From: Tom Barbette <barbette@kth.se>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>, Tom Barbette <barbette@kth.se>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Add rte_eth_read_clock API
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 07:19:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190327061935.19572-1-barbette@kth.se> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190327061932.wrm0F7OdVHuCkWwq_JRv74kUfa5ohTAgxckMyLoBYXQ@z> (raw)
Some NICs allow to timestamp packets, but do not support the full
PTP synchronization process. Hence, the value set in the mbuf
timestamp field is only the raw value of an internal clock.
To make sense of this value, one at least needs to be able to query
the current hardware clock value. As with the TSC, from there
a frequency can be derieved by querying multiple time the current value of the
internal clock with some known delay between the queries (example
provided in the API doc).
This patch series adds support for MLX5.
An example app is provided in the rxtx_callback application.
It has been updated to display, on top of the software latency
in cycles, the total latency since the packet was received in hardware.
The API is used to compute a delta in the TX callback. The raw amount of
ticks is converted to cycles using a variation of the technique describe above.
Aside from offloading timestamping, which relieve the
software from a few operations, this allows to get much more precision
when studying the source of the latency in a system.
Eg. in our 100G, CX5 setup the rxtx callback application shows
SW latency is around 74 cycles (TSC is 3.2Ghz), but the latency
including NIC processing, PCIe, and queuing is around 196 cycles.
One may think at first this API is overlapping with te_eth_timesync_read_time.
rte_eth_timesync_read_time is clearly identified as part of a set of functions
to use PTP synchronization.
The device raw clock is not "sync" in any way. More importantly, the returned
value is not a timeval, but an amount of ticks. We could have a cast-based
solution, but on top of being an ugly solution, some people seeing the timeval
type of rte_eth_timesync_read_time could use it blindly.
Change in v2:
- Rebase on current master
Tom Barbette (3):
rte_ethdev: Add API function to read dev clock
mlx5: Implement support for read_clock
rxtx_callbacks: Add support for HW timestamp
doc/guides/nics/features.rst | 1 +
doc/guides/sample_app_ug/rxtx_callbacks.rst | 9 ++-
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c | 1 +
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h | 1 +
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_ethdev.c | 29 +++++++
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_glue.c | 8 ++
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_glue.h | 2 +
examples/rxtx_callbacks/Makefile | 2 +
examples/rxtx_callbacks/main.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++-
examples/rxtx_callbacks/meson.build | 1 +
lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 13 ++++
lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 44 +++++++++++
lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_core.h | 6 ++
lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_version.map | 1 +
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 2 +
15 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-03-27 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-27 6:19 Tom Barbette [this message]
2019-03-27 6:19 ` Tom Barbette
2019-03-27 6:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] rte_ethdev: Add API function to read dev clock Tom Barbette
2019-03-27 6:19 ` Tom Barbette
2019-04-02 17:46 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-02 17:46 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-02 19:24 ` Tom Barbette
2019-04-02 19:24 ` Tom Barbette
2019-03-27 6:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] mlx5: Implement support for read_clock Tom Barbette
2019-03-27 6:19 ` Tom Barbette
2019-04-02 17:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-02 17:47 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-02 18:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-02 18:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-02 19:05 ` Tom Barbette
2019-04-02 19:05 ` Tom Barbette
2019-04-03 5:28 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-04-03 5:28 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-03-27 6:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] rxtx_callbacks: Add support for HW timestamp Tom Barbette
2019-03-27 6:19 ` Tom Barbette
2019-04-02 18:22 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-02 18:22 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-02 19:39 ` Tom Barbette
2019-04-02 19:39 ` Tom Barbette
2019-03-27 14:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Add rte_eth_read_clock API Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-27 14:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-27 14:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-27 14:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-27 14:54 ` Wiles, Keith
2019-03-27 14:54 ` Wiles, Keith
2019-03-27 16:08 ` Tom Barbette
2019-03-27 16:08 ` Tom Barbette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190327061935.19572-1-barbette@kth.se \
--to=barbette@kth.se \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).