From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872F21B54E for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 17:25:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wBNGPRmS011008 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 11:25:52 -0500 Received: from e12.ny.us.ibm.com (e12.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.202]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2pj3k1u5jn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 11:25:52 -0500 Received: from localhost by e12.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 16:25:52 -0000 Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.25) by e12.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.199) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Sun, 23 Dec 2018 16:25:49 -0000 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id wBNGPm2522282290 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 23 Dec 2018 16:25:48 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5652FB2067; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 16:25:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DCEB2064; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 16:25:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.85.153.1]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 16:25:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E962516C3698; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 08:25:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 08:25:56 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli , dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, gavin.hu@arm.com, dharmik.thakkar@arm.com, nd@arm.com, Malvika Gupta References: <20181122033055.3431-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> <20181222021420.5114-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> <20181222021420.5114-3-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> <20181222233051.0a930102@xeon-e3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181222233051.0a930102@xeon-e3> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18122316-0060-0000-0000-000002E8F4B0 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010273; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000272; SDB=6.01135978; UDB=6.00590753; IPR=6.00916150; MB=3.00024811; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-12-23 16:25:51 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18122316-0061-0000-0000-000047A47CB1 Message-Id: <20181223162556.GS4170@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-12-23_12:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=947 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1812230148 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 13:11:36 +0100 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 2/2] test/rcu_qsbr: add API and functional tests X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: paulmck@linux.ibm.com List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 16:25:53 -0000 On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 11:30:51PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 20:14:20 -0600 > Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote: > > > From: Dharmik Thakkar > > > > Add API positive/negative test cases and functional tests. > > > > Signed-off-by: Malvika Gupta > > Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar > > Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli > > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu > > Just a thought, could you build stress tests like the kernel RCU tests? > One worry is that RCU does not play well with blocking threads (and sometimes preemption). There are similar tests in the userspace RCU library, as well, which can be found at http://liburcu. Thanx, Paul