DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: note validation commitment required for stables
@ 2019-03-22 11:44 Kevin Traynor
  2019-03-22 11:44 ` Kevin Traynor
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Traynor @ 2019-03-22 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev, john.mcnamara, marko.kovacevic
  Cc: stable, bluca, yskoh, ferruh.yigit, thomas, stephen, Kevin Traynor

If a stable branch for a specific DPDK release is to proceed,
along with needing a maintainer, there should also be commitment
from major contributors for validation of the releases.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
---
 doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
index 4214103b3..0130991e2 100644
--- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
@@ -27,5 +27,6 @@ Stable Releases
 
 Any major release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a
-maintainer volunteers to maintain it.
+maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from major
+contributors to validate it before releases.
 
 A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release back to an
-- 
2.20.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: note validation commitment required for stables
  2019-03-22 11:44 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: note validation commitment required for stables Kevin Traynor
@ 2019-03-22 11:44 ` Kevin Traynor
  2019-03-22 13:30 ` Luca Boccassi
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Traynor @ 2019-03-22 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev, john.mcnamara, marko.kovacevic
  Cc: stable, bluca, yskoh, ferruh.yigit, thomas, stephen, Kevin Traynor

If a stable branch for a specific DPDK release is to proceed,
along with needing a maintainer, there should also be commitment
from major contributors for validation of the releases.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
---
 doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
index 4214103b3..0130991e2 100644
--- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
@@ -27,5 +27,6 @@ Stable Releases
 
 Any major release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a
-maintainer volunteers to maintain it.
+maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from major
+contributors to validate it before releases.
 
 A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release back to an
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: note validation commitment required for stables
  2019-03-22 11:44 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: note validation commitment required for stables Kevin Traynor
  2019-03-22 11:44 ` Kevin Traynor
@ 2019-03-22 13:30 ` Luca Boccassi
  2019-03-22 13:30   ` Luca Boccassi
  2019-03-25 10:14 ` Kovacevic, Marko
  2019-03-27 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: note validation and timeline " Kevin Traynor
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Luca Boccassi @ 2019-03-22 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kevin Traynor, dev, john.mcnamara, marko.kovacevic
  Cc: stable, yskoh, ferruh.yigit, thomas, stephen

On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 11:44 +0000, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> If a stable branch for a specific DPDK release is to proceed,
> along with needing a maintainer, there should also be commitment
> from major contributors for validation of the releases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> index 4214103b3..0130991e2 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> @@ -27,5 +27,6 @@ Stable Releases
>  
>  Any major release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a
> -maintainer volunteers to maintain it.
> +maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from
> major
> +contributors to validate it before releases.
>  
>  A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release
> back to an

Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: note validation commitment required for stables
  2019-03-22 13:30 ` Luca Boccassi
@ 2019-03-22 13:30   ` Luca Boccassi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Luca Boccassi @ 2019-03-22 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kevin Traynor, dev, john.mcnamara, marko.kovacevic
  Cc: stable, yskoh, ferruh.yigit, thomas, stephen

On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 11:44 +0000, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> If a stable branch for a specific DPDK release is to proceed,
> along with needing a maintainer, there should also be commitment
> from major contributors for validation of the releases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> index 4214103b3..0130991e2 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> @@ -27,5 +27,6 @@ Stable Releases
>  
>  Any major release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a
> -maintainer volunteers to maintain it.
> +maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from
> major
> +contributors to validate it before releases.
>  
>  A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release
> back to an

Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: note validation commitment required for stables
  2019-03-22 11:44 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: note validation commitment required for stables Kevin Traynor
  2019-03-22 11:44 ` Kevin Traynor
  2019-03-22 13:30 ` Luca Boccassi
@ 2019-03-25 10:14 ` Kovacevic, Marko
  2019-03-25 10:14   ` Kovacevic, Marko
  2019-03-27 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: note validation and timeline " Kevin Traynor
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kovacevic, Marko @ 2019-03-25 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kevin Traynor, dev, Mcnamara, John
  Cc: stable, bluca, yskoh, Yigit, Ferruh, thomas, stephen

> Subject: [PATCH] doc: note validation commitment required for stables
> 
> If a stable branch for a specific DPDK release is to proceed, along with
> needing a maintainer, there should also be commitment from major
> contributors for validation of the releases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> index 4214103b3..0130991e2 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> @@ -27,5 +27,6 @@ Stable Releases
> 
>  Any major release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a -
> maintainer volunteers to maintain it.
> +maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from
> +major contributors to validate it before releases.
> 
>  A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release back to an
> --

Acked-by: Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: note validation commitment required for stables
  2019-03-25 10:14 ` Kovacevic, Marko
@ 2019-03-25 10:14   ` Kovacevic, Marko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kovacevic, Marko @ 2019-03-25 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kevin Traynor, dev, Mcnamara, John
  Cc: stable, bluca, yskoh, Yigit, Ferruh, thomas, stephen

> Subject: [PATCH] doc: note validation commitment required for stables
> 
> If a stable branch for a specific DPDK release is to proceed, along with
> needing a maintainer, there should also be commitment from major
> contributors for validation of the releases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> index 4214103b3..0130991e2 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> @@ -27,5 +27,6 @@ Stable Releases
> 
>  Any major release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a -
> maintainer volunteers to maintain it.
> +maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from
> +major contributors to validate it before releases.
> 
>  A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release back to an
> --

Acked-by: Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: note validation and timeline required for stables
  2019-03-22 11:44 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: note validation commitment required for stables Kevin Traynor
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-03-25 10:14 ` Kovacevic, Marko
@ 2019-03-27 17:22 ` Kevin Traynor
  2019-03-27 17:22   ` Kevin Traynor
  2019-03-27 17:25   ` Luca Boccassi
  3 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Traynor @ 2019-03-27 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: john.mcnamara, marko.kovacevic, dev; +Cc: bluca, stable, Kevin Traynor

If a stable branch for a specific DPDK release is to proceed,
along with needing a maintainer, there should also be commitment
from major contributors for validation of the releases.

Also, as decided in the March 27th techboard, to facilitate user
planning, a release should be designated as a stable release
no later than 1 month after it's initial master release.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
---

v2: add 1 month deadline to designate as stable release.
I didn't add v1 acks, as this is something new.

 doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
index 4214103b3..b63cd4228 100644
--- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
@@ -27,5 +27,7 @@ Stable Releases
 
 Any major release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a
-maintainer volunteers to maintain it.
+maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from major
+contributors to validate it before releases. If a release is to be designated
+as a Stable Release, it should be done by 1 month after the master release.
 
 A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release back to an
-- 
2.20.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: note validation and timeline required for stables
  2019-03-27 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: note validation and timeline " Kevin Traynor
@ 2019-03-27 17:22   ` Kevin Traynor
  2019-03-27 17:25   ` Luca Boccassi
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Traynor @ 2019-03-27 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: john.mcnamara, marko.kovacevic, dev; +Cc: bluca, stable, Kevin Traynor

If a stable branch for a specific DPDK release is to proceed,
along with needing a maintainer, there should also be commitment
from major contributors for validation of the releases.

Also, as decided in the March 27th techboard, to facilitate user
planning, a release should be designated as a stable release
no later than 1 month after it's initial master release.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
---

v2: add 1 month deadline to designate as stable release.
I didn't add v1 acks, as this is something new.

 doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
index 4214103b3..b63cd4228 100644
--- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
@@ -27,5 +27,7 @@ Stable Releases
 
 Any major release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a
-maintainer volunteers to maintain it.
+maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from major
+contributors to validate it before releases. If a release is to be designated
+as a Stable Release, it should be done by 1 month after the master release.
 
 A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release back to an
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: note validation and timeline required for stables
  2019-03-27 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: note validation and timeline " Kevin Traynor
  2019-03-27 17:22   ` Kevin Traynor
@ 2019-03-27 17:25   ` Luca Boccassi
  2019-03-27 17:25     ` Luca Boccassi
  2019-04-05 13:36     ` Thomas Monjalon
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Luca Boccassi @ 2019-03-27 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kevin Traynor, john.mcnamara, marko.kovacevic, dev; +Cc: stable

On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 17:22 +0000, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> If a stable branch for a specific DPDK release is to proceed,
> along with needing a maintainer, there should also be commitment
> from major contributors for validation of the releases.
> 
> Also, as decided in the March 27th techboard, to facilitate user
> planning, a release should be designated as a stable release
> no later than 1 month after it's initial master release.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <
> ktraynor@redhat.com
> >
> ---
> 
> v2: add 1 month deadline to designate as stable release.
> I didn't add v1 acks, as this is something new.
> 
>  doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> index 4214103b3..b63cd4228 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> @@ -27,5 +27,7 @@ Stable Releases
>  
>  Any major release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a
> -maintainer volunteers to maintain it.
> +maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from
> major
> +contributors to validate it before releases. If a release is to be
> designated
> +as a Stable Release, it should be done by 1 month after the master
> release.
>  
>  A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release
> back to an

Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: note validation and timeline required for stables
  2019-03-27 17:25   ` Luca Boccassi
@ 2019-03-27 17:25     ` Luca Boccassi
  2019-04-05 13:36     ` Thomas Monjalon
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Luca Boccassi @ 2019-03-27 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kevin Traynor, john.mcnamara, marko.kovacevic, dev; +Cc: stable

On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 17:22 +0000, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> If a stable branch for a specific DPDK release is to proceed,
> along with needing a maintainer, there should also be commitment
> from major contributors for validation of the releases.
> 
> Also, as decided in the March 27th techboard, to facilitate user
> planning, a release should be designated as a stable release
> no later than 1 month after it's initial master release.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <
> ktraynor@redhat.com
> >
> ---
> 
> v2: add 1 month deadline to designate as stable release.
> I didn't add v1 acks, as this is something new.
> 
>  doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> index 4214103b3..b63cd4228 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> @@ -27,5 +27,7 @@ Stable Releases
>  
>  Any major release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a
> -maintainer volunteers to maintain it.
> +maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from
> major
> +contributors to validate it before releases. If a release is to be
> designated
> +as a Stable Release, it should be done by 1 month after the master
> release.
>  
>  A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release
> back to an

Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: note validation and timeline required for stables
  2019-03-27 17:25   ` Luca Boccassi
  2019-03-27 17:25     ` Luca Boccassi
@ 2019-04-05 13:36     ` Thomas Monjalon
  2019-04-05 13:36       ` Thomas Monjalon
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2019-04-05 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kevin Traynor; +Cc: dev, Luca Boccassi, john.mcnamara, marko.kovacevic, stable

27/03/2019 18:25, Luca Boccassi:
> On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 17:22 +0000, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> > If a stable branch for a specific DPDK release is to proceed,
> > along with needing a maintainer, there should also be commitment
> > from major contributors for validation of the releases.
> > 
> > Also, as decided in the March 27th techboard, to facilitate user
> > planning, a release should be designated as a stable release
> > no later than 1 month after it's initial master release.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > v2: add 1 month deadline to designate as stable release.
> > I didn't add v1 acks, as this is something new.
> > 
> > --- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> > @@ -27,5 +27,7 @@ Stable Releases
> >  
> >  Any major release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a
> > -maintainer volunteers to maintain it.
> > +maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from
> > major
> > +contributors to validate it before releases. If a release is to be
> > designated
> > +as a Stable Release, it should be done by 1 month after the master
> > release.
> >  
> >  A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release
> > back to an
> 
> Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>

Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>

Applied, thanks

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: note validation and timeline required for stables
  2019-04-05 13:36     ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2019-04-05 13:36       ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2019-04-05 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kevin Traynor; +Cc: dev, Luca Boccassi, john.mcnamara, marko.kovacevic, stable

27/03/2019 18:25, Luca Boccassi:
> On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 17:22 +0000, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> > If a stable branch for a specific DPDK release is to proceed,
> > along with needing a maintainer, there should also be commitment
> > from major contributors for validation of the releases.
> > 
> > Also, as decided in the March 27th techboard, to facilitate user
> > planning, a release should be designated as a stable release
> > no later than 1 month after it's initial master release.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > v2: add 1 month deadline to designate as stable release.
> > I didn't add v1 acks, as this is something new.
> > 
> > --- a/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/stable.rst
> > @@ -27,5 +27,7 @@ Stable Releases
> >  
> >  Any major release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a
> > -maintainer volunteers to maintain it.
> > +maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from
> > major
> > +contributors to validate it before releases. If a release is to be
> > designated
> > +as a Stable Release, it should be done by 1 month after the master
> > release.
> >  
> >  A Stable Release is used to backport fixes from an ``N`` release
> > back to an
> 
> Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>

Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>

Applied, thanks



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-05 13:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-22 11:44 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: note validation commitment required for stables Kevin Traynor
2019-03-22 11:44 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-03-22 13:30 ` Luca Boccassi
2019-03-22 13:30   ` Luca Boccassi
2019-03-25 10:14 ` Kovacevic, Marko
2019-03-25 10:14   ` Kovacevic, Marko
2019-03-27 17:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: note validation and timeline " Kevin Traynor
2019-03-27 17:22   ` Kevin Traynor
2019-03-27 17:25   ` Luca Boccassi
2019-03-27 17:25     ` Luca Boccassi
2019-04-05 13:36     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-05 13:36       ` Thomas Monjalon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).