From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B6AA05D3 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:55:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8B058CB; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:55:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C4756A3 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:55:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279203759; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:55:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:55:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=PUQJusXTSTQ3q3MhjLmXqSa7Q2Gs7VXBc5GwzQMeMns=; b=mjhP0QvN7cD2 HV/g6JicotBan1CaBQ/HKf5ORCC6bKpkizCPKKawdQbk+kgKSxnttqojFpclfzhR GbtNboxoWiNH2UmOu4rr3StcnIO5bFCk9AMIBFDdK1yZP5/Aloih2tKpf++CVgQk 7sKl+oxwJx+zz8crfKnAzzBrPv/7Nww= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=PUQJusXTSTQ3q3MhjLmXqSa7Q2Gs7VXBc5GwzQMeM ns=; b=kjr9525ppPSWPrlqbd9hYAoWeN+qu7S47mmiIiHlrsEuu6W/pGigdzpbG 9H6KYrDXKZfKMjZSk7os7AD2tsGyHLsCdHERxSaeDD2MEhfSoyfb012/2h0JfX0p sWeFtel1hrUcKL7gjTJjDPUtm90zQMWQcv/H6TNYaEB1l5io27OJf8KRJ5Yxdcdc CxxtxJSzeCncda7XzE4joA9pfYQDsVuvDEtQz8fG8HczsDsJPCQJxzfYeTXu2Y+U vb+m3TFCCKnXdrzqvyC947sDCoL1gpHXtnysVJ6WzcB/GZZ+zxyu7G47oq/5PcdW aRA/fJOduYoLCfQLhtPdPyRJjOXtg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrkedtgdehiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 140A2E498E; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:55:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran Cc: "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , "pallavi.kadam@intel.com" , "anand.rawat@intel.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "ranjit.menon@intel.com" , "jeffrey.b.shaw@intel.com" Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:55:41 +0100 Message-ID: <3620690.ieInrUnbAS@xps> In-Reply-To: <5eeb911a2c8a3877f5ae110b88f56ba76df642de.camel@marvell.com> References: <20190306041634.12976-1-anand.rawat@intel.com> <20190326105831.GA188340@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> <5eeb911a2c8a3877f5ae110b88f56ba76df642de.camel@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] kvargs: adding a module definition file X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190326135541.rhDcyEjB0FHyMDHiLMCdvZRXCydq9rukH6DIRm5su5Q@z> 26/03/2019 14:37, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran: > On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 10:58 +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > However, my hope is that down the road we can have the def file > > generated > > from the map file (or potentially vice versa). Perhaps the meson > > python > > module could be used to allow us to script it a bit. > > Make sense. Do we want to support shared lib for Windows for the first > version? or Can we live with static lib till we find a proper solution. > I do believe the base Windows Helloworld support needs to added this > release in main repo and add the subsequent features step by step. > I would treat, shared lib as subsequent feature if it is not clean. I agree, shared library can be supported later.