From: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bnxt: fix receive VLAN offload flags
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:34:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACZ4nhvyHcebyCUxX4xoOUJj=AuRZZ7XeQsAejoPFQ3Cy7Kpew@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190325213426.bEZOi1ZhLngOICcpfpeGUeWXUk4jfBZpSW37FfJD1aY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190325212754.13786-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 2:28 PM Stephen Hemminger <
stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
>
> The bnxt driver is not correctly setting the receive VLAN offload
> flags. When VLAN is offloaded the driver must set the PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED
> flag.
>
> Actually, several drivers have the same bug, only most of the
> Intel drivers look right. Any driver that sets vlan_tci is probably
> stripping the tag, and should be setting RX_VLAN_STRIPPED.
>
> To quote rte_mbuf.h:
>
> /**
> * The RX packet is a 802.1q VLAN packet, and the tci has been
> * saved in in mbuf->vlan_tci.
> * If the flag PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED is also present, the VLAN
> * header has been stripped from mbuf data, else it is still
> * present.
> */
>
> Fixes: 2eb53b134aae ("net/bnxt: add initial Rx code")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
>
Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_rxr.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_rxr.c b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_rxr.c
> index 1bfc63d9304c..dc695e17771b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_rxr.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_rxr.c
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void bnxt_tpa_start(struct bnxt_rx_queue *rxq,
> if (tpa_start1->flags2 &
> rte_cpu_to_le_32(RX_TPA_START_CMPL_FLAGS2_META_FORMAT_VLAN)) {
> mbuf->vlan_tci = rte_le_to_cpu_32(tpa_start1->metadata);
> - mbuf->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_VLAN;
> + mbuf->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_VLAN | PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED;
> }
> if (likely(tpa_start1->flags2 &
> rte_cpu_to_le_32(RX_TPA_START_CMPL_FLAGS2_L4_CS_CALC)))
> @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static int bnxt_rx_pkt(struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkt,
> (RX_PKT_CMPL_METADATA_VID_MASK |
> RX_PKT_CMPL_METADATA_DE |
> RX_PKT_CMPL_METADATA_PRI_MASK);
> - mbuf->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_VLAN;
> + mbuf->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_VLAN | PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED;
> }
>
> if (likely(RX_CMP_IP_CS_OK(rxcmp1)))
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-25 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-25 21:27 Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-25 21:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-25 21:34 ` Ajit Khaparde [this message]
2019-03-25 21:34 ` Ajit Khaparde
2019-03-26 17:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-26 17:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACZ4nhvyHcebyCUxX4xoOUJj=AuRZZ7XeQsAejoPFQ3Cy7Kpew@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=somnath.kotur@broadcom.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).