From: John Sucaet <john.sucaet@oneaccess-net.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Query : Does Binding with vfio-pci is supported inside qemu-kvm guest/vm instance.?
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 10:23:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f34022d-10cf-afa4-12a7-9da0c4e162d2@oneaccess-net.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190404082355.qCDteRwRx9nF_T1Sg35PyrnNOXtxH2CEpzJKCf1JZb4@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5453b9f7-b4b8-5831-50b3-abd52d796a24@redhat.com>
Hi Maxime,
Thanks for your answer. I want to add that I have this problem both with
18.08 and 18.11. Also I am using qemu with machine type pc-q35-2.10 (and
pcie-root). When I change it to machine type pc-i440fx-2.4 (and
pci-root), I don't see the problem. Ports are in that case, detected in
the 32-bit dpdk application, as expected.
Hope this helps in finding a reason why mmap failed.
Thanks
John
On 04/03/2019 09:54 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On 4/3/19 9:49 AM, John Sucaet wrote:
>> Thanks, Anatoly.
>>
>> Maxime, could you enlighten me a bit? I basically would like to know
>> whether I should be able to make my 32-bit dpdk application work with
>> virtio-pci-net and vfio-pci (with a 64-bit kernel), or if I should do
>> the effort to port to 64-bit (which I would like to avoid for now).
>
> I think that it should work, but that's not something I have tried.
> I will try to reproduce it this week to get a precise idea of what is
> going wrong.
>
> Thanks for reporting the issue,
> Maxime
>
>> Thank you
>> John
>>
>> On 04/02/2019 03:38 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
>>> On 02-Apr-19 11:38 AM, John Sucaet wrote:
>>>> Hi Anatoly,
>>>>
>>>> As you said: There's no reason to use igb_uio, ever!
>>>
>>> That was partly tongue in cheek, but point taken :)
>>>
>>>> I would like to ask whether vfio-pci with or without vIOMMU
>>>> should/could work for virtio-pci net devices in the case of a
>>>> 32-bit dpdk application, on a 64-bit kernel (4.9) inside a guest VM
>>>> (qemu-2.10.2-1.fc27)?
>>>>
>>>> I tried both a 64-bit and a 32-bit version of the same application,
>>>> but only in the case of the 64-bit application, the port was found
>>>> by eal. The 32-bit application gave errors like:
>>>>
>>>> EAL: pci_map_resource(): cannot mmap(16, 0xf4a01000, 0x4000, 0x0):
>>>> Invalid argument (0xffffffff)
>>>> EAL: Failed to map pci BAR4
>>>> EAL: 0000:00:02.0 mapping BAR4 failed: Invalid argument
>>>> EAL: Can't write to PCI bar (0) : offset (12)
>>>> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (12)
>>>> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (12)
>>>> EAL: Can't write to PCI bar (0) : offset (12)
>>>> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (12)
>>>> EAL: Can't write to PCI bar (0) : offset (12)
>>>> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (0)
>>>> EAL: Can't write to PCI bar (0) : offset (4)
>>>> EAL: Can't write to PCI bar (0) : offset (14)
>>>> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (14)
>>>> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (1a)
>>>> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (1c)
>>>> EAL: Can't write to PCI bar (0) : offset (e)
>>>> EAL: Can't read from PCI bar (0) : offset (c)
>>>> virtio_init_queue(): virtqueue size is not powerof 2
>>>> EAL: Requested device 0000:00:02.0 cannot be used
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you have an idea what went wrong here?
>>>>
>>>> By preference, I would like to continue to use the 32-bit
>>>> application which worked fine with the igb_uio driver.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, i am not very familiar with virtio and wouldn't know
>>> whether it's supposed to work under these conditions. Perhaps Maxime
>>> would be of more help here (CC'd).
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 03/12/2019 11:57 AM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
>>>>> On 12-Mar-19 10:20 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 05:54:39PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2019/3/12 下午5:42, Thanneeru Srinivasulu wrote:
>>>>>>>> Thanks Bruce..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 3:08 PM Bruce Richardson
>>>>>>>> <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:57:55AM +0530, Thanneeru
>>>>>>>>> Srinivasulu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I did attached pice to Guest VM using vfio-pci with qemu
>>>>>>>>>> command, and then
>>>>>>>>>> tried binding the pcie bdf with vfio-pci, observing binding
>>>>>>>>>> failure with
>>>>>>>>>> vfio-pci.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Where as when tryied with igb_uio, everything works fine.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does Binding with vfio-pci is supported inside VM/guest?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> vfio support requires the presence of an IOMMU, and you
>>>>>>>>> generally don't
>>>>>>>>> have an IOMMU available in a VM.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> /Bruce
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, Qemu support vIOMMU + VFIO in guest[1], all you need
>>>>>>> is to add a
>>>>>>> intel IOMMU and enabling caching mode.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.lfasiallc.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Device-Assignment-with-Nested-Guests-and-DPDK_Peter-Xu.pdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the info.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Bruce
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> One more thing: even without vIOMMU, VFIO has no-IOMMU mode which
>>>>> can be enabled (for a recent-enough kernel). This will make VFIO
>>>>> work even in cases where the guest doesn't have IOMMU emulation.
>>>>> See? There's no reason to use igb_uio, ever! :D
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-04 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-12 5:27 Thanneeru Srinivasulu
2019-03-12 9:38 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-03-12 9:42 ` Thanneeru Srinivasulu
2019-03-12 9:54 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-12 10:20 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-03-12 10:57 ` Burakov, Anatoly
[not found] ` <CGME20190312110957eucas1p1af74c8d26bf80fd815847ed8086a1e78@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2019-03-12 11:09 ` Ilya Maximets
2019-04-02 10:38 ` John Sucaet
2019-04-02 10:38 ` John Sucaet
2019-04-02 13:38 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-02 13:38 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-03 7:49 ` John Sucaet
2019-04-03 7:49 ` John Sucaet
2019-04-03 7:54 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-04-03 7:54 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-04-04 8:23 ` John Sucaet [this message]
2019-04-04 8:23 ` John Sucaet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f34022d-10cf-afa4-12a7-9da0c4e162d2@oneaccess-net.com \
--to=john.sucaet@oneaccess-net.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).