From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127E5A0679 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:07:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6AE2BF4; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:07:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29A32BD3; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:07:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1482257C; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:07:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:07:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=hYarxEe/7K7LKD9mM+2s/MpyiBwV+OvSkQns84IlOV0=; b=JLpjV0hesq9d kYEtcVmOhvsU3XrC3gfb1jqRYD+ztMgIGFeDsUXGsJ9zJSJulvIW/FOUoItLUPez ftnAmR8S4XxtwPfdFo26LvsHemMp2Iz3Or9QwWEJ7JOct9986STFz0ZCrudKVfYJ VwU5kO+zo750UpeoxoKtsrftNMsZ7LA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=hYarxEe/7K7LKD9mM+2s/MpyiBwV+OvSkQns84IlO V0=; b=WneFgUPBJR73178qPGf4aVfGirEO4fJV2E1dQaEJ4rKFhuZ+bX+jFSfq1 TBMca90qxQjzqrDpWVU+qP0ZuxFxPQd1+nEo9RhtlgWeIkWcVxzDov9MrcKDmtWT BZqttJgd4CkPyGYB3CsDABDyGwOcv5US7RlSnGa8gKBHUFtPrNrVQ0le1jeNsc1N TmNIASrBX0DOrQ01miUgqKRSJUGe1EhgQTCtLsNSGMSeS46YMshVyS3GhyIRO7gh +NT9J3AgyAcvBpmkVI68bDMgD6JDqMGA0i3kJ1Y4RBUuvLyZFhsG7t3fgbVjpTTV g1xhRhqnlZGZgiqijbVMYciLytcfg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrkeehgddtvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A5F8310310; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:07:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Anatoly Burakov Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:07:42 +0100 Message-ID: <2082109.KBFrvxvhQ9@xps> In-Reply-To: <2ecb586fd507d84b0b9913e5d3c358871297b2a6.1551275659.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> References: <2ecb586fd507d84b0b9913e5d3c358871297b2a6.1551275659.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: document multiprocess limitation for container API X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190328230742.aDCVP4iaBXRIv_tKDoyD1WC9M_Ldv6_pfL3ikz7YXno@z> 27/02/2019 16:41, Anatoly Burakov: > Currently, there is no support for sharing custom VFIO containers > between multiple processes, but it is not documented. > > Document this limitation. > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov Applied, thanks