From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: "David Harton (dharton)" <dharton@cisco.com>
Cc: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for ixgbevf
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 15:14:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E706115334CA1F@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190314151425.-Y68b5zArxhCvmhRbE8p3PeVDqUmXgCOSVZANCyqMzU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR11MB1701B306BDF468F3AE81F026AA4B0@CY4PR11MB1701.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Harton (dharton) [mailto:dharton@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 9:38 PM
> To: David Harton (dharton) <dharton@cisco.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for ixgbevf
>
> Hi Qi,
>
> This patch was rejected with no feedback.
>
> Can you share why?
Because as Zhao Wei explained in v1 thread, in ixgbe_vlan_offload_config , ETH_VLAN_FILTER_MASK and DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND are ignored
This looks like VLAN_FILTER AND VLAN_EXTEND offload is not supported and I didn't see you reply for that, so I assume you agree with that.
>
> Without this patch users are not able to call the rte_eth_dev_vlan_filter() API for
> ixgbevf based ports because VLAN_FILTER cannot be enabled when calling
> rte_eth_dev_configure().
OK, seems vlan filter is able to be configured for ixgbevf, but I don't know how this will work because vlan filter table needs to be enabled first (ixgbe_vlan_hw_filter_enable)
So at least when it work with a DPDK PF, vlan filter will not work, maybe kernel PF driver will enable it by default? Could you share more insight?
And same question to VLAN_EXTEND
>
> Or, am I missing something?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Harton <dharton@cisco.com>
> > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2019 3:35 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: wenzhuo.lu@intel.com; konstantin.ananyev@intel.com;
> > qi.z.zhang@intel.com; David Harton (dharton) <dharton@cisco.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for ixgbevf
> >
> > ixgbevf vlan strip and extend capabilities were removed when migrating
> > to the bit flags implementation.
> >
> > Restoring the capbility to enable these offloads at configuration time.
> >
> > Fixes: ec3b1124d14d (\"net/ixgbe: convert to new Rx offloads API\")
> > Signed-off-by: David Harton <dharton@cisco.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v2: removed unused function ixgbe_is_vf()
> >
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 23 ++---------------------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c index e92a70fb3..b1b83613e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > @@ -2813,23 +2813,6 @@ ixgbe_reset_rx_queue(struct ixgbe_adapter
> > *adapter, struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq) #endif }
> >
> > -static int
> > -ixgbe_is_vf(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > -{
> > - struct ixgbe_hw *hw = IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data-
> > >dev_private);
> > -
> > - switch (hw->mac.type) {
> > - case ixgbe_mac_82599_vf:
> > - case ixgbe_mac_X540_vf:
> > - case ixgbe_mac_X550_vf:
> > - case ixgbe_mac_X550EM_x_vf:
> > - case ixgbe_mac_X550EM_a_vf:
> > - return 1;
> > - default:
> > - return 0;
> > - }
> > -}
> > -
> > uint64_t
> > ixgbe_get_rx_queue_offloads(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) { @@ -2853,15
> > +2836,13 @@ ixgbe_get_rx_port_offloads(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
> > DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_KEEP_CRC |
> > DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME |
> > + DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER |
> > + DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND |
> > DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER;
> >
> > if (hw->mac.type == ixgbe_mac_82598EB)
> > offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP;
> >
> > - if (ixgbe_is_vf(dev) == 0)
> > - offloads |= (DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER |
> > - DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND);
> > -
> > /*
> > * RSC is only supported by 82599 and x540 PF devices in a non-SR-
> > IOV
> > * mode.
> > --
> > 2.19.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-14 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-06 15:23 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for ixgbvef David Harton
2019-03-07 13:11 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-07 14:01 ` David Harton (dharton)
2019-03-08 6:35 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-08 12:38 ` David Harton (dharton)
2019-03-11 2:02 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-08 20:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for ixgbevf David Harton
2019-03-14 13:37 ` David Harton (dharton)
2019-03-14 13:37 ` David Harton (dharton)
2019-03-14 15:14 ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]
2019-03-14 15:14 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-14 15:51 ` David Harton (dharton)
2019-03-14 15:51 ` David Harton (dharton)
2019-03-15 1:20 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-15 1:20 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-15 4:13 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-15 4:13 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-15 5:28 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-15 5:28 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-15 7:36 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-15 7:36 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-15 9:23 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-15 9:23 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-15 9:35 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-15 9:35 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-15 12:59 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-15 12:59 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-18 3:13 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-18 3:13 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-15 12:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " David Harton
2019-03-15 12:26 ` David Harton
2019-03-15 16:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter " David Harton
2019-03-15 16:08 ` David Harton
2019-03-18 3:05 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-18 3:05 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-18 4:59 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-18 4:59 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E706115334CA1F@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dharton@cisco.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).