From: Venky Venkatesh <vvenkatesh@paloaltonetworks.com>
To: "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DSW eventdev is getting "stuck"?
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 18:36:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B32DEF7-8563-4BB5-BB01-0BFE29277B37@paloaltonetworks.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190403183629.LRS2vhhfRzxyvMO2gYFJ-XgaWSD0s01wzU-mrWuZj1w@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8510f66d-a63e-4ef9-44e1-071758fec6fd@ericsson.com>
On 4/3/19, 11:34 AM, "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> wrote:
On 2019-04-03 20:17, Venky Venkatesh wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using the DSW code from 18.11 with the default settings for all the #defines. Here are some more details:
> I have an 8 port system with 1 queue.
> All ports can inject events. Port 0 and 7 inject events rarely.
> Ports 1-6 are linked to the queue and hence dequeue events.
>
> I see that in steady state the total number enqueues into the system is much greater than the total number of dequeues.
> eventdev deq#: 1948491 enq#: 1949007
>
If you have more enqueues than dequeues, it means there are events in
flight in the scheduler. In the above case, it's roughly 516 events,
which sounds perfectly healthy and normal. I say roughly, because
there's no way to take a consistent, global snapshot of all xstats counters.
[VV]: This is in steady state i.e. there are no more events being injected into the system. So shouldn’t everything get drained out at some point?
You will see a higher value than this on dev_credits_on_loan, because
the ports will borrow (and return) credits in chunks of 64 to the shared
pool, for efficiently reasons.
> However when I dump some of the data structure counters it doesn’t appear to be stuck. What may be going on?
I'm guessing it doesn't appear stuck because it's not stuck.
/M
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-03 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-03 18:17 Venky Venkatesh
2019-04-03 18:17 ` Venky Venkatesh
2019-04-03 18:33 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2019-04-03 18:33 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2019-04-03 18:36 ` Venky Venkatesh [this message]
2019-04-03 18:36 ` Venky Venkatesh
2019-04-03 19:02 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2019-04-03 19:02 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2019-04-04 5:39 ` Venky Venkatesh
2019-04-04 5:39 ` Venky Venkatesh
2019-04-04 7:39 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2019-04-04 7:39 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2019-04-04 18:13 ` Venky Venkatesh
2019-04-04 18:13 ` Venky Venkatesh
2019-04-04 19:29 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2019-04-04 19:29 ` Mattias Rönnblom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B32DEF7-8563-4BB5-BB01-0BFE29277B37@paloaltonetworks.com \
--to=vvenkatesh@paloaltonetworks.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).