From: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com,
bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
gavin.hu@arm.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com, nd@arm.com,
chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jerinj@marvell.com,
hemant.agrawal@nxp.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/1] Add 128-bit compare and set
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:29:44 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190128172945.27251-1-gage.eads@intel.com> (raw)
This patch addresses x86-64 only; other architectures can/will be supported
in the future. The __atomic intrinsic was considered for the
implementation, however libatomic was found[1] to use locks to implement
the 128-bit CAS on at least one architecture and so is eschewed here.
The interface is modeled after the __atomic_compare_exchange_16 (which
itself is based on the C++11 memory model) to best support weak
consistency architectures.
This patch was originally part of a series that introduces a non-blocking stack
mempool handler[2], and is required by a non-blocking ring patchset. This
patch was spun off so that the the NB ring depends only on this patch
and not the entire non-blocking stack patchset.
[1] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-January/124002.html
[1] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-January/123653.html
Gage Eads (1):
eal: add 128-bit cmpset (x86-64 only)
.../common/include/arch/x86/rte_atomic_64.h | 31 +++++++++++
lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/rte_atomic.h | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
--
2.13.6
next reply other threads:[~2019-01-28 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-28 17:29 Gage Eads [this message]
2019-01-28 17:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eal: add 128-bit cmpset (x86-64 only) Gage Eads
2019-01-28 23:01 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-02-01 17:06 ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-01 19:01 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-02-01 19:28 ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-01 19:43 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-02-01 21:05 ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-01 23:11 ` Ola Liljedahl
2019-02-04 18:33 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-01-31 5:48 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-02-01 17:11 ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-22 15:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/1] Add 128-bit compare and set Gage Eads
2019-02-22 15:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] eal: add 128-bit cmpxchg (x86-64 only) Gage Eads
2019-03-04 20:19 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-04 20:47 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-04 20:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/1] Add 128-bit compare and set Gage Eads
2019-03-04 20:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] eal: add 128-bit compare exchange (x86-64 only) Gage Eads
2019-03-27 23:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-27 23:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-28 16:22 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-28 16:22 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 17:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/1] Add 128-bit compare and set Gage Eads
2019-04-03 17:34 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 17:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/1] eal: add 128-bit compare exchange (x86-64 only) Gage Eads
2019-04-03 17:34 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 19:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 19:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 19:21 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 19:21 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 19:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 19:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 19:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] eal/x86: add 128-bit atomic compare exchange Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 19:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " Gage Eads
2019-04-03 19:44 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 20:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 11:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-04 11:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-04 12:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 12:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 12:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 12:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 12:14 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-04 12:14 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-04 12:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 12:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 12:22 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-04 12:22 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-04 12:24 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-04 12:24 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-04 12:52 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-04 12:52 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190128172945.27251-1-gage.eads@intel.com \
--to=gage.eads@intel.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).