DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, tiwei.bie@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com,
	jfreimann@redhat.com, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: batch used descriptors chains write-back with packed ring
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:53:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181212134459-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e91c5b6f-de71-08fd-73a0-c1bde731b26e@redhat.com>

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 05:34:31PM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
> 
> On 12/12/18 4:23 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > On 12.12.2018 11:24, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> > > Instead of writing back descriptors chains in order, let's
> > > write the first chain flags last in order to improve batching.
> > > 
> > > With Kernel's pktgen benchmark, ~3% performance gain is measured.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >   lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > >   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi.
> > I made some rough testing on my ARMv8 system with this patch and v1 of it.
> > Here is the performance difference with current master:
> >      v1: +1.1 %
> >      v2: -3.6 %
> > 
> > So, write barriers are quiet heavy in practice.
> 
> Thanks for testing it on ARM. Indeed, SMP WMB is heavier on ARM.

Besides your ideas for improving packed rings, maybe we should switch to
load_acquite/store_release?

See
	virtio: use smp_load_acquire/smp_store_release

which worked fine but as I only tested on x86 did not result in any gains.

-- 
MST

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-12 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20181212082505epcas4p36ea3086cfd223aae70a925e946fced48@epcas4p3.samsung.com>
2018-12-12  8:24 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-12-12  9:41   ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-12-12 15:23   ` Ilya Maximets
2018-12-12 16:34     ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-12-12 18:53       ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2018-12-19  9:16         ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-12-19 16:10           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-11-28  9:47 Maxime Coquelin
2018-11-28 10:05 ` Jens Freimann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181212134459-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=i.maximets@samsung.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).