From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950A11B53E for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 16:50:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D055A7FDF2; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 15:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-123-72.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.123.72]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 62A71672C5; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 15:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:50:07 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Ilya Maximets Cc: Shahaf Shuler , "dev@dpdk.org" , Maxime Coquelin , Xiao Wang , "jfreimann@redhat.com" , Tiwei Bie , Zhihong Wang , Jason Wang , "xiaolong.ye@intel.com" , "alejandro.lucero@netronome.com" , Daniel Marcovitch Message-ID: <20190109104855-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20181214153812.3878-1-i.maximets@samsung.com> <20181226163712.31596-1-i.maximets@samsung.com> <2832c88f-9b43-997c-5937-ef5ae6482fd5@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2832c88f-9b43-997c-5937-ef5ae6482fd5@samsung.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Wed, 09 Jan 2019 15:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/virtio: add platform memory ordering feature support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 15:50:49 -0000 On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:34:38PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote: > virtio_mb() is really heavy. I'd like to avoid it somehow, but I don't > know how to do this yet. Linux driver doesn't avoid it either. -- MST