DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2] net: fix rte_vlan_insert with shared mbuf
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 16:54:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190404165449.0f7ea879@shemminger-XPS-13-9360> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bcaedd78-69c9-4f6b-b5d8-6b17707b325a@gmail.com>

On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 08:41:33 -0400
Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com> wrote:

> Unfortunately, I think the complete fix is more complicated than this.
> Drivers that use rte_vlan_insert don't anticipate that the mbuf might
> change and that (hardware) transmit can fail.
> 
> They make a copy of the mbuf pointer from the incoming transmit list
> and don't update the original if rte_vlan_insert creates a new mbuf.
> If transmit fails, the application needs to be the given the new mbuf
> for re-transmission or freeing.
> 
> On 3/28/19 4:53 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > If mbuf is shared then rte_vlan_insert() would clobber the original
> > Ethernet header. The changed version handles this by getting
> > an mbuf that will hold the new Ethernet and VLAN header followed
> > by another mbuf (cloned) for the data.
> > 
> > Fixes: c974021a5949 ("ether: add soft vlan encap/decap")
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>

The virtio driver is buggy, it saves original mbuf and doesn't handle
rewrite. Dpaa2 is fine, should never happen since it checks refcnt etc.
Netvsc PMD is using this on rx path and is safe.
AF_packet PMD should work fine as well.

So virtio is the one that needs fixing

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-04 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-26 19:15 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-26 19:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-26 22:38 ` Chas Williams
2019-03-26 22:38   ` Chas Williams
2019-03-27 15:18   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-27 15:18     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-27 15:31     ` Chas Williams
2019-03-27 15:31       ` Chas Williams
2019-03-28 14:04       ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-28 14:04         ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-03-28 20:53         ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2] " Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-28 20:53           ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-03-30 12:41           ` Chas Williams
2019-03-30 12:41             ` Chas Williams
2019-04-04 23:54             ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2019-04-04 23:54               ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-06 23:11               ` Chas Williams
2019-04-06 23:11                 ` Chas Williams
2019-04-12 16:35           ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-12 16:35             ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-07-04 18:40             ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190404165449.0f7ea879@shemminger-XPS-13-9360 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=3chas3@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).