From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com (mail-wm1-f67.google.com [209.85.128.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798871B427; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:52:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id v26so315266wmh.3; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:52:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rYLWV8lwI/Sp4IUgQEBNI6V04B2iXe3kZpfnpuc3yE0=; b=rGpLmWeQwSQS9aUJ87ZqyQwuBjud1UbuNZIGbvwUK49PTiklDidUE6k4SncPjzxf1j QCEGVEH9IT5NPtRNlawdzOcPNYsZrhg9ZB12GdoNX6S1rzOU8eIfUHFQ0XWb6mOTigoF iyswEkF+WAFBvAlk5W56eXTAUPzKL5JcfqzVoFlk4ERxmjYlwd8pyWiyKR8JBlJsVAwy /VHWdZXfH5Gflkm4yXSVCukcIy/5eMx1ytN3zMQU9pibcTbQ0xZmUfhHoL5A1GLus75d 0K/u+SF52nQjKVBIJL14lubbET2vR5JR/BBOa/k1bc+OhixBcAZk9NkNxFL8S89eF3DR LgdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rYLWV8lwI/Sp4IUgQEBNI6V04B2iXe3kZpfnpuc3yE0=; b=S+w/g870ClF7UkS2SBRL5kkzaLI3NnuA3Yd3SJwx9wUrLXZHTWhSGSq8ypr3xA8Jfl x312h6oaSvv0kVzVxkvkFna1SN6H1H/r4yVAQuYgBa4gJmYq7yMCZdPfpZVm+QC+53Hg ax8WHdV3oxQcmiEzPqPMYZS6r/+fRQ5OPFdTUjVOPF/ny5HoXVeVL4p18HWMDvqfIMlz oKsDS4PChVkAo8VM4Dw3rsuPgj7PEf+k/bGEVx41Z+3IMsaX1GsPrRN91DL4sG3mRizn ysJdx5BJvg2QX6Q21K/nHqEMBNzLsfT2pVKDeVZA5JpuFROTcE6heKfkOgZilFu6CJl+ iJzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubsSWNQnUTGy5m+wNiKBvMQOTqeoZ1+oxKW3c6SXm85dBG1POYa MclhC1yoR+/TNbKcw79FeFV8yHwu3Xg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Iat2GyaObtsDl9+OphC+cRlCJyYhlrZfwv+04eh8qG7FjFHgiE3N6deKPPr0ZWHwNlMHYZ2eg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c359:: with SMTP id l25mr703620wmj.130.1549911146944; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:52:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (bzq-109-66-107-92.red.bezeqint.net. [109.66.107.92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u17sm6603339wrg.71.2019.02.11.10.52.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:52:26 -0800 (PST) From: Rami Rosen To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com, stable@dpdk.org, Rami Rosen Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 20:52:18 +0200 Message-Id: <20190211185218.13067-1-ramirose@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH ] mbuf: fix a typo X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 18:52:27 -0000 This trivial patch fixes a typo in rte_mbuf.h. Fixes: f20b50b946da ("mbuf: optimize refcnt update") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Rami Rosen --- lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h index a7f67023a..d961ccaf6 100644 --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h @@ -973,7 +973,7 @@ rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(struct rte_mbuf *m, int16_t value) { /* * The atomic_add is an expensive operation, so we don't want to - * call it in the case where we know we are the uniq holder of + * call it in the case where we know we are the unique holder of * this mbuf (i.e. ref_cnt == 1). Otherwise, an atomic * operation has to be used because concurrent accesses on the * reference counter can occur. -- 2.19.2