From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FD027D for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:40:02 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Feb 2019 01:40:00 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,390,1544515200"; d="scan'208";a="134905267" Received: from bricha3-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.221.36]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2019 01:39:58 -0800 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 20 Feb 2019 09:39:57 +0000 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 09:39:57 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "thomas@monjalon.net" Message-ID: <20190220093957.GA87164@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20190125202642.66559-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20190219145308.65668-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20190219145308.65668-5-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258012413B796@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258012413B796@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] test/bpf: move to examples folder X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 09:40:02 -0000 On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 09:35:02AM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Richardson, Bruce > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 2:53 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org; thomas@monjalon.net > > Cc: Richardson, Bruce ; Ananyev, Konstantin > > Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] test/bpf: move to examples folder > > > > The bpf folder didn't actual contain a test application, but instead > > basic examples of BPF code for use with testpmd. > > Might be the better to create app/test-pmf/bpf directory > and move them into it. > Konstantin > Assume "test-pmd" in the path, right? I actually think they are better in examples, myself, but no strong opinions. Anyone else have thoughts? [Thomas, you are generally a good man for having your say - any input here?] /Bruce