DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] is per patch checkpatch reports working?
@ 2018-10-19  7:42 Ferruh Yigit
  2018-10-19  9:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2018-10-19  7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon, Qian Xu; +Cc: dpdk-dev, dpdk-test-report

I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me.

Thanks,
ferruh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] is per patch checkpatch reports working?
  2018-10-19  7:42 [dpdk-dev] is per patch checkpatch reports working? Ferruh Yigit
@ 2018-10-19  9:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
  2018-10-19 10:38   ` Liang, Ma
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2018-10-19  9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ferruh Yigit; +Cc: Qian Xu, dpdk-dev, dpdk-test-report

19/10/2018 09:42, Ferruh Yigit:
> I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me.

Thanks, I did not notice it stopped working.

I have just restarted it.

For info, I had to install gawk because mawk was failing with
the new check in checkpatches.sh.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] is per patch checkpatch reports working?
  2018-10-19  9:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2018-10-19 10:38   ` Liang, Ma
  2018-10-19 10:43     ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Liang, Ma @ 2018-10-19 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: Ferruh Yigit, Qian Xu, dpdk-dev, dpdk-test-report

Hi Thomas,
   I still see the issue with the awk script inside check-symbol-changes.sh.
   that script still put '+' as the Section name.
   any suggestion ?
   I use fedora 24 and gawk
Regards
Liang

On 19 Oct 11:27, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 19/10/2018 09:42, Ferruh Yigit:
> > I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me.
> 
> Thanks, I did not notice it stopped working.
> 
> I have just restarted it.
> 
> For info, I had to install gawk because mawk was failing with
> the new check in checkpatches.sh.
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] is per patch checkpatch reports working?
  2018-10-19 10:38   ` Liang, Ma
@ 2018-10-19 10:43     ` Thomas Monjalon
  2018-10-19 10:45       ` Liang, Ma
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2018-10-19 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liang, Ma; +Cc: Ferruh Yigit, Qian Xu, dpdk-dev, dpdk-test-report

You should open a dedicated thread on the mailing with Cc the author of this script.

19/10/2018 12:38, Liang, Ma:
> Hi Thomas,
>    I still see the issue with the awk script inside check-symbol-changes.sh.
>    that script still put '+' as the Section name.
>    any suggestion ?
>    I use fedora 24 and gawk
> Regards
> Liang
> 
> On 19 Oct 11:27, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 19/10/2018 09:42, Ferruh Yigit:
> > > I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me.
> > 
> > Thanks, I did not notice it stopped working.
> > 
> > I have just restarted it.
> > 
> > For info, I had to install gawk because mawk was failing with
> > the new check in checkpatches.sh.
> > 
> > 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] is per patch checkpatch reports working?
  2018-10-19 10:43     ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2018-10-19 10:45       ` Liang, Ma
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Liang, Ma @ 2018-10-19 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Monjalon; +Cc: Ferruh Yigit, Qian Xu, dpdk-dev, dpdk-test-report


I did send out a patch to the author for a while. but no response. 
FYI  http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/46101/

Liang

On 19 Oct 12:43, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> You should open a dedicated thread on the mailing with Cc the author of this script.
> 
> 19/10/2018 12:38, Liang, Ma:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >    I still see the issue with the awk script inside check-symbol-changes.sh.
> >    that script still put '+' as the Section name.
> >    any suggestion ?
> >    I use fedora 24 and gawk
> > Regards
> > Liang
> > 
> > On 19 Oct 11:27, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 19/10/2018 09:42, Ferruh Yigit:
> > > > I am not getting them for a while but not sure if it is only me.
> > > 
> > > Thanks, I did not notice it stopped working.
> > > 
> > > I have just restarted it.
> > > 
> > > For info, I had to install gawk because mawk was failing with
> > > the new check in checkpatches.sh.
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-19 10:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-19  7:42 [dpdk-dev] is per patch checkpatch reports working? Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-19  9:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 10:38   ` Liang, Ma
2018-10-19 10:43     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 10:45       ` Liang, Ma

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).