DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>, anatoly.burakov@intel.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: don't needlessly setup devices in secondary process
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 19:41:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181121184132.34039-1-dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com> (raw)

Setting up a device that wasn't setup in the primary
process will possibly break the primary process. That's
because the IPC message to retrieve the group fd in the
primary will also *open* that group if it wasn't opened
before. Even though the secondary process closes that fd
soon after as a part of its error handling path, the
primary process leaks it.

What's worse, opening that fd on the primary will
increment the process-local counter of opened groups.
If it was 0 before, then the group will never be added
to the vfio container, nor dpdk memory will be ever
mapped.

This patch moves the proper error checks earlier in the
code to fuly prevent setting up devices in secondary
processes that weren't setup in the primary process.

Fixes: 2f4adfad0a69 ("vfio: add multiprocess support")
Cc: anatoly.burakov@intel.com

Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
---
 drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
index ffd26f195..54a4c959e 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
@@ -794,11 +794,6 @@ pci_vfio_map_resource_secondary(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
 	snprintf(pci_addr, sizeof(pci_addr), PCI_PRI_FMT,
 			loc->domain, loc->bus, loc->devid, loc->function);
 
-	ret = rte_vfio_setup_device(rte_pci_get_sysfs_path(), pci_addr,
-					&vfio_dev_fd, &device_info);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
 	/* if we're in a secondary process, just find our tailq entry */
 	TAILQ_FOREACH(vfio_res, vfio_res_list, next) {
 		if (rte_pci_addr_cmp(&vfio_res->pci_addr,
@@ -810,9 +805,14 @@ pci_vfio_map_resource_secondary(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
 	if (vfio_res == NULL) {
 		RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "  %s cannot find TAILQ entry for PCI device!\n",
 				pci_addr);
-		goto err_vfio_dev_fd;
+		return -1;
 	}
 
+	ret = rte_vfio_setup_device(rte_pci_get_sysfs_path(), pci_addr,
+					&vfio_dev_fd, &device_info);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	/* map BARs */
 	maps = vfio_res->maps;
 
-- 
2.17.1

             reply	other threads:[~2018-11-21 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-21 18:41 Darek Stojaczyk [this message]
2018-11-23  9:12 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-25 12:03   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-23 13:20 ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181121184132.34039-1-dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com \
    --to=dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).