DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Cc: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>,
	dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] build: establish an invariant machine type
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:52:56 +0000
Message-ID: <20181114115256.GB17424@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1542195611.11515.10.camel@debian.org>

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:40:11AM +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 12:34 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > Add the machine definition 'baseline' which is special compared
> > to 'native' (most optimized for current system) or any explicit
> > type (external entity has to decide on the type).
> > 
> > It defaults to the per arch agreed common minimal baseline
> > needed for DPDK to reasonable work.
> > 
> > That might not be the most optimized, but the most portable
> > version while still being able to support the CPU features
> > required for DPDK.
> > 
> > Going forward this can be bumped up by the DPDK project, but it
> > can never be an invariant like 'native'.
> > 
> > Distributions and other needing portable code are expected to
> > define the machine as 'baseline'.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
> > ---
> >  config/meson.build | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/config/meson.build b/config/meson.build
> > index 1af305f46..23f612457 100644
> > --- a/config/meson.build
> > +++ b/config/meson.build
> > @@ -7,6 +7,27 @@ if meson.is_cross_build()
> >  else
> >  	machine = get_option('machine')
> >  endif
> > +
> > +# machine type 'baseline' is special, it defaults to the per arch
> > agreed common
> > +# minimal baseline needed for DPDK.
> > +# That might not be the most optimized, but the most portable
> > version while
> > +# still being able to support the CPU features required for DPDK.
> > +# This can be bumped up by the DPDK project, but it can never be an
> > +# invariant like 'native'
> > +if machine == 'baseline'
> > +	if host_machine.cpu_family().startswith('x86')
> > +		# matches the old pre-meson build systems default
> > +		machine = 'corei7'
> > +	elif host_machine.cpu_family().startswith('arm')
> > +		machine = 'armv7a'
> > +	elif host_machine.cpu_family().startswith('aarch')
> > +		# arm64 manages defaults in config/arm/meson.build
> > +		machine = 'default'
> > +	elif host_machine.cpu_family().startswith('ppc')
> > +		machine = 'power8'
> > +	endif
> > +endif
> > +
> >  dpdk_conf.set('RTE_MACHINE', machine)
> >  machine_args = []
> 
> Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> 
No objection in principle, but, for alignment with make build system, do we
want to call this "default" instead? Given a clean slate, "baseline" is more
descriptive, but make already uses "default" for this. Perhaps support
both?

/Bruce

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-14 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-14 11:34 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] build: avoid non supported -march on ppc (meson) Christian Ehrhardt
2018-11-14 11:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] build: establish an invariant machine type Christian Ehrhardt
2018-11-14 11:40   ` Luca Boccassi
2018-11-14 11:52     ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2018-11-14 12:05       ` Luca Boccassi
2018-11-14 13:09         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-11-14 13:18           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Christian Ehrhardt
2018-11-14 13:54             ` Bruce Richardson
2018-11-14 14:33               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Christian Ehrhardt
2018-11-14 19:39                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-11-18 13:24                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-14 19:40                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] build: avoid non supported -march on ppc (meson) Christian Ehrhardt
2018-11-14 19:40                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] build: establish an invariant machine type Christian Ehrhardt
2018-11-18 14:24                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] build: avoid non supported -march on ppc (meson) Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-14 13:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] build: establish an invariant machine type Luca Boccassi
2018-11-14 13:08     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2018-11-14 11:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] build: avoid non supported -march on ppc (meson) Luca Boccassi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181114115256.GB17424@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git