From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A11A00E6 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:54:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BDC4C96; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:54:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B4E4C93 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:54:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29B2087638; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-112-48.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.48]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7287B6090C; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:54:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Maxime Coquelin To: dev@dpdk.org, i.maximets@samsung.com, changpeng.liu@intel.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com, dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com Cc: Maxime Coquelin Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:54:17 +0100 Message-Id: <20190319105417.16890-3-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190319105417.16890-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> References: <20190319105417.16890-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:54:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] vhost: support requests only handled by external backend X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <20190319105417.cjTcb3LdGjWaeCp38HissqjobGEAqmSuxbTvgMLXr4A@z> External backends may have specific requests to handle, and so we don't want the vhost-user lib to handle these requests as errors. This patch also changes the experimental API by introducing RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_NOT_HANDLED so that vhost-user lib can report an error if a message is handled neither by the vhost-user library nor by the external backend. The logic changes a bit so that if the callback returns with ERR, OK or REPLY, it is considered the message is handled by the external backend so it won't be handled by the vhost-user library. It is still possible for an external backend to listen to requests that have to be handled by the vhost-user library like SET_MEM_TABLE, but the callback have to return NOT_HANDLED in that case. Vhost-crypto backend is ialso adapted to this API change. Suggested-by: Ilya Maximets Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin Tested-by: Darek Stojaczyk --- lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h | 39 ++++++---------- lib/librte_vhost/vhost_crypto.c | 10 +++- lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++------------ 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h index c9c392975..d2c0c93f4 100644 --- a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h @@ -121,47 +121,34 @@ enum rte_vhost_msg_result { RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_OK = 0, /* Message handling successful and reply prepared */ RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_REPLY = 1, + /* Message not handled */ + RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_NOT_HANDLED, }; /** - * Function prototype for the vhost backend to handler specific vhost user - * messages prior to the master message handling + * Function prototype for the vhost backend to handle specific vhost user + * messages. * * @param vid * vhost device id * @param msg * Message pointer. - * @param skip_master - * If the handler requires skipping the master message handling, this variable - * shall be written 1, otherwise 0. * @return - * VH_RESULT_OK on success, VH_RESULT_REPLY on success with reply, - * VH_RESULT_ERR on failure + * RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_OK on success, + * RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_REPLY on success with reply, + * RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR on failure, + * RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_NOT_HANDLED if message was not handled. */ -typedef enum rte_vhost_msg_result (*rte_vhost_msg_pre_handle)(int vid, - void *msg, uint32_t *skip_master); - -/** - * Function prototype for the vhost backend to handler specific vhost user - * messages after the master message handling is done - * - * @param vid - * vhost device id - * @param msg - * Message pointer. - * @return - * VH_RESULT_OK on success, VH_RESULT_REPLY on success with reply, - * VH_RESULT_ERR on failure - */ -typedef enum rte_vhost_msg_result (*rte_vhost_msg_post_handle)(int vid, - void *msg); +typedef enum rte_vhost_msg_result (*rte_vhost_msg_handle)(int vid, void *msg); /** * Optional vhost user message handlers. */ struct rte_vhost_user_extern_ops { - rte_vhost_msg_pre_handle pre_msg_handle; - rte_vhost_msg_post_handle post_msg_handle; + /* Called prior to the master message handling. */ + rte_vhost_msg_handle pre_msg_handle; + /* Called after the master message handling. */ + rte_vhost_msg_handle post_msg_handle; }; /** diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_crypto.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_crypto.c index 0f437c4a1..9b4b850e8 100644 --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_crypto.c +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_crypto.c @@ -453,14 +453,20 @@ vhost_crypto_msg_post_handler(int vid, void *msg) return RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR; } - if (vmsg->request.master == VHOST_USER_CRYPTO_CREATE_SESS) { + switch (vmsg->request.master) { + case VHOST_USER_CRYPTO_CREATE_SESS: vhost_crypto_create_sess(vcrypto, &vmsg->payload.crypto_session); vmsg->fd_num = 0; ret = RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_REPLY; - } else if (vmsg->request.master == VHOST_USER_CRYPTO_CLOSE_SESS) { + break; + case VHOST_USER_CRYPTO_CLOSE_SESS: if (vhost_crypto_close_sess(vcrypto, vmsg->payload.u64)) ret = RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR; + break; + default: + ret = RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_NOT_HANDLED; + break; } return ret; diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c index 555d09ad9..39756fce7 100644 --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c @@ -1910,7 +1910,7 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd) int did = -1; int ret; int unlock_required = 0; - uint32_t skip_master = 0; + bool handled; int request; dev = get_device(vid); @@ -1928,27 +1928,30 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd) } ret = read_vhost_message(fd, &msg); - if (ret <= 0 || msg.request.master >= VHOST_USER_MAX) { + if (ret <= 0) { if (ret < 0) RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG, "vhost read message failed\n"); - else if (ret == 0) + else RTE_LOG(INFO, VHOST_CONFIG, "vhost peer closed\n"); - else - RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG, - "vhost read incorrect message\n"); return -1; } ret = 0; - if (msg.request.master != VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG) - RTE_LOG(INFO, VHOST_CONFIG, "read message %s\n", - vhost_message_str[msg.request.master]); - else - RTE_LOG(DEBUG, VHOST_CONFIG, "read message %s\n", - vhost_message_str[msg.request.master]); + request = msg.request.master; + if (request > VHOST_USER_NONE && request < VHOST_USER_MAX && + vhost_message_str[request]) { + if (request != VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG) + RTE_LOG(INFO, VHOST_CONFIG, "read message %s\n", + vhost_message_str[request]); + else + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, VHOST_CONFIG, "read message %s\n", + vhost_message_str[request]); + } else { + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, VHOST_CONFIG, "External request %d\n", request); + } ret = vhost_user_check_and_alloc_queue_pair(dev, &msg); if (ret < 0) { @@ -1964,7 +1967,7 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd) * inactive, so it is safe. Otherwise taking the access_lock * would cause a dead lock. */ - switch (msg.request.master) { + switch (request) { case VHOST_USER_SET_FEATURES: case VHOST_USER_SET_PROTOCOL_FEATURES: case VHOST_USER_SET_OWNER: @@ -1989,19 +1992,24 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd) } + handled = false; if (dev->extern_ops.pre_msg_handle) { ret = (*dev->extern_ops.pre_msg_handle)(dev->vid, - (void *)&msg, &skip_master); - if (ret == RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR) - goto skip_to_reply; - else if (ret == RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_REPLY) + (void *)&msg); + switch (ret) { + case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_REPLY: send_vhost_reply(fd, &msg); - - if (skip_master) + /* Fall-through */ + case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR: + case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_OK: + handled = true; goto skip_to_post_handle; + case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_NOT_HANDLED: + default: + break; + } } - request = msg.request.master; if (request > VHOST_USER_NONE && request < VHOST_USER_MAX) { if (!vhost_message_handlers[request]) goto skip_to_post_handle; @@ -2012,40 +2020,54 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd) RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG, "Processing %s failed.\n", vhost_message_str[request]); + handled = true; break; case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_OK: RTE_LOG(DEBUG, VHOST_CONFIG, "Processing %s succeeded.\n", vhost_message_str[request]); + handled = true; break; case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_REPLY: RTE_LOG(DEBUG, VHOST_CONFIG, "Processing %s succeeded and needs reply.\n", vhost_message_str[request]); send_vhost_reply(fd, &msg); + handled = true; + break; + default: break; } - } else { - RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG, - "Requested invalid message type %d.\n", request); - ret = RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR; } skip_to_post_handle: if (ret != RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR && dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle) { - ret = (*dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle)( - dev->vid, (void *)&msg); - if (ret == RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR) - goto skip_to_reply; - else if (ret == RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_REPLY) + ret = (*dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle)(dev->vid, + (void *)&msg); + switch (ret) { + case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_REPLY: send_vhost_reply(fd, &msg); + /* Fall-through */ + case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR: + case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_OK: + handled = true; + case RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_NOT_HANDLED: + default: + break; + } } -skip_to_reply: if (unlock_required) vhost_user_unlock_all_queue_pairs(dev); + /* If message was not handled at this stage, treat it as an error */ + if (!handled) { + RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG, + "vhost message (req: %d) was not handled.\n", request); + ret = RTE_VHOST_MSG_RESULT_ERR; + } + /* * If the request required a reply that was already sent, * this optional reply-ack won't be sent as the -- 2.20.1