From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B64F1B533 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 17:10:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Apr 2019 08:10:27 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,313,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="140287908" Received: from yexl-server.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.67.110.206]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2019 08:10:25 -0700 Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 23:05:25 +0800 From: Ye Xiaolong To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger , Luca Boccassi , Qi Zhang , Karlsson Magnus , Topel Bjorn , Maxime Coquelin , Bruce Richardson , Ananyev Konstantin , David Marchand , Andrew Rybchenko , Olivier Matz Message-ID: <20190405150525.GA41807@intel.com> References: <20190301080947.91086-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <20190404085113.16732-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <20190404085113.16732-2-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 1/1] net/af_xdp: introduce AF XDP PMD driver X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 15:10:30 -0000 Hi, Ferruh On 04/05, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >On 4/4/2019 9:51 AM, Xiaolong Ye wrote: >> Add a new PMD driver for AF_XDP which is a proposed faster version of >> AF_PACKET interface in Linux. More info about AF_XDP, please refer to [1] >> [2]. >> >> This is the vanilla version PMD which just uses a raw buffer registered as >> the umem. >> >> [1] https://fosdem.org/2018/schedule/event/af_xdp/ >> [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/745934/ >> >> Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye > ><...> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/af_xdp/meson.build b/drivers/net/af_xdp/meson.build >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000..840c93728 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/net/af_xdp/meson.build >> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause >> +# Copyright(c) 2019 Intel Corporation >> + >> +if host_machine.system() == 'linux' >> + bpf_dep = dependency('libbpf', required: false) >> + if bpf_dep.found() >> + build = true >> + else >> + bpf_dep = cc.find_library('bpf', required: false) >> + if bpf_dep.found() and cc.has_header('bpf/xsk.h', dependencies: bpf_dep) and cc.has_header('linux/if_xdp.h') >> + build = true >> + pkgconfig_extra_libs += '-lbpf' >> + else >> + build = false >> + endif >> + endif >> + ext_deps += bpf_dep >> +endif >> +sources = files('rte_eth_af_xdp.c') > >if system is not 'linux', by default build will be 'true', right, so will it try >to build the driver in that case? >What about setting "build = false" before the linux check, so won't need to set >it false again in the if block, only set it true if dependencies found? This is a good catch, we do need to initialize build = false first, otherwise meson/ninja would just try to build af_xdp pmd if system is not linux, which is undesired. Do I need to send a separate patch for this so you can squash it into af_xdp pmd patch? >And can 'ext_deps' go out of if block? If we move `ext_deps += bpf_dep` out of if block and build system is not linux, there would be error "ERROR: Unknown variable "bpf_dep".", so we need either initialize bpf_dep (to value like NULL?) first or keep `ext_deps += bpf_dep` inside the if block, I'd prefer keep it as it is, what's you opinion? Thanks, Xiaolong From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F03A0679 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 17:10:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EF51B535; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 17:10:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B64F1B533 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 17:10:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Apr 2019 08:10:27 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,313,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="140287908" Received: from yexl-server.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.67.110.206]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2019 08:10:25 -0700 Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 23:05:25 +0800 From: Ye Xiaolong To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger , Luca Boccassi , Qi Zhang , Karlsson Magnus , Topel Bjorn , Maxime Coquelin , Bruce Richardson , Ananyev Konstantin , David Marchand , Andrew Rybchenko , Olivier Matz Message-ID: <20190405150525.GA41807@intel.com> References: <20190301080947.91086-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <20190404085113.16732-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <20190404085113.16732-2-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 1/1] net/af_xdp: introduce AF XDP PMD driver X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190405150525.Up8l3bb9Ahct_PdAaveELHH_QegsjcJ1HMgqd4icd1U@z> Hi, Ferruh On 04/05, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >On 4/4/2019 9:51 AM, Xiaolong Ye wrote: >> Add a new PMD driver for AF_XDP which is a proposed faster version of >> AF_PACKET interface in Linux. More info about AF_XDP, please refer to [1] >> [2]. >> >> This is the vanilla version PMD which just uses a raw buffer registered as >> the umem. >> >> [1] https://fosdem.org/2018/schedule/event/af_xdp/ >> [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/745934/ >> >> Signed-off-by: Xiaolong Ye > ><...> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/af_xdp/meson.build b/drivers/net/af_xdp/meson.build >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000..840c93728 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/net/af_xdp/meson.build >> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause >> +# Copyright(c) 2019 Intel Corporation >> + >> +if host_machine.system() == 'linux' >> + bpf_dep = dependency('libbpf', required: false) >> + if bpf_dep.found() >> + build = true >> + else >> + bpf_dep = cc.find_library('bpf', required: false) >> + if bpf_dep.found() and cc.has_header('bpf/xsk.h', dependencies: bpf_dep) and cc.has_header('linux/if_xdp.h') >> + build = true >> + pkgconfig_extra_libs += '-lbpf' >> + else >> + build = false >> + endif >> + endif >> + ext_deps += bpf_dep >> +endif >> +sources = files('rte_eth_af_xdp.c') > >if system is not 'linux', by default build will be 'true', right, so will it try >to build the driver in that case? >What about setting "build = false" before the linux check, so won't need to set >it false again in the if block, only set it true if dependencies found? This is a good catch, we do need to initialize build = false first, otherwise meson/ninja would just try to build af_xdp pmd if system is not linux, which is undesired. Do I need to send a separate patch for this so you can squash it into af_xdp pmd patch? >And can 'ext_deps' go out of if block? If we move `ext_deps += bpf_dep` out of if block and build system is not linux, there would be error "ERROR: Unknown variable "bpf_dep".", so we need either initialize bpf_dep (to value like NULL?) first or keep `ext_deps += bpf_dep` inside the if block, I'd prefer keep it as it is, what's you opinion? Thanks, Xiaolong