DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
To: yipeng1.wang@intel.com, jerinj@marvell.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, gavin.hu@arm.com,
	nd@arm.com, Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] hash: optimize signature compare by using neon intrinsic
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:01:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190212070104.33830-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> (raw)

Implemented signature compare function based on neon intrinsic.
Hash bulk lookup had 3% - 6% performance gain after optimization.

Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
---
v2:
* Use 'rte_vect.h' instead of 'arm_neon.h'.
* Moved down variable declaration to avoid extra #ifdef.

 lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
index c01489ba5..0dddce226 100644
--- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
+++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 #include <rte_spinlock.h>
 #include <rte_ring.h>
 #include <rte_compat.h>
+#include <rte_vect.h>
 
 #include "rte_hash.h"
 #include "rte_cuckoo_hash.h"
@@ -407,6 +408,10 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params)
 	if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_SSE2))
 		h->sig_cmp_fn = RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SSE;
 	else
+#elif defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
+	if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_NEON))
+		h->sig_cmp_fn = RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NEON;
+	else
 #endif
 		h->sig_cmp_fn = RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SCALAR;
 
@@ -1581,7 +1586,7 @@ compare_signatures(uint32_t *prim_hash_matches, uint32_t *sec_hash_matches,
 
 	/* For match mask the first bit of every two bits indicates the match */
 	switch (sig_cmp_fn) {
-#ifdef RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE2
+#if defined(RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE2)
 	case RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SSE:
 		/* Compare all signatures in the bucket */
 		*prim_hash_matches = _mm_movemask_epi8(_mm_cmpeq_epi16(
@@ -1594,6 +1599,28 @@ compare_signatures(uint32_t *prim_hash_matches, uint32_t *sec_hash_matches,
 					(__m128i const *)sec_bkt->sig_current),
 				_mm_set1_epi16(sig)));
 		break;
+#elif defined(RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON)
+	case RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NEON: {
+		uint16x8_t vmat, vsig, x;
+		uint64x2_t x64;
+		int16x8_t shift = {-15, -13, -11, -9, -7, -5, -3, -1};
+
+		vsig = vld1q_dup_u16((uint16_t const *)&sig);
+		/* Compare all signatures in the primary bucket */
+		vmat = vceqq_u16(vsig,
+			vld1q_u16((uint16_t const *)prim_bkt->sig_current));
+		x = vshlq_u16(vandq_u16(vmat, vdupq_n_u16(0x8000)), shift);
+		x64 = vpaddlq_u32(vpaddlq_u16(x));
+		*prim_hash_matches = (uint32_t)(vgetq_lane_u64(x64, 0) +
+			vgetq_lane_u64(x64, 1));
+		/* Compare all signatures in the secondary bucket */
+		vmat = vceqq_u16(vsig,
+			vld1q_u16((uint16_t const *)sec_bkt->sig_current));
+		x = vshlq_u16(vandq_u16(vmat, vdupq_n_u16(0x8000)), shift);
+		x64 = vpaddlq_u32(vpaddlq_u16(x));
+		*sec_hash_matches = (uint32_t)(vgetq_lane_u64(x64, 0) +
+			vgetq_lane_u64(x64, 1)); }
+		break;
 #endif
 	default:
 		for (i = 0; i < RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES; i++) {
diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h
index eacdaa8d4..0548c97f0 100644
--- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h
+++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h
@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ struct rte_hash_key {
 enum rte_hash_sig_compare_function {
 	RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SCALAR = 0,
 	RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SSE,
+	RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NEON,
 	RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NUM
 };
 
-- 
2.17.1

             reply	other threads:[~2019-02-12  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-12  7:01 Ruifeng Wang [this message]
2019-02-13 20:31 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2019-02-14  2:40   ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-02-25 17:52 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-03-28 18:49   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-28 18:49     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190212070104.33830-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --to=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).