From: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>
To: chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: yskoh@mellanox.com, shahafs@mellanox.com, dev@dpdk.org,
orika@mellanox.com, thomas@monjalon.net, dekelp@mellanox.com,
stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/ppc: remove fix of memory barrier for IBM POWER
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:58:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1552913893-43407-1-git-send-email-dekelp@mellanox.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190318125813.3pckFW_dUXIXt729__6002U7Ink8NvnseiSkhU1moIo@z> (raw)
From previous patch description: "to improve performance on PPC64,
use light weight sync instruction instead of sync instruction."
Excerpt from IBM doc [1], section "Memory barrier instructions":
"The second form of the sync instruction is light-weight sync,
or lwsync.
This form is used to control ordering for storage accesses to system
memory only. It does not create a memory barrier for accesses to
device memory."
This patch removes the use of lwsync, so calls to rte_wmb() and
rte_rmb() will provide correct memory barrier to ensure order of
accesses to system memory and device memory.
[1] https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/systems/articles/powerpc.html
Fixes: d23a6bd04d72 ("eal/ppc: fix memory barrier for IBM POWER")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp@mellanox.com>
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/ppc_64/rte_atomic.h | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/ppc_64/rte_atomic.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/ppc_64/rte_atomic.h
index ce38350..797381c 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/ppc_64/rte_atomic.h
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/ppc_64/rte_atomic.h
@@ -63,11 +63,7 @@
* Guarantees that the STORE operations generated before the barrier
* occur before the STORE operations generated after.
*/
-#ifdef RTE_ARCH_64
-#define rte_wmb() asm volatile("lwsync" : : : "memory")
-#else
#define rte_wmb() asm volatile("sync" : : : "memory")
-#endif
/**
* Read memory barrier.
@@ -75,11 +71,7 @@
* Guarantees that the LOAD operations generated before the barrier
* occur before the LOAD operations generated after.
*/
-#ifdef RTE_ARCH_64
-#define rte_rmb() asm volatile("lwsync" : : : "memory")
-#else
#define rte_rmb() asm volatile("sync" : : : "memory")
-#endif
#define rte_smp_mb() rte_mb()
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-03-18 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-18 12:58 Dekel Peled [this message]
2019-03-18 12:58 ` Dekel Peled
2019-03-19 3:24 ` Chao Zhu
2019-03-19 3:24 ` Chao Zhu
2019-03-19 10:05 ` Dekel Peled
2019-03-19 10:05 ` Dekel Peled
2019-03-19 11:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-19 11:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-19 19:42 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-03-19 19:42 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-03-19 20:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-19 20:45 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-20 22:40 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-20 22:40 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-21 8:49 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-03-21 8:49 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-03-22 1:40 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-22 1:40 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-22 8:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-22 8:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-22 15:30 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-22 15:30 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-22 17:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-22 17:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-22 22:57 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-22 22:57 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-24 6:37 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-03-24 6:37 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-03-24 17:37 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-24 17:37 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-26 9:15 ` Dekel Peled
2019-03-26 9:15 ` Dekel Peled
2019-03-27 9:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-27 9:19 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-27 23:50 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-27 23:50 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
[not found] ` <OF456B0ECC.006EF7E7-ON882583CA.00827A75-882583CA.0082F7BE@LocalDomain>
2019-03-28 17:51 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-28 17:51 ` Pradeep Satyanarayana
2019-03-28 17:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-28 17:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-28 22:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-28 22:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1552913893-43407-1-git-send-email-dekelp@mellanox.com \
--to=dekelp@mellanox.com \
--cc=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=orika@mellanox.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).