_PRIORITY \
> $(AUTOCONF_OUTPUT)
> + $Q sh -- '$<' '$@' \
> + HAVE_TC_ACT_PEDIT \
> + linux/tc_act/tc_pedit.h \
> + enum TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_UDP \
> + $(AUTOCONF_OUTPUT)
> $Q sh -- '$<' '$@' \
> HAVE_SUPPORTED_40000baseKR4_Full \
> /usr/include/linux/ethtool.h \
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/meson.build b/drivers/net/mlx5/meson.build
> index fd93ac162..ef6a85101 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/meson.build
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/meson.build
> @@ -182,6 +182,8 @@ if build
> 'TCA_FLOWER_KEY_VLAN_ETH_TYPE' ],
> [ 'HAVE_TC_ACT_VLAN', 'linux/tc_act/tc_vlan.h',
> 'TCA_VLAN_PUSH_VLAN_PRIORITY' ],
> + [ 'HAVE_TC_ACT_PEDIT', 'linux/tc_act/tc_pedit.h',
> + 'TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_UDP' ],
> [ 'HAVE_RDMA_NL_NLDEV', 'rdma/rdma_netlink.h',
> 'RDMA_NL_NLDEV' ],
> [ 'HAVE_RDMA_NLDEV_CMD_GET', 'rdma/rdma_netlink.h',
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.h b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.h
> index 12de841e8..cbb8c56c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,12 @@
> #define MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_PUSH_VLAN (1u << 8)
> #define MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_SET_VLAN_VID (1u << 9)
> #define MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_SET_VLAN_PCP (1u << 10)
> +#define MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV4_SRC (1u << 11)
> +#define MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV4_DST (1u << 12)
> +#define MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV6_SRC (1u << 13)
> +#define MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV6_DST (1u << 14)
> +#define MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_TP_SRC (1u << 15)
> +#define MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_TP_DST (1u << 16)
>
> #define MLX5_FLOW_FATE_ACTIONS \
> (MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP | MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_QUEUE | MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_RSS)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c
> index 91f6ef678..65e8a4b3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,62 @@ struct tc_vlan {
>
> #endif /* HAVE_TC_ACT_VLAN */
>
> +#ifdef HAVE_TC_ACT_PEDIT
> +
> +#include <linux/tc_act/tc_pedit.h>
> +
> +#else /* HAVE_TC_ACT_VLAN */
New line here?
> +enum {
> + TCA_PEDIT_UNSPEC,
> + TCA_PEDIT_TM,
> + TCA_PEDIT_PARMS,
> + TCA_PEDIT_PAD,
> + TCA_PEDIT_PARMS_EX,
> + TCA_PEDIT_KEYS_EX,
> + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX,
> + __TCA_PEDIT_MAX
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HTYPE = 1,
> + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD = 2,
> + __TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_MAX
> +};
> +
> +enum pedit_header_type {
> + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_NETWORK = 0,
> + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_ETH = 1,
> + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_IP4 = 2,
> + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_IP6 = 3,
> + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_TCP = 4,
> + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_UDP = 5,
> + __PEDIT_HDR_TYPE_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +enum pedit_cmd {
> + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_SET = 0,
> + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_ADD = 1,
> + __PEDIT_CMD_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +struct tc_pedit_key {
> + __u32 mask; /* AND */
> + __u32 val; /*XOR */
> + __u32 off; /*offset */
> + __u32 at;
> + __u32 offmask;
> + __u32 shift;
> +};
> +
> +struct tc_pedit_sel {
> + tc_gen;
> + unsigned char nkeys;
> + unsigned char flags;
> + struct tc_pedit_key keys[0];
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* HAVE_TC_ACT_VLAN */
> +
> /* Normally found in linux/netlink.h. */
> #ifndef NETLINK_CAP_ACK
> #define NETLINK_CAP_ACK 10
> @@ -153,6 +209,14 @@ struct tc_vlan {
> #define IPV6_ADDR_LEN 16
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef IPV4_ADDR_LEN
> +#define IPV4_ADDR_LEN 4
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef TP_PORT_LEN
> +#define TP_PORT_LEN 2 /* Transport Port (UDP/TCP) Length */
> +#endif
> +
> /** Empty masks for known item types. */
> static const union {
> struct rte_flow_item_port_id port_id;
> @@ -230,6 +294,286 @@ struct flow_tcf_ptoi {
> (MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_POP_VLAN | MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_PUSH_VLAN | \
> MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_SET_VLAN_VID | MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_SET_VLAN_PCP)
>
> +#define MLX5_TCF_PEDIT_ACTIONS (MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV4_SRC | \
> + MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV4_DST | \
> + MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV6_SRC | \
> + MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV6_DST | \
> + MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_TP_SRC | \
> + MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_TP_DST)
> +
#define MLX5_TCF_PEDIT_ACTIONS \
(MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV4_SRC | MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV4_DST | \
MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV6_SRC | MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV6_DST | \
MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_TP_SRC | MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_TP_DST)
Isn't it better and looks alike with MLX5_TCF_VLAN_ACTIONS above?
> +#define MLX5_TCF_CONFIG_ACTIONS (MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_PORT_ID | \
> + MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_PUSH_VLAN | \
> + MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_SET_VLAN_VID | \
> + MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_SET_VLAN_PCP | \
> + MLX5_TCF_PEDIT_ACTIONS)
Same here.
> +
> +#define MAX_PEDIT_KEYS (128)
> +#define SZ_PEDIT_KEY_VAL (4)
Unnecessary parenthesis?
> +
> +struct pedit_key_ex {
> + enum pedit_header_type htype;
> + enum pedit_cmd cmd;
> +};
> +
> +struct pedit_parser {
> + struct tc_pedit_sel sel;
> + struct tc_pedit_key keys[MAX_PEDIT_KEYS];
> + struct pedit_key_ex keys_ex[MAX_PEDIT_KEYS];
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * Calculate how many pedit keys for a given
> + * size in byte
> + *
> + * @param[in] size
> + * size in byte
> + * @return
> + * number of pedit keys
> + */
> +static int
> +flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(const uint64_t size)
> +{
> + int keys = (size / SZ_PEDIT_KEY_VAL) +
> + ((size % SZ_PEDIT_KEY_VAL) ? 1 : 0);
> + return keys;
> +}
Please convert it to a macro as the size is always a builtin constant. It would
be better to be done in compile time.
> +
> +/**
> + * Set pedit key of transport (TCP/UDP) port value
> + *
> + * @param[in] actions
> + * pointer to action specification
> + * @param[in,out] p_parser
> + * pointer to pedit_parser
> + * @param[in] item_flags
> + * flags of all items presented
> + */
> +static void
> +flow_tcf_pedit_key_set_tp_port(const struct rte_flow_action *actions,
> + struct pedit_parser *p_parser,
> + uint64_t item_flags)
> +{
> + int idx = p_parser->sel.nkeys;
> +
> + if (item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_UDP)
> + p_parser->keys_ex[idx].htype = TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_UDP;
> + if (item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_TCP)
> + p_parser->keys_ex[idx].htype = TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_TCP;
> + p_parser->keys_ex[idx].cmd = TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_SET;
> + assert(offsetof(struct tcp_hdr, src_port) ==
> + offsetof(struct udp_hdr, src_port));
> + assert(offsetof(struct tcp_hdr, dst_port) ==
> + offsetof(struct udp_hdr, dst_port));
I think I was too much paranoid about this. Let's remove this assert() and just
leave a comment that the offset for port number is same for tcp and udp. I don't
think network spec for header definition will be changed ever. :-) Sorry for the
confusion.
> + p_parser->keys[idx].off =
> + actions->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC ?
> + offsetof(struct tcp_hdr, src_port) :
> + offsetof(struct tcp_hdr, dst_port);
> + p_parser->keys[idx].mask = 0xFFFF0000;
> + p_parser->keys[idx].val =
> + (__u32)((const struct rte_flow_action_set_tp *)
> + actions->conf)->port;
> + p_parser->sel.nkeys = (++idx);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Set pedit key of ipv6 address
> + *
> + * @param[in] actions
> + * pointer to action specification
> + * @param[in,out] p_parser
> + * pointer to pedit_parser
> + */
> +static void
> +flow_tcf_pedit_key_set_ipv6_addr(const struct rte_flow_action *actions,
> + struct pedit_parser *p_parser)
> +{
> + int idx = p_parser->sel.nkeys;
> + int keys = flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(IPV6_ADDR_LEN);
> + int off_base =
> + actions->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC ?
> + offsetof(struct ipv6_hdr, src_addr) :
> + offsetof(struct ipv6_hdr, dst_addr);
> + const struct rte_flow_action_set_ipv6 *conf =
> + (const struct rte_flow_action_set_ipv6 *)actions->conf;
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < keys; i++, idx++) {
> + p_parser->keys_ex[idx].htype = TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_IP6;
> + p_parser->keys_ex[idx].cmd = TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_SET;
> + p_parser->keys[idx].off = off_base + i * SZ_PEDIT_KEY_VAL;
> + p_parser->keys[idx].mask = ~UINT32_MAX;
> + memcpy(&p_parser->keys[idx].val,
> + conf->ipv6_addr + i * SZ_PEDIT_KEY_VAL,
> + SZ_PEDIT_KEY_VAL);
> + }
> + p_parser->sel.nkeys += keys;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Set pedit key of ipv4 address
> + *
> + * @param[in] actions
> + * pointer to action specification
> + * @param[in,out] p_parser
> + * pointer to pedit_parser
> + */
> +static void
> +flow_tcf_pedit_key_set_ipv4_addr(const struct rte_flow_action *actions,
> + struct pedit_parser *p_parser)
> +{
> + int idx = p_parser->sel.nkeys;
> +
> + p_parser->keys_ex[idx].htype = TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HDR_TYPE_IP4;
> + p_parser->keys_ex[idx].cmd = TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_SET;
> + p_parser->keys[idx].off =
> + actions->type == RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC ?
> + offsetof(struct ipv4_hdr, src_addr) :
> + offsetof(struct ipv4_hdr, dst_addr);
> + p_parser->keys[idx].mask = ~UINT32_MAX;
> + p_parser->keys[idx].val =
> + ((const struct rte_flow_action_set_ipv4 *)
> + actions->conf)->ipv4_addr;
> + p_parser->sel.nkeys = (++idx);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Create the pedit's na attribute in netlink message
> + * on pre-allocate message buffer
> + *
> + * @param[in,out] nl
> + * pointer to pre-allocated netlink message buffer
> + * @param[in,out] actions
> + * pointer to pointer of actions specification.
> + * @param[in,out] action_flags
> + * pointer to actions flags
> + * @param[in] item_flags
> + * flags of all item presented
> + * @return
> + * 0 on sucess
If it always returns zero (no failure), then why should it have a return value
instead of void? The caller doesn't even check it.
> + */
> +static int
> +flow_tcf_create_pedit_mnl_msg(struct nlmsghdr *nl,
> + const struct rte_flow_action **actions,
> + uint64_t item_flags)
> +{
> + struct pedit_parser p_parser;
> +
> + memset(&p_parser, 0, sizeof(p_parser));
> + mnl_attr_put_strz(nl, TCA_ACT_KIND, "pedit");
> + struct nlattr *na_act_options = mnl_attr_nest_start(nl,
> + TCA_ACT_OPTIONS);
How about,
struct nlattr *na_act_options =
mnl_attr_nest_start(nl, TCA_ACT_OPTIONS);
And move it to the declaration block (after p_parser definition).
> + /* all modify header actions should be in one tc-pedit action */
> + for (; (*actions)->type != RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; (*actions)++) {
> + switch ((*actions)->type) {
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC:
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST:
> + flow_tcf_pedit_key_set_ipv4_addr(*actions, &p_parser);
> + break;
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC:
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST:
> + flow_tcf_pedit_key_set_ipv6_addr(*actions, &p_parser);
> + break;
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC:
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST:
> + flow_tcf_pedit_key_set_tp_port(*actions,
> + &p_parser, item_flags);
> + break;
> + default:
> + goto pedit_mnl_msg_done;
> + }
> + }
> +pedit_mnl_msg_done:
> + p_parser.sel.action = TC_ACT_PIPE;
> + mnl_attr_put(nl, TCA_PEDIT_PARMS_EX,
> + sizeof(p_parser.sel) +
> + p_parser.sel.nkeys * sizeof(struct tc_pedit_key),
> + &p_parser);
Indentation.
> + struct nlattr *na_pedit_keys = mnl_attr_nest_start(nl,
> + TCA_PEDIT_KEYS_EX | NLA_F_NESTED);
We don't allow declaring a variable in the middle of a block. You can declare it
in the beginning of a block right after "{". And indentation is wrong.
> + for (int i = 0; i < p_parser.sel.nkeys; i++) {
> + struct nlattr *na_pedit_key = mnl_attr_nest_start(nl,
> + TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX | NLA_F_NESTED);
Indentation.
struct nlattr *na_pedit_key =
mnl_attr_nest_start(nl,
TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX | NLA_F_NESTED);
> + mnl_attr_put_u16(nl, TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_HTYPE,
> + p_parser.keys_ex[i].htype);
> + mnl_attr_put_u16(nl, TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD,
> + p_parser.keys_ex[i].cmd);
> + mnl_attr_nest_end(nl, na_pedit_key);
> + }
> + mnl_attr_nest_end(nl, na_pedit_keys);
> + mnl_attr_nest_end(nl, na_act_options);
> + (*actions)--;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * Calculate max memory size of one TC-pedit actions.
> + * One TC-pedit action can contain set of keys each defining
> + * a rewrite element (rte_flow action)
> + *
> + * @param[in,out] actions
> + * actions specification.
> + * @param[in,out] action_flags
> + * actions flags
> + * @param[in,out] size
> + * accumulated size
> + * @return
> + * Max memory size of one TC-pedit action
> + */
> +static int
> +flow_tcf_get_pedit_actions_size(const struct rte_flow_action **actions,
> + uint64_t *action_flags)
> +{
> + int pedit_size = 0;
> + int keys = 0;
> + uint64_t flags = 0;
> +
> + pedit_size += SZ_NLATTR_NEST + /* na_act_index. */
> + SZ_NLATTR_STRZ_OF("pedit") +
> + SZ_NLATTR_NEST; /* TCA_ACT_OPTIONS. */
> + for (; (*actions)->type != RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; (*actions)++) {
> + switch ((*actions)->type) {
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC:
> + keys += flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(IPV4_ADDR_LEN);
> + flags |= MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV4_SRC;
> + break;
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST:
> + keys += flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(IPV4_ADDR_LEN);
> + flags |= MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV4_DST;
> + break;
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC:
> + keys += flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(IPV6_ADDR_LEN);
> + flags |= MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV6_SRC;
> + break;
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST:
> + keys += flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(IPV6_ADDR_LEN);
> + flags |= MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV6_DST;
> + break;
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC:
> + /* TCP is as same as UDP */
> + keys += flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(TP_PORT_LEN);
> + flags |= MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_TP_SRC;
> + break;
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST:
> + /* TCP is as same as UDP */
> + keys += flow_tcf_calc_pedit_keys(TP_PORT_LEN);
> + flags |= MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_TP_DST;
> + break;
> + default:
> + goto get_pedit_action_size_done;
> + }
> + }
> +get_pedit_action_size_done:
> + /* TCA_PEDIT_PARAMS_EX */
> + pedit_size += SZ_NLATTR_DATA_OF(sizeof(struct tc_pedit_sel) +
> + keys * sizeof(struct tc_pedit_key));
Indentation.
> + pedit_size += SZ_NLATTR_NEST; /* TCA_PEDIT_KEYS */
> + pedit_size += keys *
> + /* TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX + HTYPE + CMD */
> + (SZ_NLATTR_NEST + SZ_NLATTR_DATA_OF(2) + SZ_NLATTR_DATA_OF(2));
Indentation.
> + (*action_flags) |= flags;
> + (*actions)--;
> + return pedit_size;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * Retrieve mask for pattern item.
> *
> @@ -433,11 +777,14 @@ flow_tcf_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> of_set_vlan_vid;
> const struct rte_flow_action_of_set_vlan_pcp *
> of_set_vlan_pcp;
> + const struct rte_flow_action_set_ipv4 *set_ipv4;
> + const struct rte_flow_action_set_ipv6 *set_ipv6;
> } conf;
> uint32_t item_flags = 0;
> uint32_t action_flags = 0;
> uint8_t next_protocol = -1;
> unsigned int tcm_ifindex = 0;
> + uint8_t pedit_validated = 0;
> struct flow_tcf_ptoi ptoi[PTOI_TABLE_SZ_MAX(dev)];
> struct rte_eth_dev *port_id_dev = NULL;
> bool in_port_id_set;
> @@ -648,16 +995,20 @@ flow_tcf_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> }
> for (; actions->type != RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; actions++) {
> unsigned int i;
> + uint32_t current_action_flag = 0;
>
> switch (actions->type) {
> case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_VOID:
> break;
> case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PORT_ID:
> + current_action_flag = MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_PORT_ID;
> if (action_flags & MLX5_TCF_FATE_ACTIONS)
> return rte_flow_error_set
> (error, EINVAL,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, actions,
> "can't have multiple fate actions");
> + if (!actions->conf)
> + break;
> conf.port_id = actions->conf;
> if (conf.port_id->original)
> i = 0;
> @@ -672,7 +1023,6 @@ flow_tcf_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> conf.port_id,
> "missing data to convert port ID to"
> " ifindex");
> - action_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_PORT_ID;
> port_id_dev = &rte_eth_devices[conf.port_id->id];
> break;
> case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_DROP:
> @@ -681,13 +1031,13 @@ flow_tcf_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> (error, EINVAL,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, actions,
> "can't have multiple fate actions");
> - action_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP;
> + current_action_flag = MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP;
> break;
> case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_POP_VLAN:
> - action_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_POP_VLAN;
> + current_action_flag = MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_POP_VLAN;
> break;
> case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_PUSH_VLAN:
> - action_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_PUSH_VLAN;
> + current_action_flag = MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_PUSH_VLAN;
> break;
> case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_SET_VLAN_VID:
> if (!(action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_PUSH_VLAN))
> @@ -696,7 +1046,7 @@ flow_tcf_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, actions,
> "vlan modify is not supported,"
> " set action must follow push action");
> - action_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_SET_VLAN_VID;
> + current_action_flag = MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_SET_VLAN_VID;
> break;
> case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_OF_SET_VLAN_PCP:
> if (!(action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_PUSH_VLAN))
> @@ -705,7 +1055,25 @@ flow_tcf_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, actions,
> "vlan modify is not supported,"
> " set action must follow push action");
> - action_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_SET_VLAN_PCP;
> + current_action_flag = MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_OF_SET_VLAN_PCP;
> + break;
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC:
> + current_action_flag = MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV4_SRC;
> + break;
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST:
> + current_action_flag = MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV4_DST;
> + break;
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC:
> + current_action_flag = MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV6_SRC;
> + break;
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST:
> + current_action_flag = MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV6_DST;
> + break;
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC:
> + current_action_flag = MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_TP_SRC;
> + break;
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST:
> + current_action_flag = MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_TP_DST;
> break;
> default:
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
> @@ -713,6 +1081,66 @@ flow_tcf_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> actions,
> "action not supported");
> }
> + if (current_action_flag & MLX5_TCF_CONFIG_ACTIONS) {
> + if (!actions->conf)
> + return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION_CONF,
> + actions,
> + "action configuration not set");
> + }
> + if ((current_action_flag & MLX5_TCF_PEDIT_ACTIONS) &&
> + pedit_validated)
> + return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
> + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> + actions,
> + "not successive pedit "
> + "actions");
User doesn't understand what the pedit means. It should be "set actions"?
E.g. "set actions should be listed successively"
> + if ((current_action_flag & ~MLX5_TCF_PEDIT_ACTIONS) &&
> + (action_flags & MLX5_TCF_PEDIT_ACTIONS))
> + pedit_validated = 1;
> + action_flags |= current_action_flag;
> + }
> + if ((action_flags & MLX5_TCF_PEDIT_ACTIONS) &&
> + (action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_DROP))
> + return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
> + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> + actions,
> + "actions are not compatible");
Be more specific. "set action is not compatible with drop action"
> + if ((action_flags & MLX5_TCF_PEDIT_ACTIONS) &&
> + !(action_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_PORT_ID))
> + return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
> + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> + actions,
> + "pedit action must be followed by "
> + "port_id action");
No pedit for user.
Thanks,
Yongseok
> + if (action_flags &
> + (MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV4_SRC | MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV4_DST)) {
> + if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3_IPV4))
> + return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> + actions,
> + "no ipv4 item found in"
> + " pattern");
> + }
> + if (action_flags &
> + (MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV6_SRC | MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_IPV6_DST)) {
> + if (!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3_IPV6))
> + return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> + actions,
> + "no ipv6 item found in"
> + " pattern");
> + }
> + if (action_flags &
> + (MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_TP_SRC | MLX5_FLOW_ACTION_SET_TP_DST)) {
> + if (!(item_flags &
> + (MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_UDP |
> + MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_TCP)))
> + return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> + RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> + actions,
> + "no TCP/UDP item found in"
> + " pattern");
> }
> /*
> * FW syndrome (0xA9C090):
> @@ -884,6 +1312,15 @@ flow_tcf_get_actions_and_size(const struct rte_flow_action actions[],
> SZ_NLATTR_TYPE_OF(uint16_t) + /* VLAN ID. */
> SZ_NLATTR_TYPE_OF(uint8_t); /* VLAN prio. */
> break;
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC:
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST:
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC:
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST:
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC:
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST:
> + size += flow_tcf_get_pedit_actions_size(&actions,
> + &flags);
> + break;
> default:
> DRV_LOG(WARNING,
> "unsupported action %p type %d,"
> @@ -1042,6 +1479,7 @@ flow_tcf_translate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct mlx5_flow *dev_flow,
> struct nlattr *na_flower_act;
> struct nlattr *na_vlan_id = NULL;
> struct nlattr *na_vlan_priority = NULL;
> + uint64_t item_flags = 0;
>
> claim_nonzero(flow_tcf_build_ptoi_table(dev, ptoi,
> PTOI_TABLE_SZ_MAX(dev)));
> @@ -1088,6 +1526,7 @@ flow_tcf_translate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct mlx5_flow *dev_flow,
> tcm->tcm_ifindex = ptoi[i].ifindex;
> break;
> case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH:
> + item_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L2;
> mask.eth = flow_tcf_item_mask
> (items, &rte_flow_item_eth_mask,
> &flow_tcf_mask_supported.eth,
> @@ -1121,6 +1560,7 @@ flow_tcf_translate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct mlx5_flow *dev_flow,
> }
> break;
> case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VLAN:
> + item_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_VLAN;
> mask.vlan = flow_tcf_item_mask
> (items, &rte_flow_item_vlan_mask,
> &flow_tcf_mask_supported.vlan,
> @@ -1153,6 +1593,7 @@ flow_tcf_translate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct mlx5_flow *dev_flow,
> RTE_BE16(0x0fff)));
> break;
> case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4:
> + item_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3_IPV4;
> mask.ipv4 = flow_tcf_item_mask
> (items, &rte_flow_item_ipv4_mask,
> &flow_tcf_mask_supported.ipv4,
> @@ -1192,6 +1633,7 @@ flow_tcf_translate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct mlx5_flow *dev_flow,
> }
> break;
> case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6:
> + item_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L3_IPV6;
> mask.ipv6 = flow_tcf_item_mask
> (items, &rte_flow_item_ipv6_mask,
> &flow_tcf_mask_supported.ipv6,
> @@ -1233,6 +1675,7 @@ flow_tcf_translate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct mlx5_flow *dev_flow,
> }
> break;
> case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_UDP:
> + item_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_UDP;
> mask.udp = flow_tcf_item_mask
> (items, &rte_flow_item_udp_mask,
> &flow_tcf_mask_supported.udp,
> @@ -1262,6 +1705,7 @@ flow_tcf_translate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct mlx5_flow *dev_flow,
> }
> break;
> case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_TCP:
> + item_flags |= MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_OUTER_L4_TCP;
> mask.tcp = flow_tcf_item_mask
> (items, &rte_flow_item_tcp_mask,
> &flow_tcf_mask_supported.tcp,
> @@ -1412,6 +1856,18 @@ flow_tcf_translate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct mlx5_flow *dev_flow,
> conf.of_set_vlan_pcp->vlan_pcp;
> }
> break;
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_SRC:
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV4_DST:
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_SRC:
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_IPV6_DST:
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_SRC:
> + case RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_TP_DST:
> + na_act_index =
> + mnl_attr_nest_start(nlh, na_act_index_cur++);
> + flow_tcf_create_pedit_mnl_msg(nlh,
> + &actions, item_flags);
> + mnl_attr_nest_end(nlh, na_act_index);
> + break;
> default:
> return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
> RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-11 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-25 11:51 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: eswitch-IP address UDP/TCP port rewrite Xiaoyu Min
2018-09-28 23:03 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-09-30 7:21 ` Xiaoyu Min
2018-10-01 20:19 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-10-08 11:22 ` Xiaoyu Min
2018-10-08 22:08 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-10-09 7:03 ` Jack Min
2018-10-09 8:55 ` Yongseok Koh
2018-10-10 12:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: rewrite IP address UDP/TCP port by E-Switch Jack Min
2018-10-11 4:45 ` Yongseok Koh [this message]
2018-10-11 9:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Jack Min
2018-10-11 13:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Jack Min
2018-10-11 13:39 ` Shahaf Shuler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181011044521.GB27741@mtidpdk.mti.labs.mlnx \
--to=yskoh@mellanox.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jackmin@mellanox.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).