DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Shaw <jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Jeff Shaw <jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, hofors@lysator.liu.se
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: remove variable length array
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:17:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181214191706.GA10186@ae13-28.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181214185928.GA9964@ae13-28.jf.intel.com>

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:59:28AM -0800, Jeff Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:36:03AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 08:38:27 -0800
> > Jeff Shaw <jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Compilers that do not support the C11 standard, or do not implement
> > > gcc extensions, may not support variable length arrays.
> > > 
> > > The code prior to this commit produced the following warning when
> > > compiled with "-Wvla -std=c90".
> > > 
> > >   warning: ISO C90 forbids variable length array ‘array’ [-Wvla]
> > > 
> > > This commit removes the variable length array from the PMD debug
> > > trace function by allocating memory dynamically on the stack using
> > > alloca().
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Shaw <jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_dev.h | 19 +++++++++----------
> > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_dev.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_dev.h
> > > index a9724dc91..af772872b 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_dev.h
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_dev.h
> > > @@ -47,22 +47,21 @@ __attribute__((format(printf, 2, 0)))
> > >  static inline void
> > >  rte_pmd_debug_trace(const char *func_name, const char *fmt, ...)
> > >  {
> > > +	char *buffer;
> > > +	int buf_len;
> > >  	va_list ap;
> > >  
> > >  	va_start(ap, fmt);
> > > +	buf_len = vsnprintf(NULL, 0, fmt, ap) + 1;
> > > +	va_end(ap);
> > >  
> > > -	{
> > > -		char buffer[vsnprintf(NULL, 0, fmt, ap) + 1];
> > > +	buffer = (char *)alloca(buf_len);
> > 
> > alloca is void * so cast is not necessary.
> 
> I get a compiler warning on Windows, hence the cast. I suppose we could
> disable the warning.
> 
> > 
> > You might be able to skip the buffering step entirely by using rte_log
> > a little more creatively, see how other logging works.
> 
> Probably right... this eventuall needs to be done in ~100 other places,
> most of which aren't used with rte_log(), so it seemed fitting.
> 
> > 
> > But to go further since rte_pmd_debug_trace is not used anywhere in
> > current code base in DPDK, it should just be removed.
> 
> Much better solution :)

Actually, it cannot be removed. It is used by librte_eventdev. When
RTE_LIBRTE_EVENTDEV_DEBUG is defined, the RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE macro
uses rte_pmd_debug_trace.

I will remove the cast and update the commit message to reference C99
instead of C11 as requested by Mattias R.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-14 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-14 16:38 Jeff Shaw
2018-12-14 18:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-12-14 18:59   ` Jeff Shaw
2018-12-14 19:17     ` Jeff Shaw [this message]
2018-12-14 18:36 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-12-14 19:07   ` Jeff Shaw
2018-12-14 20:28     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-12-14 20:50       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: simplify RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE Stephen Hemminger
2018-12-14 21:20         ` Jeff Shaw
2018-12-14 21:57           ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-12-21 16:17           ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-21 18:11         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jeff Shaw
2018-12-21 18:18           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Jeff Shaw
2018-12-22  0:37             ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-12-19 21:45       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: remove variable length array Thomas Monjalon
2018-12-20 10:53         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2018-12-20 11:03           ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-12-14 20:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jeff Shaw
2018-12-15 14:26   ` Wiles, Keith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181214191706.GA10186@ae13-28.jf.intel.com \
    --to=jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hofors@lysator.liu.se \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).