From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AA5A0679 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:49:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922DD4C9D; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:49:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC84F3256 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:49:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AC325B9A; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:49:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:49:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=DzqAQMnKrIPRkg/zpRMVpFZ7/iF/+DsUYeZrRmtmtH4=; b=ftxQfmeGVKw6 6XGi8xo4fSUjvC9TmAUC1y1Tg386/YMxQk17AHGIfiO6149Gfk8jhyGqtnyGRSRU ZfN3K5PbEgPQX9J/BudoQzD4THUldFhU7szHuleO0YQwxDHJfc9Xuo1Qhn7B3qK7 pfMyr/c2rZhCCMlQWepEmWmO8NABr9U= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=DzqAQMnKrIPRkg/zpRMVpFZ7/iF/+DsUYeZrRmtmt H4=; b=wajc0guToidxCjYE6tinDpehDuBCX67irdDq+5mZdib2YjidZU6jHDGmS m2Mc2Z4k+gLdjhGObhwQm+tj5qbAnSS6DMndt1fKuMhq5j/qIHMe7tfOeDDxJeu/ JYrwbewNYYKG4mm4+UeFmrwQKY6orQKbwWIH8hUWUi5FokwL1b2KW6omfL8vgC53 YB4xFlBvOl7vAugmnSZ3wRa2jjUBgvmnMyW7X9EEYyRMVUgBADKVUQcR9oHnOXLF WEdbfKM/ulkvtiz+eRcT9cibSUmTSPYKY/L/ukl1Ue0dRWUm3IFD/IYKxVCIP6S2 V01W7Ssjq/irye4bCv9cwb4HxiE0g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrkeeggdduudelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukf hppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhh ohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 449E710319; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:49:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "ruifeng.wang@arm.com" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , "yipeng1.wang@intel.com" , "honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com" , "gavin.hu@arm.com" , "nd@arm.com" Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:49:48 +0100 Message-ID: <2794402.BjIRTHIkEN@xps> In-Reply-To: <1fa3a781c8ad62571723b90348bdf4df59f89e0b.camel@marvell.com> References: <20190212070104.33830-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> <1fa3a781c8ad62571723b90348bdf4df59f89e0b.camel@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] hash: optimize signature compare by using neon intrinsic X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190328184948.8SdhbneP2m45CBjVZnEXu29XU5d66fN5wkaL6FtMNvY@z> 25/02/2019 18:52, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran: > On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 15:01 +0800, Ruifeng Wang wrote: > > Implemented signature compare function based on neon intrinsic. > > Hash bulk lookup had 3% - 6% performance gain after optimization. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang > > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu > > Acked-by: Jerin Jacob Applied, thanks