From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB593238; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 08:21:27 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Nov 2018 23:21:22 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,235,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="91279896" Received: from yexl-server.sh.intel.com ([10.67.110.207]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2018 23:21:20 -0800 From: Xiaolong Ye To: Qi Zhang , Beilei Xing Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, Xiaolong Ye , mgsmith@netgate.com Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 15:20:05 +0800 Message-Id: <20181115072005.60413-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: update the maximum wait time in comment X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:21:28 -0000 As the code has changed the max wait time to 1000ms, the comment should be changed accordingly. Fixes: 64f1c8539c8c ("net/ixgbe: wait longer for link after fiber MAC setup") Cc: mgsmith@netgate.com Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye --- drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_common.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_common.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_common.c index 21f973e5e..fb50719fb 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_common.c +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_common.c @@ -5259,7 +5259,7 @@ s32 ixgbe_setup_mac_link_multispeed_fiber(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, ixgbe_flap_tx_laser(hw); /* Wait for the controller to acquire link. Per IEEE 802.3ap, - * Section 73.10.2, we may have to wait up to 500ms if KR is + * Section 73.10.2, we may have to wait up to 1000ms if KR is * attempted. 82599 uses the same timing for 10g SFI. */ for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) { -- 2.17.1