* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt @ 2019-03-20 22:35 Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-20 22:35 ` Dharmik Thakkar ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-20 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: dev, Dharmik Thakkar This patch series: - Enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. - Adds lock-free read-write concurrency tests for ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar (2): hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 3 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 163 +++++++++----- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 + 4 files changed, 405 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt 2019-03-20 22:35 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-20 22:35 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-20 22:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-20 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: dev, Dharmik Thakkar This patch series: - Enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. - Adds lock-free read-write concurrency tests for ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar (2): hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 3 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 163 +++++++++----- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 + 4 files changed, 405 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-03-20 22:35 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-20 22:35 ` Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-20 22:35 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-20 22:35 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-22 23:48 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-03-20 22:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 3 siblings, 2 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-20 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara, John McNamara, Marko Kovacevic Cc: dev, Dharmik Thakkar This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> --- doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 3 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 ++ 3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst index 85a6edfa8b16..b00446e949ba 100644 --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst @@ -108,8 +108,7 @@ Extendable Bucket Functionality support An extra flag is used to enable this functionality (flag is not set by default). When the (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE) is set and in the very unlikely case due to excessive hash collisions that a key has failed to be inserted, the hash table bucket is extended with a linked list to insert these failed keys. This feature is important for the workloads (e.g. telco workloads) that need to insert up to 100% of the -hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Currently the extendable bucket is not supported -with the lock-free concurrency implementation (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF). +hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Implementation Details (non Extendable Bucket Case) diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c index c01489ba5193..4cb05a5528c1 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) unsigned int readwrite_concur_support = 0; unsigned int writer_takes_lock = 0; unsigned int no_free_on_del = 0; + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free = NULL; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt = NULL; unsigned int readwrite_concur_lf_support = 0; @@ -170,15 +171,6 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) return NULL; } - if ((params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) && - (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE)) { - rte_errno = EINVAL; - RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "rte_hash_create: extendable bucket " - "feature not supported with rw concurrency " - "lock free\n"); - return NULL; - } - /* Check extra flags field to check extra options. */ if (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_TRANS_MEM_SUPPORT) hw_trans_mem_support = 1; @@ -302,6 +294,16 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) */ for (i = 1; i <= num_buckets; i++) rte_ring_sp_enqueue(r_ext, (void *)((uintptr_t) i)); + + if (readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + ext_bkt_to_free = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * + num_key_slots, 0); + if (ext_bkt_to_free == NULL) { + RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "ext bkt to free memory allocation " + "failed\n"); + goto err_unlock; + } + } } const uint32_t key_entry_size = @@ -393,6 +395,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) default_hash_func : params->hash_func; h->key_store = k; h->free_slots = r; + h->ext_bkt_to_free = ext_bkt_to_free; h->tbl_chng_cnt = tbl_chng_cnt; *h->tbl_chng_cnt = 0; h->hw_trans_mem_support = hw_trans_mem_support; @@ -443,6 +446,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) rte_free(buckets_ext); rte_free(k); rte_free(tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(ext_bkt_to_free); return NULL; } @@ -484,6 +488,7 @@ rte_hash_free(struct rte_hash *h) rte_free(h->buckets); rte_free(h->buckets_ext); rte_free(h->tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(h->ext_bkt_to_free); rte_free(h); rte_free(te); } @@ -799,7 +804,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -831,7 +836,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -1054,7 +1059,15 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* Check if slot is available */ if (likely(cur_bkt->key_idx[i] == EMPTY_SLOT)) { cur_bkt->sig_current[i] = short_sig; - cur_bkt->key_idx[i] = new_idx; + /* Key can be of arbitrary length, so it is + * not possible to store it atomically. + * Hence the new key element's memory stores + * (key as well as data) should be complete + * before it is referenced. + */ + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[i], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return new_idx - 1; } @@ -1072,7 +1085,15 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, bkt_id = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)ext_bkt_id) - 1; /* Use the first location of the new bucket */ (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).sig_current[0] = short_sig; - (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0] = new_idx; + /* Key can be of arbitrary length, so it is + * not possible to store it atomically. + * Hence the new key element's memory stores + * (key as well as data) should be complete + * before it is referenced. + */ + __atomic_store_n(&(h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); /* Link the new bucket to sec bucket linked list */ last = rte_hash_get_last_bkt(sec_bkt); last->next = &h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]; @@ -1366,7 +1387,8 @@ remove_entry(const struct rte_hash *h, struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt, unsigned i) * empty slot. */ static inline void -__rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { +__rte_hash_compact_ll(const struct rte_hash *h, + struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { int i; struct rte_hash_bucket *last_bkt; @@ -1377,10 +1399,27 @@ __rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { for (i = RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (last_bkt->key_idx[i] != EMPTY_SLOT) { - cur_bkt->key_idx[pos] = last_bkt->key_idx[i]; cur_bkt->sig_current[pos] = last_bkt->sig_current[i]; + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[pos], + last_bkt->key_idx[i], + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + if (h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + /* Inform the readers that the table has changed + * Since there is one writer, load acquire on + * tbl_chng_cnt is not required. + */ + __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, + *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + /* The store to sig_current should + * not move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. + */ + __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); + } last_bkt->sig_current[i] = NULL_SIGNATURE; - last_bkt->key_idx[i] = EMPTY_SLOT; + __atomic_store_n(&last_bkt->key_idx[i], + EMPTY_SLOT, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); return; } } @@ -1449,7 +1488,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* look for key in primary bucket */ ret = search_and_remove(h, key, prim_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(prim_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, prim_bkt, pos); last_bkt = prim_bkt->next; prev_bkt = prim_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1461,7 +1500,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, sec_bkt) { ret = search_and_remove(h, key, cur_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(cur_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, cur_bkt, pos); last_bkt = sec_bkt->next; prev_bkt = sec_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1488,11 +1527,24 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, } /* found empty bucket and recycle */ if (i == RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES) { - prev_bkt->next = last_bkt->next = NULL; + prev_bkt->next = NULL; uint32_t index = last_bkt - h->buckets_ext + 1; - rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + /* Recycle the empty bkt if + * no_free_on_del is disabled. + */ + if (h->no_free_on_del) + /* Store index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled + * on calling rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. + * When lock free read-write concurrency is enabled, + * an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list + * immediately (as readers might be using it still). + * Hence freeing of the ext bkt is piggy-backed to + * freeing of the key index. + */ + h->ext_bkt_to_free[ret] = index; + else + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); } - __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return ret; } @@ -1545,6 +1597,14 @@ rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, /* Out of bounds */ if (position >= total_entries) return -EINVAL; + if (h->ext_table_support) { + uint32_t index = h->ext_bkt_to_free[position]; + if (index) { + /* Recycle empty ext bkt to free list. */ + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + h->ext_bkt_to_free[position] = 0; + } + } if (h->use_local_cache) { lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); @@ -1855,6 +1915,9 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, rte_prefetch0(secondary_bkt[i]); } + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) + positions[i] = -ENOENT; + do { /* Load the table change counter before the lookup * starts. Acquire semantics will make sure that @@ -1899,7 +1962,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, /* Compare keys, first hits in primary first */ for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - positions[i] = -ENOENT; while (prim_hitmask[i]) { uint32_t hit_index = __builtin_ctzl(prim_hitmask[i]) @@ -1972,6 +2034,35 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, continue; } + /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ + if (hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) { + if (hit_mask != NULL) + *hit_mask = hits; + return; + } + /* need to check ext buckets for match */ + if (h->ext_table_support) { + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { + if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) + continue; + next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; + FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { + if (data != NULL) + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + &data[i], cur_bkt); + else + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + NULL, cur_bkt); + if (ret != -1) { + positions[i] = ret; + hits |= 1ULL << i; + break; + } + } + } + } /* The loads of sig_current in compare_signatures * should not move below the load from tbl_chng_cnt. */ @@ -1988,34 +2079,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE); } while (cnt_b != cnt_a); - /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ - if ((hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) || !h->ext_table_support) { - if (hit_mask != NULL) - *hit_mask = hits; - __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h); - return; - } - - /* need to check ext buckets for match */ - for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) - continue; - next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; - FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { - if (data != NULL) - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], &data[i], cur_bkt); - else - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], NULL, cur_bkt); - if (ret != -1) { - positions[i] = ret; - hits |= 1ULL << i; - break; - } - } - } - if (hit_mask != NULL) *hit_mask = hits; } diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h index eacdaa8d4684..48c85c890712 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ struct rte_hash { rte_rwlock_t *readwrite_lock; /**< Read-write lock thread-safety. */ struct rte_hash_bucket *buckets_ext; /**< Extra buckets array */ struct rte_ring *free_ext_bkts; /**< Ring of indexes of free buckets */ + /* Stores index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled on calling + * rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. When lock free read-write concurrency is + * enabled, an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list immediately + * (as readers might be using it still). Hence freeing of the ext bkt + * is piggy-backed to freeing of the key index. + */ + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt; /**< Indicates if the hash table changed from last read. */ } __rte_cache_aligned; -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-03-20 22:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-20 22:35 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-22 23:48 ` Wang, Yipeng1 1 sibling, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-20 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara, John McNamara, Marko Kovacevic Cc: dev, Dharmik Thakkar This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> --- doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 3 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 ++ 3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst index 85a6edfa8b16..b00446e949ba 100644 --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst @@ -108,8 +108,7 @@ Extendable Bucket Functionality support An extra flag is used to enable this functionality (flag is not set by default). When the (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE) is set and in the very unlikely case due to excessive hash collisions that a key has failed to be inserted, the hash table bucket is extended with a linked list to insert these failed keys. This feature is important for the workloads (e.g. telco workloads) that need to insert up to 100% of the -hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Currently the extendable bucket is not supported -with the lock-free concurrency implementation (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF). +hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Implementation Details (non Extendable Bucket Case) diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c index c01489ba5193..4cb05a5528c1 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) unsigned int readwrite_concur_support = 0; unsigned int writer_takes_lock = 0; unsigned int no_free_on_del = 0; + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free = NULL; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt = NULL; unsigned int readwrite_concur_lf_support = 0; @@ -170,15 +171,6 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) return NULL; } - if ((params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) && - (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE)) { - rte_errno = EINVAL; - RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "rte_hash_create: extendable bucket " - "feature not supported with rw concurrency " - "lock free\n"); - return NULL; - } - /* Check extra flags field to check extra options. */ if (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_TRANS_MEM_SUPPORT) hw_trans_mem_support = 1; @@ -302,6 +294,16 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) */ for (i = 1; i <= num_buckets; i++) rte_ring_sp_enqueue(r_ext, (void *)((uintptr_t) i)); + + if (readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + ext_bkt_to_free = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * + num_key_slots, 0); + if (ext_bkt_to_free == NULL) { + RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "ext bkt to free memory allocation " + "failed\n"); + goto err_unlock; + } + } } const uint32_t key_entry_size = @@ -393,6 +395,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) default_hash_func : params->hash_func; h->key_store = k; h->free_slots = r; + h->ext_bkt_to_free = ext_bkt_to_free; h->tbl_chng_cnt = tbl_chng_cnt; *h->tbl_chng_cnt = 0; h->hw_trans_mem_support = hw_trans_mem_support; @@ -443,6 +446,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) rte_free(buckets_ext); rte_free(k); rte_free(tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(ext_bkt_to_free); return NULL; } @@ -484,6 +488,7 @@ rte_hash_free(struct rte_hash *h) rte_free(h->buckets); rte_free(h->buckets_ext); rte_free(h->tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(h->ext_bkt_to_free); rte_free(h); rte_free(te); } @@ -799,7 +804,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -831,7 +836,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -1054,7 +1059,15 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* Check if slot is available */ if (likely(cur_bkt->key_idx[i] == EMPTY_SLOT)) { cur_bkt->sig_current[i] = short_sig; - cur_bkt->key_idx[i] = new_idx; + /* Key can be of arbitrary length, so it is + * not possible to store it atomically. + * Hence the new key element's memory stores + * (key as well as data) should be complete + * before it is referenced. + */ + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[i], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return new_idx - 1; } @@ -1072,7 +1085,15 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, bkt_id = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)ext_bkt_id) - 1; /* Use the first location of the new bucket */ (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).sig_current[0] = short_sig; - (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0] = new_idx; + /* Key can be of arbitrary length, so it is + * not possible to store it atomically. + * Hence the new key element's memory stores + * (key as well as data) should be complete + * before it is referenced. + */ + __atomic_store_n(&(h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); /* Link the new bucket to sec bucket linked list */ last = rte_hash_get_last_bkt(sec_bkt); last->next = &h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]; @@ -1366,7 +1387,8 @@ remove_entry(const struct rte_hash *h, struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt, unsigned i) * empty slot. */ static inline void -__rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { +__rte_hash_compact_ll(const struct rte_hash *h, + struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { int i; struct rte_hash_bucket *last_bkt; @@ -1377,10 +1399,27 @@ __rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { for (i = RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (last_bkt->key_idx[i] != EMPTY_SLOT) { - cur_bkt->key_idx[pos] = last_bkt->key_idx[i]; cur_bkt->sig_current[pos] = last_bkt->sig_current[i]; + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[pos], + last_bkt->key_idx[i], + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + if (h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + /* Inform the readers that the table has changed + * Since there is one writer, load acquire on + * tbl_chng_cnt is not required. + */ + __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, + *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + /* The store to sig_current should + * not move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. + */ + __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); + } last_bkt->sig_current[i] = NULL_SIGNATURE; - last_bkt->key_idx[i] = EMPTY_SLOT; + __atomic_store_n(&last_bkt->key_idx[i], + EMPTY_SLOT, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); return; } } @@ -1449,7 +1488,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* look for key in primary bucket */ ret = search_and_remove(h, key, prim_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(prim_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, prim_bkt, pos); last_bkt = prim_bkt->next; prev_bkt = prim_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1461,7 +1500,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, sec_bkt) { ret = search_and_remove(h, key, cur_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(cur_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, cur_bkt, pos); last_bkt = sec_bkt->next; prev_bkt = sec_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1488,11 +1527,24 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, } /* found empty bucket and recycle */ if (i == RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES) { - prev_bkt->next = last_bkt->next = NULL; + prev_bkt->next = NULL; uint32_t index = last_bkt - h->buckets_ext + 1; - rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + /* Recycle the empty bkt if + * no_free_on_del is disabled. + */ + if (h->no_free_on_del) + /* Store index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled + * on calling rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. + * When lock free read-write concurrency is enabled, + * an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list + * immediately (as readers might be using it still). + * Hence freeing of the ext bkt is piggy-backed to + * freeing of the key index. + */ + h->ext_bkt_to_free[ret] = index; + else + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); } - __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return ret; } @@ -1545,6 +1597,14 @@ rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, /* Out of bounds */ if (position >= total_entries) return -EINVAL; + if (h->ext_table_support) { + uint32_t index = h->ext_bkt_to_free[position]; + if (index) { + /* Recycle empty ext bkt to free list. */ + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + h->ext_bkt_to_free[position] = 0; + } + } if (h->use_local_cache) { lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); @@ -1855,6 +1915,9 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, rte_prefetch0(secondary_bkt[i]); } + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) + positions[i] = -ENOENT; + do { /* Load the table change counter before the lookup * starts. Acquire semantics will make sure that @@ -1899,7 +1962,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, /* Compare keys, first hits in primary first */ for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - positions[i] = -ENOENT; while (prim_hitmask[i]) { uint32_t hit_index = __builtin_ctzl(prim_hitmask[i]) @@ -1972,6 +2034,35 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, continue; } + /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ + if (hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) { + if (hit_mask != NULL) + *hit_mask = hits; + return; + } + /* need to check ext buckets for match */ + if (h->ext_table_support) { + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { + if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) + continue; + next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; + FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { + if (data != NULL) + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + &data[i], cur_bkt); + else + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + NULL, cur_bkt); + if (ret != -1) { + positions[i] = ret; + hits |= 1ULL << i; + break; + } + } + } + } /* The loads of sig_current in compare_signatures * should not move below the load from tbl_chng_cnt. */ @@ -1988,34 +2079,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE); } while (cnt_b != cnt_a); - /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ - if ((hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) || !h->ext_table_support) { - if (hit_mask != NULL) - *hit_mask = hits; - __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h); - return; - } - - /* need to check ext buckets for match */ - for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) - continue; - next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; - FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { - if (data != NULL) - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], &data[i], cur_bkt); - else - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], NULL, cur_bkt); - if (ret != -1) { - positions[i] = ret; - hits |= 1ULL << i; - break; - } - } - } - if (hit_mask != NULL) *hit_mask = hits; } diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h index eacdaa8d4684..48c85c890712 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ struct rte_hash { rte_rwlock_t *readwrite_lock; /**< Read-write lock thread-safety. */ struct rte_hash_bucket *buckets_ext; /**< Extra buckets array */ struct rte_ring *free_ext_bkts; /**< Ring of indexes of free buckets */ + /* Stores index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled on calling + * rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. When lock free read-write concurrency is + * enabled, an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list immediately + * (as readers might be using it still). Hence freeing of the ext bkt + * is piggy-backed to freeing of the key index. + */ + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt; /**< Indicates if the hash table changed from last read. */ } __rte_cache_aligned; -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-03-20 22:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-20 22:35 ` Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-22 23:48 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-03-22 23:48 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-03-25 20:10 ` Dharmik Thakkar 1 sibling, 2 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Wang, Yipeng1 @ 2019-03-22 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dharmik Thakkar, Gobriel, Sameh, Richardson, Bruce, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, Mcnamara, John, Kovacevic, Marko Cc: dev, Gobriel, Sameh, Tai, Charlie Thanks for the patch! Comments inlined: >-----Original Message----- >From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thakkar@arm.com] >Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 3:35 PM >To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce ><bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John ><john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Kovacevic, Marko <marko.kovacevic@intel.com> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >Subject: [PATCH 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket > >This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for >extendable bucket feature. > >Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> >Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> >Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >--- > doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 3 +- > lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- > lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 ++ > 3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst >index 85a6edfa8b16..b00446e949ba 100644 >--- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst >+++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst >@@ -108,8 +108,7 @@ Extendable Bucket Functionality support > An extra flag is used to enable this functionality (flag is not set by default). When the (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE) is set >and > in the very unlikely case due to excessive hash collisions that a key has failed to be inserted, the hash table bucket is extended with a >linked > list to insert these failed keys. This feature is important for the workloads (e.g. telco workloads) that need to insert up to 100% of the >-hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Currently the extendable bucket is not supported >-with the lock-free concurrency implementation (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF). >+hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). [Wang, Yipeng] I am thinking maybe make it a bit more clear here by adding something like: Please note that with the lock-free flag enabled, users need to promptly free the deleted keys, to maintain the 100% capacity guarantee. I want to add this because of the piggy-back mechanism, one un-recycled key with an un-recycled ext bucket may actually makes in total of 9 entries unavailable (8 entries in the ext bucket). So it would be useful to remind the user here. > > >@@ -1054,7 +1059,15 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, > /* Check if slot is available */ > if (likely(cur_bkt->key_idx[i] == EMPTY_SLOT)) { > cur_bkt->sig_current[i] = short_sig; >- cur_bkt->key_idx[i] = new_idx; >+ /* Key can be of arbitrary length, so it is >+ * not possible to store it atomically. >+ * Hence the new key element's memory stores >+ * (key as well as data) should be complete >+ * before it is referenced. >+ */ [Wang, Yipeng] My understanding is this atomic store is to prevent the signature store leaking after the key_idx store. But the comment does not exactly describe this reason. >+ __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[i], >+ new_idx, >+ __ATOMIC_RELEASE); > __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); > return new_idx - 1; > } >@@ -1545,6 +1597,14 @@ rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, > /* Out of bounds */ > if (position >= total_entries) > return -EINVAL; >+ if (h->ext_table_support) { >+ uint32_t index = h->ext_bkt_to_free[position]; [Wang, Yipeng] I think user can theoretically set RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_NO_FREE_ON_DEL to be 1 But LF flag to be 0. I think here you assume this function only called when LF flag is 1. You may need to Add another condition e.g. if(h->ext_table_support && h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) >+ if (index) { >+ /* Recycle empty ext bkt to free list. */ >+ rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); >+ h->ext_bkt_to_free[position] = 0; >+ } >+ } > > if (h->use_local_cache) { > lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-03-22 23:48 ` Wang, Yipeng1 @ 2019-03-22 23:48 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-03-25 20:10 ` Dharmik Thakkar 1 sibling, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Wang, Yipeng1 @ 2019-03-22 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dharmik Thakkar, Gobriel, Sameh, Richardson, Bruce, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, Mcnamara, John, Kovacevic, Marko Cc: dev, Gobriel, Sameh, Tai, Charlie Thanks for the patch! Comments inlined: >-----Original Message----- >From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thakkar@arm.com] >Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 3:35 PM >To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce ><bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John ><john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Kovacevic, Marko <marko.kovacevic@intel.com> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >Subject: [PATCH 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket > >This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for >extendable bucket feature. > >Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> >Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> >Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >--- > doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 3 +- > lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- > lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 ++ > 3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst >index 85a6edfa8b16..b00446e949ba 100644 >--- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst >+++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst >@@ -108,8 +108,7 @@ Extendable Bucket Functionality support > An extra flag is used to enable this functionality (flag is not set by default). When the (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE) is set >and > in the very unlikely case due to excessive hash collisions that a key has failed to be inserted, the hash table bucket is extended with a >linked > list to insert these failed keys. This feature is important for the workloads (e.g. telco workloads) that need to insert up to 100% of the >-hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Currently the extendable bucket is not supported >-with the lock-free concurrency implementation (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF). >+hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). [Wang, Yipeng] I am thinking maybe make it a bit more clear here by adding something like: Please note that with the lock-free flag enabled, users need to promptly free the deleted keys, to maintain the 100% capacity guarantee. I want to add this because of the piggy-back mechanism, one un-recycled key with an un-recycled ext bucket may actually makes in total of 9 entries unavailable (8 entries in the ext bucket). So it would be useful to remind the user here. > > >@@ -1054,7 +1059,15 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, > /* Check if slot is available */ > if (likely(cur_bkt->key_idx[i] == EMPTY_SLOT)) { > cur_bkt->sig_current[i] = short_sig; >- cur_bkt->key_idx[i] = new_idx; >+ /* Key can be of arbitrary length, so it is >+ * not possible to store it atomically. >+ * Hence the new key element's memory stores >+ * (key as well as data) should be complete >+ * before it is referenced. >+ */ [Wang, Yipeng] My understanding is this atomic store is to prevent the signature store leaking after the key_idx store. But the comment does not exactly describe this reason. >+ __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[i], >+ new_idx, >+ __ATOMIC_RELEASE); > __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); > return new_idx - 1; > } >@@ -1545,6 +1597,14 @@ rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, > /* Out of bounds */ > if (position >= total_entries) > return -EINVAL; >+ if (h->ext_table_support) { >+ uint32_t index = h->ext_bkt_to_free[position]; [Wang, Yipeng] I think user can theoretically set RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_NO_FREE_ON_DEL to be 1 But LF flag to be 0. I think here you assume this function only called when LF flag is 1. You may need to Add another condition e.g. if(h->ext_table_support && h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) >+ if (index) { >+ /* Recycle empty ext bkt to free list. */ >+ rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); >+ h->ext_bkt_to_free[position] = 0; >+ } >+ } > > if (h->use_local_cache) { > lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-03-22 23:48 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-03-22 23:48 ` Wang, Yipeng1 @ 2019-03-25 20:10 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 20:10 ` Dharmik Thakkar 1 sibling, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-25 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wang, Yipeng1 Cc: Gobriel, Sameh, Richardson, Bruce, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, Mcnamara, John, Kovacevic, Marko, dev, Tai, Charlie, nd, Honnappa Nagarahalli +Honnappa Hi Yipeng, Thank you for reviewing! > On Mar 22, 2019, at 6:48 PM, Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the patch! > > Comments inlined: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thakkar@arm.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 3:35 PM >> To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce >> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John >> <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Kovacevic, Marko <marko.kovacevic@intel.com> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket >> >> This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for >> extendable bucket feature. >> >> Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >> --- >> doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 3 +- >> lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- >> lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 ++ >> 3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst >> index 85a6edfa8b16..b00446e949ba 100644 >> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst >> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst >> @@ -108,8 +108,7 @@ Extendable Bucket Functionality support >> An extra flag is used to enable this functionality (flag is not set by default). When the (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE) is set >> and >> in the very unlikely case due to excessive hash collisions that a key has failed to be inserted, the hash table bucket is extended with a >> linked >> list to insert these failed keys. This feature is important for the workloads (e.g. telco workloads) that need to insert up to 100% of the >> -hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Currently the extendable bucket is not supported >> -with the lock-free concurrency implementation (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF). >> +hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). > [Wang, Yipeng] I am thinking maybe make it a bit more clear here by adding something like: > Please note that with the lock-free flag enabled, users need to promptly free the deleted keys, to maintain the 100% capacity guarantee. > > I want to add this because of the piggy-back mechanism, one un-recycled key with an un-recycled ext bucket may actually makes in total > of 9 entries unavailable (8 entries in the ext bucket). So it would be useful to remind the user here. All right. I will add it. >> >> >> @@ -1054,7 +1059,15 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, >> /* Check if slot is available */ >> if (likely(cur_bkt->key_idx[i] == EMPTY_SLOT)) { >> cur_bkt->sig_current[i] = short_sig; >> - cur_bkt->key_idx[i] = new_idx; >> + /* Key can be of arbitrary length, so it is >> + * not possible to store it atomically. >> + * Hence the new key element's memory stores >> + * (key as well as data) should be complete >> + * before it is referenced. >> + */ > [Wang, Yipeng] My understanding is this atomic store is to prevent the signature store leaking after the key_idx store. > But the comment does not exactly describe this reason. I will update the comment. >> + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[i], >> + new_idx, >> + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); >> __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); >> return new_idx - 1; >> } >> @@ -1545,6 +1597,14 @@ rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, >> /* Out of bounds */ >> if (position >= total_entries) >> return -EINVAL; >> + if (h->ext_table_support) { >> + uint32_t index = h->ext_bkt_to_free[position]; > [Wang, Yipeng] I think user can theoretically set RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_NO_FREE_ON_DEL to be 1 > But LF flag to be 0. I think here you assume this function only called when LF flag is 1. You may need to > Add another condition e.g. if(h->ext_table_support && h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) Correct. I will update it. >> + if (index) { >> + /* Recycle empty ext bkt to free list. */ >> + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); >> + h->ext_bkt_to_free[position] = 0; >> + } >> + } >> >> if (h->use_local_cache) { >> lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-03-25 20:10 ` Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-25 20:10 ` Dharmik Thakkar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-25 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wang, Yipeng1 Cc: Gobriel, Sameh, Richardson, Bruce, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, Mcnamara, John, Kovacevic, Marko, dev, Tai, Charlie, nd, Honnappa Nagarahalli +Honnappa Hi Yipeng, Thank you for reviewing! > On Mar 22, 2019, at 6:48 PM, Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the patch! > > Comments inlined: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thakkar@arm.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 3:35 PM >> To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce >> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John >> <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Kovacevic, Marko <marko.kovacevic@intel.com> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket >> >> This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for >> extendable bucket feature. >> >> Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >> --- >> doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 3 +- >> lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- >> lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 ++ >> 3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst >> index 85a6edfa8b16..b00446e949ba 100644 >> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst >> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst >> @@ -108,8 +108,7 @@ Extendable Bucket Functionality support >> An extra flag is used to enable this functionality (flag is not set by default). When the (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE) is set >> and >> in the very unlikely case due to excessive hash collisions that a key has failed to be inserted, the hash table bucket is extended with a >> linked >> list to insert these failed keys. This feature is important for the workloads (e.g. telco workloads) that need to insert up to 100% of the >> -hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Currently the extendable bucket is not supported >> -with the lock-free concurrency implementation (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF). >> +hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). > [Wang, Yipeng] I am thinking maybe make it a bit more clear here by adding something like: > Please note that with the lock-free flag enabled, users need to promptly free the deleted keys, to maintain the 100% capacity guarantee. > > I want to add this because of the piggy-back mechanism, one un-recycled key with an un-recycled ext bucket may actually makes in total > of 9 entries unavailable (8 entries in the ext bucket). So it would be useful to remind the user here. All right. I will add it. >> >> >> @@ -1054,7 +1059,15 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, >> /* Check if slot is available */ >> if (likely(cur_bkt->key_idx[i] == EMPTY_SLOT)) { >> cur_bkt->sig_current[i] = short_sig; >> - cur_bkt->key_idx[i] = new_idx; >> + /* Key can be of arbitrary length, so it is >> + * not possible to store it atomically. >> + * Hence the new key element's memory stores >> + * (key as well as data) should be complete >> + * before it is referenced. >> + */ > [Wang, Yipeng] My understanding is this atomic store is to prevent the signature store leaking after the key_idx store. > But the comment does not exactly describe this reason. I will update the comment. >> + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[i], >> + new_idx, >> + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); >> __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); >> return new_idx - 1; >> } >> @@ -1545,6 +1597,14 @@ rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, >> /* Out of bounds */ >> if (position >= total_entries) >> return -EINVAL; >> + if (h->ext_table_support) { >> + uint32_t index = h->ext_bkt_to_free[position]; > [Wang, Yipeng] I think user can theoretically set RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_NO_FREE_ON_DEL to be 1 > But LF flag to be 0. I think here you assume this function only called when LF flag is 1. You may need to > Add another condition e.g. if(h->ext_table_support && h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) Correct. I will update it. >> + if (index) { >> + /* Recycle empty ext bkt to free list. */ >> + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); >> + h->ext_bkt_to_free[position] = 0; >> + } >> + } >> >> if (h->use_local_cache) { >> lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-03-20 22:35 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-20 22:35 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-20 22:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-20 22:35 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-20 22:35 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 3 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-20 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara Cc: dev, Dharmik Thakkar Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf. Test with lock-free enabled and with lock-free disabled. Test include: - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt, hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> --- app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 284 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c index cbfd9322696b..ddd8d7aa6a7d 100644 --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ #define READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH 4 #define READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH 8 #define BULK_LOOKUP 16 +#define READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT 32 + +#define WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT 0 +#define WRITE_KEY_SHIFT 1 +#define WRITE_EXT_BKT 2 + #define NUM_TEST 3 unsigned int rwc_core_cnt[NUM_TEST] = {1, 2, 4}; @@ -51,6 +57,7 @@ struct rwc_perf { uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_sp[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t w_ks_r_miss[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t multi_rw[NUM_TEST - 1][2][NUM_TEST]; + uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[2][NUM_TEST]; }; static struct rwc_perf rwc_lf_results, rwc_non_lf_results; @@ -62,11 +69,15 @@ struct { uint32_t *keys_absent; uint32_t *keys_shift_path; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks; uint32_t count_keys_ks; uint32_t count_keys_absent; uint32_t count_keys_shift_path; uint32_t count_keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt; + uint32_t count_keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t single_insert; struct rte_hash *h; } tbl_rwc_test_param; @@ -81,6 +92,35 @@ uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; uint8_t *scanned_bkts; +static inline uint16_t +get_short_sig(const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + return hash >> 16; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_prim_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return hash & bucket_bitmask; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_alt_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + uint32_t cur_bkt_idx, uint16_t sig) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return (cur_bkt_idx ^ sig) & bucket_bitmask; +} + + static inline int get_enabled_cores_list(void) { @@ -168,9 +208,12 @@ generate_keys(void) uint32_t *keys_ks = NULL; uint32_t *keys_absent = NULL; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt = NULL; uint32_t *found = NULL; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks = 0; uint32_t count_keys_ks = 0; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt = 0; uint32_t i; /* @@ -251,14 +294,32 @@ generate_keys(void) goto err; } + /* + * This consist of keys which will be stored in extended buckets + */ + keys_ext_bkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ext_bkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } + + /* + * This consist of keys which when deleted causes shifting of keys + * in extended buckets to respective secondary buckets + */ + keys_ks_extbkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ks_extbkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } hash_sig_t sig; uint32_t prim_bucket_idx; - int ret; + uint32_t sec_bucket_idx; + uint16_t short_sig; uint32_t num_buckets; - uint32_t bucket_bitmask; num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; - bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + int ret; /* * Used to mark bkts in which at least one key was shifted to its @@ -275,6 +336,8 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks = keys_ks; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_absent = keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path = keys_non_shift_path; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt = keys_ext_bkt; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt = keys_ks_extbkt; /* Generate keys by adding previous two keys, neglect overflow */ printf("Generating keys...\n"); keys[0] = 0; @@ -287,7 +350,8 @@ generate_keys(void) /* Check if primary bucket has space.*/ sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, tbl_rwc_test_param.keys+i); - prim_bucket_idx = sig & bucket_bitmask; + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + sig); ret = check_bucket(prim_bucket_idx, keys[i]); if (ret < 0) { /* @@ -368,6 +432,47 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_absent = count_keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path = count; + memset(scanned_bkts, 0, num_buckets); + count = 0; + /* Find keys that will be in extended buckets */ + for (i = 0; i < count_keys_ks; i++) { + ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys_ks + i); + if (ret < 0) { + /* Key will be added to ext bkt */ + keys_ext_bkt[count_keys_extbkt++] = keys_ks[i]; + /* Sec bkt to be added to keys_ks_extbkt */ + sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks + i); + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, sig); + short_sig = get_short_sig(sig); + sec_bucket_idx = get_alt_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + prim_bucket_idx, short_sig); + if (scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] == 0) + scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] = 1; + } + } + + /* Find keys that will shift keys in ext bucket*/ + for (i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++) { + if (scanned_bkts[i] == 1) { + iter = i * 8; + while (rte_hash_iterate(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + &next_key, &next_data, &iter) >= 0) { + /* Check if key belongs to the current bucket */ + if (i >= (iter-1)/8) + keys_ks_extbkt[count++] + = *(const uint32_t *)next_key; + else + break; + } + } + } + + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt = count; + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt = count_keys_extbkt; + printf("\nCount of keys NOT causing shifting of existing keys to " "alternate location: %d\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks); printf("\nCount of keys causing shifting of existing keys to alternate " @@ -378,6 +483,10 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path); printf("Count of keys not likely to be on the shift path: %d\n\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path); + printf("Count of keys in extended buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt); + printf("Count of keys shifting keys in ext buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(found); rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); @@ -390,12 +499,14 @@ generate_keys(void) rte_free(keys_absent); rte_free(found); rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path); + rte_free(keys_ext_bkt); + rte_free(keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(scanned_bkts); return -1; } static int -init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) +init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm, int ext_bkt) { struct rte_hash *handle; @@ -425,6 +536,9 @@ init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY | RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD; + if (ext_bkt) + hash_params.extra_flag |= RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE; + hash_params.name = "tests"; handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params); @@ -452,7 +566,7 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) void *temp_a[BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE]; /* Used to identify keys not inserted in the hash table */ - pos = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); + pos = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); if (pos == NULL) { printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); return -1; @@ -467,6 +581,9 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH) { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path; + } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT) { + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; + read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; } else { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path; @@ -482,7 +599,6 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) /* Array of pointer to the list of keys */ for (j = 0; j < BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE; j++) temp_a[j] = keys + i + j; - rte_hash_lookup_bulk(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, (const void **) ((uintptr_t)temp_a), @@ -539,22 +655,25 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } static int -write_keys(uint8_t key_shift) +write_keys(uint8_t write_type) { uint32_t i; int ret; uint32_t key_cnt; uint32_t *keys; - if (key_shift) { + if (write_type == WRITE_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks; - } else { + } else if (write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_no_ks; + } else if (write_type == WRITE_EXT_BKT) { + key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; } for (i = 0; i < key_cnt; i++) { ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys + i); - if (!key_shift && ret < 0) { + if ((write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) && ret < 0) { printf("writer failed %"PRIu32"\n", i); return -1; } @@ -581,18 +700,18 @@ test_rwc_multi_writer(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NO_KEY_SHIFTS; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, read - hit\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -612,7 +731,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; writer_done = 1; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) @@ -650,19 +769,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; int ret; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -687,7 +806,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -722,19 +841,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, - int rwc_lf, int htm) + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit" " (non-shift-path)\n"); @@ -755,15 +874,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -798,19 +917,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit (shift-path)" "\n"); @@ -831,15 +950,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -874,19 +993,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int - htm) + htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -906,15 +1025,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -949,18 +1068,18 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int */ static int test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m, k; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Multi-add-lookup\n"); uint8_t pos_core; @@ -991,8 +1110,8 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, writer_done = 0; for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) multi_writer_done[i] = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; /* Launch reader(s) */ @@ -1000,7 +1119,7 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; pos_core = 0; /* Launch writers */ @@ -1045,6 +1164,88 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, return -1; } +/* + * Test lookup perf: + * Reader(s) lookup keys present in the extendable bkt. + */ +static int +test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) +{ + unsigned int n, m; + uint64_t i; + int use_jhash = 0; + uint8_t write_type; + uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT; + + rte_atomic64_init(&greads); + rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); + + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) + goto err; + printf("\nTest: Hash add - key-shifts, read - hit (ext_bkt)\n"); + for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { + if (m == 1) { + printf("\n** With bulk-lookup **\n"); + read_type |= BULK_LOOKUP; + } + for (n = 0; n < NUM_TEST; n++) { + unsigned int tot_lcore = rte_lcore_count(); + if (tot_lcore < rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1) + goto finish; + + printf("\nNumber of readers: %u\n", rwc_core_cnt[n]); + + rte_atomic64_clear(&greads); + rte_atomic64_clear(&gread_cycles); + + rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + writer_done = 0; + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, + (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, + enabled_core_ids[i]); + for (i = 0; i < tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt; + i++) { + if (rte_hash_del_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt + i) + < 0) { + printf("Delete Failed: %u\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt[i]); + goto err; + } + } + writer_done = 1; + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); + + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0) + goto err; + + unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup = + rte_atomic64_read(&gread_cycles) / + rte_atomic64_read(&greads); + rwc_perf_results->w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[m][n] + = cycles_per_lookup; + printf("Cycles per lookup: %llu\n", cycles_per_lookup); + } + } + +finish: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return 0; + +err: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return -1; +} + static int test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) { @@ -1057,6 +1258,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) int rwc_lf = 0; int htm; int use_jhash = 0; + int ext_bkt = 0; if (rte_lcore_count() == 1) { printf("More than one lcore is required " "to do read write lock-free concurrency test\n"); @@ -1070,7 +1272,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) else htm = 0; - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) return -1; if (generate_keys() != 0) return -1; @@ -1079,25 +1281,29 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) if (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) { rwc_lf = 1; + ext_bkt = 1; printf("Test lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" " enabled\n"); if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; } printf("\nTest lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" @@ -1112,21 +1318,26 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) } } else printf("With HTM Enabled\n"); - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; results: printf("\n\t\t\t\t\t\t********** Results summary **********\n\n"); @@ -1158,8 +1369,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("Disabled\t"); if (htm) @@ -1179,7 +1393,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("_______\t\t_______\t\t_________\t___\t\t" "_________\t\t\t\t\t\t_________________\n"); -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-03-20 22:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-20 22:35 ` Dharmik Thakkar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-20 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara Cc: dev, Dharmik Thakkar Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf. Test with lock-free enabled and with lock-free disabled. Test include: - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt, hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> --- app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 284 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c index cbfd9322696b..ddd8d7aa6a7d 100644 --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ #define READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH 4 #define READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH 8 #define BULK_LOOKUP 16 +#define READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT 32 + +#define WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT 0 +#define WRITE_KEY_SHIFT 1 +#define WRITE_EXT_BKT 2 + #define NUM_TEST 3 unsigned int rwc_core_cnt[NUM_TEST] = {1, 2, 4}; @@ -51,6 +57,7 @@ struct rwc_perf { uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_sp[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t w_ks_r_miss[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t multi_rw[NUM_TEST - 1][2][NUM_TEST]; + uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[2][NUM_TEST]; }; static struct rwc_perf rwc_lf_results, rwc_non_lf_results; @@ -62,11 +69,15 @@ struct { uint32_t *keys_absent; uint32_t *keys_shift_path; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks; uint32_t count_keys_ks; uint32_t count_keys_absent; uint32_t count_keys_shift_path; uint32_t count_keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt; + uint32_t count_keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t single_insert; struct rte_hash *h; } tbl_rwc_test_param; @@ -81,6 +92,35 @@ uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; uint8_t *scanned_bkts; +static inline uint16_t +get_short_sig(const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + return hash >> 16; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_prim_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return hash & bucket_bitmask; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_alt_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + uint32_t cur_bkt_idx, uint16_t sig) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return (cur_bkt_idx ^ sig) & bucket_bitmask; +} + + static inline int get_enabled_cores_list(void) { @@ -168,9 +208,12 @@ generate_keys(void) uint32_t *keys_ks = NULL; uint32_t *keys_absent = NULL; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt = NULL; uint32_t *found = NULL; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks = 0; uint32_t count_keys_ks = 0; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt = 0; uint32_t i; /* @@ -251,14 +294,32 @@ generate_keys(void) goto err; } + /* + * This consist of keys which will be stored in extended buckets + */ + keys_ext_bkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ext_bkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } + + /* + * This consist of keys which when deleted causes shifting of keys + * in extended buckets to respective secondary buckets + */ + keys_ks_extbkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ks_extbkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } hash_sig_t sig; uint32_t prim_bucket_idx; - int ret; + uint32_t sec_bucket_idx; + uint16_t short_sig; uint32_t num_buckets; - uint32_t bucket_bitmask; num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; - bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + int ret; /* * Used to mark bkts in which at least one key was shifted to its @@ -275,6 +336,8 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks = keys_ks; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_absent = keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path = keys_non_shift_path; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt = keys_ext_bkt; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt = keys_ks_extbkt; /* Generate keys by adding previous two keys, neglect overflow */ printf("Generating keys...\n"); keys[0] = 0; @@ -287,7 +350,8 @@ generate_keys(void) /* Check if primary bucket has space.*/ sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, tbl_rwc_test_param.keys+i); - prim_bucket_idx = sig & bucket_bitmask; + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + sig); ret = check_bucket(prim_bucket_idx, keys[i]); if (ret < 0) { /* @@ -368,6 +432,47 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_absent = count_keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path = count; + memset(scanned_bkts, 0, num_buckets); + count = 0; + /* Find keys that will be in extended buckets */ + for (i = 0; i < count_keys_ks; i++) { + ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys_ks + i); + if (ret < 0) { + /* Key will be added to ext bkt */ + keys_ext_bkt[count_keys_extbkt++] = keys_ks[i]; + /* Sec bkt to be added to keys_ks_extbkt */ + sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks + i); + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, sig); + short_sig = get_short_sig(sig); + sec_bucket_idx = get_alt_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + prim_bucket_idx, short_sig); + if (scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] == 0) + scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] = 1; + } + } + + /* Find keys that will shift keys in ext bucket*/ + for (i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++) { + if (scanned_bkts[i] == 1) { + iter = i * 8; + while (rte_hash_iterate(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + &next_key, &next_data, &iter) >= 0) { + /* Check if key belongs to the current bucket */ + if (i >= (iter-1)/8) + keys_ks_extbkt[count++] + = *(const uint32_t *)next_key; + else + break; + } + } + } + + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt = count; + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt = count_keys_extbkt; + printf("\nCount of keys NOT causing shifting of existing keys to " "alternate location: %d\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks); printf("\nCount of keys causing shifting of existing keys to alternate " @@ -378,6 +483,10 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path); printf("Count of keys not likely to be on the shift path: %d\n\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path); + printf("Count of keys in extended buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt); + printf("Count of keys shifting keys in ext buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(found); rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); @@ -390,12 +499,14 @@ generate_keys(void) rte_free(keys_absent); rte_free(found); rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path); + rte_free(keys_ext_bkt); + rte_free(keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(scanned_bkts); return -1; } static int -init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) +init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm, int ext_bkt) { struct rte_hash *handle; @@ -425,6 +536,9 @@ init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY | RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD; + if (ext_bkt) + hash_params.extra_flag |= RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE; + hash_params.name = "tests"; handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params); @@ -452,7 +566,7 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) void *temp_a[BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE]; /* Used to identify keys not inserted in the hash table */ - pos = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); + pos = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); if (pos == NULL) { printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); return -1; @@ -467,6 +581,9 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH) { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path; + } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT) { + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; + read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; } else { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path; @@ -482,7 +599,6 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) /* Array of pointer to the list of keys */ for (j = 0; j < BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE; j++) temp_a[j] = keys + i + j; - rte_hash_lookup_bulk(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, (const void **) ((uintptr_t)temp_a), @@ -539,22 +655,25 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } static int -write_keys(uint8_t key_shift) +write_keys(uint8_t write_type) { uint32_t i; int ret; uint32_t key_cnt; uint32_t *keys; - if (key_shift) { + if (write_type == WRITE_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks; - } else { + } else if (write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_no_ks; + } else if (write_type == WRITE_EXT_BKT) { + key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; } for (i = 0; i < key_cnt; i++) { ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys + i); - if (!key_shift && ret < 0) { + if ((write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) && ret < 0) { printf("writer failed %"PRIu32"\n", i); return -1; } @@ -581,18 +700,18 @@ test_rwc_multi_writer(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NO_KEY_SHIFTS; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, read - hit\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -612,7 +731,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; writer_done = 1; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) @@ -650,19 +769,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; int ret; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -687,7 +806,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -722,19 +841,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, - int rwc_lf, int htm) + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit" " (non-shift-path)\n"); @@ -755,15 +874,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -798,19 +917,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit (shift-path)" "\n"); @@ -831,15 +950,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -874,19 +993,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int - htm) + htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -906,15 +1025,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -949,18 +1068,18 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int */ static int test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m, k; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Multi-add-lookup\n"); uint8_t pos_core; @@ -991,8 +1110,8 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, writer_done = 0; for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) multi_writer_done[i] = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; /* Launch reader(s) */ @@ -1000,7 +1119,7 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; pos_core = 0; /* Launch writers */ @@ -1045,6 +1164,88 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, return -1; } +/* + * Test lookup perf: + * Reader(s) lookup keys present in the extendable bkt. + */ +static int +test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) +{ + unsigned int n, m; + uint64_t i; + int use_jhash = 0; + uint8_t write_type; + uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT; + + rte_atomic64_init(&greads); + rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); + + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) + goto err; + printf("\nTest: Hash add - key-shifts, read - hit (ext_bkt)\n"); + for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { + if (m == 1) { + printf("\n** With bulk-lookup **\n"); + read_type |= BULK_LOOKUP; + } + for (n = 0; n < NUM_TEST; n++) { + unsigned int tot_lcore = rte_lcore_count(); + if (tot_lcore < rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1) + goto finish; + + printf("\nNumber of readers: %u\n", rwc_core_cnt[n]); + + rte_atomic64_clear(&greads); + rte_atomic64_clear(&gread_cycles); + + rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + writer_done = 0; + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, + (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, + enabled_core_ids[i]); + for (i = 0; i < tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt; + i++) { + if (rte_hash_del_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt + i) + < 0) { + printf("Delete Failed: %u\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt[i]); + goto err; + } + } + writer_done = 1; + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); + + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0) + goto err; + + unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup = + rte_atomic64_read(&gread_cycles) / + rte_atomic64_read(&greads); + rwc_perf_results->w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[m][n] + = cycles_per_lookup; + printf("Cycles per lookup: %llu\n", cycles_per_lookup); + } + } + +finish: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return 0; + +err: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return -1; +} + static int test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) { @@ -1057,6 +1258,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) int rwc_lf = 0; int htm; int use_jhash = 0; + int ext_bkt = 0; if (rte_lcore_count() == 1) { printf("More than one lcore is required " "to do read write lock-free concurrency test\n"); @@ -1070,7 +1272,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) else htm = 0; - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) return -1; if (generate_keys() != 0) return -1; @@ -1079,25 +1281,29 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) if (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) { rwc_lf = 1; + ext_bkt = 1; printf("Test lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" " enabled\n"); if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; } printf("\nTest lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" @@ -1112,21 +1318,26 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) } } else printf("With HTM Enabled\n"); - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; results: printf("\n\t\t\t\t\t\t********** Results summary **********\n\n"); @@ -1158,8 +1369,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("Disabled\t"); if (htm) @@ -1179,7 +1393,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("_______\t\t_______\t\t_________\t___\t\t" "_________\t\t\t\t\t\t_________________\n"); -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt 2019-03-20 22:35 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2019-03-20 22:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar ` (3 more replies) 3 siblings, 4 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-25 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: dev, Dharmik Thakkar This patch series: - Enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. - Adds lock-free read-write concurrency tests for ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar (2): hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 160 ++++++++----- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 + 4 files changed, 404 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-25 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: dev, Dharmik Thakkar This patch series: - Enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. - Adds lock-free read-write concurrency tests for ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar (2): hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 160 ++++++++----- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 + 4 files changed, 404 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 18:20 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 3 siblings, 2 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-25 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara, John McNamara, Marko Kovacevic Cc: dev, Dharmik Thakkar This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> --- v2: - Update doc (Yipeng) - Update lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c (Yipeng) --- doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 ++ 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst index 85a6edfa8b16..d06c7de2ead1 100644 --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst @@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ Extendable Bucket Functionality support An extra flag is used to enable this functionality (flag is not set by default). When the (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE) is set and in the very unlikely case due to excessive hash collisions that a key has failed to be inserted, the hash table bucket is extended with a linked list to insert these failed keys. This feature is important for the workloads (e.g. telco workloads) that need to insert up to 100% of the -hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Currently the extendable bucket is not supported -with the lock-free concurrency implementation (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF). - +hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). +Please note that with the 'lock free read/write concurrency' flag enabled, users need to call 'rte_hash_free_key_with_position' API in order to free the empty buckets and +deleted keys, to maintain the 100% capacity guarantee. Implementation Details (non Extendable Bucket Case) --------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c index c01489ba5193..98ec929a54eb 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) unsigned int readwrite_concur_support = 0; unsigned int writer_takes_lock = 0; unsigned int no_free_on_del = 0; + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free = NULL; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt = NULL; unsigned int readwrite_concur_lf_support = 0; @@ -170,15 +171,6 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) return NULL; } - if ((params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) && - (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE)) { - rte_errno = EINVAL; - RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "rte_hash_create: extendable bucket " - "feature not supported with rw concurrency " - "lock free\n"); - return NULL; - } - /* Check extra flags field to check extra options. */ if (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_TRANS_MEM_SUPPORT) hw_trans_mem_support = 1; @@ -302,6 +294,16 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) */ for (i = 1; i <= num_buckets; i++) rte_ring_sp_enqueue(r_ext, (void *)((uintptr_t) i)); + + if (readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + ext_bkt_to_free = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * + num_key_slots, 0); + if (ext_bkt_to_free == NULL) { + RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "ext bkt to free memory allocation " + "failed\n"); + goto err_unlock; + } + } } const uint32_t key_entry_size = @@ -393,6 +395,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) default_hash_func : params->hash_func; h->key_store = k; h->free_slots = r; + h->ext_bkt_to_free = ext_bkt_to_free; h->tbl_chng_cnt = tbl_chng_cnt; *h->tbl_chng_cnt = 0; h->hw_trans_mem_support = hw_trans_mem_support; @@ -443,6 +446,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) rte_free(buckets_ext); rte_free(k); rte_free(tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(ext_bkt_to_free); return NULL; } @@ -484,6 +488,7 @@ rte_hash_free(struct rte_hash *h) rte_free(h->buckets); rte_free(h->buckets_ext); rte_free(h->tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(h->ext_bkt_to_free); rte_free(h); rte_free(te); } @@ -799,7 +804,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -831,7 +836,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -1054,7 +1059,12 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* Check if slot is available */ if (likely(cur_bkt->key_idx[i] == EMPTY_SLOT)) { cur_bkt->sig_current[i] = short_sig; - cur_bkt->key_idx[i] = new_idx; + /* Store to signature should not leak after + * the store to key_idx + */ + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[i], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return new_idx - 1; } @@ -1072,7 +1082,15 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, bkt_id = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)ext_bkt_id) - 1; /* Use the first location of the new bucket */ (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).sig_current[0] = short_sig; - (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0] = new_idx; + /* Key can be of arbitrary length, so it is + * not possible to store it atomically. + * Hence the new key element's memory stores + * (key as well as data) should be complete + * before it is referenced. + */ + __atomic_store_n(&(h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); /* Link the new bucket to sec bucket linked list */ last = rte_hash_get_last_bkt(sec_bkt); last->next = &h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]; @@ -1366,7 +1384,8 @@ remove_entry(const struct rte_hash *h, struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt, unsigned i) * empty slot. */ static inline void -__rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { +__rte_hash_compact_ll(const struct rte_hash *h, + struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { int i; struct rte_hash_bucket *last_bkt; @@ -1377,10 +1396,27 @@ __rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { for (i = RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (last_bkt->key_idx[i] != EMPTY_SLOT) { - cur_bkt->key_idx[pos] = last_bkt->key_idx[i]; cur_bkt->sig_current[pos] = last_bkt->sig_current[i]; + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[pos], + last_bkt->key_idx[i], + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + if (h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + /* Inform the readers that the table has changed + * Since there is one writer, load acquire on + * tbl_chng_cnt is not required. + */ + __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, + *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + /* The store to sig_current should + * not move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. + */ + __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); + } last_bkt->sig_current[i] = NULL_SIGNATURE; - last_bkt->key_idx[i] = EMPTY_SLOT; + __atomic_store_n(&last_bkt->key_idx[i], + EMPTY_SLOT, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); return; } } @@ -1449,7 +1485,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* look for key in primary bucket */ ret = search_and_remove(h, key, prim_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(prim_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, prim_bkt, pos); last_bkt = prim_bkt->next; prev_bkt = prim_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1461,7 +1497,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, sec_bkt) { ret = search_and_remove(h, key, cur_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(cur_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, cur_bkt, pos); last_bkt = sec_bkt->next; prev_bkt = sec_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1488,11 +1524,24 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, } /* found empty bucket and recycle */ if (i == RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES) { - prev_bkt->next = last_bkt->next = NULL; + prev_bkt->next = NULL; uint32_t index = last_bkt - h->buckets_ext + 1; - rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + /* Recycle the empty bkt if + * no_free_on_del is disabled. + */ + if (h->no_free_on_del) + /* Store index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled + * on calling rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. + * When lock free read-write concurrency is enabled, + * an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list + * immediately (as readers might be using it still). + * Hence freeing of the ext bkt is piggy-backed to + * freeing of the key index. + */ + h->ext_bkt_to_free[ret] = index; + else + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); } - __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return ret; } @@ -1545,6 +1594,14 @@ rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, /* Out of bounds */ if (position >= total_entries) return -EINVAL; + if (h->ext_table_support && h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + uint32_t index = h->ext_bkt_to_free[position]; + if (index) { + /* Recycle empty ext bkt to free list. */ + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + h->ext_bkt_to_free[position] = 0; + } + } if (h->use_local_cache) { lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); @@ -1855,6 +1912,9 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, rte_prefetch0(secondary_bkt[i]); } + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) + positions[i] = -ENOENT; + do { /* Load the table change counter before the lookup * starts. Acquire semantics will make sure that @@ -1899,7 +1959,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, /* Compare keys, first hits in primary first */ for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - positions[i] = -ENOENT; while (prim_hitmask[i]) { uint32_t hit_index = __builtin_ctzl(prim_hitmask[i]) @@ -1972,6 +2031,35 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, continue; } + /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ + if (hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) { + if (hit_mask != NULL) + *hit_mask = hits; + return; + } + /* need to check ext buckets for match */ + if (h->ext_table_support) { + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { + if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) + continue; + next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; + FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { + if (data != NULL) + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + &data[i], cur_bkt); + else + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + NULL, cur_bkt); + if (ret != -1) { + positions[i] = ret; + hits |= 1ULL << i; + break; + } + } + } + } /* The loads of sig_current in compare_signatures * should not move below the load from tbl_chng_cnt. */ @@ -1988,34 +2076,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE); } while (cnt_b != cnt_a); - /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ - if ((hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) || !h->ext_table_support) { - if (hit_mask != NULL) - *hit_mask = hits; - __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h); - return; - } - - /* need to check ext buckets for match */ - for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) - continue; - next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; - FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { - if (data != NULL) - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], &data[i], cur_bkt); - else - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], NULL, cur_bkt); - if (ret != -1) { - positions[i] = ret; - hits |= 1ULL << i; - break; - } - } - } - if (hit_mask != NULL) *hit_mask = hits; } diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h index eacdaa8d4684..48c85c890712 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ struct rte_hash { rte_rwlock_t *readwrite_lock; /**< Read-write lock thread-safety. */ struct rte_hash_bucket *buckets_ext; /**< Extra buckets array */ struct rte_ring *free_ext_bkts; /**< Ring of indexes of free buckets */ + /* Stores index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled on calling + * rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. When lock free read-write concurrency is + * enabled, an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list immediately + * (as readers might be using it still). Hence freeing of the ext bkt + * is piggy-backed to freeing of the key index. + */ + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt; /**< Indicates if the hash table changed from last read. */ } __rte_cache_aligned; -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 18:20 ` Wang, Yipeng1 1 sibling, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-25 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara, John McNamara, Marko Kovacevic Cc: dev, Dharmik Thakkar This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> --- v2: - Update doc (Yipeng) - Update lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c (Yipeng) --- doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 ++ 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst index 85a6edfa8b16..d06c7de2ead1 100644 --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst @@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ Extendable Bucket Functionality support An extra flag is used to enable this functionality (flag is not set by default). When the (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE) is set and in the very unlikely case due to excessive hash collisions that a key has failed to be inserted, the hash table bucket is extended with a linked list to insert these failed keys. This feature is important for the workloads (e.g. telco workloads) that need to insert up to 100% of the -hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Currently the extendable bucket is not supported -with the lock-free concurrency implementation (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF). - +hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). +Please note that with the 'lock free read/write concurrency' flag enabled, users need to call 'rte_hash_free_key_with_position' API in order to free the empty buckets and +deleted keys, to maintain the 100% capacity guarantee. Implementation Details (non Extendable Bucket Case) --------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c index c01489ba5193..98ec929a54eb 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) unsigned int readwrite_concur_support = 0; unsigned int writer_takes_lock = 0; unsigned int no_free_on_del = 0; + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free = NULL; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt = NULL; unsigned int readwrite_concur_lf_support = 0; @@ -170,15 +171,6 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) return NULL; } - if ((params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) && - (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE)) { - rte_errno = EINVAL; - RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "rte_hash_create: extendable bucket " - "feature not supported with rw concurrency " - "lock free\n"); - return NULL; - } - /* Check extra flags field to check extra options. */ if (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_TRANS_MEM_SUPPORT) hw_trans_mem_support = 1; @@ -302,6 +294,16 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) */ for (i = 1; i <= num_buckets; i++) rte_ring_sp_enqueue(r_ext, (void *)((uintptr_t) i)); + + if (readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + ext_bkt_to_free = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * + num_key_slots, 0); + if (ext_bkt_to_free == NULL) { + RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "ext bkt to free memory allocation " + "failed\n"); + goto err_unlock; + } + } } const uint32_t key_entry_size = @@ -393,6 +395,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) default_hash_func : params->hash_func; h->key_store = k; h->free_slots = r; + h->ext_bkt_to_free = ext_bkt_to_free; h->tbl_chng_cnt = tbl_chng_cnt; *h->tbl_chng_cnt = 0; h->hw_trans_mem_support = hw_trans_mem_support; @@ -443,6 +446,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) rte_free(buckets_ext); rte_free(k); rte_free(tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(ext_bkt_to_free); return NULL; } @@ -484,6 +488,7 @@ rte_hash_free(struct rte_hash *h) rte_free(h->buckets); rte_free(h->buckets_ext); rte_free(h->tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(h->ext_bkt_to_free); rte_free(h); rte_free(te); } @@ -799,7 +804,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -831,7 +836,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -1054,7 +1059,12 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* Check if slot is available */ if (likely(cur_bkt->key_idx[i] == EMPTY_SLOT)) { cur_bkt->sig_current[i] = short_sig; - cur_bkt->key_idx[i] = new_idx; + /* Store to signature should not leak after + * the store to key_idx + */ + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[i], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return new_idx - 1; } @@ -1072,7 +1082,15 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, bkt_id = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)ext_bkt_id) - 1; /* Use the first location of the new bucket */ (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).sig_current[0] = short_sig; - (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0] = new_idx; + /* Key can be of arbitrary length, so it is + * not possible to store it atomically. + * Hence the new key element's memory stores + * (key as well as data) should be complete + * before it is referenced. + */ + __atomic_store_n(&(h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); /* Link the new bucket to sec bucket linked list */ last = rte_hash_get_last_bkt(sec_bkt); last->next = &h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]; @@ -1366,7 +1384,8 @@ remove_entry(const struct rte_hash *h, struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt, unsigned i) * empty slot. */ static inline void -__rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { +__rte_hash_compact_ll(const struct rte_hash *h, + struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { int i; struct rte_hash_bucket *last_bkt; @@ -1377,10 +1396,27 @@ __rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { for (i = RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (last_bkt->key_idx[i] != EMPTY_SLOT) { - cur_bkt->key_idx[pos] = last_bkt->key_idx[i]; cur_bkt->sig_current[pos] = last_bkt->sig_current[i]; + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[pos], + last_bkt->key_idx[i], + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + if (h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + /* Inform the readers that the table has changed + * Since there is one writer, load acquire on + * tbl_chng_cnt is not required. + */ + __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, + *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + /* The store to sig_current should + * not move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. + */ + __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); + } last_bkt->sig_current[i] = NULL_SIGNATURE; - last_bkt->key_idx[i] = EMPTY_SLOT; + __atomic_store_n(&last_bkt->key_idx[i], + EMPTY_SLOT, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); return; } } @@ -1449,7 +1485,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* look for key in primary bucket */ ret = search_and_remove(h, key, prim_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(prim_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, prim_bkt, pos); last_bkt = prim_bkt->next; prev_bkt = prim_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1461,7 +1497,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, sec_bkt) { ret = search_and_remove(h, key, cur_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(cur_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, cur_bkt, pos); last_bkt = sec_bkt->next; prev_bkt = sec_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1488,11 +1524,24 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, } /* found empty bucket and recycle */ if (i == RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES) { - prev_bkt->next = last_bkt->next = NULL; + prev_bkt->next = NULL; uint32_t index = last_bkt - h->buckets_ext + 1; - rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + /* Recycle the empty bkt if + * no_free_on_del is disabled. + */ + if (h->no_free_on_del) + /* Store index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled + * on calling rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. + * When lock free read-write concurrency is enabled, + * an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list + * immediately (as readers might be using it still). + * Hence freeing of the ext bkt is piggy-backed to + * freeing of the key index. + */ + h->ext_bkt_to_free[ret] = index; + else + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); } - __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return ret; } @@ -1545,6 +1594,14 @@ rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, /* Out of bounds */ if (position >= total_entries) return -EINVAL; + if (h->ext_table_support && h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + uint32_t index = h->ext_bkt_to_free[position]; + if (index) { + /* Recycle empty ext bkt to free list. */ + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + h->ext_bkt_to_free[position] = 0; + } + } if (h->use_local_cache) { lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); @@ -1855,6 +1912,9 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, rte_prefetch0(secondary_bkt[i]); } + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) + positions[i] = -ENOENT; + do { /* Load the table change counter before the lookup * starts. Acquire semantics will make sure that @@ -1899,7 +1959,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, /* Compare keys, first hits in primary first */ for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - positions[i] = -ENOENT; while (prim_hitmask[i]) { uint32_t hit_index = __builtin_ctzl(prim_hitmask[i]) @@ -1972,6 +2031,35 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, continue; } + /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ + if (hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) { + if (hit_mask != NULL) + *hit_mask = hits; + return; + } + /* need to check ext buckets for match */ + if (h->ext_table_support) { + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { + if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) + continue; + next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; + FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { + if (data != NULL) + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + &data[i], cur_bkt); + else + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + NULL, cur_bkt); + if (ret != -1) { + positions[i] = ret; + hits |= 1ULL << i; + break; + } + } + } + } /* The loads of sig_current in compare_signatures * should not move below the load from tbl_chng_cnt. */ @@ -1988,34 +2076,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE); } while (cnt_b != cnt_a); - /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ - if ((hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) || !h->ext_table_support) { - if (hit_mask != NULL) - *hit_mask = hits; - __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h); - return; - } - - /* need to check ext buckets for match */ - for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) - continue; - next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; - FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { - if (data != NULL) - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], &data[i], cur_bkt); - else - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], NULL, cur_bkt); - if (ret != -1) { - positions[i] = ret; - hits |= 1ULL << i; - break; - } - } - } - if (hit_mask != NULL) *hit_mask = hits; } diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h index eacdaa8d4684..48c85c890712 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ struct rte_hash { rte_rwlock_t *readwrite_lock; /**< Read-write lock thread-safety. */ struct rte_hash_bucket *buckets_ext; /**< Extra buckets array */ struct rte_ring *free_ext_bkts; /**< Ring of indexes of free buckets */ + /* Stores index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled on calling + * rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. When lock free read-write concurrency is + * enabled, an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list immediately + * (as readers might be using it still). Hence freeing of the ext bkt + * is piggy-backed to freeing of the key index. + */ + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt; /**< Indicates if the hash table changed from last read. */ } __rte_cache_aligned; -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 18:20 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 18:20 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 20:16 ` Dharmik Thakkar 1 sibling, 2 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Wang, Yipeng1 @ 2019-04-01 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dharmik Thakkar, Gobriel, Sameh, Richardson, Bruce, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, Mcnamara, John, Kovacevic, Marko Cc: dev >-----Original Message----- >From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thakkar@arm.com] >Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 2:09 PM >To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce ><bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John ><john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Kovacevic, Marko <marko.kovacevic@intel.com> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket > >This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for >extendable bucket feature. > >Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> >Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> >Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >@@ -1072,7 +1082,15 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, > bkt_id = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)ext_bkt_id) - 1; > /* Use the first location of the new bucket */ > (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).sig_current[0] = short_sig; >- (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0] = new_idx; >+ /* Key can be of arbitrary length, so it is >+ * not possible to store it atomically. >+ * Hence the new key element's memory stores >+ * (key as well as data) should be complete >+ * before it is referenced. >+ */ [Wang, Yipeng] Minor issue: does this comment need to be fixed too? If so you could include my ack for next version. Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> Thanks Yipeng! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-04-01 18:20 ` Wang, Yipeng1 @ 2019-04-01 18:20 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 20:16 ` Dharmik Thakkar 1 sibling, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Wang, Yipeng1 @ 2019-04-01 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dharmik Thakkar, Gobriel, Sameh, Richardson, Bruce, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, Mcnamara, John, Kovacevic, Marko Cc: dev >-----Original Message----- >From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thakkar@arm.com] >Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 2:09 PM >To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce ><bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John ><john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Kovacevic, Marko <marko.kovacevic@intel.com> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket > >This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for >extendable bucket feature. > >Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> >Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> >Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >@@ -1072,7 +1082,15 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, > bkt_id = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)ext_bkt_id) - 1; > /* Use the first location of the new bucket */ > (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).sig_current[0] = short_sig; >- (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0] = new_idx; >+ /* Key can be of arbitrary length, so it is >+ * not possible to store it atomically. >+ * Hence the new key element's memory stores >+ * (key as well as data) should be complete >+ * before it is referenced. >+ */ [Wang, Yipeng] Minor issue: does this comment need to be fixed too? If so you could include my ack for next version. Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> Thanks Yipeng! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-04-01 18:20 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 18:20 ` Wang, Yipeng1 @ 2019-04-01 20:16 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 20:16 ` Dharmik Thakkar 1 sibling, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wang, Yipeng1 Cc: Gobriel, Sameh, Richardson, Bruce, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, Mcnamara, John, Kovacevic, Marko, dev, Honnappa Nagarahalli, nd +Honnappa Hi Yipeng, Thank you for the review! > On Apr 1, 2019, at 1:20 PM, Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thakkar@arm.com] >> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 2:09 PM >> To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce >> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John >> <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Kovacevic, Marko <marko.kovacevic@intel.com> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket >> >> This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for >> extendable bucket feature. >> >> Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >> @@ -1072,7 +1082,15 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, >> bkt_id = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)ext_bkt_id) - 1; >> /* Use the first location of the new bucket */ >> (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).sig_current[0] = short_sig; >> - (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0] = new_idx; >> + /* Key can be of arbitrary length, so it is >> + * not possible to store it atomically. >> + * Hence the new key element's memory stores >> + * (key as well as data) should be complete >> + * before it is referenced. >> + */ > [Wang, Yipeng] Minor issue: does this comment need to be fixed too? If so you could include my ack for next version. Yes, I will fix it in the next version. > > Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> > > > Thanks > Yipeng! > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-04-01 20:16 ` Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 20:16 ` Dharmik Thakkar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wang, Yipeng1 Cc: Gobriel, Sameh, Richardson, Bruce, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, Mcnamara, John, Kovacevic, Marko, dev, Honnappa Nagarahalli, nd +Honnappa Hi Yipeng, Thank you for the review! > On Apr 1, 2019, at 1:20 PM, Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thakkar@arm.com] >> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 2:09 PM >> To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce >> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John >> <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Kovacevic, Marko <marko.kovacevic@intel.com> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket >> >> This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for >> extendable bucket feature. >> >> Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >> @@ -1072,7 +1082,15 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, >> bkt_id = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)ext_bkt_id) - 1; >> /* Use the first location of the new bucket */ >> (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).sig_current[0] = short_sig; >> - (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0] = new_idx; >> + /* Key can be of arbitrary length, so it is >> + * not possible to store it atomically. >> + * Hence the new key element's memory stores >> + * (key as well as data) should be complete >> + * before it is referenced. >> + */ > [Wang, Yipeng] Minor issue: does this comment need to be fixed too? If so you could include my ack for next version. Yes, I will fix it in the next version. > > Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> > > > Thanks > Yipeng! > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 18:55 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 3 siblings, 2 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-25 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara Cc: dev, Dharmik Thakkar Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf. Test with lock-free enabled and with lock-free disabled. Test include: - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt, hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> --- app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 284 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c index cbfd9322696b..ddd8d7aa6a7d 100644 --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ #define READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH 4 #define READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH 8 #define BULK_LOOKUP 16 +#define READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT 32 + +#define WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT 0 +#define WRITE_KEY_SHIFT 1 +#define WRITE_EXT_BKT 2 + #define NUM_TEST 3 unsigned int rwc_core_cnt[NUM_TEST] = {1, 2, 4}; @@ -51,6 +57,7 @@ struct rwc_perf { uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_sp[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t w_ks_r_miss[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t multi_rw[NUM_TEST - 1][2][NUM_TEST]; + uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[2][NUM_TEST]; }; static struct rwc_perf rwc_lf_results, rwc_non_lf_results; @@ -62,11 +69,15 @@ struct { uint32_t *keys_absent; uint32_t *keys_shift_path; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks; uint32_t count_keys_ks; uint32_t count_keys_absent; uint32_t count_keys_shift_path; uint32_t count_keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt; + uint32_t count_keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t single_insert; struct rte_hash *h; } tbl_rwc_test_param; @@ -81,6 +92,35 @@ uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; uint8_t *scanned_bkts; +static inline uint16_t +get_short_sig(const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + return hash >> 16; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_prim_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return hash & bucket_bitmask; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_alt_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + uint32_t cur_bkt_idx, uint16_t sig) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return (cur_bkt_idx ^ sig) & bucket_bitmask; +} + + static inline int get_enabled_cores_list(void) { @@ -168,9 +208,12 @@ generate_keys(void) uint32_t *keys_ks = NULL; uint32_t *keys_absent = NULL; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt = NULL; uint32_t *found = NULL; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks = 0; uint32_t count_keys_ks = 0; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt = 0; uint32_t i; /* @@ -251,14 +294,32 @@ generate_keys(void) goto err; } + /* + * This consist of keys which will be stored in extended buckets + */ + keys_ext_bkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ext_bkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } + + /* + * This consist of keys which when deleted causes shifting of keys + * in extended buckets to respective secondary buckets + */ + keys_ks_extbkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ks_extbkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } hash_sig_t sig; uint32_t prim_bucket_idx; - int ret; + uint32_t sec_bucket_idx; + uint16_t short_sig; uint32_t num_buckets; - uint32_t bucket_bitmask; num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; - bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + int ret; /* * Used to mark bkts in which at least one key was shifted to its @@ -275,6 +336,8 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks = keys_ks; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_absent = keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path = keys_non_shift_path; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt = keys_ext_bkt; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt = keys_ks_extbkt; /* Generate keys by adding previous two keys, neglect overflow */ printf("Generating keys...\n"); keys[0] = 0; @@ -287,7 +350,8 @@ generate_keys(void) /* Check if primary bucket has space.*/ sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, tbl_rwc_test_param.keys+i); - prim_bucket_idx = sig & bucket_bitmask; + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + sig); ret = check_bucket(prim_bucket_idx, keys[i]); if (ret < 0) { /* @@ -368,6 +432,47 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_absent = count_keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path = count; + memset(scanned_bkts, 0, num_buckets); + count = 0; + /* Find keys that will be in extended buckets */ + for (i = 0; i < count_keys_ks; i++) { + ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys_ks + i); + if (ret < 0) { + /* Key will be added to ext bkt */ + keys_ext_bkt[count_keys_extbkt++] = keys_ks[i]; + /* Sec bkt to be added to keys_ks_extbkt */ + sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks + i); + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, sig); + short_sig = get_short_sig(sig); + sec_bucket_idx = get_alt_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + prim_bucket_idx, short_sig); + if (scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] == 0) + scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] = 1; + } + } + + /* Find keys that will shift keys in ext bucket*/ + for (i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++) { + if (scanned_bkts[i] == 1) { + iter = i * 8; + while (rte_hash_iterate(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + &next_key, &next_data, &iter) >= 0) { + /* Check if key belongs to the current bucket */ + if (i >= (iter-1)/8) + keys_ks_extbkt[count++] + = *(const uint32_t *)next_key; + else + break; + } + } + } + + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt = count; + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt = count_keys_extbkt; + printf("\nCount of keys NOT causing shifting of existing keys to " "alternate location: %d\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks); printf("\nCount of keys causing shifting of existing keys to alternate " @@ -378,6 +483,10 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path); printf("Count of keys not likely to be on the shift path: %d\n\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path); + printf("Count of keys in extended buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt); + printf("Count of keys shifting keys in ext buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(found); rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); @@ -390,12 +499,14 @@ generate_keys(void) rte_free(keys_absent); rte_free(found); rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path); + rte_free(keys_ext_bkt); + rte_free(keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(scanned_bkts); return -1; } static int -init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) +init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm, int ext_bkt) { struct rte_hash *handle; @@ -425,6 +536,9 @@ init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY | RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD; + if (ext_bkt) + hash_params.extra_flag |= RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE; + hash_params.name = "tests"; handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params); @@ -452,7 +566,7 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) void *temp_a[BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE]; /* Used to identify keys not inserted in the hash table */ - pos = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); + pos = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); if (pos == NULL) { printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); return -1; @@ -467,6 +581,9 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH) { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path; + } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT) { + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; + read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; } else { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path; @@ -482,7 +599,6 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) /* Array of pointer to the list of keys */ for (j = 0; j < BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE; j++) temp_a[j] = keys + i + j; - rte_hash_lookup_bulk(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, (const void **) ((uintptr_t)temp_a), @@ -539,22 +655,25 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } static int -write_keys(uint8_t key_shift) +write_keys(uint8_t write_type) { uint32_t i; int ret; uint32_t key_cnt; uint32_t *keys; - if (key_shift) { + if (write_type == WRITE_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks; - } else { + } else if (write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_no_ks; + } else if (write_type == WRITE_EXT_BKT) { + key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; } for (i = 0; i < key_cnt; i++) { ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys + i); - if (!key_shift && ret < 0) { + if ((write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) && ret < 0) { printf("writer failed %"PRIu32"\n", i); return -1; } @@ -581,18 +700,18 @@ test_rwc_multi_writer(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NO_KEY_SHIFTS; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, read - hit\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -612,7 +731,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; writer_done = 1; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) @@ -650,19 +769,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; int ret; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -687,7 +806,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -722,19 +841,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, - int rwc_lf, int htm) + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit" " (non-shift-path)\n"); @@ -755,15 +874,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -798,19 +917,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit (shift-path)" "\n"); @@ -831,15 +950,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -874,19 +993,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int - htm) + htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -906,15 +1025,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -949,18 +1068,18 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int */ static int test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m, k; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Multi-add-lookup\n"); uint8_t pos_core; @@ -991,8 +1110,8 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, writer_done = 0; for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) multi_writer_done[i] = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; /* Launch reader(s) */ @@ -1000,7 +1119,7 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; pos_core = 0; /* Launch writers */ @@ -1045,6 +1164,88 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, return -1; } +/* + * Test lookup perf: + * Reader(s) lookup keys present in the extendable bkt. + */ +static int +test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) +{ + unsigned int n, m; + uint64_t i; + int use_jhash = 0; + uint8_t write_type; + uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT; + + rte_atomic64_init(&greads); + rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); + + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) + goto err; + printf("\nTest: Hash add - key-shifts, read - hit (ext_bkt)\n"); + for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { + if (m == 1) { + printf("\n** With bulk-lookup **\n"); + read_type |= BULK_LOOKUP; + } + for (n = 0; n < NUM_TEST; n++) { + unsigned int tot_lcore = rte_lcore_count(); + if (tot_lcore < rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1) + goto finish; + + printf("\nNumber of readers: %u\n", rwc_core_cnt[n]); + + rte_atomic64_clear(&greads); + rte_atomic64_clear(&gread_cycles); + + rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + writer_done = 0; + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, + (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, + enabled_core_ids[i]); + for (i = 0; i < tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt; + i++) { + if (rte_hash_del_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt + i) + < 0) { + printf("Delete Failed: %u\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt[i]); + goto err; + } + } + writer_done = 1; + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); + + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0) + goto err; + + unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup = + rte_atomic64_read(&gread_cycles) / + rte_atomic64_read(&greads); + rwc_perf_results->w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[m][n] + = cycles_per_lookup; + printf("Cycles per lookup: %llu\n", cycles_per_lookup); + } + } + +finish: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return 0; + +err: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return -1; +} + static int test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) { @@ -1057,6 +1258,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) int rwc_lf = 0; int htm; int use_jhash = 0; + int ext_bkt = 0; if (rte_lcore_count() == 1) { printf("More than one lcore is required " "to do read write lock-free concurrency test\n"); @@ -1070,7 +1272,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) else htm = 0; - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) return -1; if (generate_keys() != 0) return -1; @@ -1079,25 +1281,29 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) if (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) { rwc_lf = 1; + ext_bkt = 1; printf("Test lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" " enabled\n"); if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; } printf("\nTest lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" @@ -1112,21 +1318,26 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) } } else printf("With HTM Enabled\n"); - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; results: printf("\n\t\t\t\t\t\t********** Results summary **********\n\n"); @@ -1158,8 +1369,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("Disabled\t"); if (htm) @@ -1179,7 +1393,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("_______\t\t_______\t\t_________\t___\t\t" "_________\t\t\t\t\t\t_________________\n"); -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 18:55 ` Wang, Yipeng1 1 sibling, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-03-25 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara Cc: dev, Dharmik Thakkar Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf. Test with lock-free enabled and with lock-free disabled. Test include: - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt, hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> --- app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 284 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c index cbfd9322696b..ddd8d7aa6a7d 100644 --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ #define READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH 4 #define READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH 8 #define BULK_LOOKUP 16 +#define READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT 32 + +#define WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT 0 +#define WRITE_KEY_SHIFT 1 +#define WRITE_EXT_BKT 2 + #define NUM_TEST 3 unsigned int rwc_core_cnt[NUM_TEST] = {1, 2, 4}; @@ -51,6 +57,7 @@ struct rwc_perf { uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_sp[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t w_ks_r_miss[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t multi_rw[NUM_TEST - 1][2][NUM_TEST]; + uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[2][NUM_TEST]; }; static struct rwc_perf rwc_lf_results, rwc_non_lf_results; @@ -62,11 +69,15 @@ struct { uint32_t *keys_absent; uint32_t *keys_shift_path; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks; uint32_t count_keys_ks; uint32_t count_keys_absent; uint32_t count_keys_shift_path; uint32_t count_keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt; + uint32_t count_keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t single_insert; struct rte_hash *h; } tbl_rwc_test_param; @@ -81,6 +92,35 @@ uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; uint8_t *scanned_bkts; +static inline uint16_t +get_short_sig(const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + return hash >> 16; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_prim_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return hash & bucket_bitmask; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_alt_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + uint32_t cur_bkt_idx, uint16_t sig) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return (cur_bkt_idx ^ sig) & bucket_bitmask; +} + + static inline int get_enabled_cores_list(void) { @@ -168,9 +208,12 @@ generate_keys(void) uint32_t *keys_ks = NULL; uint32_t *keys_absent = NULL; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt = NULL; uint32_t *found = NULL; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks = 0; uint32_t count_keys_ks = 0; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt = 0; uint32_t i; /* @@ -251,14 +294,32 @@ generate_keys(void) goto err; } + /* + * This consist of keys which will be stored in extended buckets + */ + keys_ext_bkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ext_bkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } + + /* + * This consist of keys which when deleted causes shifting of keys + * in extended buckets to respective secondary buckets + */ + keys_ks_extbkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ks_extbkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } hash_sig_t sig; uint32_t prim_bucket_idx; - int ret; + uint32_t sec_bucket_idx; + uint16_t short_sig; uint32_t num_buckets; - uint32_t bucket_bitmask; num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; - bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + int ret; /* * Used to mark bkts in which at least one key was shifted to its @@ -275,6 +336,8 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks = keys_ks; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_absent = keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path = keys_non_shift_path; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt = keys_ext_bkt; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt = keys_ks_extbkt; /* Generate keys by adding previous two keys, neglect overflow */ printf("Generating keys...\n"); keys[0] = 0; @@ -287,7 +350,8 @@ generate_keys(void) /* Check if primary bucket has space.*/ sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, tbl_rwc_test_param.keys+i); - prim_bucket_idx = sig & bucket_bitmask; + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + sig); ret = check_bucket(prim_bucket_idx, keys[i]); if (ret < 0) { /* @@ -368,6 +432,47 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_absent = count_keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path = count; + memset(scanned_bkts, 0, num_buckets); + count = 0; + /* Find keys that will be in extended buckets */ + for (i = 0; i < count_keys_ks; i++) { + ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys_ks + i); + if (ret < 0) { + /* Key will be added to ext bkt */ + keys_ext_bkt[count_keys_extbkt++] = keys_ks[i]; + /* Sec bkt to be added to keys_ks_extbkt */ + sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks + i); + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, sig); + short_sig = get_short_sig(sig); + sec_bucket_idx = get_alt_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + prim_bucket_idx, short_sig); + if (scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] == 0) + scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] = 1; + } + } + + /* Find keys that will shift keys in ext bucket*/ + for (i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++) { + if (scanned_bkts[i] == 1) { + iter = i * 8; + while (rte_hash_iterate(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + &next_key, &next_data, &iter) >= 0) { + /* Check if key belongs to the current bucket */ + if (i >= (iter-1)/8) + keys_ks_extbkt[count++] + = *(const uint32_t *)next_key; + else + break; + } + } + } + + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt = count; + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt = count_keys_extbkt; + printf("\nCount of keys NOT causing shifting of existing keys to " "alternate location: %d\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks); printf("\nCount of keys causing shifting of existing keys to alternate " @@ -378,6 +483,10 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path); printf("Count of keys not likely to be on the shift path: %d\n\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path); + printf("Count of keys in extended buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt); + printf("Count of keys shifting keys in ext buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(found); rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); @@ -390,12 +499,14 @@ generate_keys(void) rte_free(keys_absent); rte_free(found); rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path); + rte_free(keys_ext_bkt); + rte_free(keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(scanned_bkts); return -1; } static int -init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) +init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm, int ext_bkt) { struct rte_hash *handle; @@ -425,6 +536,9 @@ init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY | RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD; + if (ext_bkt) + hash_params.extra_flag |= RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE; + hash_params.name = "tests"; handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params); @@ -452,7 +566,7 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) void *temp_a[BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE]; /* Used to identify keys not inserted in the hash table */ - pos = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); + pos = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); if (pos == NULL) { printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); return -1; @@ -467,6 +581,9 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH) { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path; + } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT) { + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; + read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; } else { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path; @@ -482,7 +599,6 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) /* Array of pointer to the list of keys */ for (j = 0; j < BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE; j++) temp_a[j] = keys + i + j; - rte_hash_lookup_bulk(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, (const void **) ((uintptr_t)temp_a), @@ -539,22 +655,25 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } static int -write_keys(uint8_t key_shift) +write_keys(uint8_t write_type) { uint32_t i; int ret; uint32_t key_cnt; uint32_t *keys; - if (key_shift) { + if (write_type == WRITE_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks; - } else { + } else if (write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_no_ks; + } else if (write_type == WRITE_EXT_BKT) { + key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; } for (i = 0; i < key_cnt; i++) { ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys + i); - if (!key_shift && ret < 0) { + if ((write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) && ret < 0) { printf("writer failed %"PRIu32"\n", i); return -1; } @@ -581,18 +700,18 @@ test_rwc_multi_writer(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NO_KEY_SHIFTS; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, read - hit\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -612,7 +731,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; writer_done = 1; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) @@ -650,19 +769,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; int ret; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -687,7 +806,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -722,19 +841,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, - int rwc_lf, int htm) + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit" " (non-shift-path)\n"); @@ -755,15 +874,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -798,19 +917,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit (shift-path)" "\n"); @@ -831,15 +950,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -874,19 +993,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int - htm) + htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -906,15 +1025,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -949,18 +1068,18 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int */ static int test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m, k; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Multi-add-lookup\n"); uint8_t pos_core; @@ -991,8 +1110,8 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, writer_done = 0; for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) multi_writer_done[i] = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; /* Launch reader(s) */ @@ -1000,7 +1119,7 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; pos_core = 0; /* Launch writers */ @@ -1045,6 +1164,88 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, return -1; } +/* + * Test lookup perf: + * Reader(s) lookup keys present in the extendable bkt. + */ +static int +test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) +{ + unsigned int n, m; + uint64_t i; + int use_jhash = 0; + uint8_t write_type; + uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT; + + rte_atomic64_init(&greads); + rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); + + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) + goto err; + printf("\nTest: Hash add - key-shifts, read - hit (ext_bkt)\n"); + for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { + if (m == 1) { + printf("\n** With bulk-lookup **\n"); + read_type |= BULK_LOOKUP; + } + for (n = 0; n < NUM_TEST; n++) { + unsigned int tot_lcore = rte_lcore_count(); + if (tot_lcore < rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1) + goto finish; + + printf("\nNumber of readers: %u\n", rwc_core_cnt[n]); + + rte_atomic64_clear(&greads); + rte_atomic64_clear(&gread_cycles); + + rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + writer_done = 0; + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, + (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, + enabled_core_ids[i]); + for (i = 0; i < tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt; + i++) { + if (rte_hash_del_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt + i) + < 0) { + printf("Delete Failed: %u\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt[i]); + goto err; + } + } + writer_done = 1; + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); + + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0) + goto err; + + unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup = + rte_atomic64_read(&gread_cycles) / + rte_atomic64_read(&greads); + rwc_perf_results->w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[m][n] + = cycles_per_lookup; + printf("Cycles per lookup: %llu\n", cycles_per_lookup); + } + } + +finish: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return 0; + +err: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return -1; +} + static int test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) { @@ -1057,6 +1258,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) int rwc_lf = 0; int htm; int use_jhash = 0; + int ext_bkt = 0; if (rte_lcore_count() == 1) { printf("More than one lcore is required " "to do read write lock-free concurrency test\n"); @@ -1070,7 +1272,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) else htm = 0; - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) return -1; if (generate_keys() != 0) return -1; @@ -1079,25 +1281,29 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) if (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) { rwc_lf = 1; + ext_bkt = 1; printf("Test lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" " enabled\n"); if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; } printf("\nTest lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" @@ -1112,21 +1318,26 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) } } else printf("With HTM Enabled\n"); - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; results: printf("\n\t\t\t\t\t\t********** Results summary **********\n\n"); @@ -1158,8 +1369,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("Disabled\t"); if (htm) @@ -1179,7 +1393,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("_______\t\t_______\t\t_________\t___\t\t" "_________\t\t\t\t\t\t_________________\n"); -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 18:55 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 18:55 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 20:06 ` Dharmik Thakkar 1 sibling, 2 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Wang, Yipeng1 @ 2019-04-01 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dharmik Thakkar, Gobriel, Sameh, Richardson, Bruce, De Lara Guarch, Pablo Cc: dev A little bit improvement on commit-message maybe needed. >-----Original Message----- >From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thakkar@arm.com] >Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 2:09 PM >To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce ><bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt [Wang, Yipeng] *for* ext bucket > >Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf. [Wang, Yipeng] for extendable bucket feature. >Test with lock-free enabled and with lock-free disabled. [Wang, Yipeng] It is tested with both lock-free enabled and disabled case. > >Test include: > >- hash lookup on keys in ext bkt, >hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt [Wang, Yipeng] Two test scenarios right? A bit of formatting.. Tests include: - hash lookup on keys in ext bucket. - hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bucket to secondary bucket. > >Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >--- >+/* >+ * Test lookup perf: >+ * Reader(s) lookup keys present in the extendable bkt. >+ */ >+static int >+test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, >+ int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) >+{ >+ unsigned int n, m; >+ uint64_t i; >+ int use_jhash = 0; >+ uint8_t write_type; >+ uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT; >+ >+ rte_atomic64_init(&greads); >+ rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); >+ >+ if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) >+ goto err; >+ printf("\nTest: Hash add - key-shifts, read - hit (ext_bkt)\n"); >+ for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { >+ if (m == 1) { >+ printf("\n** With bulk-lookup **\n"); >+ read_type |= BULK_LOOKUP; >+ } >+ for (n = 0; n < NUM_TEST; n++) { >+ unsigned int tot_lcore = rte_lcore_count(); >+ if (tot_lcore < rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1) >+ goto finish; >+ >+ printf("\nNumber of readers: %u\n", rwc_core_cnt[n]); >+ >+ rte_atomic64_clear(&greads); >+ rte_atomic64_clear(&gread_cycles); >+ >+ rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); >+ write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; >+ if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) >+ goto err; >+ write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; >+ if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) >+ goto err; >+ writer_done = 0; >+ for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) >+ rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, >+ (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, >+ enabled_core_ids[i]); >+ for (i = 0; i < tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt; >+ i++) { >+ if (rte_hash_del_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, >+ tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt + i) >+ < 0) { >+ printf("Delete Failed: %u\n", >+ tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt[i]); >+ goto err; >+ } >+ } >+ writer_done = 1; >+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); [Wang, Yipeng] Not requirement for this perf patch, but is it better to read the shifted key again Just to verify the logic? If not difficult please add. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-04-01 18:55 ` Wang, Yipeng1 @ 2019-04-01 18:55 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 20:06 ` Dharmik Thakkar 1 sibling, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Wang, Yipeng1 @ 2019-04-01 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dharmik Thakkar, Gobriel, Sameh, Richardson, Bruce, De Lara Guarch, Pablo Cc: dev A little bit improvement on commit-message maybe needed. >-----Original Message----- >From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thakkar@arm.com] >Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 2:09 PM >To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce ><bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt [Wang, Yipeng] *for* ext bucket > >Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf. [Wang, Yipeng] for extendable bucket feature. >Test with lock-free enabled and with lock-free disabled. [Wang, Yipeng] It is tested with both lock-free enabled and disabled case. > >Test include: > >- hash lookup on keys in ext bkt, >hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt [Wang, Yipeng] Two test scenarios right? A bit of formatting.. Tests include: - hash lookup on keys in ext bucket. - hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bucket to secondary bucket. > >Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >--- >+/* >+ * Test lookup perf: >+ * Reader(s) lookup keys present in the extendable bkt. >+ */ >+static int >+test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, >+ int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) >+{ >+ unsigned int n, m; >+ uint64_t i; >+ int use_jhash = 0; >+ uint8_t write_type; >+ uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT; >+ >+ rte_atomic64_init(&greads); >+ rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); >+ >+ if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) >+ goto err; >+ printf("\nTest: Hash add - key-shifts, read - hit (ext_bkt)\n"); >+ for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { >+ if (m == 1) { >+ printf("\n** With bulk-lookup **\n"); >+ read_type |= BULK_LOOKUP; >+ } >+ for (n = 0; n < NUM_TEST; n++) { >+ unsigned int tot_lcore = rte_lcore_count(); >+ if (tot_lcore < rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1) >+ goto finish; >+ >+ printf("\nNumber of readers: %u\n", rwc_core_cnt[n]); >+ >+ rte_atomic64_clear(&greads); >+ rte_atomic64_clear(&gread_cycles); >+ >+ rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); >+ write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; >+ if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) >+ goto err; >+ write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; >+ if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) >+ goto err; >+ writer_done = 0; >+ for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) >+ rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, >+ (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, >+ enabled_core_ids[i]); >+ for (i = 0; i < tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt; >+ i++) { >+ if (rte_hash_del_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, >+ tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt + i) >+ < 0) { >+ printf("Delete Failed: %u\n", >+ tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt[i]); >+ goto err; >+ } >+ } >+ writer_done = 1; >+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); [Wang, Yipeng] Not requirement for this perf patch, but is it better to read the shifted key again Just to verify the logic? If not difficult please add. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-04-01 18:55 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 18:55 ` Wang, Yipeng1 @ 2019-04-01 20:06 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 20:06 ` Dharmik Thakkar 1 sibling, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wang, Yipeng1 Cc: Gobriel, Sameh, Richardson, Bruce, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, dev, Honnappa Nagarahalli, nd +Honnappa Hi Yipeng, Thank you for the review comments! > On Apr 1, 2019, at 1:55 PM, Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> wrote: > > A little bit improvement on commit-message maybe needed. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thakkar@arm.com] >> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 2:09 PM >> To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce >> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt > [Wang, Yipeng] *for* ext bucket Exceeds 50 characters limit. >> >> Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf. > [Wang, Yipeng] for extendable bucket feature. Will update in the next version. >> Test with lock-free enabled and with lock-free disabled. > [Wang, Yipeng] It is tested with both lock-free enabled and disabled case. Will update in the next version. > >> >> Test include: >> >> - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt, >> hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt > [Wang, Yipeng] > Two test scenarios right? A bit of formatting.. > Tests include: It is a single test wherein lookup perf is tested for with hash delete causing key-shifts. I will put it as Test includes: > - hash lookup on keys in ext bucket. > - hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bucket to secondary bucket. > >> >> Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >> --- >> +/* >> + * Test lookup perf: >> + * Reader(s) lookup keys present in the extendable bkt. >> + */ >> +static int >> +test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, >> + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) >> +{ >> + unsigned int n, m; >> + uint64_t i; >> + int use_jhash = 0; >> + uint8_t write_type; >> + uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT; >> + >> + rte_atomic64_init(&greads); >> + rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); >> + >> + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) >> + goto err; >> + printf("\nTest: Hash add - key-shifts, read - hit (ext_bkt)\n"); >> + for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { >> + if (m == 1) { >> + printf("\n** With bulk-lookup **\n"); >> + read_type |= BULK_LOOKUP; >> + } >> + for (n = 0; n < NUM_TEST; n++) { >> + unsigned int tot_lcore = rte_lcore_count(); >> + if (tot_lcore < rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1) >> + goto finish; >> + >> + printf("\nNumber of readers: %u\n", rwc_core_cnt[n]); >> + >> + rte_atomic64_clear(&greads); >> + rte_atomic64_clear(&gread_cycles); >> + >> + rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); >> + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; >> + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) >> + goto err; >> + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; >> + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) >> + goto err; >> + writer_done = 0; >> + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) >> + rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, >> + (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, >> + enabled_core_ids[i]); >> + for (i = 0; i < tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt; >> + i++) { >> + if (rte_hash_del_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, >> + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt + i) >> + < 0) { >> + printf("Delete Failed: %u\n", >> + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt[i]); >> + goto err; >> + } >> + } >> + writer_done = 1; >> + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); > [Wang, Yipeng] Not requirement for this perf patch, but is it better to read the shifted key again > Just to verify the logic? If not difficult please add. Keys in ext bkt (including shifted keys) are being read in a loop while writer_done equals 0 i.e. while keys are being deleted. Test fails if look up fails. Do you think there is still a need to add one more round of look up on all the keys in ext bkt (some of which have now been shifted to secondary bkts)? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-04-01 20:06 ` Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 20:06 ` Dharmik Thakkar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wang, Yipeng1 Cc: Gobriel, Sameh, Richardson, Bruce, De Lara Guarch, Pablo, dev, Honnappa Nagarahalli, nd +Honnappa Hi Yipeng, Thank you for the review comments! > On Apr 1, 2019, at 1:55 PM, Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> wrote: > > A little bit improvement on commit-message maybe needed. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thakkar@arm.com] >> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 2:09 PM >> To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce >> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt > [Wang, Yipeng] *for* ext bucket Exceeds 50 characters limit. >> >> Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf. > [Wang, Yipeng] for extendable bucket feature. Will update in the next version. >> Test with lock-free enabled and with lock-free disabled. > [Wang, Yipeng] It is tested with both lock-free enabled and disabled case. Will update in the next version. > >> >> Test include: >> >> - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt, >> hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt > [Wang, Yipeng] > Two test scenarios right? A bit of formatting.. > Tests include: It is a single test wherein lookup perf is tested for with hash delete causing key-shifts. I will put it as Test includes: > - hash lookup on keys in ext bucket. > - hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bucket to secondary bucket. > >> >> Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >> --- >> +/* >> + * Test lookup perf: >> + * Reader(s) lookup keys present in the extendable bkt. >> + */ >> +static int >> +test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, >> + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) >> +{ >> + unsigned int n, m; >> + uint64_t i; >> + int use_jhash = 0; >> + uint8_t write_type; >> + uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT; >> + >> + rte_atomic64_init(&greads); >> + rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); >> + >> + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) >> + goto err; >> + printf("\nTest: Hash add - key-shifts, read - hit (ext_bkt)\n"); >> + for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { >> + if (m == 1) { >> + printf("\n** With bulk-lookup **\n"); >> + read_type |= BULK_LOOKUP; >> + } >> + for (n = 0; n < NUM_TEST; n++) { >> + unsigned int tot_lcore = rte_lcore_count(); >> + if (tot_lcore < rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1) >> + goto finish; >> + >> + printf("\nNumber of readers: %u\n", rwc_core_cnt[n]); >> + >> + rte_atomic64_clear(&greads); >> + rte_atomic64_clear(&gread_cycles); >> + >> + rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); >> + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; >> + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) >> + goto err; >> + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; >> + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) >> + goto err; >> + writer_done = 0; >> + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) >> + rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, >> + (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, >> + enabled_core_ids[i]); >> + for (i = 0; i < tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt; >> + i++) { >> + if (rte_hash_del_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, >> + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt + i) >> + < 0) { >> + printf("Delete Failed: %u\n", >> + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt[i]); >> + goto err; >> + } >> + } >> + writer_done = 1; >> + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); > [Wang, Yipeng] Not requirement for this perf patch, but is it better to read the shifted key again > Just to verify the logic? If not difficult please add. Keys in ext bkt (including shifted keys) are being read in a loop while writer_done equals 0 i.e. while keys are being deleted. Test fails if look up fails. Do you think there is still a need to add one more round of look up on all the keys in ext bkt (some of which have now been shifted to secondary bkts)? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 22:18 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` Dharmik Thakkar ` (3 more replies) 3 siblings, 4 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar This patch series: - Enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. - Adds lock-free read-write concurrency tests for ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar (2): hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 157 ++++++++----- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 + 4 files changed, 401 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 22:18 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar This patch series: - Enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. - Adds lock-free read-write concurrency tests for ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar (2): hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 157 ++++++++----- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 + 4 files changed, 401 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 22:18 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 3 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara, John McNamara, Marko Kovacevic Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> --- doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 ++ 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst index 85a6edfa8b16..d06c7de2ead1 100644 --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst @@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ Extendable Bucket Functionality support An extra flag is used to enable this functionality (flag is not set by default). When the (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE) is set and in the very unlikely case due to excessive hash collisions that a key has failed to be inserted, the hash table bucket is extended with a linked list to insert these failed keys. This feature is important for the workloads (e.g. telco workloads) that need to insert up to 100% of the -hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Currently the extendable bucket is not supported -with the lock-free concurrency implementation (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF). - +hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). +Please note that with the 'lock free read/write concurrency' flag enabled, users need to call 'rte_hash_free_key_with_position' API in order to free the empty buckets and +deleted keys, to maintain the 100% capacity guarantee. Implementation Details (non Extendable Bucket Case) --------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c index c01489ba5193..8213dbf5f782 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) unsigned int readwrite_concur_support = 0; unsigned int writer_takes_lock = 0; unsigned int no_free_on_del = 0; + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free = NULL; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt = NULL; unsigned int readwrite_concur_lf_support = 0; @@ -170,15 +171,6 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) return NULL; } - if ((params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) && - (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE)) { - rte_errno = EINVAL; - RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "rte_hash_create: extendable bucket " - "feature not supported with rw concurrency " - "lock free\n"); - return NULL; - } - /* Check extra flags field to check extra options. */ if (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_TRANS_MEM_SUPPORT) hw_trans_mem_support = 1; @@ -302,6 +294,16 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) */ for (i = 1; i <= num_buckets; i++) rte_ring_sp_enqueue(r_ext, (void *)((uintptr_t) i)); + + if (readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + ext_bkt_to_free = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * + num_key_slots, 0); + if (ext_bkt_to_free == NULL) { + RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "ext bkt to free memory allocation " + "failed\n"); + goto err_unlock; + } + } } const uint32_t key_entry_size = @@ -393,6 +395,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) default_hash_func : params->hash_func; h->key_store = k; h->free_slots = r; + h->ext_bkt_to_free = ext_bkt_to_free; h->tbl_chng_cnt = tbl_chng_cnt; *h->tbl_chng_cnt = 0; h->hw_trans_mem_support = hw_trans_mem_support; @@ -443,6 +446,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) rte_free(buckets_ext); rte_free(k); rte_free(tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(ext_bkt_to_free); return NULL; } @@ -484,6 +488,7 @@ rte_hash_free(struct rte_hash *h) rte_free(h->buckets); rte_free(h->buckets_ext); rte_free(h->tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(h->ext_bkt_to_free); rte_free(h); rte_free(te); } @@ -799,7 +804,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -831,7 +836,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -1054,7 +1059,12 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* Check if slot is available */ if (likely(cur_bkt->key_idx[i] == EMPTY_SLOT)) { cur_bkt->sig_current[i] = short_sig; - cur_bkt->key_idx[i] = new_idx; + /* Store to signature should not leak after + * the store to key_idx + */ + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[i], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return new_idx - 1; } @@ -1072,7 +1082,12 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, bkt_id = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)ext_bkt_id) - 1; /* Use the first location of the new bucket */ (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).sig_current[0] = short_sig; - (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0] = new_idx; + /* Store to signature should not leak after + * the store to key_idx + */ + __atomic_store_n(&(h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); /* Link the new bucket to sec bucket linked list */ last = rte_hash_get_last_bkt(sec_bkt); last->next = &h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]; @@ -1366,7 +1381,8 @@ remove_entry(const struct rte_hash *h, struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt, unsigned i) * empty slot. */ static inline void -__rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { +__rte_hash_compact_ll(const struct rte_hash *h, + struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { int i; struct rte_hash_bucket *last_bkt; @@ -1377,10 +1393,27 @@ __rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { for (i = RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (last_bkt->key_idx[i] != EMPTY_SLOT) { - cur_bkt->key_idx[pos] = last_bkt->key_idx[i]; cur_bkt->sig_current[pos] = last_bkt->sig_current[i]; + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[pos], + last_bkt->key_idx[i], + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + if (h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + /* Inform the readers that the table has changed + * Since there is one writer, load acquire on + * tbl_chng_cnt is not required. + */ + __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, + *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + /* The store to sig_current should + * not move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. + */ + __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); + } last_bkt->sig_current[i] = NULL_SIGNATURE; - last_bkt->key_idx[i] = EMPTY_SLOT; + __atomic_store_n(&last_bkt->key_idx[i], + EMPTY_SLOT, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); return; } } @@ -1449,7 +1482,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* look for key in primary bucket */ ret = search_and_remove(h, key, prim_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(prim_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, prim_bkt, pos); last_bkt = prim_bkt->next; prev_bkt = prim_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1461,7 +1494,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, sec_bkt) { ret = search_and_remove(h, key, cur_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(cur_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, cur_bkt, pos); last_bkt = sec_bkt->next; prev_bkt = sec_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1488,11 +1521,24 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, } /* found empty bucket and recycle */ if (i == RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES) { - prev_bkt->next = last_bkt->next = NULL; + prev_bkt->next = NULL; uint32_t index = last_bkt - h->buckets_ext + 1; - rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + /* Recycle the empty bkt if + * no_free_on_del is disabled. + */ + if (h->no_free_on_del) + /* Store index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled + * on calling rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. + * When lock free read-write concurrency is enabled, + * an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list + * immediately (as readers might be using it still). + * Hence freeing of the ext bkt is piggy-backed to + * freeing of the key index. + */ + h->ext_bkt_to_free[ret] = index; + else + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); } - __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return ret; } @@ -1545,6 +1591,14 @@ rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, /* Out of bounds */ if (position >= total_entries) return -EINVAL; + if (h->ext_table_support && h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + uint32_t index = h->ext_bkt_to_free[position]; + if (index) { + /* Recycle empty ext bkt to free list. */ + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + h->ext_bkt_to_free[position] = 0; + } + } if (h->use_local_cache) { lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); @@ -1855,6 +1909,9 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, rte_prefetch0(secondary_bkt[i]); } + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) + positions[i] = -ENOENT; + do { /* Load the table change counter before the lookup * starts. Acquire semantics will make sure that @@ -1899,7 +1956,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, /* Compare keys, first hits in primary first */ for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - positions[i] = -ENOENT; while (prim_hitmask[i]) { uint32_t hit_index = __builtin_ctzl(prim_hitmask[i]) @@ -1972,6 +2028,35 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, continue; } + /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ + if (hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) { + if (hit_mask != NULL) + *hit_mask = hits; + return; + } + /* need to check ext buckets for match */ + if (h->ext_table_support) { + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { + if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) + continue; + next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; + FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { + if (data != NULL) + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + &data[i], cur_bkt); + else + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + NULL, cur_bkt); + if (ret != -1) { + positions[i] = ret; + hits |= 1ULL << i; + break; + } + } + } + } /* The loads of sig_current in compare_signatures * should not move below the load from tbl_chng_cnt. */ @@ -1988,34 +2073,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE); } while (cnt_b != cnt_a); - /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ - if ((hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) || !h->ext_table_support) { - if (hit_mask != NULL) - *hit_mask = hits; - __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h); - return; - } - - /* need to check ext buckets for match */ - for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) - continue; - next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; - FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { - if (data != NULL) - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], &data[i], cur_bkt); - else - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], NULL, cur_bkt); - if (ret != -1) { - positions[i] = ret; - hits |= 1ULL << i; - break; - } - } - } - if (hit_mask != NULL) *hit_mask = hits; } diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h index eacdaa8d4684..48c85c890712 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ struct rte_hash { rte_rwlock_t *readwrite_lock; /**< Read-write lock thread-safety. */ struct rte_hash_bucket *buckets_ext; /**< Extra buckets array */ struct rte_ring *free_ext_bkts; /**< Ring of indexes of free buckets */ + /* Stores index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled on calling + * rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. When lock free read-write concurrency is + * enabled, an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list immediately + * (as readers might be using it still). Hence freeing of the ext bkt + * is piggy-backed to freeing of the key index. + */ + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt; /**< Indicates if the hash table changed from last read. */ } __rte_cache_aligned; -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 22:18 ` Dharmik Thakkar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara, John McNamara, Marko Kovacevic Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> --- doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 ++ 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst index 85a6edfa8b16..d06c7de2ead1 100644 --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst @@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ Extendable Bucket Functionality support An extra flag is used to enable this functionality (flag is not set by default). When the (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE) is set and in the very unlikely case due to excessive hash collisions that a key has failed to be inserted, the hash table bucket is extended with a linked list to insert these failed keys. This feature is important for the workloads (e.g. telco workloads) that need to insert up to 100% of the -hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Currently the extendable bucket is not supported -with the lock-free concurrency implementation (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF). - +hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). +Please note that with the 'lock free read/write concurrency' flag enabled, users need to call 'rte_hash_free_key_with_position' API in order to free the empty buckets and +deleted keys, to maintain the 100% capacity guarantee. Implementation Details (non Extendable Bucket Case) --------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c index c01489ba5193..8213dbf5f782 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) unsigned int readwrite_concur_support = 0; unsigned int writer_takes_lock = 0; unsigned int no_free_on_del = 0; + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free = NULL; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt = NULL; unsigned int readwrite_concur_lf_support = 0; @@ -170,15 +171,6 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) return NULL; } - if ((params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) && - (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE)) { - rte_errno = EINVAL; - RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "rte_hash_create: extendable bucket " - "feature not supported with rw concurrency " - "lock free\n"); - return NULL; - } - /* Check extra flags field to check extra options. */ if (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_TRANS_MEM_SUPPORT) hw_trans_mem_support = 1; @@ -302,6 +294,16 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) */ for (i = 1; i <= num_buckets; i++) rte_ring_sp_enqueue(r_ext, (void *)((uintptr_t) i)); + + if (readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + ext_bkt_to_free = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * + num_key_slots, 0); + if (ext_bkt_to_free == NULL) { + RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "ext bkt to free memory allocation " + "failed\n"); + goto err_unlock; + } + } } const uint32_t key_entry_size = @@ -393,6 +395,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) default_hash_func : params->hash_func; h->key_store = k; h->free_slots = r; + h->ext_bkt_to_free = ext_bkt_to_free; h->tbl_chng_cnt = tbl_chng_cnt; *h->tbl_chng_cnt = 0; h->hw_trans_mem_support = hw_trans_mem_support; @@ -443,6 +446,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) rte_free(buckets_ext); rte_free(k); rte_free(tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(ext_bkt_to_free); return NULL; } @@ -484,6 +488,7 @@ rte_hash_free(struct rte_hash *h) rte_free(h->buckets); rte_free(h->buckets_ext); rte_free(h->tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(h->ext_bkt_to_free); rte_free(h); rte_free(te); } @@ -799,7 +804,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -831,7 +836,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -1054,7 +1059,12 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* Check if slot is available */ if (likely(cur_bkt->key_idx[i] == EMPTY_SLOT)) { cur_bkt->sig_current[i] = short_sig; - cur_bkt->key_idx[i] = new_idx; + /* Store to signature should not leak after + * the store to key_idx + */ + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[i], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return new_idx - 1; } @@ -1072,7 +1082,12 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, bkt_id = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)ext_bkt_id) - 1; /* Use the first location of the new bucket */ (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).sig_current[0] = short_sig; - (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0] = new_idx; + /* Store to signature should not leak after + * the store to key_idx + */ + __atomic_store_n(&(h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); /* Link the new bucket to sec bucket linked list */ last = rte_hash_get_last_bkt(sec_bkt); last->next = &h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]; @@ -1366,7 +1381,8 @@ remove_entry(const struct rte_hash *h, struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt, unsigned i) * empty slot. */ static inline void -__rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { +__rte_hash_compact_ll(const struct rte_hash *h, + struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { int i; struct rte_hash_bucket *last_bkt; @@ -1377,10 +1393,27 @@ __rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { for (i = RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (last_bkt->key_idx[i] != EMPTY_SLOT) { - cur_bkt->key_idx[pos] = last_bkt->key_idx[i]; cur_bkt->sig_current[pos] = last_bkt->sig_current[i]; + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[pos], + last_bkt->key_idx[i], + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + if (h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + /* Inform the readers that the table has changed + * Since there is one writer, load acquire on + * tbl_chng_cnt is not required. + */ + __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, + *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + /* The store to sig_current should + * not move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. + */ + __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); + } last_bkt->sig_current[i] = NULL_SIGNATURE; - last_bkt->key_idx[i] = EMPTY_SLOT; + __atomic_store_n(&last_bkt->key_idx[i], + EMPTY_SLOT, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); return; } } @@ -1449,7 +1482,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* look for key in primary bucket */ ret = search_and_remove(h, key, prim_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(prim_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, prim_bkt, pos); last_bkt = prim_bkt->next; prev_bkt = prim_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1461,7 +1494,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, sec_bkt) { ret = search_and_remove(h, key, cur_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(cur_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, cur_bkt, pos); last_bkt = sec_bkt->next; prev_bkt = sec_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1488,11 +1521,24 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, } /* found empty bucket and recycle */ if (i == RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES) { - prev_bkt->next = last_bkt->next = NULL; + prev_bkt->next = NULL; uint32_t index = last_bkt - h->buckets_ext + 1; - rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + /* Recycle the empty bkt if + * no_free_on_del is disabled. + */ + if (h->no_free_on_del) + /* Store index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled + * on calling rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. + * When lock free read-write concurrency is enabled, + * an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list + * immediately (as readers might be using it still). + * Hence freeing of the ext bkt is piggy-backed to + * freeing of the key index. + */ + h->ext_bkt_to_free[ret] = index; + else + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); } - __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return ret; } @@ -1545,6 +1591,14 @@ rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, /* Out of bounds */ if (position >= total_entries) return -EINVAL; + if (h->ext_table_support && h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + uint32_t index = h->ext_bkt_to_free[position]; + if (index) { + /* Recycle empty ext bkt to free list. */ + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + h->ext_bkt_to_free[position] = 0; + } + } if (h->use_local_cache) { lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); @@ -1855,6 +1909,9 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, rte_prefetch0(secondary_bkt[i]); } + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) + positions[i] = -ENOENT; + do { /* Load the table change counter before the lookup * starts. Acquire semantics will make sure that @@ -1899,7 +1956,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, /* Compare keys, first hits in primary first */ for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - positions[i] = -ENOENT; while (prim_hitmask[i]) { uint32_t hit_index = __builtin_ctzl(prim_hitmask[i]) @@ -1972,6 +2028,35 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, continue; } + /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ + if (hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) { + if (hit_mask != NULL) + *hit_mask = hits; + return; + } + /* need to check ext buckets for match */ + if (h->ext_table_support) { + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { + if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) + continue; + next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; + FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { + if (data != NULL) + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + &data[i], cur_bkt); + else + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + NULL, cur_bkt); + if (ret != -1) { + positions[i] = ret; + hits |= 1ULL << i; + break; + } + } + } + } /* The loads of sig_current in compare_signatures * should not move below the load from tbl_chng_cnt. */ @@ -1988,34 +2073,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE); } while (cnt_b != cnt_a); - /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ - if ((hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) || !h->ext_table_support) { - if (hit_mask != NULL) - *hit_mask = hits; - __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h); - return; - } - - /* need to check ext buckets for match */ - for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) - continue; - next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; - FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { - if (data != NULL) - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], &data[i], cur_bkt); - else - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], NULL, cur_bkt); - if (ret != -1) { - positions[i] = ret; - hits |= 1ULL << i; - break; - } - } - } - if (hit_mask != NULL) *hit_mask = hits; } diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h index eacdaa8d4684..48c85c890712 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ struct rte_hash { rte_rwlock_t *readwrite_lock; /**< Read-write lock thread-safety. */ struct rte_hash_bucket *buckets_ext; /**< Extra buckets array */ struct rte_ring *free_ext_bkts; /**< Ring of indexes of free buckets */ + /* Stores index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled on calling + * rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. When lock free read-write concurrency is + * enabled, an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list immediately + * (as readers might be using it still). Hence freeing of the ext bkt + * is piggy-backed to freeing of the key index. + */ + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt; /**< Indicates if the hash table changed from last read. */ } __rte_cache_aligned; -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 22:18 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:52 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 3 siblings, 2 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf for extendable bucket feature. It is tested with both lock-free enabled and lock-free disabled case. Test includes: - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt - hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> --- app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 284 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c index cbfd9322696b..ddd8d7aa6a7d 100644 --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ #define READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH 4 #define READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH 8 #define BULK_LOOKUP 16 +#define READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT 32 + +#define WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT 0 +#define WRITE_KEY_SHIFT 1 +#define WRITE_EXT_BKT 2 + #define NUM_TEST 3 unsigned int rwc_core_cnt[NUM_TEST] = {1, 2, 4}; @@ -51,6 +57,7 @@ struct rwc_perf { uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_sp[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t w_ks_r_miss[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t multi_rw[NUM_TEST - 1][2][NUM_TEST]; + uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[2][NUM_TEST]; }; static struct rwc_perf rwc_lf_results, rwc_non_lf_results; @@ -62,11 +69,15 @@ struct { uint32_t *keys_absent; uint32_t *keys_shift_path; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks; uint32_t count_keys_ks; uint32_t count_keys_absent; uint32_t count_keys_shift_path; uint32_t count_keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt; + uint32_t count_keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t single_insert; struct rte_hash *h; } tbl_rwc_test_param; @@ -81,6 +92,35 @@ uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; uint8_t *scanned_bkts; +static inline uint16_t +get_short_sig(const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + return hash >> 16; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_prim_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return hash & bucket_bitmask; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_alt_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + uint32_t cur_bkt_idx, uint16_t sig) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return (cur_bkt_idx ^ sig) & bucket_bitmask; +} + + static inline int get_enabled_cores_list(void) { @@ -168,9 +208,12 @@ generate_keys(void) uint32_t *keys_ks = NULL; uint32_t *keys_absent = NULL; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt = NULL; uint32_t *found = NULL; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks = 0; uint32_t count_keys_ks = 0; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt = 0; uint32_t i; /* @@ -251,14 +294,32 @@ generate_keys(void) goto err; } + /* + * This consist of keys which will be stored in extended buckets + */ + keys_ext_bkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ext_bkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } + + /* + * This consist of keys which when deleted causes shifting of keys + * in extended buckets to respective secondary buckets + */ + keys_ks_extbkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ks_extbkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } hash_sig_t sig; uint32_t prim_bucket_idx; - int ret; + uint32_t sec_bucket_idx; + uint16_t short_sig; uint32_t num_buckets; - uint32_t bucket_bitmask; num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; - bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + int ret; /* * Used to mark bkts in which at least one key was shifted to its @@ -275,6 +336,8 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks = keys_ks; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_absent = keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path = keys_non_shift_path; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt = keys_ext_bkt; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt = keys_ks_extbkt; /* Generate keys by adding previous two keys, neglect overflow */ printf("Generating keys...\n"); keys[0] = 0; @@ -287,7 +350,8 @@ generate_keys(void) /* Check if primary bucket has space.*/ sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, tbl_rwc_test_param.keys+i); - prim_bucket_idx = sig & bucket_bitmask; + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + sig); ret = check_bucket(prim_bucket_idx, keys[i]); if (ret < 0) { /* @@ -368,6 +432,47 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_absent = count_keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path = count; + memset(scanned_bkts, 0, num_buckets); + count = 0; + /* Find keys that will be in extended buckets */ + for (i = 0; i < count_keys_ks; i++) { + ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys_ks + i); + if (ret < 0) { + /* Key will be added to ext bkt */ + keys_ext_bkt[count_keys_extbkt++] = keys_ks[i]; + /* Sec bkt to be added to keys_ks_extbkt */ + sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks + i); + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, sig); + short_sig = get_short_sig(sig); + sec_bucket_idx = get_alt_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + prim_bucket_idx, short_sig); + if (scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] == 0) + scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] = 1; + } + } + + /* Find keys that will shift keys in ext bucket*/ + for (i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++) { + if (scanned_bkts[i] == 1) { + iter = i * 8; + while (rte_hash_iterate(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + &next_key, &next_data, &iter) >= 0) { + /* Check if key belongs to the current bucket */ + if (i >= (iter-1)/8) + keys_ks_extbkt[count++] + = *(const uint32_t *)next_key; + else + break; + } + } + } + + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt = count; + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt = count_keys_extbkt; + printf("\nCount of keys NOT causing shifting of existing keys to " "alternate location: %d\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks); printf("\nCount of keys causing shifting of existing keys to alternate " @@ -378,6 +483,10 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path); printf("Count of keys not likely to be on the shift path: %d\n\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path); + printf("Count of keys in extended buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt); + printf("Count of keys shifting keys in ext buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(found); rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); @@ -390,12 +499,14 @@ generate_keys(void) rte_free(keys_absent); rte_free(found); rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path); + rte_free(keys_ext_bkt); + rte_free(keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(scanned_bkts); return -1; } static int -init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) +init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm, int ext_bkt) { struct rte_hash *handle; @@ -425,6 +536,9 @@ init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY | RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD; + if (ext_bkt) + hash_params.extra_flag |= RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE; + hash_params.name = "tests"; handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params); @@ -452,7 +566,7 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) void *temp_a[BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE]; /* Used to identify keys not inserted in the hash table */ - pos = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); + pos = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); if (pos == NULL) { printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); return -1; @@ -467,6 +581,9 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH) { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path; + } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT) { + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; + read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; } else { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path; @@ -482,7 +599,6 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) /* Array of pointer to the list of keys */ for (j = 0; j < BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE; j++) temp_a[j] = keys + i + j; - rte_hash_lookup_bulk(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, (const void **) ((uintptr_t)temp_a), @@ -539,22 +655,25 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } static int -write_keys(uint8_t key_shift) +write_keys(uint8_t write_type) { uint32_t i; int ret; uint32_t key_cnt; uint32_t *keys; - if (key_shift) { + if (write_type == WRITE_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks; - } else { + } else if (write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_no_ks; + } else if (write_type == WRITE_EXT_BKT) { + key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; } for (i = 0; i < key_cnt; i++) { ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys + i); - if (!key_shift && ret < 0) { + if ((write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) && ret < 0) { printf("writer failed %"PRIu32"\n", i); return -1; } @@ -581,18 +700,18 @@ test_rwc_multi_writer(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NO_KEY_SHIFTS; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, read - hit\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -612,7 +731,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; writer_done = 1; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) @@ -650,19 +769,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; int ret; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -687,7 +806,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -722,19 +841,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, - int rwc_lf, int htm) + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit" " (non-shift-path)\n"); @@ -755,15 +874,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -798,19 +917,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit (shift-path)" "\n"); @@ -831,15 +950,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -874,19 +993,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int - htm) + htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -906,15 +1025,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -949,18 +1068,18 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int */ static int test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m, k; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Multi-add-lookup\n"); uint8_t pos_core; @@ -991,8 +1110,8 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, writer_done = 0; for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) multi_writer_done[i] = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; /* Launch reader(s) */ @@ -1000,7 +1119,7 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; pos_core = 0; /* Launch writers */ @@ -1045,6 +1164,88 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, return -1; } +/* + * Test lookup perf: + * Reader(s) lookup keys present in the extendable bkt. + */ +static int +test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) +{ + unsigned int n, m; + uint64_t i; + int use_jhash = 0; + uint8_t write_type; + uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT; + + rte_atomic64_init(&greads); + rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); + + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) + goto err; + printf("\nTest: Hash add - key-shifts, read - hit (ext_bkt)\n"); + for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { + if (m == 1) { + printf("\n** With bulk-lookup **\n"); + read_type |= BULK_LOOKUP; + } + for (n = 0; n < NUM_TEST; n++) { + unsigned int tot_lcore = rte_lcore_count(); + if (tot_lcore < rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1) + goto finish; + + printf("\nNumber of readers: %u\n", rwc_core_cnt[n]); + + rte_atomic64_clear(&greads); + rte_atomic64_clear(&gread_cycles); + + rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + writer_done = 0; + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, + (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, + enabled_core_ids[i]); + for (i = 0; i < tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt; + i++) { + if (rte_hash_del_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt + i) + < 0) { + printf("Delete Failed: %u\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt[i]); + goto err; + } + } + writer_done = 1; + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); + + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0) + goto err; + + unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup = + rte_atomic64_read(&gread_cycles) / + rte_atomic64_read(&greads); + rwc_perf_results->w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[m][n] + = cycles_per_lookup; + printf("Cycles per lookup: %llu\n", cycles_per_lookup); + } + } + +finish: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return 0; + +err: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return -1; +} + static int test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) { @@ -1057,6 +1258,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) int rwc_lf = 0; int htm; int use_jhash = 0; + int ext_bkt = 0; if (rte_lcore_count() == 1) { printf("More than one lcore is required " "to do read write lock-free concurrency test\n"); @@ -1070,7 +1272,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) else htm = 0; - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) return -1; if (generate_keys() != 0) return -1; @@ -1079,25 +1281,29 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) if (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) { rwc_lf = 1; + ext_bkt = 1; printf("Test lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" " enabled\n"); if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; } printf("\nTest lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" @@ -1112,21 +1318,26 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) } } else printf("With HTM Enabled\n"); - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; results: printf("\n\t\t\t\t\t\t********** Results summary **********\n\n"); @@ -1158,8 +1369,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("Disabled\t"); if (htm) @@ -1179,7 +1393,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("_______\t\t_______\t\t_________\t___\t\t" "_________\t\t\t\t\t\t_________________\n"); -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 22:18 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:52 ` Wang, Yipeng1 1 sibling, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf for extendable bucket feature. It is tested with both lock-free enabled and lock-free disabled case. Test includes: - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt - hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> --- app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 284 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c index cbfd9322696b..ddd8d7aa6a7d 100644 --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ #define READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH 4 #define READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH 8 #define BULK_LOOKUP 16 +#define READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT 32 + +#define WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT 0 +#define WRITE_KEY_SHIFT 1 +#define WRITE_EXT_BKT 2 + #define NUM_TEST 3 unsigned int rwc_core_cnt[NUM_TEST] = {1, 2, 4}; @@ -51,6 +57,7 @@ struct rwc_perf { uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_sp[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t w_ks_r_miss[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t multi_rw[NUM_TEST - 1][2][NUM_TEST]; + uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[2][NUM_TEST]; }; static struct rwc_perf rwc_lf_results, rwc_non_lf_results; @@ -62,11 +69,15 @@ struct { uint32_t *keys_absent; uint32_t *keys_shift_path; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks; uint32_t count_keys_ks; uint32_t count_keys_absent; uint32_t count_keys_shift_path; uint32_t count_keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt; + uint32_t count_keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t single_insert; struct rte_hash *h; } tbl_rwc_test_param; @@ -81,6 +92,35 @@ uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; uint8_t *scanned_bkts; +static inline uint16_t +get_short_sig(const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + return hash >> 16; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_prim_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return hash & bucket_bitmask; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_alt_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + uint32_t cur_bkt_idx, uint16_t sig) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return (cur_bkt_idx ^ sig) & bucket_bitmask; +} + + static inline int get_enabled_cores_list(void) { @@ -168,9 +208,12 @@ generate_keys(void) uint32_t *keys_ks = NULL; uint32_t *keys_absent = NULL; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt = NULL; uint32_t *found = NULL; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks = 0; uint32_t count_keys_ks = 0; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt = 0; uint32_t i; /* @@ -251,14 +294,32 @@ generate_keys(void) goto err; } + /* + * This consist of keys which will be stored in extended buckets + */ + keys_ext_bkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ext_bkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } + + /* + * This consist of keys which when deleted causes shifting of keys + * in extended buckets to respective secondary buckets + */ + keys_ks_extbkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ks_extbkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } hash_sig_t sig; uint32_t prim_bucket_idx; - int ret; + uint32_t sec_bucket_idx; + uint16_t short_sig; uint32_t num_buckets; - uint32_t bucket_bitmask; num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; - bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + int ret; /* * Used to mark bkts in which at least one key was shifted to its @@ -275,6 +336,8 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks = keys_ks; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_absent = keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path = keys_non_shift_path; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt = keys_ext_bkt; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt = keys_ks_extbkt; /* Generate keys by adding previous two keys, neglect overflow */ printf("Generating keys...\n"); keys[0] = 0; @@ -287,7 +350,8 @@ generate_keys(void) /* Check if primary bucket has space.*/ sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, tbl_rwc_test_param.keys+i); - prim_bucket_idx = sig & bucket_bitmask; + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + sig); ret = check_bucket(prim_bucket_idx, keys[i]); if (ret < 0) { /* @@ -368,6 +432,47 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_absent = count_keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path = count; + memset(scanned_bkts, 0, num_buckets); + count = 0; + /* Find keys that will be in extended buckets */ + for (i = 0; i < count_keys_ks; i++) { + ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys_ks + i); + if (ret < 0) { + /* Key will be added to ext bkt */ + keys_ext_bkt[count_keys_extbkt++] = keys_ks[i]; + /* Sec bkt to be added to keys_ks_extbkt */ + sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks + i); + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, sig); + short_sig = get_short_sig(sig); + sec_bucket_idx = get_alt_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + prim_bucket_idx, short_sig); + if (scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] == 0) + scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] = 1; + } + } + + /* Find keys that will shift keys in ext bucket*/ + for (i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++) { + if (scanned_bkts[i] == 1) { + iter = i * 8; + while (rte_hash_iterate(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + &next_key, &next_data, &iter) >= 0) { + /* Check if key belongs to the current bucket */ + if (i >= (iter-1)/8) + keys_ks_extbkt[count++] + = *(const uint32_t *)next_key; + else + break; + } + } + } + + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt = count; + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt = count_keys_extbkt; + printf("\nCount of keys NOT causing shifting of existing keys to " "alternate location: %d\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks); printf("\nCount of keys causing shifting of existing keys to alternate " @@ -378,6 +483,10 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path); printf("Count of keys not likely to be on the shift path: %d\n\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path); + printf("Count of keys in extended buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt); + printf("Count of keys shifting keys in ext buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(found); rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); @@ -390,12 +499,14 @@ generate_keys(void) rte_free(keys_absent); rte_free(found); rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path); + rte_free(keys_ext_bkt); + rte_free(keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(scanned_bkts); return -1; } static int -init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) +init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm, int ext_bkt) { struct rte_hash *handle; @@ -425,6 +536,9 @@ init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY | RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD; + if (ext_bkt) + hash_params.extra_flag |= RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE; + hash_params.name = "tests"; handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params); @@ -452,7 +566,7 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) void *temp_a[BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE]; /* Used to identify keys not inserted in the hash table */ - pos = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); + pos = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); if (pos == NULL) { printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); return -1; @@ -467,6 +581,9 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH) { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path; + } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT) { + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; + read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; } else { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path; @@ -482,7 +599,6 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) /* Array of pointer to the list of keys */ for (j = 0; j < BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE; j++) temp_a[j] = keys + i + j; - rte_hash_lookup_bulk(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, (const void **) ((uintptr_t)temp_a), @@ -539,22 +655,25 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } static int -write_keys(uint8_t key_shift) +write_keys(uint8_t write_type) { uint32_t i; int ret; uint32_t key_cnt; uint32_t *keys; - if (key_shift) { + if (write_type == WRITE_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks; - } else { + } else if (write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_no_ks; + } else if (write_type == WRITE_EXT_BKT) { + key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; } for (i = 0; i < key_cnt; i++) { ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys + i); - if (!key_shift && ret < 0) { + if ((write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) && ret < 0) { printf("writer failed %"PRIu32"\n", i); return -1; } @@ -581,18 +700,18 @@ test_rwc_multi_writer(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NO_KEY_SHIFTS; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, read - hit\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -612,7 +731,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; writer_done = 1; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) @@ -650,19 +769,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; int ret; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -687,7 +806,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -722,19 +841,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, - int rwc_lf, int htm) + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit" " (non-shift-path)\n"); @@ -755,15 +874,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -798,19 +917,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit (shift-path)" "\n"); @@ -831,15 +950,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -874,19 +993,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int - htm) + htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -906,15 +1025,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -949,18 +1068,18 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int */ static int test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m, k; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Multi-add-lookup\n"); uint8_t pos_core; @@ -991,8 +1110,8 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, writer_done = 0; for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) multi_writer_done[i] = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; /* Launch reader(s) */ @@ -1000,7 +1119,7 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; pos_core = 0; /* Launch writers */ @@ -1045,6 +1164,88 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, return -1; } +/* + * Test lookup perf: + * Reader(s) lookup keys present in the extendable bkt. + */ +static int +test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) +{ + unsigned int n, m; + uint64_t i; + int use_jhash = 0; + uint8_t write_type; + uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT; + + rte_atomic64_init(&greads); + rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); + + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) + goto err; + printf("\nTest: Hash add - key-shifts, read - hit (ext_bkt)\n"); + for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { + if (m == 1) { + printf("\n** With bulk-lookup **\n"); + read_type |= BULK_LOOKUP; + } + for (n = 0; n < NUM_TEST; n++) { + unsigned int tot_lcore = rte_lcore_count(); + if (tot_lcore < rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1) + goto finish; + + printf("\nNumber of readers: %u\n", rwc_core_cnt[n]); + + rte_atomic64_clear(&greads); + rte_atomic64_clear(&gread_cycles); + + rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + writer_done = 0; + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, + (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, + enabled_core_ids[i]); + for (i = 0; i < tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt; + i++) { + if (rte_hash_del_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt + i) + < 0) { + printf("Delete Failed: %u\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt[i]); + goto err; + } + } + writer_done = 1; + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); + + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0) + goto err; + + unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup = + rte_atomic64_read(&gread_cycles) / + rte_atomic64_read(&greads); + rwc_perf_results->w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[m][n] + = cycles_per_lookup; + printf("Cycles per lookup: %llu\n", cycles_per_lookup); + } + } + +finish: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return 0; + +err: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return -1; +} + static int test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) { @@ -1057,6 +1258,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) int rwc_lf = 0; int htm; int use_jhash = 0; + int ext_bkt = 0; if (rte_lcore_count() == 1) { printf("More than one lcore is required " "to do read write lock-free concurrency test\n"); @@ -1070,7 +1272,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) else htm = 0; - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) return -1; if (generate_keys() != 0) return -1; @@ -1079,25 +1281,29 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) if (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) { rwc_lf = 1; + ext_bkt = 1; printf("Test lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" " enabled\n"); if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; } printf("\nTest lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" @@ -1112,21 +1318,26 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) } } else printf("With HTM Enabled\n"); - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; results: printf("\n\t\t\t\t\t\t********** Results summary **********\n\n"); @@ -1158,8 +1369,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("Disabled\t"); if (htm) @@ -1179,7 +1393,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("_______\t\t_______\t\t_________\t___\t\t" "_________\t\t\t\t\t\t_________________\n"); -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 22:52 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 22:52 ` Wang, Yipeng1 1 sibling, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread From: Wang, Yipeng1 @ 2019-04-01 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dharmik Thakkar, Gobriel, Sameh, Richardson, Bruce, De Lara Guarch, Pablo Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli >-----Original Message----- >From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thakkar@arm.com] >Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 3:19 PM >To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce ><bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org; honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt > >Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf for >extendable bucket feature. >It is tested with both lock-free enabled and lock-free disabled case. > >Test includes: > >- hash lookup on keys in ext bkt >- hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt > >Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-04-01 22:52 ` Wang, Yipeng1 @ 2019-04-01 22:52 ` Wang, Yipeng1 0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Wang, Yipeng1 @ 2019-04-01 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dharmik Thakkar, Gobriel, Sameh, Richardson, Bruce, De Lara Guarch, Pablo Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli >-----Original Message----- >From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thakkar@arm.com] >Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 3:19 PM >To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce ><bruce.richardson@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org; honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt > >Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf for >extendable bucket feature. >It is tested with both lock-free enabled and lock-free disabled case. > >Test includes: > >- hash lookup on keys in ext bkt >- hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt > >Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 23:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 23:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar ` (3 more replies) 3 siblings, 4 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar This patch series: - Enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. - Adds lock-free read-write concurrency tests for ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar (2): hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 157 ++++++++----- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 + 4 files changed, 401 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 23:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar This patch series: - Enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. - Adds lock-free read-write concurrency tests for ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar (2): hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 157 ++++++++----- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 + 4 files changed, 401 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 23:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 23:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 23:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 3 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara, John McNamara, Marko Kovacevic Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> --- v3: - Update lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c (Yipeng) - Add Acked-by tag. --- v2: - Update doc (Yipeng) - Update lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c (Yipeng) --- doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 ++ 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst index 85a6edfa8b16..d06c7de2ead1 100644 --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst @@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ Extendable Bucket Functionality support An extra flag is used to enable this functionality (flag is not set by default). When the (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE) is set and in the very unlikely case due to excessive hash collisions that a key has failed to be inserted, the hash table bucket is extended with a linked list to insert these failed keys. This feature is important for the workloads (e.g. telco workloads) that need to insert up to 100% of the -hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Currently the extendable bucket is not supported -with the lock-free concurrency implementation (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF). - +hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). +Please note that with the 'lock free read/write concurrency' flag enabled, users need to call 'rte_hash_free_key_with_position' API in order to free the empty buckets and +deleted keys, to maintain the 100% capacity guarantee. Implementation Details (non Extendable Bucket Case) --------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c index c01489ba5193..8213dbf5f782 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) unsigned int readwrite_concur_support = 0; unsigned int writer_takes_lock = 0; unsigned int no_free_on_del = 0; + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free = NULL; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt = NULL; unsigned int readwrite_concur_lf_support = 0; @@ -170,15 +171,6 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) return NULL; } - if ((params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) && - (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE)) { - rte_errno = EINVAL; - RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "rte_hash_create: extendable bucket " - "feature not supported with rw concurrency " - "lock free\n"); - return NULL; - } - /* Check extra flags field to check extra options. */ if (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_TRANS_MEM_SUPPORT) hw_trans_mem_support = 1; @@ -302,6 +294,16 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) */ for (i = 1; i <= num_buckets; i++) rte_ring_sp_enqueue(r_ext, (void *)((uintptr_t) i)); + + if (readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + ext_bkt_to_free = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * + num_key_slots, 0); + if (ext_bkt_to_free == NULL) { + RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "ext bkt to free memory allocation " + "failed\n"); + goto err_unlock; + } + } } const uint32_t key_entry_size = @@ -393,6 +395,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) default_hash_func : params->hash_func; h->key_store = k; h->free_slots = r; + h->ext_bkt_to_free = ext_bkt_to_free; h->tbl_chng_cnt = tbl_chng_cnt; *h->tbl_chng_cnt = 0; h->hw_trans_mem_support = hw_trans_mem_support; @@ -443,6 +446,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) rte_free(buckets_ext); rte_free(k); rte_free(tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(ext_bkt_to_free); return NULL; } @@ -484,6 +488,7 @@ rte_hash_free(struct rte_hash *h) rte_free(h->buckets); rte_free(h->buckets_ext); rte_free(h->tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(h->ext_bkt_to_free); rte_free(h); rte_free(te); } @@ -799,7 +804,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -831,7 +836,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -1054,7 +1059,12 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* Check if slot is available */ if (likely(cur_bkt->key_idx[i] == EMPTY_SLOT)) { cur_bkt->sig_current[i] = short_sig; - cur_bkt->key_idx[i] = new_idx; + /* Store to signature should not leak after + * the store to key_idx + */ + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[i], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return new_idx - 1; } @@ -1072,7 +1082,12 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, bkt_id = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)ext_bkt_id) - 1; /* Use the first location of the new bucket */ (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).sig_current[0] = short_sig; - (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0] = new_idx; + /* Store to signature should not leak after + * the store to key_idx + */ + __atomic_store_n(&(h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); /* Link the new bucket to sec bucket linked list */ last = rte_hash_get_last_bkt(sec_bkt); last->next = &h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]; @@ -1366,7 +1381,8 @@ remove_entry(const struct rte_hash *h, struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt, unsigned i) * empty slot. */ static inline void -__rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { +__rte_hash_compact_ll(const struct rte_hash *h, + struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { int i; struct rte_hash_bucket *last_bkt; @@ -1377,10 +1393,27 @@ __rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { for (i = RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (last_bkt->key_idx[i] != EMPTY_SLOT) { - cur_bkt->key_idx[pos] = last_bkt->key_idx[i]; cur_bkt->sig_current[pos] = last_bkt->sig_current[i]; + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[pos], + last_bkt->key_idx[i], + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + if (h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + /* Inform the readers that the table has changed + * Since there is one writer, load acquire on + * tbl_chng_cnt is not required. + */ + __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, + *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + /* The store to sig_current should + * not move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. + */ + __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); + } last_bkt->sig_current[i] = NULL_SIGNATURE; - last_bkt->key_idx[i] = EMPTY_SLOT; + __atomic_store_n(&last_bkt->key_idx[i], + EMPTY_SLOT, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); return; } } @@ -1449,7 +1482,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* look for key in primary bucket */ ret = search_and_remove(h, key, prim_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(prim_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, prim_bkt, pos); last_bkt = prim_bkt->next; prev_bkt = prim_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1461,7 +1494,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, sec_bkt) { ret = search_and_remove(h, key, cur_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(cur_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, cur_bkt, pos); last_bkt = sec_bkt->next; prev_bkt = sec_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1488,11 +1521,24 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, } /* found empty bucket and recycle */ if (i == RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES) { - prev_bkt->next = last_bkt->next = NULL; + prev_bkt->next = NULL; uint32_t index = last_bkt - h->buckets_ext + 1; - rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + /* Recycle the empty bkt if + * no_free_on_del is disabled. + */ + if (h->no_free_on_del) + /* Store index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled + * on calling rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. + * When lock free read-write concurrency is enabled, + * an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list + * immediately (as readers might be using it still). + * Hence freeing of the ext bkt is piggy-backed to + * freeing of the key index. + */ + h->ext_bkt_to_free[ret] = index; + else + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); } - __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return ret; } @@ -1545,6 +1591,14 @@ rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, /* Out of bounds */ if (position >= total_entries) return -EINVAL; + if (h->ext_table_support && h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + uint32_t index = h->ext_bkt_to_free[position]; + if (index) { + /* Recycle empty ext bkt to free list. */ + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + h->ext_bkt_to_free[position] = 0; + } + } if (h->use_local_cache) { lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); @@ -1855,6 +1909,9 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, rte_prefetch0(secondary_bkt[i]); } + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) + positions[i] = -ENOENT; + do { /* Load the table change counter before the lookup * starts. Acquire semantics will make sure that @@ -1899,7 +1956,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, /* Compare keys, first hits in primary first */ for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - positions[i] = -ENOENT; while (prim_hitmask[i]) { uint32_t hit_index = __builtin_ctzl(prim_hitmask[i]) @@ -1972,6 +2028,35 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, continue; } + /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ + if (hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) { + if (hit_mask != NULL) + *hit_mask = hits; + return; + } + /* need to check ext buckets for match */ + if (h->ext_table_support) { + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { + if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) + continue; + next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; + FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { + if (data != NULL) + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + &data[i], cur_bkt); + else + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + NULL, cur_bkt); + if (ret != -1) { + positions[i] = ret; + hits |= 1ULL << i; + break; + } + } + } + } /* The loads of sig_current in compare_signatures * should not move below the load from tbl_chng_cnt. */ @@ -1988,34 +2073,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE); } while (cnt_b != cnt_a); - /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ - if ((hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) || !h->ext_table_support) { - if (hit_mask != NULL) - *hit_mask = hits; - __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h); - return; - } - - /* need to check ext buckets for match */ - for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) - continue; - next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; - FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { - if (data != NULL) - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], &data[i], cur_bkt); - else - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], NULL, cur_bkt); - if (ret != -1) { - positions[i] = ret; - hits |= 1ULL << i; - break; - } - } - } - if (hit_mask != NULL) *hit_mask = hits; } diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h index eacdaa8d4684..48c85c890712 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ struct rte_hash { rte_rwlock_t *readwrite_lock; /**< Read-write lock thread-safety. */ struct rte_hash_bucket *buckets_ext; /**< Extra buckets array */ struct rte_ring *free_ext_bkts; /**< Ring of indexes of free buckets */ + /* Stores index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled on calling + * rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. When lock free read-write concurrency is + * enabled, an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list immediately + * (as readers might be using it still). Hence freeing of the ext bkt + * is piggy-backed to freeing of the key index. + */ + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt; /**< Indicates if the hash table changed from last read. */ } __rte_cache_aligned; -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 23:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara, John McNamara, Marko Kovacevic Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> --- v3: - Update lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c (Yipeng) - Add Acked-by tag. --- v2: - Update doc (Yipeng) - Update lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c (Yipeng) --- doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 ++ 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst index 85a6edfa8b16..d06c7de2ead1 100644 --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst @@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ Extendable Bucket Functionality support An extra flag is used to enable this functionality (flag is not set by default). When the (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE) is set and in the very unlikely case due to excessive hash collisions that a key has failed to be inserted, the hash table bucket is extended with a linked list to insert these failed keys. This feature is important for the workloads (e.g. telco workloads) that need to insert up to 100% of the -hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Currently the extendable bucket is not supported -with the lock-free concurrency implementation (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF). - +hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). +Please note that with the 'lock free read/write concurrency' flag enabled, users need to call 'rte_hash_free_key_with_position' API in order to free the empty buckets and +deleted keys, to maintain the 100% capacity guarantee. Implementation Details (non Extendable Bucket Case) --------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c index c01489ba5193..8213dbf5f782 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) unsigned int readwrite_concur_support = 0; unsigned int writer_takes_lock = 0; unsigned int no_free_on_del = 0; + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free = NULL; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt = NULL; unsigned int readwrite_concur_lf_support = 0; @@ -170,15 +171,6 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) return NULL; } - if ((params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) && - (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE)) { - rte_errno = EINVAL; - RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "rte_hash_create: extendable bucket " - "feature not supported with rw concurrency " - "lock free\n"); - return NULL; - } - /* Check extra flags field to check extra options. */ if (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_TRANS_MEM_SUPPORT) hw_trans_mem_support = 1; @@ -302,6 +294,16 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) */ for (i = 1; i <= num_buckets; i++) rte_ring_sp_enqueue(r_ext, (void *)((uintptr_t) i)); + + if (readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + ext_bkt_to_free = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * + num_key_slots, 0); + if (ext_bkt_to_free == NULL) { + RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "ext bkt to free memory allocation " + "failed\n"); + goto err_unlock; + } + } } const uint32_t key_entry_size = @@ -393,6 +395,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) default_hash_func : params->hash_func; h->key_store = k; h->free_slots = r; + h->ext_bkt_to_free = ext_bkt_to_free; h->tbl_chng_cnt = tbl_chng_cnt; *h->tbl_chng_cnt = 0; h->hw_trans_mem_support = hw_trans_mem_support; @@ -443,6 +446,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) rte_free(buckets_ext); rte_free(k); rte_free(tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(ext_bkt_to_free); return NULL; } @@ -484,6 +488,7 @@ rte_hash_free(struct rte_hash *h) rte_free(h->buckets); rte_free(h->buckets_ext); rte_free(h->tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(h->ext_bkt_to_free); rte_free(h); rte_free(te); } @@ -799,7 +804,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -831,7 +836,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -1054,7 +1059,12 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* Check if slot is available */ if (likely(cur_bkt->key_idx[i] == EMPTY_SLOT)) { cur_bkt->sig_current[i] = short_sig; - cur_bkt->key_idx[i] = new_idx; + /* Store to signature should not leak after + * the store to key_idx + */ + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[i], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return new_idx - 1; } @@ -1072,7 +1082,12 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, bkt_id = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)ext_bkt_id) - 1; /* Use the first location of the new bucket */ (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).sig_current[0] = short_sig; - (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0] = new_idx; + /* Store to signature should not leak after + * the store to key_idx + */ + __atomic_store_n(&(h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); /* Link the new bucket to sec bucket linked list */ last = rte_hash_get_last_bkt(sec_bkt); last->next = &h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]; @@ -1366,7 +1381,8 @@ remove_entry(const struct rte_hash *h, struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt, unsigned i) * empty slot. */ static inline void -__rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { +__rte_hash_compact_ll(const struct rte_hash *h, + struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { int i; struct rte_hash_bucket *last_bkt; @@ -1377,10 +1393,27 @@ __rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { for (i = RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (last_bkt->key_idx[i] != EMPTY_SLOT) { - cur_bkt->key_idx[pos] = last_bkt->key_idx[i]; cur_bkt->sig_current[pos] = last_bkt->sig_current[i]; + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[pos], + last_bkt->key_idx[i], + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + if (h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + /* Inform the readers that the table has changed + * Since there is one writer, load acquire on + * tbl_chng_cnt is not required. + */ + __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, + *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + /* The store to sig_current should + * not move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. + */ + __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); + } last_bkt->sig_current[i] = NULL_SIGNATURE; - last_bkt->key_idx[i] = EMPTY_SLOT; + __atomic_store_n(&last_bkt->key_idx[i], + EMPTY_SLOT, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); return; } } @@ -1449,7 +1482,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* look for key in primary bucket */ ret = search_and_remove(h, key, prim_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(prim_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, prim_bkt, pos); last_bkt = prim_bkt->next; prev_bkt = prim_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1461,7 +1494,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, sec_bkt) { ret = search_and_remove(h, key, cur_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(cur_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, cur_bkt, pos); last_bkt = sec_bkt->next; prev_bkt = sec_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1488,11 +1521,24 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, } /* found empty bucket and recycle */ if (i == RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES) { - prev_bkt->next = last_bkt->next = NULL; + prev_bkt->next = NULL; uint32_t index = last_bkt - h->buckets_ext + 1; - rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + /* Recycle the empty bkt if + * no_free_on_del is disabled. + */ + if (h->no_free_on_del) + /* Store index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled + * on calling rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. + * When lock free read-write concurrency is enabled, + * an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list + * immediately (as readers might be using it still). + * Hence freeing of the ext bkt is piggy-backed to + * freeing of the key index. + */ + h->ext_bkt_to_free[ret] = index; + else + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); } - __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return ret; } @@ -1545,6 +1591,14 @@ rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, /* Out of bounds */ if (position >= total_entries) return -EINVAL; + if (h->ext_table_support && h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + uint32_t index = h->ext_bkt_to_free[position]; + if (index) { + /* Recycle empty ext bkt to free list. */ + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + h->ext_bkt_to_free[position] = 0; + } + } if (h->use_local_cache) { lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); @@ -1855,6 +1909,9 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, rte_prefetch0(secondary_bkt[i]); } + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) + positions[i] = -ENOENT; + do { /* Load the table change counter before the lookup * starts. Acquire semantics will make sure that @@ -1899,7 +1956,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, /* Compare keys, first hits in primary first */ for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - positions[i] = -ENOENT; while (prim_hitmask[i]) { uint32_t hit_index = __builtin_ctzl(prim_hitmask[i]) @@ -1972,6 +2028,35 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, continue; } + /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ + if (hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) { + if (hit_mask != NULL) + *hit_mask = hits; + return; + } + /* need to check ext buckets for match */ + if (h->ext_table_support) { + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { + if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) + continue; + next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; + FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { + if (data != NULL) + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + &data[i], cur_bkt); + else + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + NULL, cur_bkt); + if (ret != -1) { + positions[i] = ret; + hits |= 1ULL << i; + break; + } + } + } + } /* The loads of sig_current in compare_signatures * should not move below the load from tbl_chng_cnt. */ @@ -1988,34 +2073,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE); } while (cnt_b != cnt_a); - /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ - if ((hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) || !h->ext_table_support) { - if (hit_mask != NULL) - *hit_mask = hits; - __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h); - return; - } - - /* need to check ext buckets for match */ - for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) - continue; - next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; - FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { - if (data != NULL) - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], &data[i], cur_bkt); - else - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], NULL, cur_bkt); - if (ret != -1) { - positions[i] = ret; - hits |= 1ULL << i; - break; - } - } - } - if (hit_mask != NULL) *hit_mask = hits; } diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h index eacdaa8d4684..48c85c890712 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ struct rte_hash { rte_rwlock_t *readwrite_lock; /**< Read-write lock thread-safety. */ struct rte_hash_bucket *buckets_ext; /**< Extra buckets array */ struct rte_ring *free_ext_bkts; /**< Ring of indexes of free buckets */ + /* Stores index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled on calling + * rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. When lock free read-write concurrency is + * enabled, an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list immediately + * (as readers might be using it still). Hence freeing of the ext bkt + * is piggy-backed to freeing of the key index. + */ + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt; /**< Indicates if the hash table changed from last read. */ } __rte_cache_aligned; -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 23:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 23:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 23:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 0:57 ` Thomas Monjalon 2019-04-02 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 3 siblings, 2 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf for extendable bucket feature. It is tested with both lock-free enabled and lock-free disabled case. Test includes: - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt - hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> --- v4: - Add Acked-by tag. --- v3: - Update commit message (Yipeng) --- app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 284 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c index cbfd9322696b..ddd8d7aa6a7d 100644 --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ #define READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH 4 #define READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH 8 #define BULK_LOOKUP 16 +#define READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT 32 + +#define WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT 0 +#define WRITE_KEY_SHIFT 1 +#define WRITE_EXT_BKT 2 + #define NUM_TEST 3 unsigned int rwc_core_cnt[NUM_TEST] = {1, 2, 4}; @@ -51,6 +57,7 @@ struct rwc_perf { uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_sp[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t w_ks_r_miss[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t multi_rw[NUM_TEST - 1][2][NUM_TEST]; + uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[2][NUM_TEST]; }; static struct rwc_perf rwc_lf_results, rwc_non_lf_results; @@ -62,11 +69,15 @@ struct { uint32_t *keys_absent; uint32_t *keys_shift_path; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks; uint32_t count_keys_ks; uint32_t count_keys_absent; uint32_t count_keys_shift_path; uint32_t count_keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt; + uint32_t count_keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t single_insert; struct rte_hash *h; } tbl_rwc_test_param; @@ -81,6 +92,35 @@ uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; uint8_t *scanned_bkts; +static inline uint16_t +get_short_sig(const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + return hash >> 16; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_prim_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return hash & bucket_bitmask; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_alt_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + uint32_t cur_bkt_idx, uint16_t sig) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return (cur_bkt_idx ^ sig) & bucket_bitmask; +} + + static inline int get_enabled_cores_list(void) { @@ -168,9 +208,12 @@ generate_keys(void) uint32_t *keys_ks = NULL; uint32_t *keys_absent = NULL; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt = NULL; uint32_t *found = NULL; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks = 0; uint32_t count_keys_ks = 0; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt = 0; uint32_t i; /* @@ -251,14 +294,32 @@ generate_keys(void) goto err; } + /* + * This consist of keys which will be stored in extended buckets + */ + keys_ext_bkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ext_bkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } + + /* + * This consist of keys which when deleted causes shifting of keys + * in extended buckets to respective secondary buckets + */ + keys_ks_extbkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ks_extbkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } hash_sig_t sig; uint32_t prim_bucket_idx; - int ret; + uint32_t sec_bucket_idx; + uint16_t short_sig; uint32_t num_buckets; - uint32_t bucket_bitmask; num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; - bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + int ret; /* * Used to mark bkts in which at least one key was shifted to its @@ -275,6 +336,8 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks = keys_ks; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_absent = keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path = keys_non_shift_path; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt = keys_ext_bkt; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt = keys_ks_extbkt; /* Generate keys by adding previous two keys, neglect overflow */ printf("Generating keys...\n"); keys[0] = 0; @@ -287,7 +350,8 @@ generate_keys(void) /* Check if primary bucket has space.*/ sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, tbl_rwc_test_param.keys+i); - prim_bucket_idx = sig & bucket_bitmask; + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + sig); ret = check_bucket(prim_bucket_idx, keys[i]); if (ret < 0) { /* @@ -368,6 +432,47 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_absent = count_keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path = count; + memset(scanned_bkts, 0, num_buckets); + count = 0; + /* Find keys that will be in extended buckets */ + for (i = 0; i < count_keys_ks; i++) { + ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys_ks + i); + if (ret < 0) { + /* Key will be added to ext bkt */ + keys_ext_bkt[count_keys_extbkt++] = keys_ks[i]; + /* Sec bkt to be added to keys_ks_extbkt */ + sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks + i); + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, sig); + short_sig = get_short_sig(sig); + sec_bucket_idx = get_alt_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + prim_bucket_idx, short_sig); + if (scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] == 0) + scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] = 1; + } + } + + /* Find keys that will shift keys in ext bucket*/ + for (i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++) { + if (scanned_bkts[i] == 1) { + iter = i * 8; + while (rte_hash_iterate(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + &next_key, &next_data, &iter) >= 0) { + /* Check if key belongs to the current bucket */ + if (i >= (iter-1)/8) + keys_ks_extbkt[count++] + = *(const uint32_t *)next_key; + else + break; + } + } + } + + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt = count; + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt = count_keys_extbkt; + printf("\nCount of keys NOT causing shifting of existing keys to " "alternate location: %d\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks); printf("\nCount of keys causing shifting of existing keys to alternate " @@ -378,6 +483,10 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path); printf("Count of keys not likely to be on the shift path: %d\n\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path); + printf("Count of keys in extended buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt); + printf("Count of keys shifting keys in ext buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(found); rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); @@ -390,12 +499,14 @@ generate_keys(void) rte_free(keys_absent); rte_free(found); rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path); + rte_free(keys_ext_bkt); + rte_free(keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(scanned_bkts); return -1; } static int -init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) +init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm, int ext_bkt) { struct rte_hash *handle; @@ -425,6 +536,9 @@ init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY | RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD; + if (ext_bkt) + hash_params.extra_flag |= RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE; + hash_params.name = "tests"; handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params); @@ -452,7 +566,7 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) void *temp_a[BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE]; /* Used to identify keys not inserted in the hash table */ - pos = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); + pos = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); if (pos == NULL) { printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); return -1; @@ -467,6 +581,9 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH) { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path; + } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT) { + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; + read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; } else { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path; @@ -482,7 +599,6 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) /* Array of pointer to the list of keys */ for (j = 0; j < BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE; j++) temp_a[j] = keys + i + j; - rte_hash_lookup_bulk(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, (const void **) ((uintptr_t)temp_a), @@ -539,22 +655,25 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } static int -write_keys(uint8_t key_shift) +write_keys(uint8_t write_type) { uint32_t i; int ret; uint32_t key_cnt; uint32_t *keys; - if (key_shift) { + if (write_type == WRITE_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks; - } else { + } else if (write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_no_ks; + } else if (write_type == WRITE_EXT_BKT) { + key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; } for (i = 0; i < key_cnt; i++) { ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys + i); - if (!key_shift && ret < 0) { + if ((write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) && ret < 0) { printf("writer failed %"PRIu32"\n", i); return -1; } @@ -581,18 +700,18 @@ test_rwc_multi_writer(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NO_KEY_SHIFTS; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, read - hit\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -612,7 +731,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; writer_done = 1; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) @@ -650,19 +769,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; int ret; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -687,7 +806,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -722,19 +841,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, - int rwc_lf, int htm) + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit" " (non-shift-path)\n"); @@ -755,15 +874,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -798,19 +917,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit (shift-path)" "\n"); @@ -831,15 +950,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -874,19 +993,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int - htm) + htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -906,15 +1025,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -949,18 +1068,18 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int */ static int test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m, k; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Multi-add-lookup\n"); uint8_t pos_core; @@ -991,8 +1110,8 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, writer_done = 0; for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) multi_writer_done[i] = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; /* Launch reader(s) */ @@ -1000,7 +1119,7 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; pos_core = 0; /* Launch writers */ @@ -1045,6 +1164,88 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, return -1; } +/* + * Test lookup perf: + * Reader(s) lookup keys present in the extendable bkt. + */ +static int +test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) +{ + unsigned int n, m; + uint64_t i; + int use_jhash = 0; + uint8_t write_type; + uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT; + + rte_atomic64_init(&greads); + rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); + + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) + goto err; + printf("\nTest: Hash add - key-shifts, read - hit (ext_bkt)\n"); + for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { + if (m == 1) { + printf("\n** With bulk-lookup **\n"); + read_type |= BULK_LOOKUP; + } + for (n = 0; n < NUM_TEST; n++) { + unsigned int tot_lcore = rte_lcore_count(); + if (tot_lcore < rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1) + goto finish; + + printf("\nNumber of readers: %u\n", rwc_core_cnt[n]); + + rte_atomic64_clear(&greads); + rte_atomic64_clear(&gread_cycles); + + rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + writer_done = 0; + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, + (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, + enabled_core_ids[i]); + for (i = 0; i < tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt; + i++) { + if (rte_hash_del_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt + i) + < 0) { + printf("Delete Failed: %u\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt[i]); + goto err; + } + } + writer_done = 1; + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); + + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0) + goto err; + + unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup = + rte_atomic64_read(&gread_cycles) / + rte_atomic64_read(&greads); + rwc_perf_results->w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[m][n] + = cycles_per_lookup; + printf("Cycles per lookup: %llu\n", cycles_per_lookup); + } + } + +finish: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return 0; + +err: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return -1; +} + static int test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) { @@ -1057,6 +1258,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) int rwc_lf = 0; int htm; int use_jhash = 0; + int ext_bkt = 0; if (rte_lcore_count() == 1) { printf("More than one lcore is required " "to do read write lock-free concurrency test\n"); @@ -1070,7 +1272,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) else htm = 0; - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) return -1; if (generate_keys() != 0) return -1; @@ -1079,25 +1281,29 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) if (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) { rwc_lf = 1; + ext_bkt = 1; printf("Test lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" " enabled\n"); if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; } printf("\nTest lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" @@ -1112,21 +1318,26 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) } } else printf("With HTM Enabled\n"); - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; results: printf("\n\t\t\t\t\t\t********** Results summary **********\n\n"); @@ -1158,8 +1369,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("Disabled\t"); if (htm) @@ -1179,7 +1393,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("_______\t\t_______\t\t_________\t___\t\t" "_________\t\t\t\t\t\t_________________\n"); -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 23:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 0:57 ` Thomas Monjalon 1 sibling, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-01 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf for extendable bucket feature. It is tested with both lock-free enabled and lock-free disabled case. Test includes: - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt - hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> --- v4: - Add Acked-by tag. --- v3: - Update commit message (Yipeng) --- app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 350 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 284 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c index cbfd9322696b..ddd8d7aa6a7d 100644 --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ #define READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH 4 #define READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH 8 #define BULK_LOOKUP 16 +#define READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT 32 + +#define WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT 0 +#define WRITE_KEY_SHIFT 1 +#define WRITE_EXT_BKT 2 + #define NUM_TEST 3 unsigned int rwc_core_cnt[NUM_TEST] = {1, 2, 4}; @@ -51,6 +57,7 @@ struct rwc_perf { uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_sp[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t w_ks_r_miss[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t multi_rw[NUM_TEST - 1][2][NUM_TEST]; + uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[2][NUM_TEST]; }; static struct rwc_perf rwc_lf_results, rwc_non_lf_results; @@ -62,11 +69,15 @@ struct { uint32_t *keys_absent; uint32_t *keys_shift_path; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks; uint32_t count_keys_ks; uint32_t count_keys_absent; uint32_t count_keys_shift_path; uint32_t count_keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt; + uint32_t count_keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t single_insert; struct rte_hash *h; } tbl_rwc_test_param; @@ -81,6 +92,35 @@ uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; uint8_t *scanned_bkts; +static inline uint16_t +get_short_sig(const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + return hash >> 16; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_prim_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return hash & bucket_bitmask; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_alt_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + uint32_t cur_bkt_idx, uint16_t sig) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return (cur_bkt_idx ^ sig) & bucket_bitmask; +} + + static inline int get_enabled_cores_list(void) { @@ -168,9 +208,12 @@ generate_keys(void) uint32_t *keys_ks = NULL; uint32_t *keys_absent = NULL; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt = NULL; uint32_t *found = NULL; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks = 0; uint32_t count_keys_ks = 0; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt = 0; uint32_t i; /* @@ -251,14 +294,32 @@ generate_keys(void) goto err; } + /* + * This consist of keys which will be stored in extended buckets + */ + keys_ext_bkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ext_bkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } + + /* + * This consist of keys which when deleted causes shifting of keys + * in extended buckets to respective secondary buckets + */ + keys_ks_extbkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ks_extbkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } hash_sig_t sig; uint32_t prim_bucket_idx; - int ret; + uint32_t sec_bucket_idx; + uint16_t short_sig; uint32_t num_buckets; - uint32_t bucket_bitmask; num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; - bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + int ret; /* * Used to mark bkts in which at least one key was shifted to its @@ -275,6 +336,8 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks = keys_ks; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_absent = keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path = keys_non_shift_path; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt = keys_ext_bkt; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt = keys_ks_extbkt; /* Generate keys by adding previous two keys, neglect overflow */ printf("Generating keys...\n"); keys[0] = 0; @@ -287,7 +350,8 @@ generate_keys(void) /* Check if primary bucket has space.*/ sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, tbl_rwc_test_param.keys+i); - prim_bucket_idx = sig & bucket_bitmask; + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + sig); ret = check_bucket(prim_bucket_idx, keys[i]); if (ret < 0) { /* @@ -368,6 +432,47 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_absent = count_keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path = count; + memset(scanned_bkts, 0, num_buckets); + count = 0; + /* Find keys that will be in extended buckets */ + for (i = 0; i < count_keys_ks; i++) { + ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys_ks + i); + if (ret < 0) { + /* Key will be added to ext bkt */ + keys_ext_bkt[count_keys_extbkt++] = keys_ks[i]; + /* Sec bkt to be added to keys_ks_extbkt */ + sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks + i); + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, sig); + short_sig = get_short_sig(sig); + sec_bucket_idx = get_alt_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + prim_bucket_idx, short_sig); + if (scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] == 0) + scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] = 1; + } + } + + /* Find keys that will shift keys in ext bucket*/ + for (i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++) { + if (scanned_bkts[i] == 1) { + iter = i * 8; + while (rte_hash_iterate(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + &next_key, &next_data, &iter) >= 0) { + /* Check if key belongs to the current bucket */ + if (i >= (iter-1)/8) + keys_ks_extbkt[count++] + = *(const uint32_t *)next_key; + else + break; + } + } + } + + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt = count; + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt = count_keys_extbkt; + printf("\nCount of keys NOT causing shifting of existing keys to " "alternate location: %d\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks); printf("\nCount of keys causing shifting of existing keys to alternate " @@ -378,6 +483,10 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path); printf("Count of keys not likely to be on the shift path: %d\n\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path); + printf("Count of keys in extended buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt); + printf("Count of keys shifting keys in ext buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(found); rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); @@ -390,12 +499,14 @@ generate_keys(void) rte_free(keys_absent); rte_free(found); rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path); + rte_free(keys_ext_bkt); + rte_free(keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(scanned_bkts); return -1; } static int -init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) +init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm, int ext_bkt) { struct rte_hash *handle; @@ -425,6 +536,9 @@ init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY | RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD; + if (ext_bkt) + hash_params.extra_flag |= RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE; + hash_params.name = "tests"; handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params); @@ -452,7 +566,7 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) void *temp_a[BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE]; /* Used to identify keys not inserted in the hash table */ - pos = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); + pos = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); if (pos == NULL) { printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); return -1; @@ -467,6 +581,9 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH) { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path; + } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT) { + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; + read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; } else { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path; @@ -482,7 +599,6 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) /* Array of pointer to the list of keys */ for (j = 0; j < BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE; j++) temp_a[j] = keys + i + j; - rte_hash_lookup_bulk(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, (const void **) ((uintptr_t)temp_a), @@ -539,22 +655,25 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } static int -write_keys(uint8_t key_shift) +write_keys(uint8_t write_type) { uint32_t i; int ret; uint32_t key_cnt; uint32_t *keys; - if (key_shift) { + if (write_type == WRITE_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks; - } else { + } else if (write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_no_ks; + } else if (write_type == WRITE_EXT_BKT) { + key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; } for (i = 0; i < key_cnt; i++) { ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys + i); - if (!key_shift && ret < 0) { + if ((write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) && ret < 0) { printf("writer failed %"PRIu32"\n", i); return -1; } @@ -581,18 +700,18 @@ test_rwc_multi_writer(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NO_KEY_SHIFTS; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, read - hit\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -612,7 +731,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; writer_done = 1; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) @@ -650,19 +769,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; int ret; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -687,7 +806,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -722,19 +841,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, - int rwc_lf, int htm) + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit" " (non-shift-path)\n"); @@ -755,15 +874,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -798,19 +917,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit (shift-path)" "\n"); @@ -831,15 +950,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -874,19 +993,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int - htm) + htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -906,15 +1025,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -949,18 +1068,18 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int */ static int test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m, k; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Multi-add-lookup\n"); uint8_t pos_core; @@ -991,8 +1110,8 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, writer_done = 0; for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) multi_writer_done[i] = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; /* Launch reader(s) */ @@ -1000,7 +1119,7 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; pos_core = 0; /* Launch writers */ @@ -1045,6 +1164,88 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, return -1; } +/* + * Test lookup perf: + * Reader(s) lookup keys present in the extendable bkt. + */ +static int +test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) +{ + unsigned int n, m; + uint64_t i; + int use_jhash = 0; + uint8_t write_type; + uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT; + + rte_atomic64_init(&greads); + rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); + + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) + goto err; + printf("\nTest: Hash add - key-shifts, read - hit (ext_bkt)\n"); + for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { + if (m == 1) { + printf("\n** With bulk-lookup **\n"); + read_type |= BULK_LOOKUP; + } + for (n = 0; n < NUM_TEST; n++) { + unsigned int tot_lcore = rte_lcore_count(); + if (tot_lcore < rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1) + goto finish; + + printf("\nNumber of readers: %u\n", rwc_core_cnt[n]); + + rte_atomic64_clear(&greads); + rte_atomic64_clear(&gread_cycles); + + rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + writer_done = 0; + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, + (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, + enabled_core_ids[i]); + for (i = 0; i < tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt; + i++) { + if (rte_hash_del_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt + i) + < 0) { + printf("Delete Failed: %u\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt[i]); + goto err; + } + } + writer_done = 1; + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); + + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0) + goto err; + + unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup = + rte_atomic64_read(&gread_cycles) / + rte_atomic64_read(&greads); + rwc_perf_results->w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[m][n] + = cycles_per_lookup; + printf("Cycles per lookup: %llu\n", cycles_per_lookup); + } + } + +finish: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return 0; + +err: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return -1; +} + static int test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) { @@ -1057,6 +1258,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) int rwc_lf = 0; int htm; int use_jhash = 0; + int ext_bkt = 0; if (rte_lcore_count() == 1) { printf("More than one lcore is required " "to do read write lock-free concurrency test\n"); @@ -1070,7 +1272,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) else htm = 0; - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) return -1; if (generate_keys() != 0) return -1; @@ -1079,25 +1281,29 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) if (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) { rwc_lf = 1; + ext_bkt = 1; printf("Test lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" " enabled\n"); if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; } printf("\nTest lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" @@ -1112,21 +1318,26 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) } } else printf("With HTM Enabled\n"); - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; results: printf("\n\t\t\t\t\t\t********** Results summary **********\n\n"); @@ -1158,8 +1369,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("Disabled\t"); if (htm) @@ -1179,7 +1393,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("_______\t\t_______\t\t_________\t___\t\t" "_________\t\t\t\t\t\t_________________\n"); -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 23:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 0:57 ` Thomas Monjalon 2019-04-02 0:57 ` Thomas Monjalon 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 1 sibling, 2 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2019-04-02 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dharmik Thakkar Cc: dev, Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara, honnappa.nagarahalli 02/04/2019 01:08, Dharmik Thakkar: > Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf for > extendable bucket feature. > It is tested with both lock-free enabled and lock-free disabled case. > > Test includes: > > - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt > - hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt > > Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> > Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> > --- > v4: > - Add Acked-by tag. FYI, no need to send a new version just for this. Please run devtools/test-meson-builds.sh. When building build-clang-static, I see this error: app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c:670:13: error: variable 'key_cnt' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-04-02 0:57 ` Thomas Monjalon @ 2019-04-02 0:57 ` Thomas Monjalon 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 1 sibling, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2019-04-02 0:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dharmik Thakkar Cc: dev, Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara, honnappa.nagarahalli 02/04/2019 01:08, Dharmik Thakkar: > Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf for > extendable bucket feature. > It is tested with both lock-free enabled and lock-free disabled case. > > Test includes: > > - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt > - hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt > > Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> > Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> > --- > v4: > - Add Acked-by tag. FYI, no need to send a new version just for this. Please run devtools/test-meson-builds.sh. When building build-clang-static, I see this error: app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c:670:13: error: variable 'key_cnt' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-04-02 0:57 ` Thomas Monjalon 2019-04-02 0:57 ` Thomas Monjalon @ 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 1 sibling, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: thomas Cc: dev, Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara, Honnappa Nagarahalli, nd Hi Thomas, Thank you for the review! > On Apr 1, 2019, at 7:57 PM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: > > 02/04/2019 01:08, Dharmik Thakkar: >> Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf for >> extendable bucket feature. >> It is tested with both lock-free enabled and lock-free disabled case. >> >> Test includes: >> >> - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt >> - hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt >> >> Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >> Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> >> --- >> v4: >> - Add Acked-by tag. > > FYI, no need to send a new version just for this. Sure, thanks! > > Please run devtools/test-meson-builds.sh. > When building build-clang-static, I see this error: > > app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c:670:13: error: > variable 'key_cnt' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false Will resolve and update. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: thomas Cc: dev, Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara, Honnappa Nagarahalli, nd Hi Thomas, Thank you for the review! > On Apr 1, 2019, at 7:57 PM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: > > 02/04/2019 01:08, Dharmik Thakkar: >> Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf for >> extendable bucket feature. >> It is tested with both lock-free enabled and lock-free disabled case. >> >> Test includes: >> >> - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt >> - hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt >> >> Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> >> Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> >> --- >> v4: >> - Add Acked-by tag. > > FYI, no need to send a new version just for this. Sure, thanks! > > Please run devtools/test-meson-builds.sh. > When building build-clang-static, I see this error: > > app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c:670:13: error: > variable 'key_cnt' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false Will resolve and update. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar ` (3 more replies) 3 siblings, 4 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar This patch series: - Enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. - Adds lock-free read-write concurrency tests for ext bkt --- v5: * Resolve devtools/test-meson-builds.sh error (Thomas). v4: * Add Acked-by tag. v3: * Update lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c (Yipeng). * Add Acked-by tag. v2: * Update doc (Yipeng). * Update lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c (Yipeng). Dharmik Thakkar (2): hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 352 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 157 +++++++++---- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 + 4 files changed, 402 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt 2019-04-02 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar This patch series: - Enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. - Adds lock-free read-write concurrency tests for ext bkt --- v5: * Resolve devtools/test-meson-builds.sh error (Thomas). v4: * Add Acked-by tag. v3: * Update lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c (Yipeng). * Add Acked-by tag. v2: * Update doc (Yipeng). * Update lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c (Yipeng). Dharmik Thakkar (2): hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 352 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 157 +++++++++---- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 + 4 files changed, 402 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-04-02 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-03 18:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Thomas Monjalon 3 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara, John McNamara, Marko Kovacevic Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> --- doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 ++ 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst index 85a6edfa8b16..d06c7de2ead1 100644 --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst @@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ Extendable Bucket Functionality support An extra flag is used to enable this functionality (flag is not set by default). When the (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE) is set and in the very unlikely case due to excessive hash collisions that a key has failed to be inserted, the hash table bucket is extended with a linked list to insert these failed keys. This feature is important for the workloads (e.g. telco workloads) that need to insert up to 100% of the -hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Currently the extendable bucket is not supported -with the lock-free concurrency implementation (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF). - +hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). +Please note that with the 'lock free read/write concurrency' flag enabled, users need to call 'rte_hash_free_key_with_position' API in order to free the empty buckets and +deleted keys, to maintain the 100% capacity guarantee. Implementation Details (non Extendable Bucket Case) --------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c index c01489ba5193..8213dbf5f782 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) unsigned int readwrite_concur_support = 0; unsigned int writer_takes_lock = 0; unsigned int no_free_on_del = 0; + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free = NULL; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt = NULL; unsigned int readwrite_concur_lf_support = 0; @@ -170,15 +171,6 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) return NULL; } - if ((params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) && - (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE)) { - rte_errno = EINVAL; - RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "rte_hash_create: extendable bucket " - "feature not supported with rw concurrency " - "lock free\n"); - return NULL; - } - /* Check extra flags field to check extra options. */ if (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_TRANS_MEM_SUPPORT) hw_trans_mem_support = 1; @@ -302,6 +294,16 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) */ for (i = 1; i <= num_buckets; i++) rte_ring_sp_enqueue(r_ext, (void *)((uintptr_t) i)); + + if (readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + ext_bkt_to_free = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * + num_key_slots, 0); + if (ext_bkt_to_free == NULL) { + RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "ext bkt to free memory allocation " + "failed\n"); + goto err_unlock; + } + } } const uint32_t key_entry_size = @@ -393,6 +395,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) default_hash_func : params->hash_func; h->key_store = k; h->free_slots = r; + h->ext_bkt_to_free = ext_bkt_to_free; h->tbl_chng_cnt = tbl_chng_cnt; *h->tbl_chng_cnt = 0; h->hw_trans_mem_support = hw_trans_mem_support; @@ -443,6 +446,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) rte_free(buckets_ext); rte_free(k); rte_free(tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(ext_bkt_to_free); return NULL; } @@ -484,6 +488,7 @@ rte_hash_free(struct rte_hash *h) rte_free(h->buckets); rte_free(h->buckets_ext); rte_free(h->tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(h->ext_bkt_to_free); rte_free(h); rte_free(te); } @@ -799,7 +804,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -831,7 +836,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -1054,7 +1059,12 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* Check if slot is available */ if (likely(cur_bkt->key_idx[i] == EMPTY_SLOT)) { cur_bkt->sig_current[i] = short_sig; - cur_bkt->key_idx[i] = new_idx; + /* Store to signature should not leak after + * the store to key_idx + */ + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[i], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return new_idx - 1; } @@ -1072,7 +1082,12 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, bkt_id = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)ext_bkt_id) - 1; /* Use the first location of the new bucket */ (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).sig_current[0] = short_sig; - (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0] = new_idx; + /* Store to signature should not leak after + * the store to key_idx + */ + __atomic_store_n(&(h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); /* Link the new bucket to sec bucket linked list */ last = rte_hash_get_last_bkt(sec_bkt); last->next = &h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]; @@ -1366,7 +1381,8 @@ remove_entry(const struct rte_hash *h, struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt, unsigned i) * empty slot. */ static inline void -__rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { +__rte_hash_compact_ll(const struct rte_hash *h, + struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { int i; struct rte_hash_bucket *last_bkt; @@ -1377,10 +1393,27 @@ __rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { for (i = RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (last_bkt->key_idx[i] != EMPTY_SLOT) { - cur_bkt->key_idx[pos] = last_bkt->key_idx[i]; cur_bkt->sig_current[pos] = last_bkt->sig_current[i]; + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[pos], + last_bkt->key_idx[i], + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + if (h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + /* Inform the readers that the table has changed + * Since there is one writer, load acquire on + * tbl_chng_cnt is not required. + */ + __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, + *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + /* The store to sig_current should + * not move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. + */ + __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); + } last_bkt->sig_current[i] = NULL_SIGNATURE; - last_bkt->key_idx[i] = EMPTY_SLOT; + __atomic_store_n(&last_bkt->key_idx[i], + EMPTY_SLOT, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); return; } } @@ -1449,7 +1482,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* look for key in primary bucket */ ret = search_and_remove(h, key, prim_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(prim_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, prim_bkt, pos); last_bkt = prim_bkt->next; prev_bkt = prim_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1461,7 +1494,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, sec_bkt) { ret = search_and_remove(h, key, cur_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(cur_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, cur_bkt, pos); last_bkt = sec_bkt->next; prev_bkt = sec_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1488,11 +1521,24 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, } /* found empty bucket and recycle */ if (i == RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES) { - prev_bkt->next = last_bkt->next = NULL; + prev_bkt->next = NULL; uint32_t index = last_bkt - h->buckets_ext + 1; - rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + /* Recycle the empty bkt if + * no_free_on_del is disabled. + */ + if (h->no_free_on_del) + /* Store index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled + * on calling rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. + * When lock free read-write concurrency is enabled, + * an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list + * immediately (as readers might be using it still). + * Hence freeing of the ext bkt is piggy-backed to + * freeing of the key index. + */ + h->ext_bkt_to_free[ret] = index; + else + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); } - __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return ret; } @@ -1545,6 +1591,14 @@ rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, /* Out of bounds */ if (position >= total_entries) return -EINVAL; + if (h->ext_table_support && h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + uint32_t index = h->ext_bkt_to_free[position]; + if (index) { + /* Recycle empty ext bkt to free list. */ + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + h->ext_bkt_to_free[position] = 0; + } + } if (h->use_local_cache) { lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); @@ -1855,6 +1909,9 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, rte_prefetch0(secondary_bkt[i]); } + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) + positions[i] = -ENOENT; + do { /* Load the table change counter before the lookup * starts. Acquire semantics will make sure that @@ -1899,7 +1956,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, /* Compare keys, first hits in primary first */ for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - positions[i] = -ENOENT; while (prim_hitmask[i]) { uint32_t hit_index = __builtin_ctzl(prim_hitmask[i]) @@ -1972,6 +2028,35 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, continue; } + /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ + if (hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) { + if (hit_mask != NULL) + *hit_mask = hits; + return; + } + /* need to check ext buckets for match */ + if (h->ext_table_support) { + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { + if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) + continue; + next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; + FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { + if (data != NULL) + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + &data[i], cur_bkt); + else + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + NULL, cur_bkt); + if (ret != -1) { + positions[i] = ret; + hits |= 1ULL << i; + break; + } + } + } + } /* The loads of sig_current in compare_signatures * should not move below the load from tbl_chng_cnt. */ @@ -1988,34 +2073,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE); } while (cnt_b != cnt_a); - /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ - if ((hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) || !h->ext_table_support) { - if (hit_mask != NULL) - *hit_mask = hits; - __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h); - return; - } - - /* need to check ext buckets for match */ - for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) - continue; - next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; - FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { - if (data != NULL) - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], &data[i], cur_bkt); - else - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], NULL, cur_bkt); - if (ret != -1) { - positions[i] = ret; - hits |= 1ULL << i; - break; - } - } - } - if (hit_mask != NULL) *hit_mask = hits; } diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h index eacdaa8d4684..48c85c890712 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ struct rte_hash { rte_rwlock_t *readwrite_lock; /**< Read-write lock thread-safety. */ struct rte_hash_bucket *buckets_ext; /**< Extra buckets array */ struct rte_ring *free_ext_bkts; /**< Ring of indexes of free buckets */ + /* Stores index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled on calling + * rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. When lock free read-write concurrency is + * enabled, an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list immediately + * (as readers might be using it still). Hence freeing of the ext bkt + * is piggy-backed to freeing of the key index. + */ + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt; /**< Indicates if the hash table changed from last read. */ } __rte_cache_aligned; -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket 2019-04-02 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara, John McNamara, Marko Kovacevic Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar This patch enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable bucket feature. Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> --- doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst | 6 +- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 7 ++ 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst index 85a6edfa8b16..d06c7de2ead1 100644 --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/hash_lib.rst @@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ Extendable Bucket Functionality support An extra flag is used to enable this functionality (flag is not set by default). When the (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE) is set and in the very unlikely case due to excessive hash collisions that a key has failed to be inserted, the hash table bucket is extended with a linked list to insert these failed keys. This feature is important for the workloads (e.g. telco workloads) that need to insert up to 100% of the -hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). Currently the extendable bucket is not supported -with the lock-free concurrency implementation (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF). - +hash table size and can't tolerate any key insertion failure (even if very few). +Please note that with the 'lock free read/write concurrency' flag enabled, users need to call 'rte_hash_free_key_with_position' API in order to free the empty buckets and +deleted keys, to maintain the 100% capacity guarantee. Implementation Details (non Extendable Bucket Case) --------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c index c01489ba5193..8213dbf5f782 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) unsigned int readwrite_concur_support = 0; unsigned int writer_takes_lock = 0; unsigned int no_free_on_del = 0; + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free = NULL; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt = NULL; unsigned int readwrite_concur_lf_support = 0; @@ -170,15 +171,6 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) return NULL; } - if ((params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) && - (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE)) { - rte_errno = EINVAL; - RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "rte_hash_create: extendable bucket " - "feature not supported with rw concurrency " - "lock free\n"); - return NULL; - } - /* Check extra flags field to check extra options. */ if (params->extra_flag & RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_TRANS_MEM_SUPPORT) hw_trans_mem_support = 1; @@ -302,6 +294,16 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) */ for (i = 1; i <= num_buckets; i++) rte_ring_sp_enqueue(r_ext, (void *)((uintptr_t) i)); + + if (readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + ext_bkt_to_free = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * + num_key_slots, 0); + if (ext_bkt_to_free == NULL) { + RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "ext bkt to free memory allocation " + "failed\n"); + goto err_unlock; + } + } } const uint32_t key_entry_size = @@ -393,6 +395,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) default_hash_func : params->hash_func; h->key_store = k; h->free_slots = r; + h->ext_bkt_to_free = ext_bkt_to_free; h->tbl_chng_cnt = tbl_chng_cnt; *h->tbl_chng_cnt = 0; h->hw_trans_mem_support = hw_trans_mem_support; @@ -443,6 +446,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) rte_free(buckets_ext); rte_free(k); rte_free(tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(ext_bkt_to_free); return NULL; } @@ -484,6 +488,7 @@ rte_hash_free(struct rte_hash *h) rte_free(h->buckets); rte_free(h->buckets_ext); rte_free(h->tbl_chng_cnt); + rte_free(h->ext_bkt_to_free); rte_free(h); rte_free(te); } @@ -799,7 +804,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -831,7 +836,7 @@ rte_hash_cuckoo_move_insert_mw(const struct rte_hash *h, __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE); - /* The stores to sig_alt and sig_current should not + /* The store to sig_current should not * move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. */ __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); @@ -1054,7 +1059,12 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* Check if slot is available */ if (likely(cur_bkt->key_idx[i] == EMPTY_SLOT)) { cur_bkt->sig_current[i] = short_sig; - cur_bkt->key_idx[i] = new_idx; + /* Store to signature should not leak after + * the store to key_idx + */ + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[i], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return new_idx - 1; } @@ -1072,7 +1082,12 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, bkt_id = (uint32_t)((uintptr_t)ext_bkt_id) - 1; /* Use the first location of the new bucket */ (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).sig_current[0] = short_sig; - (h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0] = new_idx; + /* Store to signature should not leak after + * the store to key_idx + */ + __atomic_store_n(&(h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]).key_idx[0], + new_idx, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); /* Link the new bucket to sec bucket linked list */ last = rte_hash_get_last_bkt(sec_bkt); last->next = &h->buckets_ext[bkt_id]; @@ -1366,7 +1381,8 @@ remove_entry(const struct rte_hash *h, struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt, unsigned i) * empty slot. */ static inline void -__rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { +__rte_hash_compact_ll(const struct rte_hash *h, + struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { int i; struct rte_hash_bucket *last_bkt; @@ -1377,10 +1393,27 @@ __rte_hash_compact_ll(struct rte_hash_bucket *cur_bkt, int pos) { for (i = RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (last_bkt->key_idx[i] != EMPTY_SLOT) { - cur_bkt->key_idx[pos] = last_bkt->key_idx[i]; cur_bkt->sig_current[pos] = last_bkt->sig_current[i]; + __atomic_store_n(&cur_bkt->key_idx[pos], + last_bkt->key_idx[i], + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + if (h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + /* Inform the readers that the table has changed + * Since there is one writer, load acquire on + * tbl_chng_cnt is not required. + */ + __atomic_store_n(h->tbl_chng_cnt, + *h->tbl_chng_cnt + 1, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); + /* The store to sig_current should + * not move above the store to tbl_chng_cnt. + */ + __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE); + } last_bkt->sig_current[i] = NULL_SIGNATURE; - last_bkt->key_idx[i] = EMPTY_SLOT; + __atomic_store_n(&last_bkt->key_idx[i], + EMPTY_SLOT, + __ATOMIC_RELEASE); return; } } @@ -1449,7 +1482,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, /* look for key in primary bucket */ ret = search_and_remove(h, key, prim_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(prim_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, prim_bkt, pos); last_bkt = prim_bkt->next; prev_bkt = prim_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1461,7 +1494,7 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, sec_bkt) { ret = search_and_remove(h, key, cur_bkt, short_sig, &pos); if (ret != -1) { - __rte_hash_compact_ll(cur_bkt, pos); + __rte_hash_compact_ll(h, cur_bkt, pos); last_bkt = sec_bkt->next; prev_bkt = sec_bkt; goto return_bkt; @@ -1488,11 +1521,24 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, } /* found empty bucket and recycle */ if (i == RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES) { - prev_bkt->next = last_bkt->next = NULL; + prev_bkt->next = NULL; uint32_t index = last_bkt - h->buckets_ext + 1; - rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + /* Recycle the empty bkt if + * no_free_on_del is disabled. + */ + if (h->no_free_on_del) + /* Store index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled + * on calling rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. + * When lock free read-write concurrency is enabled, + * an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list + * immediately (as readers might be using it still). + * Hence freeing of the ext bkt is piggy-backed to + * freeing of the key index. + */ + h->ext_bkt_to_free[ret] = index; + else + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); } - __hash_rw_writer_unlock(h); return ret; } @@ -1545,6 +1591,14 @@ rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, /* Out of bounds */ if (position >= total_entries) return -EINVAL; + if (h->ext_table_support && h->readwrite_concur_lf_support) { + uint32_t index = h->ext_bkt_to_free[position]; + if (index) { + /* Recycle empty ext bkt to free list. */ + rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_ext_bkts, (void *)(uintptr_t)index); + h->ext_bkt_to_free[position] = 0; + } + } if (h->use_local_cache) { lcore_id = rte_lcore_id(); @@ -1855,6 +1909,9 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, rte_prefetch0(secondary_bkt[i]); } + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) + positions[i] = -ENOENT; + do { /* Load the table change counter before the lookup * starts. Acquire semantics will make sure that @@ -1899,7 +1956,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, /* Compare keys, first hits in primary first */ for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - positions[i] = -ENOENT; while (prim_hitmask[i]) { uint32_t hit_index = __builtin_ctzl(prim_hitmask[i]) @@ -1972,6 +2028,35 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, continue; } + /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ + if (hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) { + if (hit_mask != NULL) + *hit_mask = hits; + return; + } + /* need to check ext buckets for match */ + if (h->ext_table_support) { + for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { + if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) + continue; + next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; + FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { + if (data != NULL) + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + &data[i], cur_bkt); + else + ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, + keys[i], sig[i], + NULL, cur_bkt); + if (ret != -1) { + positions[i] = ret; + hits |= 1ULL << i; + break; + } + } + } + } /* The loads of sig_current in compare_signatures * should not move below the load from tbl_chng_cnt. */ @@ -1988,34 +2073,6 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_bulk_lf(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **keys, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE); } while (cnt_b != cnt_a); - /* all found, do not need to go through ext bkt */ - if ((hits == ((1ULL << num_keys) - 1)) || !h->ext_table_support) { - if (hit_mask != NULL) - *hit_mask = hits; - __hash_rw_reader_unlock(h); - return; - } - - /* need to check ext buckets for match */ - for (i = 0; i < num_keys; i++) { - if ((hits & (1ULL << i)) != 0) - continue; - next_bkt = secondary_bkt[i]->next; - FOR_EACH_BUCKET(cur_bkt, next_bkt) { - if (data != NULL) - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], &data[i], cur_bkt); - else - ret = search_one_bucket_lf(h, keys[i], - sig[i], NULL, cur_bkt); - if (ret != -1) { - positions[i] = ret; - hits |= 1ULL << i; - break; - } - } - } - if (hit_mask != NULL) *hit_mask = hits; } diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h index eacdaa8d4684..48c85c890712 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ struct rte_hash { rte_rwlock_t *readwrite_lock; /**< Read-write lock thread-safety. */ struct rte_hash_bucket *buckets_ext; /**< Extra buckets array */ struct rte_ring *free_ext_bkts; /**< Ring of indexes of free buckets */ + /* Stores index of an empty ext bkt to be recycled on calling + * rte_hash_del_xxx APIs. When lock free read-write concurrency is + * enabled, an empty ext bkt cannot be put into free list immediately + * (as readers might be using it still). Hence freeing of the ext bkt + * is piggy-backed to freeing of the key index. + */ + uint32_t *ext_bkt_to_free; uint32_t *tbl_chng_cnt; /**< Indicates if the hash table changed from last read. */ } __rte_cache_aligned; -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-04-02 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-03 18:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Thomas Monjalon 3 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf for extendable bucket feature. It is tested with both lock-free enabled and lock-free disabled case. Test includes: - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt - hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> --- app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 352 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 285 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c index cbfd9322696b..4ab4c8ee64cf 100644 --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ #define READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH 4 #define READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH 8 #define BULK_LOOKUP 16 +#define READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT 32 + +#define WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT 0 +#define WRITE_KEY_SHIFT 1 +#define WRITE_EXT_BKT 2 + #define NUM_TEST 3 unsigned int rwc_core_cnt[NUM_TEST] = {1, 2, 4}; @@ -51,6 +57,7 @@ struct rwc_perf { uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_sp[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t w_ks_r_miss[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t multi_rw[NUM_TEST - 1][2][NUM_TEST]; + uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[2][NUM_TEST]; }; static struct rwc_perf rwc_lf_results, rwc_non_lf_results; @@ -62,11 +69,15 @@ struct { uint32_t *keys_absent; uint32_t *keys_shift_path; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks; uint32_t count_keys_ks; uint32_t count_keys_absent; uint32_t count_keys_shift_path; uint32_t count_keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt; + uint32_t count_keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t single_insert; struct rte_hash *h; } tbl_rwc_test_param; @@ -81,6 +92,35 @@ uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; uint8_t *scanned_bkts; +static inline uint16_t +get_short_sig(const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + return hash >> 16; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_prim_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return hash & bucket_bitmask; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_alt_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + uint32_t cur_bkt_idx, uint16_t sig) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return (cur_bkt_idx ^ sig) & bucket_bitmask; +} + + static inline int get_enabled_cores_list(void) { @@ -168,9 +208,12 @@ generate_keys(void) uint32_t *keys_ks = NULL; uint32_t *keys_absent = NULL; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt = NULL; uint32_t *found = NULL; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks = 0; uint32_t count_keys_ks = 0; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt = 0; uint32_t i; /* @@ -251,14 +294,32 @@ generate_keys(void) goto err; } + /* + * This consist of keys which will be stored in extended buckets + */ + keys_ext_bkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ext_bkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } + + /* + * This consist of keys which when deleted causes shifting of keys + * in extended buckets to respective secondary buckets + */ + keys_ks_extbkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ks_extbkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } hash_sig_t sig; uint32_t prim_bucket_idx; - int ret; + uint32_t sec_bucket_idx; + uint16_t short_sig; uint32_t num_buckets; - uint32_t bucket_bitmask; num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; - bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + int ret; /* * Used to mark bkts in which at least one key was shifted to its @@ -275,6 +336,8 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks = keys_ks; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_absent = keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path = keys_non_shift_path; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt = keys_ext_bkt; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt = keys_ks_extbkt; /* Generate keys by adding previous two keys, neglect overflow */ printf("Generating keys...\n"); keys[0] = 0; @@ -287,7 +350,8 @@ generate_keys(void) /* Check if primary bucket has space.*/ sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, tbl_rwc_test_param.keys+i); - prim_bucket_idx = sig & bucket_bitmask; + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + sig); ret = check_bucket(prim_bucket_idx, keys[i]); if (ret < 0) { /* @@ -368,6 +432,47 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_absent = count_keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path = count; + memset(scanned_bkts, 0, num_buckets); + count = 0; + /* Find keys that will be in extended buckets */ + for (i = 0; i < count_keys_ks; i++) { + ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys_ks + i); + if (ret < 0) { + /* Key will be added to ext bkt */ + keys_ext_bkt[count_keys_extbkt++] = keys_ks[i]; + /* Sec bkt to be added to keys_ks_extbkt */ + sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks + i); + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, sig); + short_sig = get_short_sig(sig); + sec_bucket_idx = get_alt_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + prim_bucket_idx, short_sig); + if (scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] == 0) + scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] = 1; + } + } + + /* Find keys that will shift keys in ext bucket*/ + for (i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++) { + if (scanned_bkts[i] == 1) { + iter = i * 8; + while (rte_hash_iterate(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + &next_key, &next_data, &iter) >= 0) { + /* Check if key belongs to the current bucket */ + if (i >= (iter-1)/8) + keys_ks_extbkt[count++] + = *(const uint32_t *)next_key; + else + break; + } + } + } + + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt = count; + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt = count_keys_extbkt; + printf("\nCount of keys NOT causing shifting of existing keys to " "alternate location: %d\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks); printf("\nCount of keys causing shifting of existing keys to alternate " @@ -378,6 +483,10 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path); printf("Count of keys not likely to be on the shift path: %d\n\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path); + printf("Count of keys in extended buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt); + printf("Count of keys shifting keys in ext buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(found); rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); @@ -390,12 +499,14 @@ generate_keys(void) rte_free(keys_absent); rte_free(found); rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path); + rte_free(keys_ext_bkt); + rte_free(keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(scanned_bkts); return -1; } static int -init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) +init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm, int ext_bkt) { struct rte_hash *handle; @@ -425,6 +536,9 @@ init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY | RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD; + if (ext_bkt) + hash_params.extra_flag |= RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE; + hash_params.name = "tests"; handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params); @@ -452,7 +566,7 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) void *temp_a[BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE]; /* Used to identify keys not inserted in the hash table */ - pos = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); + pos = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); if (pos == NULL) { printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); return -1; @@ -467,6 +581,9 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH) { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path; + } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT) { + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; + read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; } else { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path; @@ -482,7 +599,6 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) /* Array of pointer to the list of keys */ for (j = 0; j < BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE; j++) temp_a[j] = keys + i + j; - rte_hash_lookup_bulk(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, (const void **) ((uintptr_t)temp_a), @@ -539,22 +655,25 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } static int -write_keys(uint8_t key_shift) +write_keys(uint8_t write_type) { uint32_t i; int ret; - uint32_t key_cnt; + uint32_t key_cnt = 0; uint32_t *keys; - if (key_shift) { + if (write_type == WRITE_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks; - } else { + } else if (write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_no_ks; + } else if (write_type == WRITE_EXT_BKT) { + key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; } for (i = 0; i < key_cnt; i++) { ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys + i); - if (!key_shift && ret < 0) { + if ((write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) && ret < 0) { printf("writer failed %"PRIu32"\n", i); return -1; } @@ -581,18 +700,18 @@ test_rwc_multi_writer(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NO_KEY_SHIFTS; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, read - hit\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -612,7 +731,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; writer_done = 1; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) @@ -650,19 +769,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; int ret; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -687,7 +806,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -722,19 +841,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, - int rwc_lf, int htm) + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit" " (non-shift-path)\n"); @@ -755,15 +874,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -798,19 +917,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit (shift-path)" "\n"); @@ -831,15 +950,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -874,19 +993,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int - htm) + htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -906,15 +1025,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -949,18 +1068,18 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int */ static int test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m, k; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Multi-add-lookup\n"); uint8_t pos_core; @@ -991,8 +1110,8 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, writer_done = 0; for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) multi_writer_done[i] = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; /* Launch reader(s) */ @@ -1000,7 +1119,7 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; pos_core = 0; /* Launch writers */ @@ -1045,6 +1164,88 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, return -1; } +/* + * Test lookup perf: + * Reader(s) lookup keys present in the extendable bkt. + */ +static int +test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) +{ + unsigned int n, m; + uint64_t i; + int use_jhash = 0; + uint8_t write_type; + uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT; + + rte_atomic64_init(&greads); + rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); + + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) + goto err; + printf("\nTest: Hash add - key-shifts, read - hit (ext_bkt)\n"); + for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { + if (m == 1) { + printf("\n** With bulk-lookup **\n"); + read_type |= BULK_LOOKUP; + } + for (n = 0; n < NUM_TEST; n++) { + unsigned int tot_lcore = rte_lcore_count(); + if (tot_lcore < rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1) + goto finish; + + printf("\nNumber of readers: %u\n", rwc_core_cnt[n]); + + rte_atomic64_clear(&greads); + rte_atomic64_clear(&gread_cycles); + + rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + writer_done = 0; + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, + (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, + enabled_core_ids[i]); + for (i = 0; i < tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt; + i++) { + if (rte_hash_del_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt + i) + < 0) { + printf("Delete Failed: %u\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt[i]); + goto err; + } + } + writer_done = 1; + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); + + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0) + goto err; + + unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup = + rte_atomic64_read(&gread_cycles) / + rte_atomic64_read(&greads); + rwc_perf_results->w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[m][n] + = cycles_per_lookup; + printf("Cycles per lookup: %llu\n", cycles_per_lookup); + } + } + +finish: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return 0; + +err: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return -1; +} + static int test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) { @@ -1057,6 +1258,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) int rwc_lf = 0; int htm; int use_jhash = 0; + int ext_bkt = 0; if (rte_lcore_count() == 1) { printf("More than one lcore is required " "to do read write lock-free concurrency test\n"); @@ -1070,7 +1272,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) else htm = 0; - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) return -1; if (generate_keys() != 0) return -1; @@ -1079,25 +1281,29 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) if (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) { rwc_lf = 1; + ext_bkt = 1; printf("Test lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" " enabled\n"); if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; } printf("\nTest lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" @@ -1112,21 +1318,26 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) } } else printf("With HTM Enabled\n"); - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; results: printf("\n\t\t\t\t\t\t********** Results summary **********\n\n"); @@ -1158,8 +1369,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("Disabled\t"); if (htm) @@ -1179,7 +1393,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("_______\t\t_______\t\t_________\t___\t\t" "_________\t\t\t\t\t\t_________________\n"); -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt 2019-04-02 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-02 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yipeng Wang, Sameh Gobriel, Bruce Richardson, Pablo de Lara Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli, Dharmik Thakkar Add unit test to check for hash lookup and bulk-lookup perf for extendable bucket feature. It is tested with both lock-free enabled and lock-free disabled case. Test includes: - hash lookup on keys in ext bkt - hash delete causing key-shifts of keys from ext bkt to secondary bkt Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com> Acked-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com> --- app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c | 352 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 285 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c index cbfd9322696b..4ab4c8ee64cf 100644 --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite_lf.c @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@ #define READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH 4 #define READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH 8 #define BULK_LOOKUP 16 +#define READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT 32 + +#define WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT 0 +#define WRITE_KEY_SHIFT 1 +#define WRITE_EXT_BKT 2 + #define NUM_TEST 3 unsigned int rwc_core_cnt[NUM_TEST] = {1, 2, 4}; @@ -51,6 +57,7 @@ struct rwc_perf { uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_sp[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t w_ks_r_miss[2][NUM_TEST]; uint32_t multi_rw[NUM_TEST - 1][2][NUM_TEST]; + uint32_t w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[2][NUM_TEST]; }; static struct rwc_perf rwc_lf_results, rwc_non_lf_results; @@ -62,11 +69,15 @@ struct { uint32_t *keys_absent; uint32_t *keys_shift_path; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks; uint32_t count_keys_ks; uint32_t count_keys_absent; uint32_t count_keys_shift_path; uint32_t count_keys_non_shift_path; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt; + uint32_t count_keys_ks_extbkt; uint32_t single_insert; struct rte_hash *h; } tbl_rwc_test_param; @@ -81,6 +92,35 @@ uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE]; uint8_t *scanned_bkts; +static inline uint16_t +get_short_sig(const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + return hash >> 16; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_prim_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + const hash_sig_t hash) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return hash & bucket_bitmask; +} + +static inline uint32_t +get_alt_bucket_index(__attribute__((unused)) const struct rte_hash *h, + uint32_t cur_bkt_idx, uint16_t sig) +{ + uint32_t num_buckets; + uint32_t bucket_bitmask; + num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; + bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + return (cur_bkt_idx ^ sig) & bucket_bitmask; +} + + static inline int get_enabled_cores_list(void) { @@ -168,9 +208,12 @@ generate_keys(void) uint32_t *keys_ks = NULL; uint32_t *keys_absent = NULL; uint32_t *keys_non_shift_path = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ext_bkt = NULL; + uint32_t *keys_ks_extbkt = NULL; uint32_t *found = NULL; uint32_t count_keys_no_ks = 0; uint32_t count_keys_ks = 0; + uint32_t count_keys_extbkt = 0; uint32_t i; /* @@ -251,14 +294,32 @@ generate_keys(void) goto err; } + /* + * This consist of keys which will be stored in extended buckets + */ + keys_ext_bkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ext_bkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } + + /* + * This consist of keys which when deleted causes shifting of keys + * in extended buckets to respective secondary buckets + */ + keys_ks_extbkt = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * TOTAL_INSERT, 0); + if (keys_ks_extbkt == NULL) { + printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); + goto err; + } hash_sig_t sig; uint32_t prim_bucket_idx; - int ret; + uint32_t sec_bucket_idx; + uint16_t short_sig; uint32_t num_buckets; - uint32_t bucket_bitmask; num_buckets = rte_align32pow2(TOTAL_ENTRY) / 8; - bucket_bitmask = num_buckets - 1; + int ret; /* * Used to mark bkts in which at least one key was shifted to its @@ -275,6 +336,8 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks = keys_ks; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_absent = keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path = keys_non_shift_path; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt = keys_ext_bkt; + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt = keys_ks_extbkt; /* Generate keys by adding previous two keys, neglect overflow */ printf("Generating keys...\n"); keys[0] = 0; @@ -287,7 +350,8 @@ generate_keys(void) /* Check if primary bucket has space.*/ sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, tbl_rwc_test_param.keys+i); - prim_bucket_idx = sig & bucket_bitmask; + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + sig); ret = check_bucket(prim_bucket_idx, keys[i]); if (ret < 0) { /* @@ -368,6 +432,47 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_absent = count_keys_absent; tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path = count; + memset(scanned_bkts, 0, num_buckets); + count = 0; + /* Find keys that will be in extended buckets */ + for (i = 0; i < count_keys_ks; i++) { + ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys_ks + i); + if (ret < 0) { + /* Key will be added to ext bkt */ + keys_ext_bkt[count_keys_extbkt++] = keys_ks[i]; + /* Sec bkt to be added to keys_ks_extbkt */ + sig = rte_hash_hash(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks + i); + prim_bucket_idx = get_prim_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, sig); + short_sig = get_short_sig(sig); + sec_bucket_idx = get_alt_bucket_index( + tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + prim_bucket_idx, short_sig); + if (scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] == 0) + scanned_bkts[sec_bucket_idx] = 1; + } + } + + /* Find keys that will shift keys in ext bucket*/ + for (i = 0; i < num_buckets; i++) { + if (scanned_bkts[i] == 1) { + iter = i * 8; + while (rte_hash_iterate(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + &next_key, &next_data, &iter) >= 0) { + /* Check if key belongs to the current bucket */ + if (i >= (iter-1)/8) + keys_ks_extbkt[count++] + = *(const uint32_t *)next_key; + else + break; + } + } + } + + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt = count; + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt = count_keys_extbkt; + printf("\nCount of keys NOT causing shifting of existing keys to " "alternate location: %d\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks); printf("\nCount of keys causing shifting of existing keys to alternate " @@ -378,6 +483,10 @@ generate_keys(void) tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path); printf("Count of keys not likely to be on the shift path: %d\n\n", tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path); + printf("Count of keys in extended buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt); + printf("Count of keys shifting keys in ext buckets: %d\n\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(found); rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); @@ -390,12 +499,14 @@ generate_keys(void) rte_free(keys_absent); rte_free(found); rte_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path); + rte_free(keys_ext_bkt); + rte_free(keys_ks_extbkt); rte_free(scanned_bkts); return -1; } static int -init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) +init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm, int ext_bkt) { struct rte_hash *handle; @@ -425,6 +536,9 @@ init_params(int rwc_lf, int use_jhash, int htm) RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY | RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD; + if (ext_bkt) + hash_params.extra_flag |= RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_EXT_TABLE; + hash_params.name = "tests"; handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params); @@ -452,7 +566,7 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) void *temp_a[BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE]; /* Used to identify keys not inserted in the hash table */ - pos = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); + pos = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(uint32_t) * BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE, 0); if (pos == NULL) { printf("RTE_MALLOC failed\n"); return -1; @@ -467,6 +581,9 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH) { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_shift_path; + } else if (read_type & READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT) { + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; + read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; } else { keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_non_shift_path; read_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_non_shift_path; @@ -482,7 +599,6 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) /* Array of pointer to the list of keys */ for (j = 0; j < BULK_LOOKUP_SIZE; j++) temp_a[j] = keys + i + j; - rte_hash_lookup_bulk(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, (const void **) ((uintptr_t)temp_a), @@ -539,22 +655,25 @@ test_rwc_reader(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) } static int -write_keys(uint8_t key_shift) +write_keys(uint8_t write_type) { uint32_t i; int ret; - uint32_t key_cnt; + uint32_t key_cnt = 0; uint32_t *keys; - if (key_shift) { + if (write_type == WRITE_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks; - } else { + } else if (write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) { key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_no_ks; keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_no_ks; + } else if (write_type == WRITE_EXT_BKT) { + key_cnt = tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_extbkt; + keys = tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ext_bkt; } for (i = 0; i < key_cnt; i++) { ret = rte_hash_add_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, keys + i); - if (!key_shift && ret < 0) { + if ((write_type == WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT) && ret < 0) { printf("writer failed %"PRIu32"\n", i); return -1; } @@ -581,18 +700,18 @@ test_rwc_multi_writer(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg) */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NO_KEY_SHIFTS; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, read - hit\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -612,7 +731,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; writer_done = 1; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) @@ -650,19 +769,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift = 0; + uint8_t write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; int ret; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - no key-shifts, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -687,7 +806,7 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -722,19 +841,19 @@ test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, - int rwc_lf, int htm) + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_NON_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit" " (non-shift-path)\n"); @@ -755,15 +874,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -798,19 +917,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - hit (shift-path)" "\n"); @@ -831,15 +950,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -874,19 +993,19 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, */ static int test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int - htm) + htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; int ret; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_FAIL; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Hash add - key shift, Hash lookup - miss\n"); for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { @@ -906,15 +1025,15 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); writer_done = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; - ret = write_keys(key_shift); + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + ret = write_keys(write_type); writer_done = 1; rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); @@ -949,18 +1068,18 @@ test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, int */ static int test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, - int htm) + int htm, int ext_bkt) { unsigned int n, m, k; uint64_t i; int use_jhash = 0; - uint8_t key_shift; + uint8_t write_type; uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_SHIFT_PATH; rte_atomic64_init(&greads); rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) goto err; printf("\nTest: Multi-add-lookup\n"); uint8_t pos_core; @@ -991,8 +1110,8 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, writer_done = 0; for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) multi_writer_done[i] = 0; - key_shift = 0; - if (write_keys(key_shift) < 0) + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) goto err; /* Launch reader(s) */ @@ -1000,7 +1119,7 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, enabled_core_ids[i]); - key_shift = 1; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; pos_core = 0; /* Launch writers */ @@ -1045,6 +1164,88 @@ test_hash_multi_add_lookup(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, int rwc_lf, return -1; } +/* + * Test lookup perf: + * Reader(s) lookup keys present in the extendable bkt. + */ +static int +test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(struct rwc_perf *rwc_perf_results, + int rwc_lf, int htm, int ext_bkt) +{ + unsigned int n, m; + uint64_t i; + int use_jhash = 0; + uint8_t write_type; + uint8_t read_type = READ_PASS_KEY_SHIFTS_EXTBKT; + + rte_atomic64_init(&greads); + rte_atomic64_init(&gread_cycles); + + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) + goto err; + printf("\nTest: Hash add - key-shifts, read - hit (ext_bkt)\n"); + for (m = 0; m < 2; m++) { + if (m == 1) { + printf("\n** With bulk-lookup **\n"); + read_type |= BULK_LOOKUP; + } + for (n = 0; n < NUM_TEST; n++) { + unsigned int tot_lcore = rte_lcore_count(); + if (tot_lcore < rwc_core_cnt[n] + 1) + goto finish; + + printf("\nNumber of readers: %u\n", rwc_core_cnt[n]); + + rte_atomic64_clear(&greads); + rte_atomic64_clear(&gread_cycles); + + rte_hash_reset(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + write_type = WRITE_NO_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + write_type = WRITE_KEY_SHIFT; + if (write_keys(write_type) < 0) + goto err; + writer_done = 0; + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + rte_eal_remote_launch(test_rwc_reader, + (void *)(uintptr_t)read_type, + enabled_core_ids[i]); + for (i = 0; i < tbl_rwc_test_param.count_keys_ks_extbkt; + i++) { + if (rte_hash_del_key(tbl_rwc_test_param.h, + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt + i) + < 0) { + printf("Delete Failed: %u\n", + tbl_rwc_test_param.keys_ks_extbkt[i]); + goto err; + } + } + writer_done = 1; + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore(); + + for (i = 1; i <= rwc_core_cnt[n]; i++) + if (lcore_config[i].ret < 0) + goto err; + + unsigned long long cycles_per_lookup = + rte_atomic64_read(&gread_cycles) / + rte_atomic64_read(&greads); + rwc_perf_results->w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[m][n] + = cycles_per_lookup; + printf("Cycles per lookup: %llu\n", cycles_per_lookup); + } + } + +finish: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return 0; + +err: + rte_hash_free(tbl_rwc_test_param.h); + return -1; +} + static int test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) { @@ -1057,6 +1258,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) int rwc_lf = 0; int htm; int use_jhash = 0; + int ext_bkt = 0; if (rte_lcore_count() == 1) { printf("More than one lcore is required " "to do read write lock-free concurrency test\n"); @@ -1070,7 +1272,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) else htm = 0; - if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm) != 0) + if (init_params(rwc_lf, use_jhash, htm, ext_bkt) != 0) return -1; if (generate_keys() != 0) return -1; @@ -1079,25 +1281,29 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) if (RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF) { rwc_lf = 1; + ext_bkt = 1; printf("Test lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" " enabled\n"); if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; } printf("\nTest lookup with read-write concurrency lock free support" @@ -1112,21 +1318,26 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) } } else printf("With HTM Enabled\n"); - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_hit(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_no_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_non_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, - htm) < 0) + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) + return -1; + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_sp(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) - < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_miss(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm, + ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; - if (test_hash_multi_add_lookup(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, htm) < 0) + if (test_hash_add_ks_lookup_hit_extbkt(&rwc_non_lf_results, rwc_lf, + htm, ext_bkt) < 0) return -1; results: printf("\n\t\t\t\t\t\t********** Results summary **********\n\n"); @@ -1158,8 +1369,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n\n\t\t\t\t", + rwc_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("Disabled\t"); if (htm) @@ -1179,7 +1393,11 @@ test_hash_readwrite_lf_main(void) "(shift-path)\t\t%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_sp[j][i]); printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup miss\t\t\t\t" - "%u\n", rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + "%u\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_miss[j][i]); + printf("Hash add - key-shifts, Hash lookup hit (ext_bkt)\t\t" + "%u\n", + rwc_non_lf_results.w_ks_r_hit_extbkt[j][i]); printf("_______\t\t_______\t\t_________\t___\t\t" "_________\t\t\t\t\t\t_________________\n"); -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt 2019-04-02 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2019-04-02 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar @ 2019-04-03 18:56 ` Thomas Monjalon 2019-04-03 18:56 ` Thomas Monjalon 3 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2019-04-03 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dharmik Thakkar; +Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli 02/04/2019 21:44, Dharmik Thakkar: > This patch series: > - Enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable > bucket feature. > - Adds lock-free read-write concurrency tests for ext bkt > --- > Dharmik Thakkar (2): > hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket > test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Applied, thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt 2019-04-03 18:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Thomas Monjalon @ 2019-04-03 18:56 ` Thomas Monjalon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2019-04-03 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dharmik Thakkar; +Cc: dev, honnappa.nagarahalli 02/04/2019 21:44, Dharmik Thakkar: > This patch series: > - Enables lock-free read-write concurrency support for extendable > bucket feature. > - Adds lock-free read-write concurrency tests for ext bkt > --- > Dharmik Thakkar (2): > hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket > test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Applied, thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-03 18:56 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 50+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-03-20 22:35 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] hash: add lock free support for ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-20 22:35 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-20 22:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-20 22:35 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-22 23:48 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-03-22 23:48 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-03-25 20:10 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 20:10 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-20 22:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-20 22:35 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 18:20 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 18:20 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 20:16 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 20:16 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-03-25 21:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 18:55 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 18:55 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 20:06 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 20:06 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:18 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 22:52 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 22:52 ` Wang, Yipeng1 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 23:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 23:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 23:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-01 23:08 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 0:57 ` Thomas Monjalon 2019-04-02 0:57 ` Thomas Monjalon 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] hash: add lock free support for extendable bucket Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] test/hash: lock-free rw concurrency test ext bkt Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-02 19:44 ` Dharmik Thakkar 2019-04-03 18:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] hash: add lock free support for " Thomas Monjalon 2019-04-03 18:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).