From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369DD1B6F0; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:41:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7641D34CB; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-112-48.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.48]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5412101F969; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:41:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Maxime Coquelin To: dev@dpdk.org, tiwei.bie@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com, jfreimann@redhat.com, nicknickolaev@gmail.com, i.maximets@samsung.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, alejandro.lucero@netronome.com Cc: dgilbert@redhat.com, stable@dpdk.org, Maxime Coquelin Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:40:31 +0200 Message-Id: <20181012124047.17884-4-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20181012124047.17884-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> References: <20181012124047.17884-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 03/19] vhost: clarify reply-ack in case a reply was already sent X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 12:41:19 -0000 For messages that require a reply, a second ack should not be sent when reply-ack protocol feature is negotiated, even if the corresponding flag is set in the message. The code is compliant with the spec but it isn't clear it is, so this patch adds a comment to make it explicit. Suggested-by: Ilya Maximets Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin Acked-by: Ilya Maximets Reviewed-by: Tiwei Bie --- lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c index 09a90a20b..a7729990d 100644 --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c @@ -1783,6 +1783,11 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd) if (unlock_required) vhost_user_unlock_all_queue_pairs(dev); + /* + * If the request required a reply that was already sent, + * this optional reply-ack won't be sent as the + * VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY was cleared in send_vhost_reply(). + */ if (msg.flags & VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY) { msg.payload.u64 = ret == VH_RESULT_ERR; msg.size = sizeof(msg.payload.u64); -- 2.17.1