From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B1AA0679 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 07:41:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F99F4F91; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 07:41:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDDF4CA6 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 07:41:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Apr 2019 22:41:46 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,306,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="139862237" Received: from yexl-server.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.67.110.206]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2019 22:41:44 -0700 Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 13:36:50 +0800 From: Ye Xiaolong To: Luca Boccassi Cc: Ferruh Yigit , dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger , Qi Zhang , Karlsson Magnus , Topel Bjorn , Maxime Coquelin , Bruce Richardson , Ananyev Konstantin , David Marchand , Andrew Rybchenko , Olivier Matz Message-ID: <20190404053650.GA45218@intel.com> References: <20190301080947.91086-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <20190403165949.44857-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <20190403165949.44857-2-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <25be95ff-132c-9e3e-fe3d-b5aac3dfb388@intel.com> <181fca1e5a2274ad2e7638c25b459ab7f426f254.camel@debian.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <181fca1e5a2274ad2e7638c25b459ab7f426f254.camel@debian.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/1] net/af_xdp: introduce AF XDP PMD driver X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190404053650.IYUfdfPTOrh68adPnPfwcOAI9g0iL7U1BH2frKUF0GM@z> On 04/03, Luca Boccassi wrote: >On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 18:44 +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >> On 4/3/2019 5:59 PM, Xiaolong Ye wrote: >> > Add a new PMD driver for AF_XDP which is a proposed faster version >> > of >> > AF_PACKET interface in Linux. More info about AF_XDP, please refer >> > to [1] >> > [2]. >> > >> > This is the vanilla version PMD which just uses a raw buffer >> > registered as >> > the umem. >> > >> > [1] >> > https://fosdem.org/2018/schedule/event/af_xdp/ >> > >> > [2] >> > https://lwn.net/Articles/745934/ >> > >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye < >> > xiaolong.ye@intel.com >> > > >> >> I am not able to test functionality but code looks good to me, I can >> compile via >> Makefile (with suggested steps in doc) but not able to build with >> meson, can you >> please check below comments? >> >> <...> >> >> > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ >> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause >> > +# Copyright(c) 2019 Intel Corporation >> > + >> > +if host_machine.system() != 'linux' >> > + build = false >> > +endif >> >> After this point, if build is false it shouldn't continue to below >> checks I think. >> >> > + >> > +bpf_dep = dependency('libbpf', required: false) >> >> My library is in '/usr/local/lib64/libbpf.so' but this line can't >> find it. Where >> does 'dependency()' checks for libraries? > >dependency() uses only pkg-config (or cmake or embedded specific tools, >neither of which applies to bpf), so if you haven't built from bpf-next >you won't have the pkg-config file installed, and it will fall back to >the next block. > >Side note, there's an issue open upstream in Meson to merge >dependency() and find_library(), with some traction but it's not done >yet. > >For me building from bpf-next it works fine: > >$ PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/tmp/bpf/lib64/pkgconfig/ ninja -C build-gcc-shared >... >Dependency libbpf found: YES 0.0.2 >... >$ lddtree build-gcc-shared/drivers/librte_pmd_af_xdp.so.1.1 >librte_pmd_af_xdp.so.1.1 => build-gcc-shared/drivers/librte_pmd_af_xdp.so.1.1 (interpreter => none) > libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 > libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 > libnuma.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnuma.so.1 > librte_ethdev.so.12 => build-gcc-shared/drivers/../lib/librte_ethdev.so.12 > librte_eal.so.10 => build-gcc-shared/drivers/../lib/librte_eal.so.10 > librte_kvargs.so.1 => build-gcc-shared/drivers/../lib/librte_kvargs.so.1 > librte_net.so.1 => build-gcc-shared/drivers/../lib/librte_net.so.1 > librte_mbuf.so.5 => build-gcc-shared/drivers/../lib/librte_mbuf.so.5 > librte_mempool.so.5 => build-gcc-shared/drivers/../lib/librte_mempool.so.5 > librte_ring.so.2 => build-gcc-shared/drivers/../lib/librte_ring.so.2 > librte_cmdline.so.2 => build-gcc-shared/drivers/../lib/librte_cmdline.so.2 > librte_meter.so.2 => build-gcc-shared/drivers/../lib/librte_meter.so.2 > librte_bus_pci.so.2 => not found > librte_pci.so.1 => build-gcc-shared/drivers/../lib/librte_pci.so.1 > librte_bus_vdev.so.2 => not found > libbsd.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbsd.so.0 > librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 > libbpf.so.0 => /tmp/bpf/lib64/libbpf.so.0 > libelf.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libelf.so.1 > libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 > libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 > ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 > >> > +if bpf_dep.found() >> > + build = true >> > +else >> > + bpf_dep = cc.find_library('libbpf', required: false) >> >> Also this line can't find it, in log it says "(tried pkgconfig and >> cmake)" and >> yes there is no pkgconfig for it, any idea how 'cmake' used? > >The issue here is that it should be cc.find_library('bpf' - not >'libbpf'. I missed this when reviewing, good catch. > >That's because find_library just does a compilation test passing the >value to the compiler as a linker flag - so right now it's passing >-llibbpf. Fixing this line and the header line below makes it work >without pkg-config: > >$ CPPFLAGS=-I/tmp/bpf/include LDFLAGS=-L/tmp/bpf/lib64 meson testt >... >Dependency libbpf found: NO (tried pkgconfig and cmake) >Library bpf found: YES Thanks for pointing out, will adopt it. > >> > + if bpf_dep.found() and cc.has_header('xsk.h', dependencies: >> > bpf_dep) and cc.has_header('linux/if_xdp.h') >> >> Should this be 'lib/xsk.h' now? > >Yes, this should be 'bpf/xsk.h' Will change it in next version. Thanks, Xiaolong > >-- >Kind regards, >Luca Boccassi