From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D88A0679 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 14:45:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3F22E81; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 14:45:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7A22C36 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 14:45:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE9C220BA; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 08:45:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 02 Apr 2019 08:45:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=U5WHzazQ7VUva4pjvQ07QPksDsu4nAE3+Ef99rk0kj0=; b=FOvt+3wwkbOK QvvrhF0wY9ip8ryWgoUnwqDV4nY+JNl3gOUSeIxpYyklMKPV2yGdMlUGvJ5QAZdS lJNWJKmX2NYjRbXZBFOpNPgvxtzWcY7iUUU/T/FEJt76kREQ5m8l8cpZYg8XW8Bd 4+KyxdRLJdEC6D8RqUKkOMfSHfLTe5Y= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=U5WHzazQ7VUva4pjvQ07QPksDsu4nAE3+Ef99rk0k j0=; b=QgBJVLMDhBDx4yaBf20a2e9Mkq5PsLQJx0oR4EAJmQHYfvbdWq6pvdTvB IXuj378vRBCU9jL6UsgLYrT0yfJ7dLu6qOkDpj4P8K6ngsSFLWdieqORV2llsOKU CIwjTlXldanbz/fLttDaY+oBmceiZB6qRinkHhG9m3fl2pFHEblQ8YWeeMdbnUYF 6YJEUodShbPEf7caLEt5wBLxuxP52I8G37VKi5dDOlciCFAYmRfwUL7ekY9w7JgY ShgKuIsKZLz1ziG+LjeWqABHhPGerO0MNtazdtCgVenqif4N82jaMRRNcHOhHSXj lG+Ghk1cG9sBuT708Ub8pqzd46F3w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrtddtgdefieculddtuddrgedutddrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvden ucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrg hlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 05C3710319; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 08:45:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 14:45:32 +0200 Message-ID: <1774374.xfdjkiLUGA@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20170807120408.21975-1-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <810ae62704a0d606c8c903446f7dfee2fe94e5b9.camel@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH] eal: change init macro as exec environment specific X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190402124532.MXU6d-KuPzCvKQohLXTrQDNAQyDojVU5KcAsQNdtr5s@z> 02/04/2019 03:15, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran: > On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 20:44 +0000, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 14:14 +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote: > > > On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 09:16 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > Then maybe you should send your patches so we can decide if it is > > > > maintainable enough or not. > > > > > > The __attribute__((constructor)) only stuff we have issue to > > > support. > > > The common code changes are related to adapt > > > __attribute__((constructor)) scheme. > > > > > > This patch will fix that issue. Other than that there is no common > > > code > > > changes.i.e everything emulated under lib/librte_eal/new_port/ > > > > Thomas, > > > > I explained the use case and changes required. Let me know, do you > > need > > any other change on this patch to get this patch accepted? > > Ping? This patch needs to be refreshed. And I have some comments, sending in another email with better context.