From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127E5A0679
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:07:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6AE2BF4;
	Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:07:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29A32BD3;
 Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:07:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1482257C;
 Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:07:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:07:44 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp;
 bh=hYarxEe/7K7LKD9mM+2s/MpyiBwV+OvSkQns84IlOV0=; b=JLpjV0hesq9d
 kYEtcVmOhvsU3XrC3gfb1jqRYD+ztMgIGFeDsUXGsJ9zJSJulvIW/FOUoItLUPez
 ftnAmR8S4XxtwPfdFo26LvsHemMp2Iz3Or9QwWEJ7JOct9986STFz0ZCrudKVfYJ
 VwU5kO+zo750UpeoxoKtsrftNMsZ7LA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=hYarxEe/7K7LKD9mM+2s/MpyiBwV+OvSkQns84IlO
 V0=; b=WneFgUPBJR73178qPGf4aVfGirEO4fJV2E1dQaEJ4rKFhuZ+bX+jFSfq1
 TBMca90qxQjzqrDpWVU+qP0ZuxFxPQd1+nEo9RhtlgWeIkWcVxzDov9MrcKDmtWT
 BZqttJgd4CkPyGYB3CsDABDyGwOcv5US7RlSnGa8gKBHUFtPrNrVQ0le1jeNsc1N
 TmNIASrBX0DOrQ01miUgqKRSJUGe1EhgQTCtLsNSGMSeS46YMshVyS3GhyIRO7gh
 +NT9J3AgyAcvBpmkVI68bDMgD6JDqMGA0i3kJ1Y4RBUuvLyZFhsG7t3fgbVjpTTV
 g1xhRhqnlZGZgiqijbVMYciLytcfg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:wFOdXAVbJw5_k4H5idl547rrgAPxIU2zOiiOUL0SfE7TRnMfyNOAJQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrkeehgddtvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf
 curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu
 uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc
 fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs
 ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph
 epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho
 mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:wFOdXMA29lK2iQqqDIFaZm8wlEfpZUC2Qp0hTc-1lMFBC-T89wCp4g>
 <xmx:wFOdXBzYg7Vt6pXtI4mnHW6KSH0IiIEaWRoOqxeLrmyEspjsOhaatg>
 <xmx:wFOdXJCv5iehC_zyp3aL1OM2zD4QsEdtvhbXgJN_-5n1GKxDPk34Rg>
 <xmx:wFOdXEBAQyjz8I5TKoVZF5R5tMlYZb_WA8cNGvfx9ryQtvruusDwPQ>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A5F8310310;
 Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:07:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:07:42 +0100
Message-ID: <2082109.KBFrvxvhQ9@xps>
In-Reply-To: <2ecb586fd507d84b0b9913e5d3c358871297b2a6.1551275659.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
References: <2ecb586fd507d84b0b9913e5d3c358871297b2a6.1551275659.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: document multiprocess limitation for
	container API
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Message-ID: <20190328230742.aDCVP4iaBXRIv_tKDoyD1WC9M_Ldv6_pfL3ikz7YXno@z>

27/02/2019 16:41, Anatoly Burakov:
> Currently, there is no support for sharing custom VFIO containers
> between multiple processes, but it is not documented.
> 
> Document this limitation.
> 
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>

Applied, thanks